Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

War on Iraq

2007 Was Worst Year of Iraq Occupation

By Dahr Jamail, IPS News. Posted December 31, 2007.


Despite all the claims of improvements, the situation in Iraq keeps getting worse.
Advertisement

Despite all the claims of improvements, 2007 has been the worst year yet in Iraq.

One of the first big moves this year was the launch of a troop "surge" by the U.S. government in mid-February. The goal was to improve security in Baghdad and the western al-Anbar province, the two most violent areas. By June, an additional 28,000 troops had been deployed to Iraq, bringing the total number up to more than 160,000.

By autumn, there were over 175,000 U.S. military personnel in Iraq. This is the highest number of U.S. troops deployed yet, and while the U.S. government continues to talk of withdrawing some, the numbers on the ground appear to contradict these promises.

The Bush administration said the "surge" was also aimed at curbing sectarian killings, and to gain time for political reform for the government of U.S.-backed Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki.

During the surge, the number of Iraqis displaced from their homes quadrupled, according to the Iraqi Red Crescent. By the end of 2007, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) estimated that there are over 2.3 million internally displaced persons within Iraq, and over 2.3 million Iraqis who have fled the country.

Iraq has a population around 25 million.

The non-governmental organisation Refugees International describes Iraq's refugee problem as "the world's fastest growing refugee crisis."

In October the Syrian government began requiring visas for Iraqis. Until then it was the only country to allow Iraqis in without visas. The new restrictions have led some Iraqis to return to Baghdad, but that number is well below 50,000.

A recent UNHCR survey of families returning found that less than 18 percent did so by choice. Most came back because they lacked a visa, had run out of money abroad, or were deported.

Sectarian killings have decreased in recent months, but still continue. Bodies continue to be dumped on the streets of Baghdad daily.

One reason for a decrease in the level of violence is that most of Baghdad has essentially been divided along sectarian lines. Entire neighbourhoods are now surrounded by concrete blast walls several metres high, with strict security checkpoints. Normal life has all but vanished.

The Iraqi Red Crescent estimates that eight out of ten refugees are from Baghdad.

By the end of 2007, attacks against occupation forces decreased substantially, but still number more than 2,000 monthly. Iraqi infrastructure, like supply of potable water and electricity are improving, but remain below pre-invasion levels. Similarly with jobs and oil exports. Unemployment, according to the Iraqi government, ranges between 60-70 percent.

An Oxfam International report released in July says 70 percent of Iraqis lack access to safe drinking water, and 43 percent live on less than a dollar a day. The report also states that eight million Iraqis are in need of emergency assistance.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: media, unembedded, dahr jamail, iraq

Dahr Jamail is an independent journalist who reports from Iraq.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from War on Iraq! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
adempatriot
Posted by: adempatriot on Jan 1, 2008 5:25 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you for a truthful story after all the baloney we've been hearing lately on the MSM networks about, for example, John McCain gaining ground in the polls a bit because he said the "surge" would work when the other candidates said it wasn't. I expect the propaganda for 2008 will be "The surge is working! and we are winning in Iraq." Unfortunately, too many Americans will believe it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thank You Dahr Jamail for honest reporting
Posted by: Susan Kipping on Jan 1, 2008 11:06 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I will not vote for anyone that does not end this war immediately.

Kucinich is the only one that has not supported this war and will bring our troops home. The United States government has destroyed Iraq. Why are people supporting genocide? The Iraqis are living in total Hell and the US is responsible.

Dahr Jamail has pictures and articles at his site dahrjamailiraq.com. He also has some great interviews on Amy Goodsman's site democracynow.org. Just put Dahr Jamail's name in the slot for archives.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thanks!
Posted by: bemf on Jan 2, 2008 12:28 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a refreshing article, now if only Democrats such as Michigan Senator Carl Levin--who passes as "antiwar" in many circles--would stop praising the "military successes" of "the surge" and actually work towards ending the occupation, we could make some progress. As antiwar folks, we can't give these folks a free pass just because they have a "D" behind their name.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]