Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

War on Iraq

Backspin for War: CNN Guilty of Caving to the Pentagon?

By Norman Solomon, AlterNet. Posted August 16, 2007.


A new film, War Made Easy, reveals how the man in charge of CNN's news operation before the Iraq War kowtowed to the Pentagon. So what does he have to say for himself now?
Advertisement

The man who ran CNN's news operation during the invasion of Iraq is now doing damage control in response to a new documentary's evidence that he kowtowed to the Pentagon on behalf of the cable network. His current denial says a lot about how "liberal media" outlets remain deeply embedded in the mindsets of pro-military conformity.

Days ago, the former CNN executive publicly defended himself against a portion of the "War Made Easy" film (based on my book of the same name) that has drawn much comment from viewers since the documentary's release earlier this summer.

As Inter Press Service reported, the movie shows "a news clip of Eason Jordan, a CNN News chief executive who, in an interview with CNN, boasts of the network's cadre of professional 'military experts.' In fact, CNN's retired military generals turned war analysts were so good, Eason said, that they had all been vetted and approved by the U.S. government."

Inter Press called the vetting-and-approval process "shocking" -- and added that "in a country revered for its freedom of speech and unfettered press, Eason's comments would infuriate any veteran reporter who upholds the most basic and important tenet of the journalistic profession: independence."

But Eason Jordan doesn't want us to see it that way. And he has now fired back via an article in IraqSlogger, which calls itself "the world's premier Iraq-focused Web site." Jordan runs that Web site.

The journalist who wrote the Aug. 14 article, Christina Davidson, was in an awkward spot: "War Made Easy" directly criticizes her boss, and it was the subject of the article.

Davidson's only assessment of the film that wasn't favorable had to do with its criticisms of Jordan. "While there's no doubt that journalistic laziness contributed to the uncritical re-broadcasting of the Bush administration's official line," she wrote, "Solomon takes it a little too far in trying to make the case that all of the cable networks were actively complicit in promoting the war. Solomon bases his reasoning primarily on one choice quote from Eason Jordan, former CNN news chief and current CEO of IraqSlogger's parent company, Praedict."

In fact, the film provides a wide range of evidence that "all of the cable networks were actively complicit in promoting the war" -- the result of chronic biases rather than "journalistic laziness."

And CNN, like the rest of the cable news operations, comes in for plenty of tough scrutiny in the documentary. As the magazine Variety noted in a review of "War Made Easy" a few days ago, "Fox News is predictably bashed here, but supposedly neutral CNN gets it even harder."

CNN is among the news outlets at the core of the myth of "the liberal media" -- perpetuated, in part, by the fact that people are often overly impressed by the significance of rhetorical attacks on some media organizations by more conservative outlets. (Before his resignation from CNN in 2005, Eason Jordan was himself subjected to denunciations from the right -- for allegedly skewing news coverage to curry favor with the Baghdad government during Saddam's rule and, after the invasion, for reportedly stating that U.S. troops had targeted some journalists in Iraq.) But antipathy from right-wing pundits is hardly an indication of journalistic independence.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: iraq war, cnn

The new documentary film "War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death," based on Norman Solomon's book of the same title, is now available on DVD. For information about the full-length movie, produced by the Media Education Foundation and and narrated by Sean Penn, go to: www.WarMadeEasyTheMovie.org.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from War on Iraq! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
What's new about the lies
Posted by: Krain61 on Aug 17, 2007 6:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How long has it been since we had honest news?
They tell us only what they want us to know and
nothing more. Real stories are never covered and
stupid shit like Anna N Smith or who got a hair cut or
went to rehab or got a dui.Nothing worth writing about
or reading about. Now if they wanted they could start
a gallop poll on how many Americans would like to see
Bush and company kicked out. Shit that would boost
there ratings!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CNN Liberal? Do tell!
Posted by: Basenjis on Aug 18, 2007 3:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I sent several e-mails to CNN a few months ago complaining about their obvious conservative bent. Finally after a bland, almost somnambulistic performance by Wolfe Blitzer followed by a particularly transparent hour of Paula Zahn's during the hideous Lebanon massacre, I discovered Keith Olbermann. I haven't turned on Paula since and rarely watch CNN. If I want bias, I'll turn on Fox. They do it better.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: CNN Liberal? Do tell! Posted by: pete ess
Thank you for resisting what must have been an itch to blast.
Posted by: Sojourner on Aug 18, 2007 7:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I find the evidence convincing that CNN preferred being propagandists for the war effort. I admire Solomon's self-control. When the explanations offered by Jordan are such patent excuses, my temptation would have been to ridicule them.

The carefully stated list of evidence is more persuasive. I shall look for the showing of the film.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

All Corporate News Networks Lie
Posted by: bcgirl125 on Aug 18, 2007 8:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And it's not just sleazy lies of commission, but much more important lies of omission. What they DON'T cover is more important than the issues they do cover, and how they portray them. When will we ever see a 9/11 truther presented as anything but a fringe kook, and where is the investigation of the massive vote fraud in the last 2 elections? Nobody ever mentions the role of the Federal Reserve and its constantly inflating fiat money in the ongoing collapse of our debt-bubble based economy, either.

The grand underpinnings of all the corruption afflicting society are absolutely taboo for any discussion. The purpose of the mainstream media is to keep all the serfs "onboard" so that they will continue to work and participate in this rickety artificial creation called American society, and not rebel en masse and bring it down.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Somebody's Slow At Seeing Things
Posted by: joseph_b26 on Aug 18, 2007 9:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have been posting and blogging about the conservative bias for at least a year or more. From reading many of the comments for this story, others have been also letting the world know how bias CNN, MSNBC have become.

When I try to speak of CSPAN's Washington Journal's conservative bias, everyone and their mother jump to the program's defense. Nevertheless, there is a large right wing slant of cabal news that has given the conservatives a huge edge. Now the Republicans have the Executive Branch, the Judicial Branch, and the unofficial Media Branch of power institutions. It is a power advantage we have one chance to even out in the next election.

Our political system is in need of checks and balance. Currently, this one sided power disadvantage has created a crisis in our government. The conservatives , through bad politics, corruption and sex scandals have become very unpopular with the American people. Although they have released a very complex strategy to counter their decline in public confidence, they need to do something about the up and coming losses for the 2008 elections. Their power advantage can be whipped out should the Democrats grab a veto proof congress and senate as well as the presidency. The Republicans are running from Bush and pulling out all markers. They need to slow the momentum of the Democrats.

Here is an example of how the Washington Post tried to help the Bush administration frame the run up to the up and coming Iranian War after White House officials designated the Revolutionary Guard global terrorist:

"The decision follows congressional pressure on the administration to toughen its stance against Tehran, as well as U.S. frustration with the ineffectiveness of U.N. resolutions against Iran's nuclear program, officials said."

The Post is trying to note the Democratic congress is responsible for the aggressive stance. By default, we are in a war with Iran because we are in a war against terror. The point here is not only does the broadcast media have allegiances with the right, the paper media also tends to promote conservative ideologies.

I cannot stress how important the next election is for balance alone. If we don't stop the current drive for war, war and more war, we will be fighting for next 20 years, which is a reality I cannot live with.

Joseph

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Try a brand-new station for your TV news
Posted by: pete ess on Aug 20, 2007 11:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Do yourselves a favour: Watch Al Jazeera TV news for a while. I have, and I find it refreshing that ANYTHING is open to question or analysis. No "holy cows", no "embedded" nonsense, no Anna Nicole Smith.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]