Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

War on Iraq

Our Iraq Ambassador's Kooky Economics

By Brian Beutler, Media Consortium. Posted September 13, 2007.


Iraq Ambassador Ryan Crocker had tough marching orders this week: Spin the political and economic chaos of Iraq into something that sounds like progress -- but his numbers don't stand up to scrutiny.
Advertisement

The long-anticipated joint congressional testimony of Gen. David Petraeus and Ambassador to Iraq Ryan Crocker is now history, and the event's few fireworks have by now been widely documented. Of them, perhaps the most noted was the men's relative dispositions -- one cavalier, the other more so.

The conventional wisdom had been to expect kinder depictions of broad progress from the general than from the ambassador. What we saw instead was precisely the opposite. Both men were optimistic -- more so than Democrats, moderate Republicans, and many other critics thought reasonable. But it was Crocker, not Petraeus, who painted over his mission's most pressing concerns.

Perhaps Crocker's single biggest claim during his two days on Capitol Hill was this: "The IMF estimates that economic growth will exceed 6 percent for 2007." It's a true statement as far as it goes, but the International Monetary Fund's executive board reported the figure with less enthusiasm. "Economic growth has been slower than expected," the IMF fretted, "mainly because the expected expansion of oil production has not materialized."

Indeed, it's typical for a country as damaged as Iraq to see its economy fluctuate wildly, resulting in spurts of growth much more substantial than 6 percent. In fact, Iraq's GDP has varied greatly since the 2003 invasion. It climbed 46.5 percent from 2003 to 2004, after having fallen 41.4 percent between 2002 and 2003, according to the Brookings Institution's Iraq Index. In other words, though 6 percent would constitute significant growth for a developed nation like the United States, it is nearly meaningless for a country that's experienced as much turmoil as Iraq.

And even if the figure had been more impressive -- two or three times its reported value -- it might still be irrelevant to the great majority of Iraqis, who don't benefit from government salaries or oil industry profits.

"The IMF likes to use macroeconomic aggregates, but these are pretty irrelevant for today's Iraq," says Robert E. Looney, a professor of National Security Affairs at the Naval Postgraduate School who has written widely on developing economies. He cautions against putting too much stock in Crocker's numbers. "The figures are all over the place."

"These are just very rough approximations," Looney explains. "I believe the IMF is largely basing their estimates on oil revenues and government salaries. Clearly, for the man in the street these figures have little meaning. Unemployment is around 40 percent by most estimates. I think most experts feel average income levels in the country are about what they were in 1980."

Ambassador Crocker pointed to other metrics as well. He nodded at increased employment in reconstruction zones, capital investment of oil revenues and local business development in some provinces. He also pointed to the Iraqi cellular spectrum. "An auction of cell phone spectrum conducted by PricewaterhouseCoopers netted the government a better than expected sum of $3.75 billion," Crocker boasted.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: iraq, imf, ryan crocker, ambassador, economic progress

Brian Beutler is the Washington correspondent for the Media Consortium, a network of progressive media organizations, including AlterNet.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from War on Iraq! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Bearingpoint, USAID and the Economic Con Job in Iraq
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Sep 13, 2007 4:59 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What, exactly, is BushCo's economic plan for Iraq? The following article from the Independent, Jan 07, is a must read:

Shock and oil: Iraq's billions & the White House connection

BearingPoint is being paid $240m for its work in Iraq, winning an initial contract from the US Agency for International Development (USAid) within weeks of the fall of Saddam Hussein in 2003. It was charged with supporting the then Coalition Provisional Authority to introduce policies "which are designed to create a competitive private sector". Its role is to examine laws, regulations and institutions that regulate trade, commerce and investment, and to advise ministries and the central bank.

Last week The Independent on Sunday revealed that a BearingPoint employee, based in the US embassy in Baghdad, had been tasked with advising the Iraqi Ministry of Oil on drawing up a new hydrocarbon law. The legislation, which is due to be presented to Iraq's parliament within days, will give Western oil companies a large slice of profits from the country's oil fields in exchange for investing in new oil infrastructure...


What are they trying to do? Well, first they are attempting to use Iraq's odious debt, run up under Saddam Hussein, as leverage to force Iraq to cede control of the oilfields to US and British oil corporations - but that's only part of it. (US agricultural loans to Saddam via secretive arrangements with Italian banks are the source of some of that debt). The privatization of Iraqi water, electricity and telecommunication services is also part of the plan, as is their transfer to US interests.

Thus, the idea was to not only have control of Iraqi oil, but also to make sure that a major percentage of Iraqi oil revenue was funneled back to US corporate interests as fees for running the Iraqi water, electricity and phone system.

For more on how these ongoing schemes work, read John Perkin's "Confessions of an Economic Hitman", or see Privatizing Iraq: The IMF and the Economic Invasion , Ryan Harvey

People are clamoring for Pelosi and Reid to bring up the issue of impeachment, but I'd prefer it if the Democratic Party would stand up and acknowledge that the only reasons for the invasion were economic - that it was an aggressive action aimed at seizing another countries' natural resources using military force. That's a truth that neither Democrats nor Republicans can bring themselves to utter.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Perkins' book is a novel. Posted by: justaguy
Not a big surprise
Posted by: TT5 on Sep 13, 2007 5:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Like father like son!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Kooky" economics
Posted by: Col. Jackleg on Sep 13, 2007 11:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What's new? Bush gives us "kooky" economics through Crocker. His beloved idol, ole Rawhide, gave us "voodoo" economics through David Stockman. Ya gotta love the GOP! Lemme see if I get it: G=goofballs; O=oppressors; P=piss ants. But there is some saving grace, most have MBAs from some Ivy League school or other and we should be thankful for that reality.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]