Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

War on Iraq

Iraq Vets Facing a New Gulf War Syndrome?

By Carla McClain, Arizona Daily Star. Posted August 29, 2007.


Some young men and women who survived the war are now facing a death sentence from cancer. Is it the depleted uranium?
Advertisement

After serving in Vietnam nearly 40 years ago — and receiving the Bronze Star for it — the Tucson soldier was called back to active duty in Iraq.

While there, he awoke one morning with a sore throat. Eighteen months later, Army Sgt. James Lauderdale was dead, of a bizarrely aggressive cancer rarely seen by the doctors who tried to treat it.

As a result, his stunned and heartbroken family has joined growing ranks of sickened and dying Iraq war vets and their families who believe exposures to toxic poisons in the war zone are behind their illnesses — mostly cancers, striking the young, taking them down with alarming speed.

The number of these cancers remains undisclosed, with military officials citing patient privacy issues, as well as lack of evidence the cases are linked to conditions in the war zone. The U.S. Congress has ordered a probe of suspect toxins and may soon begin widespread testing of our armed forces.

"He got so sick, so fast"

Jim Lauderdale was 58 when his National Guard unit was deployed to the Iraq-Kuwait border, where he helped transport arriving soldiers and Marines into combat areas.

He was a strong man, say relatives, who can't remember him ever missing a day of work for illness. And he developed a cancer of the mouth, which overwhelmingly strikes smokers, drinkers and tobacco chewers. He was none of those.

"Jim's doctors didn't know why he would get this kind of cancer — they had no answers for us," said his wife, Dixie.

"He got so sick, so fast. We really think it had to be something he was exposed to over there. So many of the soldiers we met with cancer at Walter Reed (Army Medical Center) complained about the polluted air they lived in, the brown water they had to use, the dust they breathed from exploded munitions. It was very toxic."

As a mining engineer, Lauderdale knew exactly what it meant when he saw the thick black smoke pouring nonstop out of the smokestacks that line the Iraq/Kuwait border area where he was stationed for three months in 2005.

"He wrote to me that everyone was complaining about their stinging eyes and sore throats and headaches," Dixie said. "For Jim to say something like that, to complain, was very unusual.

"One of the mothers on the cancer ward had pictures of her son bathing in the brown water," she said. "He died of kidney cancer."

Stationed in roughly the same area as Lauderdale, yet another soldier — now fighting terminal colon cancer — described the scene there, of oil refineries, a cement factory, a chlorine factory and a sulfuric acid factory, all spewing unfiltered and uncontrolled substances into the air.

"One day, we were walking toward the port and they had sulfuric acid exploding out of the stacks. We were covered with it, everything was burning on us, and we had to turn around and get to the medics," said Army Staff Sgt. Frank Valentin, 35.

Not long after, he developed intense rectal pain, which doctors told him for months was hemorrhoids. Finally diagnosed with aggressive colorectal cancer — requiring extensive surgery, resulting in a colostomy bag — he was given fewer than two years to live by his Walter Reed physicians.

He is now a couple of months past that death sentence, but his chemo drugs are starting to fail, and the cancer is eating into his liver and lungs. He spends his days with his wife and three children at their Florida home.

"I don't know how much time I have," he said.

Suspect: depleted uranium

None of these soldiers know for sure what's killing them. But they suspect it's a cascade of multiple toxic exposures, coupled with the intense stress of daily life in a war zone weakening their immune systems.

"There's so much pollution from so many sources, your body can't fight what's coming at it," Valentin said. "And you don't eat well or sleep well, ever. That weakens you, too. There's no chance to gather your strength. These are kids 19, 20 and 21 getting all kinds of cancers. The Walter Reed cancer ward is packed full with them."

The prime suspect in all this, in the minds of many victims — and some scientists — is what's known as depleted uranium — the radioactive chemical prized by the military for its ability to penetrate armored vehicles. When munitions explode, the substance hits the air as fine dust, easily inhaled.

Last month, the Iraqi environment minister blamed the tons of the chemical dropped during the war's "shock and awe" campaign for a surge of cancer cases across the country.

However, the Pentagon and U.S. State Department strongly deny this, citing four studies, including one by the World Health Organization, that found levels in war zones not harmful to civilians or soldiers. A U.N. Environmental Program study concurs, but only if spent munitions are cleared away.

Returning solders have said that isn't happening.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: du, depleted uranium, healthcare, iraq

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from War on Iraq! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
Sorry, this comment has been removed from the system.
This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
Have you visited a veteran's hospital lately?
Posted by: Ellie1 on Aug 30, 2007 11:28 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The number of young patients has increased greatly, and many are there for mental and emotional reasons, which will linger long after the scars have faded. I remember watching one young man, curled up almost into a fetal position on a couch, waiting to see a doctor or therapist. The medical specialists are marvelous but overworked and overwhelmed. The effects of Bushit's disaster will linger for decades. There were still men at that hospital being treated for effects of Vietnam, and I spoke to a woman whose husband had died from Agent Orange. We will be dealing with this war for decades. I just hope I live longer than George Bushit-the only reason I would ever go to Texas is to spit on his grave. He and his cronies are mass murderers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

its staggering... heartbreakingly awful
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Sep 3, 2007 1:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
how incredibly EVIL all of this is...

simply evil.

callous, vicious, gargantuan inhumanity...

such *utter* destruction...

it takes the breath away...

at least American Troops have a vague approximation of healthcare... at least enough to keep them *fighting*...

while the Corporate HOSTAGE TAKING for the petroleum PSAs leaves the Iraqi peoples to stew in that toxic brine...

...along with our presumed 'heroes' that we simply kill more slowly...

of course, what we leave *there* doesn't stay there... it filters around the World... crippling, caustically chewing uponon everyone it touches...

...much like War, itself.


Intergenerational Transmission of Trauma: from Holocaust to Palestine, effects of long-term PTSD

Thoughts on: "Negative Statistics UnderReported by US Military: "Army’s High Suicide Rate Suggests Administration Is Understating Cases Of PTSD""

Child Abuse Yields Thousands of Deaths - Obituary: Saddam Hussein

Spread Love...
... but wear the Glove!



BlueBerry Pick'n
can be found @
ThisCanadian ~~~

We, two, form a Multitude ~ Ovid.
~~~
"Silent Freedom is Freedom Silenced"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Blame crude oil, not DU
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Sep 3, 2007 10:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Carla McClain's article did identify some of the real causes of
cancer:
1. [T]hick black smoke pouring nonstop out of the smokestacks
that line the Iraq/Kuwait border
2. [T]he polluted air they lived in, the brown water they had to
use, the dust they breathed
3. [O]il refineries, a cement factory, a chlorine factory and a
sulfuric acid factory, all spewing unfiltered and uncontrolled
substances into the air
4. "One day, we were walking toward the port and they had
sulfuric acid exploding out of the stacks. We were covered with it,
everything was burning on us, and we had to turn around and get
to the medics,"
Missed factors:
1. BENZENE from the crude oil. Benzene is the single most
likely cause of cancer until proven otherwise.
2. I don't know what is in the smoke from crude oil fires, but I
suspect that there could be additional toxic substances caused by
partial burning.

Clearly if the soldiers were sprayed with sulfuric acid, the
environment there is so polluted and so hostile that it isn't a fit
place for people. The problem is the lack of environmental
regulation of local industry and burning oil wells. Depleted
Uranium [DU] was available by mail order in 1981. DU is safe
to handle but not to ingest.
The soldiers and civilians who work for the army do not
conspire to injure soldiers. The soldiers and civilians who work
for the army do everything they can to make war as survivable as
possible for our soldiers. Our soldiers are often the children of
Department of the Army civilians. We use depleted uranium
ammunition because depleted uranium ammunition greatly
enhances our soldiers' chances of winning the war and surviving.
There is nothing else that works as well as DU ammunition in
tank vs tank battles.
DU is a chemical poison if you ingest it, but natural background
radiation is far greater than soldiers get from handling DU rounds.
Natural background radiation has always been there. More
information on background radiation is available at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Background_radiation
and:
http://www.unscear.org/unscear/en/publications/2000_1.html

Soldiers should be advised to wear their gas masks and possibly
MOPP4 chemical protection suits when encountering dangerous
chemical environments of all types. The super-dusty
environment of the middle east was new to the army as of
Operation Desert Shield. We are still learning how to deal with
powder fine dusts. Since their gas mask filters were not designed
for industrial hazards, the filters may have to be replaced often
and may not be optimal for industrial hazards. People should not
allow crude oil to remain on their skin. Benzene from the crude
oil will soak through the skin and cause cancer. Soldiers should
go around rather than through puddles of crude oil. The army has
water purification equipment that should be used to prevent
having to use polluted water.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Blame crude oil, not DU Posted by: Justwayne
» RE: tank vs tank Posted by: AsteroidMiner
how bleak a picture this is
Posted by: Suzon on Sep 4, 2007 2:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
for all concerned.

Except of course for the instigators, at least theoretically and relatively safe from harm.

Reminds me of a Bible verse that is most apt: Jesus wept.

Hey, Bush, Cheny et al, what do you say to that?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And what about vaccines?
Posted by: Ruby on Sep 4, 2007 3:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why no mention of the connection between the dangerous anthrax and smallpox vaccines and GWS type diseases?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]