Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

War on Iraq

Stop Saying Iraq Is Another Vietnam; It's Another Enron

By Bill Maher, Huffington Post. Posted September 29, 2007.


Bush is fighting a war with phony accounting tricks. They fudged the numbers to get us into Iraq and cooked the books to keep us there.
Advertisement

Iraq is Enron, and President Bush is Ken Lay. He's fighting a war with phony accounting tricks. The Bush administration fudged the numbers to get us into Iraq, and cooked the books to keep us there. "The surge" is simply another in a long series of inflated stock quotes.

This past weekend Marcel Marceau passed away at age 84. Doctors say he went quietly. Thus proving that evil thrives when good men stay silent. And just like with Enron, the good men and women who are blowing the whistle on Iraq contractor fraud are being vilified, fired, demoted, and those are the lucky ones.

Last Friday morning the Senate Democratic Policy Committee held a hearing entitled "The Mistreatment of Iraq Contracting Whistleblowers," just in time to make the Friday news dump. According to the committee more than $10 billion dollars in Iraq reconstruction and military support contracts is unaccounted for.

In other words, for every six dollars spent in Iraq one dollar is in question. And folks, it's a war-zone, you're dealing with a culture known for its haggling skills, so you've got factor in a little skimming, but this is ridiculous. If you stole that much money from the Mafia you'd be dead.

Vicente Fox may have called President Bush a "windshield cowboy," but Bush has certainly turned Iraq into a wild, wild, west. And here's another one from the War in Iraq's this-is going-to-make-you-vomit file. Some Iraq contract whistleblowers have been vilified and fired, others have been detained by the US military and subjected to harsh interrogation techniques.

Donald Vance, a Navy veteran, was working for an Iraqi-owned outfit called the Shield Group Security Company. Vance said he witnessed Shield Group selling guns, land mines, and rocket-launchers to Iraqi insurgents, American soldiers, State Department workers, and Iraqi embassy and ministry workers. Vance described Shield Groups as "a Wal-Mart for guns."

Vance reported this to the FBI, and instead of a pat on the back, he got 97 days at Camp Cropper, a military prison outside of Baghdad. In fact, Saddam's Hussein's old crib. Vance was placed in solitary confinement, subjected to head-banging music blaring from dawn to dusk, and interrogators screaming the same questions over and over again in his face.

Also testifying at the hearing along with Vance was Barry Godfrey, a former KBR employee (KBR+Halliburton=Cheney) who claimed that he was fired after complaining to his supervisors about fraudulent overcharges.

Also testifying was Bunnatine Greenhouse. Greenhouse is the former highest-ranking civilian contracting official at the Army Corps of Engineers, so I'll dispense with the "Greenhouse having gas" joke. But Greenhouse was removed from her position when she tried to crack down on "casual and clubby contracting practices" at the Army Corps of Engineers.

Also testifying was Robert Isakson who was a co-plaintiff in a "qui tam" lawsuit (a whistleblower lawsuit) against Custer Battles. No, "qui tam" is not that stuff that Chinese people do in the park, it's shorthand for the Latin Phrase "qui tam pro domino quam pro seipso," which dates back to 13th century England, and means, "He who is as much for the King as for himself."

Today, a "qui tam" lawsuit is one brought under the False Claims Act by a private plaintiff on behalf of the Federal or State Government. Isakson won the first civil verdict for Iraq reconstruction fraud against Custer Battles. However, the verdict was overturned by the judge, who ruled that because the CPA was not part of the US government, the "qui tam" statute did not apply.

Meanwhile the Bush administration has not litigated a single case against a contractor alleged to have defrauded the US Government in Iraq. Apparently, like terrorism, this isn't a law enforcement issue either.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: iraq war, war in iraq, enron, surge, bill maher

Bill Maher is the host of HBO's "Real Time with Bill Maher" which airs every Friday at 11PM.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from War on Iraq! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
You go, Bill
Posted by: vox persona on Sep 29, 2007 12:36 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I got HBO literally so I could see Real Time, and have been a fan since his early national stand-up in the early-mid '80's. I'm hard pressed to find anything he says that I disagree with. This piece reads like a journalistic essay, lighter on opinion and comedy that his usual. He names names and gives connections, and it's good to see he knows his stuff. I would vote for him as VP with Al Franken on the comedy ticket. I'm tired of this tragedy crap we get from this administration, whose comedy is unintentional....as in 'comedy of errors', and some surreal farce acted out on the stage of Theatre of the Absurd.
Keep it up Bill, I'll see you on Real Time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

change
Posted by: zircon on Sep 29, 2007 2:03 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What can anyone who has not been vulnerable and exposed to war comprehend of it? For one person it’s a pay packet and prestige, for another it’s the disappearance of the neighborhood, the drinking water and the beheading of the grand daughter.

Airing opinions with the technology on tap and the internet functioning, it seems remote to think that all we have could disappear, yet that is the case.
As independent individuals we have no grounds to trust the political caste or believe that we can influence what the president and his servants do with the weapons only they know about. Since the ideal of peace was pensioned, members of the political caste turned against the mass of their uncooperative co-nationals.

If the trend to war is not reversed, the world is shortly due to face the true scale of what has been going on behind the scenes all these years under the cover of “National Defence”. We will have little possibility to save ourselves. The difference between right and wrong will be obliterated.

If nuclear war breaks out –even on a contained scale as is seemingly intentioned - the human project will be rocked to its core.

It is crystal clear now, today, in the present moment of relative calm, before the burning of all our bridges with the ideals of our past, that a future can not be guaranteed by people who have normalized a state of war. It is impossible to imagine how and where they assume divine right over lives they have not created. Yet, they do.
They overate their activity since they are not aware enough of what they destroy.

Instead they resort to hurting the psychological makeup of humans, taking away the ground beliefs they cherish and destroying their ability to cope. And all because an ego overblown can not give in when it knows it is in the wrong.

The grand public has never been able to control ’rulers’ and ’governors’ because they have no means to do so. The people has been turned into a weak and pathetic worm, conditioned and desensitized. We are stupid enough to believe we are born equal while at the same time permanently accepting a subservient role of ‘spectator’. Voluntarily we surrender the alternative option of shared power which we could and should rightfully demand together.

We have every tecnhnology necessary to organize ourselves better.
If the will were there, collectively, the majority could cooperativeyly steer its affairs in a just and de-centralized mode.

It would be worthwhile and desirable to bring into being a method of government that aims for a division of decision-making, arranged on a shared, rotational basis in order to bypass corruption that results when weak people are exposed to the temptation of getting one over the next man.. Something like the call-up to a public jury with limited power and - just for a strictly limited period..

With the division of responsibility, it is probable that an equilibrium would be achieved once the permanent leadership and political caste were disempowered and the mass of people empowered to take turns as individuals of equal validity in the decisions affecting the society.

I don’t think the Blackwaters, Exxons and Enrons would have their way then.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Zircon's change Posted by: giles
» Ultimate purpose of life... Posted by: Cathyc
» RE: Zircon's change Posted by: zircon
» RE: change Posted by: Ellen Remore
Here's how to convict the guilty....
Posted by: mizipi on Sep 29, 2007 2:17 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Get an overweight, 19 year old girl to give a bunch of men blow-jobs, then the whole country will be in an uproar, especially the right-wing media and the MSM.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» because its a girl? n/m Posted by: bookie
Imperialism = Imperialism
Posted by: socialpsych on Sep 29, 2007 4:07 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sorry, Bill, but creative accounting was at work during Vietnam, too. It may be true that Bush, Cheney, & Co. have taken it to a new level. And it is easier to document today than in the 1960s, thanks to IT. But Imperialism = Imperialism, whenever and wherever it happens, so the analogy with Vietnam stands.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Modern Day Imperialism Posted by: Cathyc
Burma
Posted by: Abushite on Sep 29, 2007 4:36 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If Sportsmen and women refuse to attend The CHINESE olympics - then China will decide decide to stop the murder of the people of Burma!

Tell VISA to stop its support of the olympics. Do they really need blood money ??????

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thanks again, Bill Mahr
Posted by: Tom Degan on Sep 29, 2007 5:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why isn't his program running on the main stream media? Everybody should be watching it! Isn't it sad that we've gotted to the point in America's history when we have to depend on comedians to keep us informed. The fact that this is going on should make every one of us stand up and shout "ENOUGH!" Unfortunately, the people have become addicted to the Stupid Pills that have been distributed to them by the corporate media.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
"The Rant" by Tom Degan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Thanks again, Bill Mahr Posted by: january37
» Addicted to Stupid Pills... Posted by: Cathyc
» RE: comedians Posted by: Sushi
Thieves in high places
Posted by: frank69 on Sep 29, 2007 7:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Jim Hightower is totally correct in his description of the Bush regime as "Thieves in High Places."
The Imposter makes Warren Harding look like an honest and great statesman!
The Bush/Cheney regime is like the Mafia - only dumber - their crookedness is so glaringly obvious!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bush/Cheney regime is smarter Posted by: scott balogh
...more worry...
Posted by: Bozwell on Sep 29, 2007 8:46 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most kinda' figure Iraq and the ME ventures are due to OIL, our dependence upon that resource and with the rise of others global markets and their needs, the competition is stiff for control ,distribution and of course, profiteerings. Most will acknowledge MOST were indeed taken back when Bush at the UN brought up BURMA/Myanmar...caught many off guard and what timing, for no sooner noted, then more news erupted (none of it "good" )...today in the NYT, there is an article, regarding Myanmar OIL and GAS resources and the current negotiations going on to "develope" itand distribute it....Regrettably, now makes sense of why suddenly Bush (ever the "oil-interested"biz man) brings the spotlight to the region and THEIR need for "freedom/democracy/relief from a brutal junta/etc....Many are vying for those "contracts" and the "junta" is NOT exactly inclined to favor "westerners" in particular !!!
Think this homeland best concentrate on ways and mean of becoming truly energy suffiecient of its own accord, need to stop the need of scalping others for OUR over indulgences . How short sighted to not recognize the true opportunity that such independence would be multifold, creating a whole new "industry" and pathway for economic growth and so much more. Kinda scary whats coming with the present myoptic leadership we are helmed by on so many critical levels and bodes not any too well for the future generations (IF somehow there ARE future generations with so many willingly racing to an expected "rapture" even if induced by mere mortal men, unfortunately ALL suffer the consequences in their attempt to fulfill their fantasy's !!!)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Read The Rolling Stone
Posted by: BlackbirdHighway on Sep 29, 2007 9:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Rolling Stone Magazine had an excellent and very detailed article about Iraq contractor abuses: The Great Iraq Swindle

The MSM, not so much. There's something wrong with our society when the best sources of news are the Comedy Central channel and The Onion. The Rolling Stone and McClatchy do a good job too. WashPo, NYT, and the rest are worse than useless, when you consider the propoganda that has to be filtered out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How dare you run down
Posted by: willymack on Sep 29, 2007 12:07 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our grand and glorious President and his Merrie Men! Can't you see they have our best interests in mind? Their stunning achievements in Afghanistan, Iraq, and elsewhere speak for themselves. I get such a warm feeling whenever I see our Dear Leader on TV-almost as warm as when I pee my pants. Oh-oh; gotta run. Some men with nets are coming after me.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The official American religion...
Posted by: Suz on Sep 29, 2007 12:09 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...is NOT christianity. It is money. And, like faithful devotees, we fervently worship at It's hallowed altar and sacrifice each other for It and debase ourselves for It in myriads of ways.

The practice is greed. And God is the dollar.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Organized religion = MONEY! Posted by: Cathyc
Vietnam was an ENRON in that it too like Iraq cost the American taxpayers dearly.
Posted by: maxpayne on Sep 29, 2007 12:46 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Iraq is both Vietnam and ENRON in one. Mr. Moyers, you're cool and all and I know you served under LBJ although you probably didn't support the Vietnam war but let's get everything straight. Both economically and security wise, both Iraq and Vietnam were disasterous. Btw, what do you say about the Democrats giving Bush another blank check for more Iraq war spending and another likely war but this time with Iran ?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Is anyone surprised?
Posted by: Ellen Remore on Sep 29, 2007 3:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The situation with the Iraq "contractors" (aka profiteering bottom feeders) is nauseating, but hardly innovative. After all, profits are what wars have always been about. (This one, however, should have simply been tagged "Pre-emptive War, Inc..) In addition, we seem to have unleashed on the hapless Iraqis a ravening horde of xenophobic Rusty Calleys.

Yet we hear nothing from either government stalwarts nor their Fourth Estate counterparts. Personally, I'm becoming increasingly convinced that every member of Congress has been slipped a boodle of Halliburton, Bechtel, etc. stock. Either that, or Bush has Polaroids of all of them in flagrante with barnyard animals.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Everyone talks, but no one Walks
Posted by: dayahka on Sep 29, 2007 7:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is beyond question that Bush is an evil man. The article is yet another set of evidence, of possible millions, provided to characterize and condemn this venal man and his administration. What is so interesting, however, is that this man, who belongs with Hitler, Mao, and Stalin on Mount Killmore, is left in office by the representatives as well as the people, and has another 16 months to further wreck the country and the world. The only conclusion I can reach is that we are all wimps who can talk a lot but can't walk--or else we're just as evil as he is. (I suspect that both options are true.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not like Enron...
Posted by: MarvinBeaty on Sep 29, 2007 7:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't think the folks just helicopter bombed in Baghdad get the connection between Enron and Iraq War.
Check Sept. 29 Al Jazeera.net

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nice comment - though there were Enron aspects at play in Vietnam as well.
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Sep 29, 2007 8:30 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's funny that Bill Maher mentions KBR, because back when Cheney was just another underling in the Nixon Administration (along with his pal Donald Rumsfeld) guess who had the contract for building Vietnam bases? Here's an except from the wiki entry on KBR:

" According to Dan Briody, who wrote a book on the subject, the company became part of a consortium of four companies that built about 85 percent of the infrastructure needed by the Army during the Vietnam War. At the height of the anti-war movement of the 1960s, Brown & Root was derided as "Burn & Loot" by protesters."

The more things change, the more they stay the same.

What these guys need to do is to file a qui tam whistleblower suit against these bastards. The U.S. government is certain to respond with the argument that all US government contracts in Iraq are "top secret" and cannot be challenged in a court of law. However, that might not fly in the current climate. At the very least, the whistleblowers will get some good publicity by doing so.

You know, these are the very same companies that got a lot of the 'rebuilding contracts' in New Orleans post-Katrina, and you might just find them doing contract work for your city, state and local governments as well. It's not just weapons, mercenaries (Blackwater, Dyncorp, Triple Canopy, Aegis) and oil (Halliburton, etc.) - it's also water (Louis Berger and their subcontractor Camp Dresser Mckee, as well as Fluor, Shaw, Black & Veatch), telecommunications (NEC, etc), various construction projects (Bechtel and Parsons), economic consulting (BearingPoint), and so on.

What do they all have in common? They all gave fat donations to Republican reelection efforts over the past seven years. As Karl Rove said, "You lick our ass, we'll lick yours!"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Iraq is worse than Vietnam and Enron combined
Posted by: stryder on Sep 29, 2007 10:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Maybe not in loss of life (on the American side) for Vietnam but certainly by most other moral or legal measures.

This is a war of conquest based on naked deception where victims are the cost of doing business.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not Enron, the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan
Posted by: ischindl on Sep 30, 2007 10:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Watch the dollar keep sliding down while the price of gas skyrockets! Rather than addressing these problems, this administration is distracted by war. This administration is hell bent on losing US superpower status!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fan
Posted by: sunyc2 on Sep 30, 2007 12:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Catch 22: It really means, according to the book, if you can't stop them they'll do it. But also Remember American soldier Milominederbender who said " don't worry, we all made money as stockholders". He was referring to his leasing planes so the WWII Germans pilots could strafe the American base.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bill needs to get on some meds
Posted by: gretavo on Oct 1, 2007 6:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So that he can handle the truth about 9/11. Of course his case is beyond one of ignorance or denial--he is literally helping to cover up the truth behind 9/11 by insulting and mocking those who raise perfectly valid issues with the bogus official story. So Bill, they lied about everything BUT 9/11 huh? Give it up,pal, you're toast.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ken Burns - "The War"
Posted by: Maryanne on Oct 1, 2007 9:04 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We have been watching Ken Burns' "The War" on PBS this week. Having seen documentaries and read numerous books on this war, we did not anticipate the reaction we would have to this production. Two to three hour segments of watching were almost unbearable- would have been better to get this in smaller doses. A group of friends got together in the past week to not only discuss this but to bring to it observations of mostly brothers and husbands who fought in WWII, Korea, or Vietnam. Everyone said the same thing. Even those who had come back physically and psychologically unwounded (no acute PTSD) were different. They would not speak of experiences, had unexpected reactions to normal events and were changed in personality.

That being said, if it is so difficult, so draining to watch old film and soldier's comments about their experiences in WWII, WHAT are the current military and Iraqis experiencing IN REAL LIFE that we, even the most empathetic of us, cannot even imagine. The horrors that are now in their lives will last a lifetime while Iraqi children will grow up hating America for what it has done to their families. And hatred will lead to more violence- this time against us - in the future unless we change our policy NOW. (if it isn't already too late.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Grouchy
Posted by: bikesnbach on Oct 5, 2007 7:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's not so much like Ken Lay and Enron but it exactly the same as Milo Minderbinder in Catch 22. He even sold gasoline to the Germans.
keith campbell
Denver

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]