Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

War on Iraq

The Surrender is Working: U.S. Cedes Town to 'Al Qaeda in Iraq'

By Mohammed Fadhel, Azzaman. Posted February 6, 2008.


U.S. casualties are down in large part because the military have surrendered territory to the "terrorists."
Advertisement

Members of al-Qaeda group have retaken a strategic town, some 70 kilometers south of the oil-rich city of Kirkuk, members of parliament said.

The MPs said Tuz Khormato, a predominantly Shiite town, was now in the hands of 'al-Qaeda in Mesopotamia', the group's official appellation.

The MPs gave no reason for the unexpected withdrawal of U.S. Marines from the town.

But they said the departure of U.S. troops has led to "a dangerous upsurge in insecurity" with bandits and fighters attacking travelers and vehicles on the highway to Kirkuk.

Tuz Khormato has a slight Turkmen majority. Iraqi Turkmen are predominantly Shiites.

Turkmen MPs have sent a statement to Prime Minister Noori al-Maliki's government urging him to send troops to guard the city and the highway.

The town has been the scene of devastating suicide bombings in the past. In one of them more than 100 people were killed.

Suicide bombers have even targeted the town's main Shiite Husainiya or mosque.

The statement said kidnappings had increased and the scene of headless bodies dumped on roads and the highway has returned once again.

"The tragic and horrific events in Tuz Khormato only a few days following the withdrawal of the multi-national forces (U.S. troops) is a clear indication of how ill-prepared and weak the army and security forces are," the statement said.

It said currently some of the kidnappings and crimes occur as Iraqi troops and police look on.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: iraq, surrender is working, aqi

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from War on Iraq! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Straight talk!
Posted by: carbon-based on Feb 6, 2008 10:43 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
""The Surrender is Working: U.S. Cedes Town to 'Al Qaeda in Iraq'"" -

not quite the way it worked..US withdraw and Al Qaeda then entered the town as there were no US troops there to provide security. The headline makes it seem Al Qaeda drove the US troops out.. not likely!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» It's as straight as you can get Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: It's as straight as you can get Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: It's as straight as you can get Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: It's as straight as you can get Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: It's as straight as you can get Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: Straight talk! Posted by: aethr
» Also ... Posted by: Joshua Holland
.
Posted by: ShoShenQ on Feb 6, 2008 6:29 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
only fools doubted that the talibans/al Qaeda would win in Afghanistan, after all they only need to not lose in order to win.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

d'oh
Posted by: ShoShenQ on Feb 6, 2008 6:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I meant insurgents/iraq, tho the same comment applies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

so what is this?
Posted by: Joe on Feb 7, 2008 1:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is this a "we need to crack down harder and stay" story or is this a "we need to get out" story. if mccain or hillary used this story to justify staying would they be right or wrong?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: so what is this? Posted by: Joshua Holland