Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

War on Iraq

The Terror America Wrought

By Robert Scheer, Truthdig. Posted August 8, 2007.


What can we learn by recalling that the week that terrorists targeted schoolchildren in Iraq, is the 62nd anniversary of the U.S. attack on Japan that killed thousands of children?
Advertisement

During a week of mayhem in Iraq, in which terrorists have rightly been condemned for targeting schoolchildren, it is sobering to recall that this week is also the 62nd anniversary of a U.S. attack that deliberately took the lives of thousands of children on their way to school in the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

As noted in the Strategic Bombing Survey conducted at President Harry Truman's request, when the bomb hit Hiroshima on April 6, 1945, "nearly all the school children ... were at work in the open," to be exploded, irradiated or incinerated in the perfect firestorm that the planners back at the University of California-run Los Alamos lab had envisioned for the bomb's maximum psychological impact.

The terror plot worked all too well, as Hiroshima's Mayor Tadatoshi Akiba recalled this week: "That fateful summer, 8:15 a.m. The roar of a B-29 breaks the morning calm. A parachute opens in the blue sky. Then suddenly, a flash, an enormous blast -- silence -- hell on Earth. The eyes of young girls watching the parachute were melted. Their faces became giant charred blisters. The skin of people seeking help dangled from their fingernails. ... Others died when their eyeballs and internal organs burst from their bodies -- Hiroshima was a hell where those who somehow survived envied the dead."

Like most of the others killed by the two American bombs, neither the children nor the adults had any role in Japan's decision to go to war, but they were picked as the target instead of an isolated but fortified military base whose antiaircraft fire posed a higher risk. The target preferred by U.S. atomic scientists -- a patch in the ocean or unpopulated terrain -- was rejected, because the effect of hundreds of thousands of civilians dying would be all the more dramatic.

The victims in Hiroshima and Nagasaki were available soft targets, much like the children playing in Iraq, suddenly caught in the crossfire of battles waged beyond their control.

In "White Light/Black Rain," a devastating HBO documentary released this week, there is an interview with the sole survivor of a Japanese elementary school of 620 students. The murder of the other 619, and the 370,000 overall deaths attributed to the bombings, 85 percent of which were civilian deaths, has never compelled a widespread examination of the "end justifies the means" morality of our own state-sanctioned acts of terror.

Indeed, the horrifying footage taken by Japanese and American cameramen soon after the devastation, and shown in the HBO film, was long kept secret by the U.S. government for fear that an informed American public might question this nation's incipient nuclear arms race.

Just exactly what distinguishes the United States' use of the ever-so-cutely-named "Fat Man" and "Little Boy" atomic bombs on cities in Japan from the car bombs of Baghdad or the planes that smashed into the World Trade Center? To even raise the question, as was found in one recent university case, can be a career-ending move.

Of course, we had our justifications, as terrorists always do. Truman defended his decision to drop the atomic bombs on civilians over the objection of leading atomic scientists on the grounds that it was a necessary military action to save lives by forcing a quick Japanese surrender. He insisted on that imperative despite the objections of top military figures, including Gen. Dwight Eisenhower, who contended that the war would end quickly without dropping the bomb.

The subsequent release of formerly secret documents makes a hash of Truman's rationalization. His White House was fully informed that the Japanese were on the verge of collapse, and their surrender was made all the more likely by the Soviets' imminent entry into the fight.

At most, the Japanese were asking for the face-saving gesture of retaining their emperor, and even that modest demand would likely have been abandoned with the shift of massive numbers of Allied troops and firepower from the battlefront of a defeated Germany to a confrontation with its deeply wounded Asian ally.

Instead, the U.S. played midwife to the birth of the nuclear monster, the ultimate terrorist weapon that presents a continuing and growing threat to the survival of human life on Earth.

This is a lesson to be pondered at a time when President Bush plays power games with a nuclear-equipped Russia while coddling Pakistan, the main proliferator of nuclear weapons to rogue regimes, and Congress authorizes an expansion of the U.S. nuclear program to better fight the war on terror by "improving" the ultimate weapon of terror, which the U.S. alone stands guilty of using.

More links:

For a fuller explanation of the suppression of footage taken shortly after the Hiroshima and Nagasaki attacks, follow this link.

Click here to go to HBO's site for "White Light/Black Rain."

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: nagasaki, hiroshima, nuclear weapons, japan, iraq

Robert Scheer is the co-author of The Five Biggest Lies Bush Told Us About Iraq. See more of Robert Scheer at TruthDig.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from War on Iraq! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
A dem drops the bomb - a repub shows constraint!
Posted by: Conservasaurus on Aug 8, 2007 7:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
aint that a twist!

Interesting article but very shallow in terms of events and idelogy of both parties .. The obvious question is why would/should the US be concerned about Japanese children when the Japanese were not - the horrible conclusion to the war the Japan brought upon themselves was due mainly to their own conduct in the war.. fighting to the death in every campaign - their brutal torture and rape was legendary.

Absent of those feeling and impressions during that perior, one cannot look reasonably upon the actions of America to end the war in a way that would save untold thousands of US lives.. I doubt anyone at that time was really concerned about Japanese lives.

As for the comment that all Japan wanted was to keep their emperor, that is absolutely wrong.. the night before the surrender was to be signed, there was almost an assination and revolt by top military officers.. Japanese did not surrender..ever.. We could have starved them..and they would still not surrender - They wanted a conditional treaty..to save face..not just to keep their emperor!

Truman's decision, while a hard one, was the logical one given the times!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the state terrorists misdirect our attention to individual terrorists
Posted by: Suzon on Aug 9, 2007 4:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
lest it be noticed that state terrorism can inflict far more human suffering. Did the "Shock and Awe" bombing of Baghdad make a single American safer?

Why do we "normalize" state terrorism? My guess is that we have a psychological need to believe that those who have power over us are both good and wise. It is vital that we understand this human weakness in order to be on guard against it.

Nations are artificial constructs. Einstein said, "Forget everything else and remember your humanity".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hiroshima, Nagasaki, 9/11 and Jesus Christ!
Posted by: wawa on Aug 9, 2007 5:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a child, I could not comprehend how my country could cold bloodedly target and murder an estimated 110,000 Japanese citizens and severely injure another 130,000 innocent civilians in order to 'save' American lives.

As an adult, I am aggrieved that my government has still not repented for their terrorism nor expressed public sorrow for the lives that were vaporized and devastated in 1945, when by 1950, another 230,000 innocent Japanese had died from injuries or radiation poisoning.

If THAT DAY, we call 9/11 taught us anything, it should be that America's nuclear arsenal cannot keep us safe or secure from the actions of a few violent mad men who target and murder innocent ones.


2,000 years ago, a social justice, radical revolutionary Palestinian devout Jewish road warrior and prophet rose up and challenged the job security of the corrupt Temple by teaching the people that they did not have to pay the high priests for ritual baths or to sacrifice livestock to be OK with God; for God already loved them just as they were; sinners, outcasts, diseased, cripples, poor and oppressed common folk, widows, orphans and prisoners enduring under military occupation.

2,000 years ago the Roman Occupying Forces routinely crucified any agitator for disturbing the status quo of the elite. A particular social justice, radical revolutionary Palestinian devout Jewish road warrior and prophet named Jesus, issued a political statement and is quoted in Mark's Gospel, "If any want to be my followers, let them deny themselves and take up their cross and follow me."-Mark 8:34.

2,000 years ago, "the cross…was neither a religious icon nor metaphor for personal anguish or humility. It had only one meaning: that terrible form of capitol punishment reserved by imperial Rome for political dissenters. The cross was a common sight in the revolutionary Palestine of Mark's time; in this recruiting call, the disciple is invited to reckon with the consequences facing those who dare to challenge the hegemony of imperial Rome."-Ched Myers, Sojourners Magazine , August 2007, page 28.

In America, we have a lot of religion about Jesus, but not much of the religion Jesus actually taught...


THE REST:
WAWA BLOG August 5, 2007
http://www.wearewideawake.org/



Eileen Fleming, Reporter and Editor http://www.wearewideawake.org/
Author "Keep Hope Alive" and "Memoirs of a Nice Irish American Girl's' Life in Occupied Territory"
Producer "30 Minutes With Vanunu."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What we can learn is that to win a war you pull out all the stops
Posted by: bestofthebest on Aug 9, 2007 8:56 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We won WWII because we did what was necessary and that was to smash the enemy. This was done with Democrats in office. Now we have trouble winning anything because the rules of engagement have so many restrictions put on by Democrats that have swung to the left. Liberalism has changed the rules of engagement. If this Administration wasn't so hamstrung we would have won and been out of Iraq along time ago.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

American leaders knew Japan was ready to surrender
Posted by: lrrysgl on Aug 9, 2007 11:07 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Historian Howard Zinn states in the Nation magazine (8/2000): “The justification for dropping the bomb was that a US invasion of Japan would have resulted in the death of tens of thousands, perhaps hundreds of thousands, but “even official projections for the number of casualties in an invasion did not go beyond 46,000.”

Howard Zinn notes the Japanese were ready to surrender, and “American military leaders knew that.” Secretary of War Henry Stimson, before the bomb was dropped, told General Eisenhower that ‘Japan was already defeated and that dropping the bomb was completely unnecessary.’”

Before the bomb was dropped, the Japanese Supreme War Council authorized Foreign Minister Sato to approach the Soviet Union to mediate an end to the war. Togo sent a telegram to Sato stating: “Unconditional surrender is the only obstacle to peace. It is his Majesty’s heart’s desire to see the swift termination of the war.”

The United States knew about the telegram because it had broken the Japanese code early in the war.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: This is just so WRONG Posted by: bestofthebest
A few bridges may get repaired after the Minnesota calamity.
Posted by: Sojourner on Aug 9, 2007 12:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Right, there's no justification for dropping atomic bombs, as there's no justification for the GOP in MN vetoing highway repairs.

The American Way is to close the barn door after the horses are gone. We know that. Telling us that again and again is necessary but not sufficient.

Why did we have to use the bomb before we believed it? Why do citizens fight teaching evolution in the schools? Why do some people still think race matters?

So long as we cannot tell the difference between denial and recognition, we govern ourselves foolishly. Doing the right thing is harder than denial.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wrong to Drop Atomic Bombs on Japan
Posted by: Peacemaker on Aug 10, 2007 3:31 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One of the worst happenings in the history of humankind was the invention of nuclear bombs. Equally horrible was America's dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan, in 1945. The whole world knows America set the precedent of using nuclear weapons on another nation. I hope I am wrong, but it is almost a certainty that some evil force will one day attack America with nuclear weapons. The huge stockpile of weapons the United States and the former Soviet Union built up is shameful. Over the years, the trillions of dollars they spent on nuclear weapons could have been used to feed a hungry world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How does this go on?
Posted by: EKSwitaj on Aug 10, 2007 4:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Perhaps the greatest tragedy of Hiroshima and Nagasaki is that the horrors enacted on the people of these cities did not put a stop to acts of state terrorism. The Hiroshima Peace Memorial Museum sells a book about the effects of depleted uranium on the children of Iraq.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hindsight is far from 20/20
Posted by: gradioc on Aug 10, 2007 5:15 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Over 400,000 American GI's had already come home in boxes, roughly 10,000 a month over the course of the US involvement. The total number of dead in Asia at the hands of the Japanese is incalculable, but millions upon more millions in China, Burma, Indochina, Korea, The Phillipines. I grieve for the innocent Japanese who died, as I grieve for all who died, but I do not blame Truman for ending it. I blame the Japanese and German governments for beginning it. To sit in your easy chair and condemn Truman for being a war leader when his nation was at war is the epitome of arrogance.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hindsight is far from 20/20 Posted by: mountainmama
To Nuke Or Not To Nuke: As the Democratic Candidates the question!
Posted by: michaelo on Aug 10, 2007 6:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As noted in my blog this date ---
linked text

the questions here are simple: What is wrong with denouncing the use of nuclear weapons? Do you or do you not plan to use nuclear weapons?

We don’t know because these “contenders” for the US Presidency are moral cowards or worse, war mongers.

As seen in the preceding photographs (in my blog) taken after the nuclear terror visited upon Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 the US was the first nation to use nuclear terror weapons – either against military or civilian targets.

President Bill Clinton continued the use of nuclear weapons (the so-called “depleted uranium” block buster bombs) in Kosovo through the United Nations action in the early 190’s; Presidents George Bush Senior and Junior continued there use in Iraq and Afghanistan and the US ally, Israel, used them in its war in Lebanon.

Please see complete article via the link

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Depleted uranium Posted by: AsteroidMiner
American terrorists
Posted by: mountainmama on Aug 10, 2007 8:09 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was born 6 days after D Day, and am 63 years old. I was forced to do the idiotic "duck and cover" routine on a regular basis. We didn't have storm/tornado drills, we had air raid drills in school. From the first time I knew and understood what happened with the bombing of Japan, I was moved so deeply that I became "anti-war" from grade school age on. It haunted me. But more then that it embarrassed me to be an American and went against everything I was taught. A nation that was supposed to be "God-fearing" encouraged war and hatred. I learned a lot as a child. I learned rampant hypocracy, biogry and violence are what made up (makes up) a large majority of America. And this is terribly sad. It appears we will never learn.

He who claims we have "evolved" as a nation, lives with his head in the sand and is doomed to die violently!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It is the American way
Posted by: Socrates on Aug 11, 2007 1:51 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The US' holocaust has been continuous since the very beginning. Native Americans, Phillipines, Korea, Viet Nam, Angola, Laos, Cambodia, Haiti, Iraq, Iran, Indonesia, Dresden, Greece, Spain, Diego Garcia, Mexico, the African slave trade, Jim Crow and the strange fruit trees with black bodies swinging. So horrific as it may be, it is par for the course of the US' foundation while dressed to look like something noble.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It is the American way Posted by: Oralloy
Wg=hat if it had not been dropped?
Posted by: vertical on Aug 12, 2007 1:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What if we had not dropped those bombs? Nuclear arms would still have been developed, but we would never have known the horror of their use. Not knowing might have lead us to s hooting war with the USSR, and the Earth would have been destroyed!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Major Errors in the Article
Posted by: Oralloy on Aug 30, 2007 10:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article contains numerous errors.

First, it incorrectly portrays the cities as if the were purely civilian targets. In fact, Hiroshima was a major military center, with the most important military headquarters of the war, and with tens of thousands of soldiers. Nagasaki was an important center of arms manufacturing.

Second, it inexplicitly doubles the number of people killed. There aren't any reliable estimates that go anywhere near the number of deaths claimed in the article.

The article incorrectly labels these attacks as terrorism, which is a covert attack against civilians. The A-bombs were not covert, and were not targeted at civilians. This also answers its question about how the WTC attack differs -- it *was* aimed at civilians.

The claim that Truman insisted on the bombings over the objections of his advisors, including Ike, is completely false.

Ike says he made his opposition to Stimson, not to Truman. And according to Ike's story, he made this objection during an idle dinner conversation, not at any policy meeting. The date of this dinner conversation was after the final decision to drop the bombs had been made, after the final orders to drop the bombs had been sent to the military, and after Truman had set sail back to America. As Truman did not arrive in America until after Hiroshima had been bombed, Stimson could not have relayed Ike's belated objections even if he were inclined to do so.

It is unlikely that Stimson ever felt inclined to repeat Ike's objections to anyone. Ike's views were contrary to the intelligence we were receiving from Japan at the time, and according to Ike's story Stimson wasted no time in telling him just how wrong he was. There are no records of this conversation other than Ike's own recollections of it.

No other military official opposed the use of the bombs during the war, or claimed that they did so. One or two wanted to only use the bombs after Japan was warned of the bombs and of the Soviets being about to enter the war, but that isn't really opposing their use.

The claim of "formerly secret documents" takes those documents out of context by viewing them in light of postwar knowledge. While Japan did appear to be on their last legs, they also appeared to be refusing to surrender and they appeared to be able to mount an extremely bloody defense if we invaded.

And if, at most, the Japanese were just asking for a guarantee for the Emperor, why did they make clear in their communications that they wanted more than that, and would never surrender just with a guarantee for the Emperor?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]