Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

War on Iraq

Why Iraq Is Getting Worse

By David Enders, In These Times. Posted September 12, 2007.


With the focus on civil war between Sunnis and Shiites, the ongoing conflict between Shiites in the South continues unnoticed.
Advertisement

A cloud of steam rises above the crowd in the 120-degree heat. As their leader approaches the podium, the thousands who have assembled meet him with pledges of their fealty.

"We are all Badr Brigade!" they shout, a reference to the paramilitary organization of the Supreme Iraqi Islamic Council (SIIC), which held this rally on July 19, in honor of Ayatollah Bakr al-Hakim, the party's founding leader, who was assassinated here four years ago. His nephew, Amar al-Hakim, now holds the position.

I was one of the millions who attended al-Hakim's funeral four years ago, some of whom walked the 100 miles from Baghdad to Najaf to show their sorrow. It was largely a peaceful affair.

But now, as Iraq devolves further into civil war inside civil war inside occupation, the commemoration of al-Hakim's death, which prompted mourning from Shiites across the country, has taken on a largely political feel. The Badr Brigade is at war with Sunni guerillas and other Shiite militias, and largely considered by its opponents to be the tool of corrupt, exiled elites who have allied themselves with the occupation in order to carve up Iraq.

The country's disintegration is obvious in Najaf, one of the seven of the nine southern provinces in which SIIC controls the municipal government. Here, things are run as a police state: I accepted an invitation by SIIC to travel to Najaf from Baghdad because it was the only way to safely negotiate the dangerous road between the two cities.

Despite the assurances of SIIC officials that Najaf was safe, we were given strict orders not to leave our hotel--at which Iraqi military and police loyal to the party had been posted--unless we were with them. When I left the tour for a pre-arranged meeting with the spokesman from Tayyera Sadrieen, another Shiite political party led by Moqtada al-Sadr, it nearly provoked an armed confrontation.

During the interview, Tayyera Sadrieen's spokesman, Saleh al-Obaidi, laid out why supporters of his party and its paramilitary, the Jeish al-Mehdi (JAM), had clashed with Badr loyalists across the country and, increasingly, in southern Iraq's poorest provinces of Misan and Muthanna, which are inaccessible to western journalists. In August, two of SIIC's governors there were assassinated by the JAM.

"The Sadrieen in general focus on the people. The southern governorates are suffering more than Baghdad maybe, concerning the services and the economic situation," al-Obaidi says. "There were no tensions for 15 or 16 months [after the invasion], but, at the same time, there were no services and no help from the governors of these provinces, so the people started to demonstrate and look and ask for something better. Unfortunately, the reaction from many governors was severe--they used guns and campaigns of detention against the people."

Fighting escalated at the end of August in Karbala, when JAM fighters attempted to take over a Badr-controlled Shiite shrine during a religious festival. After clashes that left more than 50 dead, Sadr ordered his militia to "suspend" operations for six months, though it is unclear to what extent Sadr controls the men fighting under his name, and the announcement mirrored one Sadr made two years ago.

In Basra, the only place in Iraq that is actually exporting oil and therefore producing revenue, a three-way battle is taking place between SIIC, the JAM and Fadhila, a Sadrist offshoot with support in the city. The British military withdrew its troops at the end of August, leaving only about 5,000 troops stationed at the airport. Corruption and a deadly power struggle have left Basra in a state of decline. Fadhila and SIIC, the two most powerful parties in Basra's provincial council, continue to fight over the governor's seat, which has brought governance to a halt, while the JAM and gangs that increasingly fought British troops have taken over the streets.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: federalism, iraq

David Enders, author of Baghdad Bulletin, reported from Iraq this summer with support from a grant by the Pulitzer Center.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from War on Iraq! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Because...
Posted by: TT5 on Sep 13, 2007 12:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
your so called "Superpower military" is getting it's ass KICKED!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Because... Posted by: Iconoclast421
» RE: Because... Posted by: donl51
And...
Posted by: TT5 on Sep 13, 2007 12:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
we have a new SUPER POWER in town, altough a little modest:)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And America...
Posted by: TT5 on Sep 13, 2007 12:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is wasting whats left of it's fire power on secondary targets

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: And America... Posted by: Iconoclast421
Who is this 'Serge in Iraq' they keep talking about?
Posted by: vox persona on Sep 13, 2007 12:51 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's face it, the damage was done as soon as our boy king marched us into the uranium depleted sands of Iraq. He thought he was 'projecting strength' in his 'crusade' (his word), but actually showed the weakness of impatience as he played right into the hands of jihadists and other radical elements in the region. They needed a failed state to thrive, and voila, here comes our Decider-in-Chief and his warmaking profiteering machine to the rescue. Democracy must first come from within, and cannot be imposed into a Muslim tribal country contrived by imperial Western powers. My heart goes out to the inhabitants of the region, people are people everywhere, but some systems and 'freedoms' have to develop from the roots up. His 'last resort' rheyoric was a lie from the beginning, how does he (they) sleep at night? At the cost of over 3760 of our finest already shipped back in body bags, I would love to be a fly on that wall as W explains to Christ why his preemptive doctrine was more important than the teaching 'Blessed are the peacemakers'. Using the ultra-conservative lifespan estimate of 65 years, and with most of our fallen soldiers still having 40 or more years left on their actuarial life, perfect karma would be if Bush had to experience, in real time (as if on a movie screen) every unlived moment of those who died because of his aggressive and imperial action. All the experiences missed, the babies born, the graduations, birthdays, weddings, lifetime after lifetime of lives cut short. That would keep his spirit consciousness busy for several hundred thousand years.
What a waste....and for what?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's supposed to get bad.
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Sep 13, 2007 8:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In a nutshell, if things don't get worse in Iraq,then our war industries don't make any money. Make no mistake,this war is big business. At billions of dollars a month,it's paying off better than WW2,Korea and Vietnam combined. Too bad,there's a better,more necessary need for the money.......OUR CHILDREN.
How can you raise a well balanced,loving,caring,compassionate child in a Nation that glorifies violence? Think not,just look at TV. If you have movie channels just look at how many flicks are violent. I watched for 1 day and never found one film that was'nt violent. The best I could find was 'Mild Violence'.
There's 300 million of us in America. There's about a million of us that enjoy violence. Most of them hold public office.
If we're going to have any kind of World that's worth living in,then we have to keep these violence prone ninnies out of Office,out of power. The time has come to lay open the wounds and see that we've created an infection that's meant to get worse,because we're bumbling doctors extracting money out of a dumb paitent. Let's put someone in office that wants to 'Advance Humanity' and not a war profiteer.
Draft Jeffrey7 for Prez.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Petraeus's El Salvador plan for Iraq
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Sep 13, 2007 8:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From DN, Sept 11:

"RICK ROWLEY: Well, when General Petraeus says that they're merely applauding these tribes from the sidelines, he's lying. I mean, while we were embedded with the Americans, we saw American military commanders hand wads of cash to tribal militias. And when he says that they are facilitating their integration into the country’s security forces, what he means is they're pressuring Iraq's government to incorporate these militias wholesale into the police forces.

Now, this is quite similar to what happened in El Salvador, when US-funded death squads went on a rampage, killing thousands of civilians and instituting a reign of terror in that country.

"RICK ROWLEY: Well, it's been widely reported that these are former insurgents who were fighting Americans in the past. And that, you know, is troubling for American soldiers. But the far more troubling issue for Iraq is that many of these groups are war criminals who are responsible for sectarian cleansing in the region.

That looks like the Salvador Option, but now it seems that the US is involved in setting up both Shia and Sunni death squads.

...it's hardly surprising that some Pentagon and White House officials are now talking openly about resurrecting the "Salvador Option" in Iraq—that is, to create "hit squads" composed of Kurdish and Shi'a paramilitaries to seek out and kill armed dissidents as well as non-violent sympathizers, just as the U.S. indirectly mobilized and financed death squads throughout Central America two decades ago.

Now, the propaganda is being poured on ever so thickly by the US Army. It is indeed an effort to create Disneyland cartoon characters for the US corporate press to promote:

"CPT. MARTIN WOHLGEMUTH: Sattar Abu Risha, a living legacy in his own right. He's probably better known as Lawrence of Arabia to the Americans. His legacy is what allowed this to happen in a lot of different places. And it’s happening in Amiriya, they've got freedom fighters."

First, the language - "freedom fighters" is identical to that used to describe the US-funded death squads in Central America as well as the mujihedeen in Afghanistan - you know, the people who then went on to form Al Queda. Second, the sheik was just assassinated. Hard to spin that into a positive event, isn't it?

Petraeus - the guy is worse than Rumsfeld. See this article on him: ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=39235

"Fallon told Petraeus that he considered him to be "an ass-kissing little chickenshit" and added, "I hate people like that", the sources say. That remark reportedly came after Petraeus began the meeting by making remarks that Fallon interpreted as trying to ingratiate himself with a superior. . .

. . .The policy context of Fallon's extraordinarily abrasive treatment of his subordinate was Petraeus's agreement in February to serve as front man for the George W. Bush administration's effort to sell its policy of increasing U.S. troop strength in Iraq to Congress."


He's nothing but Rumsfeld in makeup.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lets Move On, We All know what this is about
Posted by: Missing Piece on Sep 13, 2007 10:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Iraq is another vietnam except that it has the worlds last remaining oil. We are there till the oil is gone gaurented. Our Military has to be there strategicly speaking. The best way to secure it is to have the Iraq's fighting amongst themselves and that is exactly what they are doing. If a country is willing to commit false flag operations on its own soil its not a big stretch to think it may be blowing up mosques overseas.

Now that we agree on this, lets talk about what you and I can do to get off of oil. Earth homes with solar, wind and electric cars that can put energy back into grid as well. If you want to support the troops this is what needs done.

You might as well do it now before its too late. Bush & Cheney both have homes off the grid.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

U.S. Strategic Interest in Iraq left Undefended?
Posted by: cognitorex on Sep 13, 2007 11:48 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We and the Brits have left the oil rich part of Iraq and its vital international port for shipments, i.e. the most important part of Iraq, to Iranian influenced warring bands of Shiites.
Elsewhere our troops are attacked one hundred and seventy five times a day.
(177.8 attacks a day on troops Reuters 7.20.07)

What in the holy christ are we exactly doing there? Defending the contractors in non National Interest territory???

If we're staying in Iraq in such force to defend the Emerald Palace when we've already lost control over most areas of strategic interest, that's like defending your ego when you're in quicksand. Or like getting a boob job with the last of your cash when the Doc says you've got cancer.
cognitorex blogspot

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Worse?
Posted by: Col. Jackleg on Sep 13, 2007 11:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Iraq is a shining light whose luminosity covers the world in the glory of a free democracy dedicated to the well-being of its beloved masses. It must be so, George W. Asshole says it is.....huh? The author says no way, things are bad and getting wrose since we introduced freedom at gunpoint in Iraq. Worse than what? You know, we could be killing innocent elders, women and children while we deliver freedom to the thankless Iraqis.....ouch! God or Allah be praised, I guess.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Start with our fore-bearers (partially)
Posted by: talkville on Sep 15, 2007 7:37 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr Churchill and Co. actually DREW Iraq. Created it from smoke and from mirrors.

"East is East and West is West and never the 'twain shall meet" I remember hearing sometime, somewhere when I was but a baby of the baby boom.

Trade is ok and great even; all over the world. And yet, when Mr West decides to trade, he wants to govern-- and he occupies, to MAKE trade happen and according to rules drawn out by Smith, Schmitt, Hayek, etc. etc. And Mr USA undertakes to identify with Mr West (with the meek submission of Mr Ex-U.K. and Mr Europe and thus to tell Mr East that T.I.N.A. as Reagan and Thatcher spoke to bring us to the present.

The Hubris (genuine Greek version and very Old) and the Tragedy (very old Greek and very Old) is OURS. If there are any Citizens in any Polis-es left, it needs to be considered, urgently. We are in a forced Imperial Age -- and Caesar is an Idiot, and Idiots to NECESSARILY follow. This begins our 21st Century, and humans are less, not more, of what we were. Neither a god or gods or aliens will extricate us from these acts; only humans can become more human.

PNAC was a project for a "new" American Century. They failed miserably and involved our entire globe. Nothing now is new, it's only old and used--perhaps re-packaged. This is the Best they offered-- Iraq. Look there and look at our future, if one can look past our present... . Here and there, I see only Zealots and Myth.

No Magic makes a stone be stoned -- but the Priest can if one only follows his Canon. The Priest lives well, ON us. Even Science and DNA can make us Believe. Iraq is application of a Wish not a Fact. The West (re-presented by the USA) is the Wish-er; Iraq the 1st Wish-ee. And East is East and West is West and the Twain has been made to wreck. Dangerous and very, very dark times indeed! It's time to meet ourselves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]