Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

War on Iraq

Report: Iraqis Years Away From Autonomy

The Associated Press. Posted October 18, 2007.


In Congressional testimony, USIP officials say the country needs years of "engagement."
Advertisement

Editor's Note: When reading this story, keep this in mind: As of this past summer, when the State Department stopped releasing the data, Iraqis still had fewer hours of electricity, on average, than they enjoyed before the invasion in 2003. After the power grid was destroyed during the first Gulf War, Iraqi engineers got the system up and running within 90 days. Also keep in mind that hundreds of thousands of career civil servants were fired unceremoniously from a number of Iraqi ministries on the orders of Paul Bremer, who headed the transitional occupation government.

Teaching local officials in Iraq to govern themselves and provide their citizens with basic services will take "years of steady engagement." It also will rely heavily on the U.S. government's ability to recruit skilled civilians, investigators told a House panel Thursday.

"Stability operations is not a game for pick up teams," said Robert Perito, a security expert at the United States Institute of Peace in Washington.

The United States has dispatched various provincial reconstruction teams (PRTs) in Iraq and Afghanistan to teach, coach and mentor Iraqis in towns and provinces. Staffed mostly by civilian officials, with the military providing security, the teams show promise but with an effectiveness that is difficult to judge because the needs vary greatly from province to province.

The Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction concluded in a new report Thursday that the teams are making "incremental progress" but require "years of steady engagement."

Stuart W. Bowen Jr., head of the IG reconstruction office, said lessons learned from the teams point to a bigger need to coordinate relief efforts among the federal agencies.

"If the story of Iraq reconstruction tells anything, teaches any lesson, it is that the U.S. government was not well structured and was not well poised in 2003 to engage in the kind of post-conflict relief and reconstruction operations we have faced," Bowen said.

Bowen and Perito testified before the House Armed Services' oversight and investigations subcommittee. Members of the panel said they convened the hearing to see if more can be done to gauge the effectiveness of the teams.

"Measuring the PRTs, it would seem to me, is an art, not a science," said Rep. Todd Akin of Missouri, the top Republican on the panel. Knowing if the reconstruction teams are accomplished "is unclear as these countries will be in a perpetual state of improving governance and increasing economic development," he added.

There are more than two dozen of the teams operating in Iraq and the U.S. has provided $1.9 billion to support it as of August.

"In many locations, the PRT program in Iraq is making incremental progress in developing the nation's provincial and local government capacity to effectively govern and manage its own reconstruction, despite" continuing violence and strife, the report said. "However, Iraq's complex and overlapping sectarian, political and ethnic conflicts, as well as the difficult security situation continue to hinder progress in promoting economic development, the rule of law and political reconciliation," it said.

"Despite the best efforts of PRT civilian and military officials who are working under dangerous and austere conditions to accelerate the Iraqi transition to self-reliance, resolving these problems will likely be a slow process," Bowen said in the report.

"It will require years of steady engagement and will depend heavily on the security environment and political settlements at the national level."

The report also said that "numerous PRT officials identified rule of law as the most problematic" area. It noted that in many places there is little cooperation between police, courts, and correction facilities and that judicial orders are routinely ignored.

It also said there has been little progress toward political reconciliation.

The PRT program itself has been plagued by problems. Previous reports have found it was difficult to find people with the correct skills to do the work -- particularly civilians. There also has been a shortage of Arabic speakers and understanding of Iraq's culture and history as well as a lack of organization within the U.S. government to carry out the program, according to those past reports.

AlterNet is making this material available in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107: This article is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: iraq, reconstruction, sigir

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from War on Iraq! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
And the purpose of re-posting this article to alternet is?
Posted by: ScottP on Oct 18, 2007 12:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't get it. AP does another one of its daily propaganda pieces where they pretend that the US is in Iraq to help. Why is that news? Why is it posted at alternet? Are we not supposed to know the Washington party circuit story about it by now?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't worry
Posted by: donl51 on Oct 18, 2007 8:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
if we keep at what we're doin' in Iraq'',huge bases''12-13, I believe iraq will never be autonomis ''just be one of our colonies!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Convenience exceeded only by arrogance
Posted by: Ellen Remore on Oct 19, 2007 12:42 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How convenient for the administration that Iraq requires "years of engagement!" That should give the military plenty of time to finish those Iraqi bases. It also allows Halliburton, Bechtel, et al. to strech out their ride on the "Reconstruction" gravy train. What a bonanza for them that Bush's stalwarts failed to plan an occupation strategy--(actually, maybe we've been seeing that strategy.)

As for "teaching the Iraqis to govern themselves"--good Lord, is that not the epitome of arrogance? Since, of course, their country hasn't been around a whole hell of a lot longer than ours. However, while we're at it, maybe somebody can manage to teach the entire Bush administration how to govern. They've certainly sucked at it up till now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]