Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

War on Iraq

Playing at a Theater Near You: Hollywood Does Bush's Middle East Disasters

By Sari Gelzer, AlterNet. Posted November 8, 2007.


Hollywood is catching up with Bush’s disastrous policies abroad. (Film guide included.)
Advertisement

The tidal wave of film releases tied to Bush's Wars in the Middle East began this fall with the Sept. 13 release of In the Valley of Elah, a movie about a father's search for his son, who goes missing upon his return from serving in Iraq. The October release of Rendition depicts an American woman searching for her Egyptian-born husband who has been sent to a secret CIA prison, while the November debut of Brian De Palma's Redacted, is a docu-drama on the murder of a 14-year-old Iraqi girl and her family by U.S. troops.

This long set of Hollywood films and documentaries are heading to theaters on the assumption that audiences are willing to see them. Perhaps producers and distributors have read the numbers released in a mid-October CNN poll that say 65 percent of Americans oppose the U.S. war in Iraq, while a CBS poll of the same time frame declared that 45 percent of respondents want U.S. troops home in less than one year.

With strong sentiment against the war, it would seem reasonable to assume that these films would be successful, especially as many of them feature megastar Hollywood talent. But the jury isn't in yet. In the Valley of Elah received favorable reviews, but it has not been a box-office hit. Neither has Rendition, which was not favorably reviewed. But many more of these films are slated to run from now and well into 2008.

This month will see the arrival of the docu-drama Redacted and Lions for Lambs, directed by and starring Robert Redford, Meryl Streep, and Tom Hanks. The controversial documentary Meeting Resistance, which interviews Iraqis who chose to fight U.S. soldiers, who they say are occupying their homeland, will also be released nationwide.

In December, John Cusack will star in Grace is Gone, depicting a father's struggle to cope when his wife is killed while serving in Iraq. And on Christmas day, Charlie Wilson's War, starring Tom Hanks, will hit theaters, to depict the true story of a Texas congressman who funneled millions of dollars to the Mujahideen in Aghanistan during the cold war.

Films to look for in 2008 include, Stop Loss, starring Ryan Phillipe, who plays a soldier who goes AWOL to avoid his second tour in Iraq. Planned for March of 2008, Errol Morris' documentary Standard Operating Procedure focuses on the Abu Ghraib prison scandal.

If Hollywood is correct in believing that Americans are ready to face their open wounds, the potential power that these film releases could have on the American public can be understood by looking back to the U.S. war in Vietnam. Media scholar Marshall McLuhan wrote in 1975 about the impact of news coverage on ending the war in Vietnam:

"Television brought the brutality of war into the comfort of the living room. Vietnam was lost in the living rooms of America -- not on the battlefields of Vietnam."

By "lost" McLuhan refers to the hearts and minds of Americans and their support for the war. In the Vietnam conflict, "lost" refers to the point when the war ended and U.S. troops returned home. With the Iraq war close to the end of its fourth year, many politicians continue to support a war with no clear end, and the war has already been lost to a large portion of Americans. The upcoming slate of films on the Middle East will only make the case stronger.

Below is a guide to the release dates and links to these movies and documentaries, with film info from imdb.com:

Released this September and October:

  • Alive Day Memories from Iraq, HBO documentary premiered: Sept. 9, 2007. Sopranos star James Gandolfini speaks with veterans about the scars of Iraq.
  • In the Valley of Elah. Release date: Sept. 14, 2007 (limited), Sept. 28, 2007 (nationwide). A career officer (Tommy Lee Jones) and his wife (Susan Sarandon) work with a police detective (Charlize Theron) to uncover the truth behind their son's disappearance following his return from a tour of duty in Iraq.
  • Rendition. Release date: Oct. 19, 2007. An American woman searches for her Egyptian-born husband who has been sent to a secret CIA prison.

  • Digg!

    See more stories tagged with: war, iraq, film, troops, hollywood, middle east, tom cruise, robert redford

    Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from War on Iraq! Sign up now »

    Advertisement
    Advertisement

     

    Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
    Comments closed.
    The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
    View:
    Change in Semantics
    Posted by: NoPCZone on Nov 8, 2007 3:12 AM   
    Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
    Bush and the NeoCons may have pushed the war and the Right-Wing MSM may have pimped it, but America has sat back largely gutless and let the 'President Select' and his minions wreak havoc upon every aspect of our government and society. The fact that the protests were as small as they were and are still as small as they are concerns me greatly.

    At this late date they are no longer Bush's- they belong to America. A brain-dead, celebrity-obsessed 'culture' allowed the first appointed President in US history to parlay knee-jerk fear into a license to destroy our nation. BushCo used the Shock Doctrine for more than Disaster Capitalism- they used it to dismantle the Bill of Rights.

    By this time America owns it, the world knows it and history will record it. Sad but true.

    [« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

    » RE: Change in Semantics Posted by: rinpochet
    » RE: Protest Posted by: NoPCZone
    » I agree 100% Posted by: LeeAnnG
    Gloom & doom
    Posted by: willymack on Nov 8, 2007 8:38 AM   
    Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
    Too bad these dire predictions are much closer to the truth than otherwise. What reason have we had to be optomistic about our "president's" intentions? What words of praise are forthcoming from abroad, except from neocom stooges? How do we get mass murderers, war criminals, and war profiteers into prison, where they belong without ripping the heart from our country? The reason more angry and intense demonstrations on the streets as in the Viet Nam era are not happening lies in the realization that the deck is truly stacked against us, and a real possibility of being hauled off to a concentration camp is as palpable as the awareness of our mortality. The effort by Hollywood is too little, too late. It should've begun on Jan. 20th, 2001, with film footage of people throwing eggs at bush's limousine, following his "inaugration".

    [« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

    » ...that whole SCENE... Posted by: snideelf
    All that having a 'movie' of these fiascos does is....
    Posted by: Voicedude on Nov 8, 2007 8:57 AM   
    Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
    ....make it seem 'cooler'. To the liberals, it's a watered-down version of preaching to the choir. To the Neo-cons, it's another 'exageration' that only reinforces their view that this is all justified - AND 'proof' of just how liberal Hollywood is. To Hollywood, it's just another hot button topic to profit from.

    No new revelations will be made, no policies will change.

    We'll all just get a bit more accustomed to seeing it all because we see it so much in the movies.....

    P.S. You guys forgot "The Kingdom", a well made action film whose final line/message summarizes the whole problem!

    [« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

    » Maybe these movies do more... Posted by: wheresarah
    anti-war movies
    Posted by: donl51 on Nov 8, 2007 9:11 AM   
    Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
    This latest w/Tom Cruise is the one that the Fox news goons have been ragging on,especially O'Riley .his contention is that these movies are ruining this country,that people in foreign countries see us as cowards ,and of course that no-one w/any common sense cares about Robert Redford or what he does anymore out there in the middle of nowhere, and Cruises reputation as an actor will be circling the drain [much like Bushco.has led this country ] anyway ,at least Keith Obermann got a chance to nail OR.......I think those ..prefer the propaganda type movies over the truth,its not that these movies are necesarily designed to be anti-war ,its just that they aren't designed as guts and glory type ,I've seen numerous actually filmed no-script documentaries over the years that show war for what it is! Iwas in the Vietnam war for 26mon.14 days and trust me when i got out I did eventually see that John Wayne piece of propaganda,now thats a real patriotic movie!that the Fox news goons and Bushco.warmongers would love to see more of comming out of hollywood,...all the comments on this so far have been excellent,....''.true but sad'',waiting for the ringer! Shrub lover

    [« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

    Living in fiction is one of the causes of the debacle
    Posted by: ScottP on Nov 8, 2007 9:24 AM   
    Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
    The author buys into the same kind of rationale that brings about each of our succession of wars of aggression: the ends justify the means. So if we can help end this war by using fiction and myths and propaganda, then we should use those tools just like the right wing does. That's utterly stupid. All you do is leave the foundation in place to start the next war of aggression in 5-10 years (if they can wait that long). How many times do we want to repeat the Vietnam to Iraq cycle? We need to address root problems, like people who care more about their little myths than about real people and real problems and real opportunities.

    Turn off your TV, boycott the movies, boycott Exxon, down with the robber barons and their wars and propaganda!

    [« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

    Warm metal jacket
    Posted by: eddie torres on Nov 8, 2007 10:12 AM   
    Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
    Fantastic solution to America's political, military, and financial woes: give more of your family's dwindling disposable income to millionaire actors like Tom Hanks and billionaire corporate studios like Fox.

    How warm and fuzzy will the average American slob feel standing in a bread line with thousands of other wage slaves discussing whether Hanks deserves an Oscar™ for Charlie Wilson's Wart?

    [« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

    Nothing will change. Until...
    Posted by: PJAW on Nov 8, 2007 6:39 AM   
    Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
    The fact that Hollywood is finally getting on the anti-war bandwagon is, of course, good news. But as is typically the case, they only respond when sufficient public sentiment exists to assure a profit from these films.

    True, there are those in entertainment who have shown true courage and patriotism, but they are individuals who generally do not have the means to actually bring their beliefs to the big screen in technicolor and surround sound, where it will have the greatest impact on the masses. Michael Moore somehow manages to do that, but documentaries are a much lower budget film genre. Perhaps audiences would attend a film consising of interviews of influential public figures, sort of like a Studs Terkel book but in the theaters. Interviews interspersed with footage documenting the atrocity that this administration is might be a powerful presentation.

    [« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

    Nothing will change. Until...
    Posted by: PJAW on Nov 8, 2007 6:39 AM   
    Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
    The fact that Hollywood is finally getting on the anti-war bandwagon is, of course, good news. But as is typically the case, they only respond when sufficient public sentiment exists to assure a profit from these films.

    True, there are those in entertainment who have shown true courage and patriotism, but they are individuals who generally do not have the means to actually bring their beliefs to the big screen in technicolor and surround sound, where it will have the greatest impact on the masses. Michael Moore somehow manages to do that, but documentaries are a much lower budget film genre. Perhaps audiences would attend a film consising of interviews of influential public figures, sort of like a Studs Terkel book but in the theaters. Interviews interspersed with footage documenting the atrocity that this administration is might be a powerful presentation.

    [« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

    Movies cost money to make...
    Posted by: babs on Nov 8, 2007 10:42 AM   
    Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
    ... and y'all should be happy that somebody is putting their money where their mouth is, and risking the ire of the still-mighty, murderous right.

    Remember during the run up to the debacle in Iraq, there were mainstream magazines sporting cover photos of various celebrities (mostly actors) who had the temerity to speak out against the "war". They were branded, in large red letters, "Traitors". Nice. Free speech anyone?

    Yep, it silenced filmmakers for awhile, but in a recent interview with Redford (Lions for Lambs), he said that he was so disgusted and fed up with his criminal government that he was pulling out the stops and making this film. He dared the bushies to come after him and was warned that it could happen. And Cruise plays a scheming, opportunistic, psycho repuglican - not a stretch for the "operating thetan" and a shrewd bit of casting.

    [« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

    We like our war movies "heroic" and about past conflicts
    Posted by: CJC on Nov 8, 2007 11:24 AM   
    Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
    It's not a surprise that serious movies about the Iraq war and other real time foreign policy debacles are not "popular."

    Even though the Iraq war has dwindling public support it doesn't follow that many people will spend an evening out watching movies about it. Heroes are more fun. Further, a lot of people love to keep their heads in the sand.

    I saw "In the Valley of Elah" last night, with about 10 other movie patrons in a liberal Boston suburb. I thought the movie was excellent and showed the complexity of military service and how soldiers are brutalized and destroyed by it, but I did come home feeling as though a Hummer was on my chest. I had the same feeling after reading one of (Senator) James Webb's novels about Vietnam, "Fields of Fire."

    It's great that there are an increasing number of non-documentary as well as documentary films about our war machine. I don't mind if Tom Hanks and Hollywood studios make money. What else is new? The more movies there are the more people will be exposed to aspects of what's going on in our name that they are unfamiliar with.

    How many serious war movies do you think President Bush has ever seen?

    Of course, there are books, but they take longer than two hours to read and cost more than a movie ticket. We're not a highly literate bunch anyway, us Americans.

    [« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

    Actually kind of a shame...
    Posted by: snideelf on Nov 8, 2007 2:57 PM   
    Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
    ...that Hollow Wood bigwigs can get together to put together all of these movies and make money off the suffering of others.

    Wouldn't it make more sense to use that kind of power to instead somehow organize and protest against the war and try to bring it to an end instead of making movies about the war and profitting handsomely from all of these movies?

    These days no one bats an eye. It's business as usual in super-capitalist America.

    It's like the Hollow Wood sleaze bags are saying, "It's alright America, can't bring yourself to say or do anything about chimpy's war? That's okay. We'll make movies of the thing so you can go see them and somehow think that someone is doing something about the war."

    Oh yeah, someone's doing something about chimpy's war alright.

    [« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

    why it may matter
    Posted by: particle on Nov 8, 2007 3:54 PM   
    Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
    Although Hollywood is poll chasing for dollars, many people and some you may know, live with their heads in a world of entertainment. In conversations their references are to movies and programs, even about politics. Sad to say, the consequences of the Great American Wingnut Disaster won't become heartfelt until they're emoted at the masses with bread and circuses.

    [« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

    Movie impact outside of America
    Posted by: Nedtheredhead on Nov 8, 2007 4:40 PM   
    Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
    There is no doubt that movies change public opinion, whether they are fiction, documentaries or a mix of both. This change can turn the undecided in favor of the antagonist, such a Bush and his cronies, or against them.
    But never forget that American movies are viewed more by non Americans than by Americans. The world gets to, eventually, view these reflections and it is often the peoples of other nations, via their governments, that put pressure on Governments such as the US that the American population can't.
    In other words the European, British, Australian, Indonesian, New Zealand, South African peoples, to mention just a few, can do what Americans can't do...via the UN or through other protocols.
    So don't dismiss your Hollywood as just a money making organisation, they seriously influence the world.

    [« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

    Movies might change opinions, but Opinions don't change Anything
    Posted by: common intelligence on Nov 8, 2007 5:57 PM   
    Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
    When I was in College I wanted to and tried to affect enlightened change for the benefit of humanity. I thought I actually could make a valuable contribution. One that would wake up people to the future that has now become the present.

    Well, I failed. Then, all I was working at, hoping humanity could avoid the pit falls that are now ever present.

    So it's become too obvious to me now that the weight of overwhelming mass ignorance of humanity can not be swaid in time to avoid kaos, or redirect the herd to greener pastures in time to over come running off the cliff.

    The momentum of mass procrastination far exceeds the responsiveness of this run-away train. Just like the Ship full of CHinese junk that crashed into the San Fransico Bay Bridge in aq thick fog yesterday. Then it spilled a load of fuel oil into the water just as the Dungeness crab season opened.
    Humanities greed and momentum can not be stpped in time.
    We are on full time damage control.

    The best the movies can actually do is keep us precoccupied so when the moment comes of humanities demise we can all give up our egocentric blind hope just as the light goes out.

    "Good nght, and good bye"!

    [« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

    saying what needs be done will get you killed
    Posted by: kgnz on Nov 27, 2007 8:02 PM   
    Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
    when I was in grade school I was repeatedly told not to fight, that the bullies would just leave me alone if they saw I would not fight back. But I remember that despite the beatings I took it was only after I did put up a fight did the attacks stop, at least for a while. It is the same now, but the threatened injuries from standing up to a much greater bully will be than a bloody nose and a black eye. It is verily your very life that stands to be forfeit now, and I suppose many who would have gone to protests before, hesitate to go, suspecting that no less than this may be the cost of their protest, today. With these films we the viewing audience get to vicariously make this realization and then go on our merry way. But oddly the drama depicted for our viewing pleasure is becoming more the reality and our own lives become more make believe like and of less and less consequence

    [« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]