Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

War on Iraq

Iraqis Furious About 'Above-the-Law' Security Contractors

Middle East Online. Posted October 5, 2007.


Blackwater chief says company guards not 'cowboys.'
Advertisement

Iraqi politicians and lawyers voiced anger Wednesday that "above-the-law" security contractors were continuing to operate in Iraq while being probed over a deadly shooting incident 17 days ago.

"Some foreign companies believe they are above the Iraqi law," Amira al-Baldawi, a member of the ruling coalition, said as more reports emerged of "cowboy" antics and drunken shootings involving US firm Blackwater.

Iraqi officials had tried to stop Blackwater from operating after its employees were accused of opening fire indiscriminately in central Baghdad on September 16 killing at least 10 Iraqi civilians, Baldawi said.

"The Iraqi government on its part has taken measures to stop Blackwater but this company has connections with bodies and consequently would not abide by the Iraqi law," she said, without specifying the nature of the "bodies".

Baghdad lawyer Hassan Shaaban said the firm should have been shut down until investigators probing the September 16 incident had finished their work.

"This company should halt its work until investigations are over," he said. "There should have been an investigation into the Nisoor Square event before a decision was taken to say if they should continue working in Iraq or not."

"As far as the law is concerned, if the probes prove they are responsible for the incident they should be expelled in accordance with Iraqi law," said Hassan.

"They are not an army neither US armed forces. They merely present company services and consequently any violation on the land of Iraq should be subject to the Iraqi judiciary."

Blackwater shootout left 17 Iraqis dead

Seventeen people were killed and 24 injured in the September 16 Baghdad shootout involving Blackwater USA, the New York Times reported Wednesday.

That death toll is significantly higher than the 10 originally reported in the incident which prompted intense criticism of Blackwater's operational activities.

Citing witnesses, Iraqi investigators and a US official, the Times said the shootout in Baghdad's Nisour Square started when a Blackwater guard fired a single shot at a hospital pathologist driving his mother on an errand, killing him.

When the man's car continued to roll ahead toward the Blackwater team, they let loose "an intense barrage of gunfire in several directions," killing the mother in the car and hitting numerous fleeing Iraqis, the newspaper said.

The Times also said that shortly after the first shootout, a Blackwater convoy opened fire at another spot a few hundred meters (yards) away near the square, an incident that had previously gone unreported.

While the Times report suggested that the Blackwater team did not come under attack, as the company has claimed, it said it was not clear if Iraqi security forces themselves began firing once the incident began -- which could have led the Blackwater men to believe they were being attacked.

The Times followed in the wake of a US Congressional committee report which accused Blackwater, which protects US diplomats and visiting dignitaries in Iraq, of covering up fatal shootings involving its staff.

Blackwater chief says Iraq guards not 'cowboys'

The boss of US security contractor Blackwater Tuesday denied his staff ran riot like "cowboys" and said they acted appropriately in the Baghdad shootout.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: mercenaries, blackwater, iraq

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from War on Iraq! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Horror upon Horror!
Posted by: Basenjis on Oct 5, 2007 9:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How many more of these horrors do we have to put up with before Congress does its Job? It's not as if we haven't impeached before--and for far, far less flagrant and insidious crimes. The United States is bartering away its very soul!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

dumbo
Posted by: downwithpatriotism on Oct 5, 2007 11:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The treaty provisions that were installed in the Iraq constitution was made for the US and its imperial allies. It is called Extra-territoriality and what Blackwater proves is what was proven in China and all the occupied territories like Japan, South Korea and Germany in the last two centuries. It is the most blatant disregard for democracy and Law and liberty and freedom. It is the most hypocritical byproduct of America by saying on one hand that you hold all these truths to be self evident...and that you are fighting for thier freedom...when in fact you are making slaves out of the entire nation.

The USA has forced the subservient defeated power to sign their soverignty away by (1) immunizing all US citizens and their employees from the law of the land. If you kill or maime or steal, the colonial country has no right to prosecute or seek justice. (2) Settlements an territories are ceded to the US and represent US territory like Guam or any island in the pacific owned by the US. The US practiced this nonsense in the 20th and 19th centuries so it knows better.

In short, the patsy's that the US used to sign these provisions had to accept these terms before the US would stop waging illegal war. The patsys are the duly recognized government of Iraq in this case but it was some idiot acceptable to the US administration who was willing to sell his people down the drain. In the case of China, the People's Republic of China had to destroy Chiang Kai Chek in order to make the people of China free; in order to ignore extra-territoriality and the real estate siezed by the US. It is imperialism in the 21st Century and this country is engaged in it. Can you see why everyone is trying to dump America? They have stolen territory in Iraq that no one can get back and plunged our nation into a new war. Someone in the MIddleEast will have to destroy Iraq before it's people are free once again. For that reason, I hope that the US loses this war and is kicked out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: dumbo - It ISN'T a war! Posted by: Ian MacLeod
» RE: dumbo - It ISN'T a war! Posted by: Ian MacLeod
» RE: dumbo - It ISN'T a war! Posted by: downwithpatriotism
» RE: dumbo - It ISN'T a war! Posted by: Ian MacLeod