Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

War on Iraq

Spain's "Downing Street Memo": Bush was Set on Attacking Iraq

Middle East Online. Posted September 26, 2007.


Report: Talk of diplomatic solutions in lead-up to Iraq invasion were all a big lie.
Advertisement

MADRID - US President George W. Bush threatened nations with retaliation if they did not vote for a UN resolution backing the Iraq war, according to a transcript published Wednesday of a conversation he had with former Spanish prime minister Jose Maria Aznar.

In the transcript of a meeting on February 22, 2003 -- a month before the US-led invasion of Iraq -- published in the El Pais daily, Bush tells Aznar that nations like Mexico, Angola, Chile and Cameroon must know that the security of the United States is at stake.

He says during the meeting on his ranch in Texas that Angola stood to lose financial aid while Chile could see a free trade agreement held up in the US Senate if they did not back the resolution, the left-wing paper said.

The confidential transcript was prepared by Spain's ambassador to the United States at the time, Javier Ruperez, the paper said.

Prior to the US-led invasion of Iraq on March 20, 2003, Washington unsuccessfully lobbied the 15 members of the UN Security Council for a second resolution paving the way for military action against Iraq if Saddam Hussein failed to comply with demands to disarm.

But during the meeting with Aznar, Bush made it clear the US would invade Iraq by the end of March 2003 whether or not there was a UN resolution to authorize it, El Pais reported.

"We have to get rid of Saddam. There are two weeks left. In two weeks we will be ready militarily. We will be in Baghdad at the end of March," Bush said in the transcript which was translated into Spanish by the newspaper.

Victory would come "without destruction", he added.

The meeting between Aznar and Bush came just days after a massive protest in Madrid by more than a million people against the invasion which Aznar's conservative government backed.

Aznar tells Bush in the transcript that he needed Washington's help to get Spanish public opinion behind the invasion. He adds that he is worried by Bush's optimism.

"I am optimistic because I believe I am right. I am at peace with myself," Bush responded.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: bush, iraq, lies, aznar

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from War on Iraq! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
More & More
Posted by: FedUp on Sep 26, 2007 11:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
little missives such as this will continue to surface, often exposing the complicity of other heads of countries, but so what?
If the Bush criminal gang isn't brought to real justice, this will be little more than media fill.
Using the blow-job in the Oval office as a measuring rod of what constitutes an impeachable, treasonous offense, there's plenty to bring these criminals to justice on a whole slew of crimes.
But it ain't gonna happen; the democrats and the republicans, at the end of the day, sit together at the same dinner table and pass around the spoils of their plunder like dinner rolls.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

those of us paying attention knew this at the outset, before he was elected
Posted by: KaptainSpiffy on Sep 26, 2007 11:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
but the drive to a 'new world order' a 'new american century' was already in motion. thieves and greedy people stole the future.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

EXPLETIVES DELETED
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Sep 30, 2007 12:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"US President George W. Bush threatened nations with retaliation
if they did not vote for a UN resolution backing the Iraq war"

⁄€‹›fifl‡°·‚— Œ„´‰ˇÁ ¨ˆØ∏”’ ÅÍÎÏ˝ÓÔ ÒÚÆ¸˛Ç◊ı ˜Â¯˘¿
¸˛Ç◊ı ˜Â¯¿ ˘¯Â˜ı±—‚·°‡ flfi› ‹!@# $% ^&*()_+

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How George W. Bush got those fundamentalist votes
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Sep 30, 2007 12:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think I finally know why all those wingnuts, alias fundamentalist
christians, voted for George W. Bush. Reference book: "The
Accidental Mind" by David J. Linden, 2007 Belknap Press of
Harvard University Press. Religion is caused by the extreme
klugeyness of the "designed" by evolution brain. In particular,
the narrative creation system cannot be turned off. It generates
false narratives that are believed by the generating person in
experiments done in the laboratory. This book has the best
explanation of resistance to evolution: "There has also been an
assumption that if one accepts the idea that life developed without
divine intervention, it necessarily follows that all aspects of
religious thought must be rejected. Those who take this line of
argument to extremes argue that when religious thought is rejected
moral and social codes will degenerate and "the law of the jungle"
will be all that is left. It is imagined by religious fundamentalists
that those who do not share their particular religious faith are
incapable of leading moral lives." These suppositions are not true
in many ways. Linden later mentions that the creationists
[intelligent design advocates] are exactly 180 degrees wrong
rather than just a little wrong. Being exactly wrong, they are
unable to unlearn their error.

Reference book: "The Science of Good and Evil" by Michael
Shermer, 2004
"Morality and Ethics are now in the jurisdiction of Science and
greatly improved thereby."
Morality and Ethics are instinctive. Mostly female instinct. We
owe our morality and ethics to evolution, not to religion. Those
charlatans we call clergy have usurped and co-opted female moral
instincts for the purpose of making it all the more difficult for the
weak minded to realize that they are being scammed by religion.

All George W. Bush had to do to get their votes was to claim to
believe the same religion. Since they never looked at his actions,
they had no chance of detecting his lies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]