Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

War on Iraq

Disgraced General Who Pushed for Torture in Iraq Is Now a Spokesman for Democrats?

By Amy Goodman, Democracy Now!. Posted November 27, 2007.


Ricardo Sanchez was the Iraq commander during the Abu Ghraib atrocities, and last week he gave the Dems' weekly radio address. Amy Goodman revisits how the torture policy began.
Advertisement

Amy Goodman: Every Saturday, the President of United States gives a radio address to the nation. It's followed by the Democratic response, usually given by a House or a Senate Democrat. It may have surprised some that this past Saturday the Democrats chose retired General Sanchez to give the address. That's retired Lieutenant General Ricardo Sanchez.

    Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez: For as long as we have troops in Iraq, the American people must insist that our deploying men and women are properly trained and properly equipped for the missions they will be asked to perform.

    The funding bill passed by the House of Representatives last week with a bipartisan vote makes the proper preparation of our deploying troops a priority and requires the type of shift in their mission that will allow their numbers to be reduced substantially. Furthermore, the bill puts America on the path to regaining our moral authority by requiring all government employees to abide by the Army Field Manual on interrogations, which is in compliance with the Geneva Conventions. America must accept nothing less.

Goodman: According to the ACLU, documents show Army Lieutenant General Ricardo Sanchez, the former top US military commander in Iraq, urged his troops to "go to the outer limits" to extract information from prisoners. Previously released documents have linked Sanchez to the use of Army dogs during interrogations.

Democracy Now! interviewed Janis Karpinski in October of 2005. She was the only military officer to be disciplined after the Abu Ghraib scandal broke. She said she was scapegoated. She served under General Sanchez and talked about his role in, among other practices, ghost detainees.

    Col. Janis Karpinski: We were directed on several occasions, and directed through the CJTF-7, through General Fast or General Sanchez, by -- the instructions were originating at the Pentagon, from Secretary Rumsfeld, and we were instructed to hold prisoners without putting their -- giving -- assigning a prisoner number or putting them on the database, and that is contrary to the Geneva Conventions. We all knew it was contrary to the Geneva Conventions. And we were told that this -- these instructions were being given by Secretary Rumsfeld, and --

    Goodman: Who told you that?

    Karpinski: Colonel Warren and General Fast, the intel officer for General Sanchez, and General Sanchez himself.

    Goodman: General Fast is General Barbara Fast?

    Karpinski: General Barbara Fast. And we were told that these instructions were for specific individuals, and they were a special case. And we would hold them without assigning a prisoner number until they were -- until an order was given on how to handle them.

    Goodman: So that the International Committee of the Red Cross would not know that they exist, would not ask to see them?

    Karpinski: Correct. Now, they didn't -- the ICRC would not look for specific prisoners unless there was a reason or a number provided to them, for example, and because there was no communication between prisoners and family members, at least not from Abu Ghraib, because security detainees, as we were told, they fit into a different category. So, it would be unusual for the ICRC to be looking for a specific prisoner by a prisoner number. They would come in, they would look at conditions, they would talk to individuals. Sometimes they would randomly select numbers, but the purpose of not putting them on any database is to keep them from being known.

Goodman: Former Brigadier General Janis Karpinski was demoted to colonel. University of Wisconsin Professor Alfred McCoy, the author of A Question of Torture, spoke to Democracy Now! in February of 2006 about General Sanchez.

    Alfred McKoy: In September of 2003, General Sanchez issued orders, detailed orders, for expanded interrogation techniques beyond those allowed in the US Army Field Manual 3452, and if you look at those techniques, what he's ordering, in essence, is a combination of self-inflicted pain, stress positions and sensory disorientation. And if you look at the 1963 CIA KUBARK Counterintelligence Interrogation Manual, you look at the 1983 CIA Interrogation Training Manual that they used in Honduras for training Honduran officers in torture and interrogation, and then twenty years later, you look at General Sanchez's 2003 orders, there's a striking continuity across this forty-year span in both the general principles: this total assault on the existential platforms of human identity and existence, OK, and the specific techniques, the way of achieving that, through the attack on these sensory receptors.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: democrats, torture, abu ghraib, amy goodman, gen. sanchez, tara mckelvey

Amy Goodman is the host of the nationally syndicated radio news program, Democracy Now!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from War on Iraq! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
WTF?
Posted by: Eat Politicians on Nov 27, 2007 1:09 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wow.

The Democrats confuse and frighten me with some of their decisions, I don't understand what they could have been thinking.

Excellent article Amy, as always. You are one of the shining lights...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Moral Bankruptcy is Bipartisan
Posted by: AlexLawyer on Nov 27, 2007 2:42 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Courageous journalists have documented serious violations of US and international law, including forced disappearance, false imprisonment, torture (including dozens of deaths under torture by US officials) and obstruction of justice. In the face of overwhelming evidence of crimes extending up to the President himself, the Democrats have supinely supported him and even granted legal immunity to war criminals. Now they are using a war criminal as their spokesman. There is something seriously wrong with these people; their morals are abysmal and their judgment severely impaired. If they had a shred of decency or respect for the Constitution and laws they would hold public hearings, repeal immunity and take action. The candidates currently serving in Congress should act immediately to salvage their credibility, and our nation's.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Perhaps
Posted by: PJAW on Nov 27, 2007 4:17 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
key Democrats were charmed by the fact that Sanchez has come out and acknowleged that the real purpose behind the invasion of Iraq was control of the oil resources. Perhaps they believed that having him speak would lend credibility to the allegation that Bush has been lying about this war from the very beginning. He's admittedly a lousy spokesperson for truth and justice inasmuch as he has been an integral part of the crimes that have taken place in Iraq, but then the American people seem more responsive to the message of "reformed" criminals than they do to those who have taken the high moral ground all along.

Certainly the media plays a major role in this, as we see with Hillary Clinton (one of Bush's enablers on the Dem side) being annointed now as "anti-war" for campaign purposes, while people like Kucinich and Feingold are often described as somehow radical.

Sanchez is flawed in serious ways, but perhaps that is exactly why he was chosen to speak. Kind of a "see, even the bad guys are abandoning Bush" sort of statement. I guess a lot depends on what he said about the purpose of the war in general and not so much his statements about torture.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Naming names
Posted by: Figfest on Nov 27, 2007 4:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Speaking of allocating responsibility, exactly who chose Sanchez to represent the Democrats?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not only
Posted by: profmarcus on Nov 27, 2007 7:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
not only was general sanchez "connected" with "enhanced interrogation techniques" at abu ghraib, in september 2003, he AUTHORED the memorandum spelling them out and detailing their use... even worse, when giving testimony under oath to the senate armed services committee in may 2004, he perjured himself by asserting that he had done nothing of the kind... he is a liar that is apparently attempting to redeem himself after the fact while still not admitting to his role in perpetrating criminality...

The General Who Authorized "Enhanced Interrogation Techniques and Lied About It

And, yes, I DO take it personally

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Monsters
Posted by: QQOblivion on Nov 27, 2007 7:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Those who torture -- who beat, rape, torment, water-board, sexually humiliate, etc -- are sick f***ing monsters, pure and simple.
And those who ordered the torture, who allowed the torture, who profited off the torture, they are also complicit in this act of total control over the already-powerless, over the (often innocent, as it turns out) detainees of the so-called "War on Terror".
(And I have heard that other hard-core forms of torture other than those mentioned in the article have been used by American interrogators, including genital mutilation and electrocution.)

It is time for this sickness which has infected what it means to be an American come to a quick and final end. How could we have descended to such depths as a country? Why is the "usefulness" of torture even debated these days? How utterly vile.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Monsters Posted by: bobtr900
Infected
Posted by: rjgwood on Nov 27, 2007 8:06 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The democratic leadership are infected by the same disease as the republicans: the lure of money and power.

Hillary will give us more of the same.

Vote change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Infected Posted by: bobtr900
Have you seen the curvature of the earth?
Posted by: Lauren on Nov 27, 2007 8:12 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A question on a car ad this morning. It made me start crying, triggering my PTSD big time.

Yes, I have seen the curvature of the earth, several times, and a very beautiful thing it is to see too.

I cried because I remember seeing it out the window of the airplane when we were returning home from Hawaii with the kids. It was a very hard trip for me, my family's values had gotten all screwed up.

I'd bought some books for the trip home and read about how to end war - globally.

I told Jeff and he got mad at me. I couldn't HAVE an idea about how to end war. He was very angry, he seemed to always be angry with me. So now when I think about how beautiful it is to see a thing like the curvature of the earth, I also think how I had an idea to end war and my 'soul mate' was angry with me for having it.

What else can I do BUT cry?

Well, I can go read AlterNet.

Where I learn the most awful, cry making things - like this story. Ghees, when does it stop?

The finger-trick on you tube is a good start, but the belly dancing lesson is just as good, in some ways better. It is good to remember life is full of tricks, but it is also very sweet and beautiful.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Vision-less Democrats
Posted by: the islander on Nov 27, 2007 11:29 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Democrats have no vision. There's no known context behind anything they do. No vision means no values.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We live in a One Party State
Posted by: clarence on Nov 27, 2007 8:51 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's the Corporate Party. The Dems and the Rethugs are simply two wings of it. Their goals are the same, occasionally they differ about how to achieve them.
Fortunately, their are a few mavericks in each who don't toe the party line.
I'm talking up Kucinich for now, but because a majority of Americans agree with his views regarding nearly everything his Dem opponents and their corporate patrons won't give him a place at the debates. The other Repug candidates and their patrons are doing the same to Ron Paul.
I'm hoping to see the two of them get together as a second party alternative in the general election.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What?! the Dims are in bed with the Torturers?!
Posted by: DaBear on Nov 28, 2007 9:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I sooo shocked! [extreme sarcasm intended]

Don't throw away your vote, if it's even counted by the junta anyway, vote your conscience, not for fascists.

Besides, the Machine is here to eat your vote and reallocate it for its own needs. 2006 should teach all those who cling to "hope" that it's time for moving beyond hope and actually doing something... the Dims are exactly as liberal as the fascist necons on the other side of the aisle. Get a clue, wake up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Most Americans Believed the Lies in the Beginning
Posted by: tommy1957 on Nov 28, 2007 1:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Many Americans who supported our invasion of Iraq have changed their minds after finding out the facts. Still many who have been told the facts still support the way believing the administrations initial lies are true. I don't hold Politian’s who were deceived responsible for their previous votes and inaction on this matter, but I do hold them accountable now. Democrats need to stand up to this administration and tell them the buck has stop and they need to start bring our troops home. The horrific crimes would have never been committed (for the most part) except for this war. If I was an Iraqi and you accidentally killed someone in my family, I would want to kill you and all of your friends. Why can't we understand that is a natural reaction to the senseless murders of everyday Iraqis as the hands of our troops?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

SAY NO......... TO "Ricardo Sanchez"
Posted by: risk on Nov 28, 2007 3:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Forced into Retirement Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez is a nut case and will do any thing to get into politics for his own personal gain. Do we want him making the same decisions for this country he made for those prisoners?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]