Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

War on Iraq

Iraqi Oil Workers' Union Founder: U.S.-Backed Oil Law Is "Robbery"

By Amy Goodman, Democracy Now!. Posted July 9, 2007.


The proposed oil law facing the Iraqi cabinet would allow Western oil companies to take about 50% of all production as their share, an "obvious robbery of the Iraqi oil," says oil workers union heavy.
Advertisement

As the Iraqi cabinet approves part of a controversial oil law, we speak with Faleh Abood Umara, the general secretary of the Federation of Oil Unions and a founding member of the oil workers union in Iraq. He calls on Iraqi lawmakers to reject the legislation. We also speak with Hashmeya Muhsin Hussein, president of the Electrical Utility Workers Union and the first woman to head a national union in Iraq.

Amy Goodman: In Iraq, opposition is growing among some Sunni, Shia and Kurdish factions to a controversial oil law backed by Washington. Draft legislation on the distribution of oil wealth in Iraq was approved by the Iraqi cabinet last Tuesday and could go to parliament for review as early as this week. Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki called the bill "the most important law in Iraq."

US lawmakers have demanded Iraq advance the measure before Congress approves additional war funding, but critics say the law would leave Iraq's oil open to foreign takeover. A parliamentary boycott by Sunni and Shia factions is expected to slow the bill's passage.

In addition, six Nobel Peace Prize laureates have released a statement in opposition to the legislation. The laureates include Betty Williams, Mairead Maguire, Rigoberta Menchu, Jody Williams, Shirin Ebadi and Wangari Maathai. The statement read, in part, "The Iraqi oil law could benefit foreign oil companies at the expense of the Iraqi people, deny the Iraqi people economic security, create greater instability and move the country further away from peace."

Last month, the Iraqi oil workers union went on a strike to protest the law. Two leading union members recently traveled to the United States to meet with members of Congress and attend last week's US Social Forum in Atlanta. Hashmeya Muhsin Hussein is president of the Electrical Utility Workers Union, the first woman to head a national union in Iraq. Faleh Abood Umara is the general secretary of the Federation of Oil Unions and a founding member of the oil workers union in Iraq. In 1998 he was detained by Saddam Hussein's regime for his activities on behalf of his coworkers. Well, they recently came to New York and joined us in our firehouse studio. I began by asking Faleh Abood Umara to describe the current situation for oil workers in Iraq and why he's protesting this proposed oil law.

Faleh Abood Umara: [translated] With regards to the situation of the Iraqi oil workers, they're persevering in their work and preserving the Iraqi oil wells. The reason we went on strike was to make twenty-seven demands, which we submitted to the Iraqi prime minister. He agreed to them, but the minister of oil did not implement the demands that led to the strike.

The most important point or one of the most important points is our demand not to rush through the new Iraqi oil law, because we believe that this oil law does not serve the interests of the Iraqi people. So we ask our friends in the United States, as well, to stand in solidarity with us and publicize the ill effects of this law, so that it never is agreed upon in the parliament.

Goodman: Explain the law.

Umara: [translated] According to Article 111 of the Iraqi Constitution, which states that the oil and gas of Iraq are owned by the Iraqi people and they have the right to control it. But when you look into the details of the law, many of the articles of the law actually conflict with this preamble of the law, the most important point of which is the issue of the production-sharing agreements, which allows the international oil companies, especially the American ones, to exploit the oil fields without our knowledge of what they are actually doing with it. And they take about 50% of the production as their share, which we think it's an obvious robbery of the Iraqi oil.

We also object to the procedure by which these companies are given the contracts for exploiting the oil, because it allows the granting of the contracts with the aid of foreign advisers. We demanded that it's actually the Iraqi experts that need to be consulted with regards to the granting of the contracts.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: iraq, oil law, oil workers union

Amy Goodman is the host of the nationally syndicated radio news program, Democracy Now!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from War on Iraq! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
So what do people think we're in Iraq for, Israel? Yeah, right!!
Posted by: yellow on Jul 9, 2007 12:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What's the big suprise? As one Canadian Journalist artfully put it, "It's the crude dude!!"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Really the oil deal is quite fair by American standards
Posted by: ateo on Jul 9, 2007 2:47 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To anyone living in the U.S. where an oil company can knock on your door and tell you, "there is oil under your land, that we own, we are going to take it and give you nothing for it" the Iraq deal is quite logical.

I mean, what have I gotten from all of those oil wells pumping away in Texas etc.? 3 dollars a gallon, that's what.

Imposing American style capitalism on the world can be a shock to people who expect fairness, but what can I say?

Welcome to the 21st century. Every country on Earth better get used to it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Exploitation is NEVER fair Posted by: CounterCorp
Am I missing something here??
Posted by: kww355 on Jul 9, 2007 3:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why is this person described as an oil union "heavy" ? A heavy denotes a bad guy. It sounds to me like he's just supporting his union and his country's oil.

Why should Western forces take half the oil? We've already utterly destroyed their country and decimated the population. Are we going to rob them of half of the last thing of any value they have left?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Time to start the long march home
Posted by: Democritus on Jul 9, 2007 4:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The New York Times finally got it right in its July 8 editorial. It's time to start our withdrawal from Iraq. Those who say that our occupation is needed to help quell the violence are refuted by the words of Iraqis who say it's the occupation that is fueling the violence. We invaded Iraq to install a compliant government and grab their oil. Bush and his cronies didn't plan on having the Iraqi people rise up in protest. The Iraqis know how to manage their own oil. Our oil companies should learn how to negotiate rather than waste American lives for easy profits.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You and what army? Posted by: LMNOP
Well, Du-uuuh!!
Posted by: LMNOP on Jul 9, 2007 5:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Americans in business *not* stealing is news.

Man bites dog is news. When dog bites man, that's not news.

What did you think was going to happen? Gold, frankencense and myrrh for everybody? This is America. Somebody's gonna get screwed.

Did anyone ever think that Bush's Christianity meant anything?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Well, Du-uuuh!! Posted by: shd1230
Operation Iraqi Liberation
Posted by: Johnny Hempseed on Jul 9, 2007 5:14 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The first, "name" for this boondogle said it all, O.I.L. But keep repeating it Amy we need you.Thanks jh

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

noo waaay !?
Posted by: ShoShenQ on Jul 9, 2007 5:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
OIL ?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Profits, Power and Warfare....
Posted by: Michael Boldin on Jul 9, 2007 6:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is what this has been all about since the beginning. This war is not, as most of us know, being fought for security or freedom - except for the security of oil and the freedom to exploit Iraq's resources.

Dennis Kucinich has been quite outspoken about the new oil "law" - and we really should join him in calling for an end to madness...

Some follow up reading:

"Revealed: Why Your Sons and Daughters Died in Iraq" - click here

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Iraqi oil law
Posted by: profmarcus on Jul 9, 2007 6:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the full truth of the iraq oil law is actually much worse than you present here... i keep reading stories, interviews, and articles on the pending iraq oil law, each claiming to be reporting on what the traditional u.s. media is leaving out, and everyone of them, it seems, including this one, still omit the most significant details... those details were reported back in january by the uk independent and later by the inter press news service agency... the following is from the independent...
-----
[The production sharing agreements - PSAs] envisioned by the Iraqi petrochemical law contained extremely favorable provisions for the oil companies, in which they would be entitled to 70 percent of profits until development expenses were amortized and 20 percent afterwards. This would have guaranteed them at least twice the typical profit margin over the long run and many times that figure during the initial years.

There are other elements in the law (and the possible PSA contracts) that have also roused resistance inside Iraq. Among the most controversial:

* Insofar as PSAs or their legal equivalent were enacted, Iraq would lose control over what levels of oil the country produced with the potential to substantially weaken the grip of OPEC on the oil market.

* The law would allow the oil companies to fully repatriate all profits from oil sales, almost insuring that the proceeds would not be reinvested in the Iraqi economy.

* The Iraqi government would not have control over oil company operations inside Iraq. Any disputes would be referred instead to pro-industry international arbitration panels.

* No contracts would be public documents.

* Contacting companies would not be obliged to hire Iraqi workers, and could pursue the current policy of employing American technicians and South Asian manual laborers.

Several African countries with vast mineral riches have been subjected to these sorts of conditions, with large multinational companies extracting both minerals and profits while returning only a tiny fraction of the proceeds to the local population. As the resources are taken out of the ground and the country, the local population actually becomes poorer, while the potential for future prosperity is drained.
-----
And, yes, I DO take it personally

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Iraqi oil law Posted by: cyrena1987
The corruptive nature of oilmen: a personal observation.
Posted by: HughScott on Jul 9, 2007 7:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In 1956, I worked as a seismologist for Atlantic Refinery Company (ARCO). By doing so, I followed the footsteps of my late father, Ed Scott, a career geologist and high level executive for Union Oil of California, now Unocal.

Years later, in 2004, I wrote about Dad in my nonfiction book, George Dub-ya Bush, THE PHONY FIGHTER PILOT, to point the destructive influence oilmen have had on U.S. foreign policy.

I already knew Bush and Cheney were oilmen before winning the White House. But imagine my surprise upon learning that our current UN ambassador and former Iraq ambassador, Zalmay Khalilzad, had been a Unocal consultant.

Not coincidentally, in 1997, Khalilzad helped form the subversive neocon organization, Project for a New American Century (PNAC), along with Gulf War 2 architects Cheney, Don Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz and Scooter Libby. Bush is connected to PNAC through his brother, Jeb, a PNAC founder.

Another original PNAC member, Steve Forbes, has said he wants the IMF out of Iraq and U.S. oil companies in.

Returning to Khalilzad, in addition to his Unocal relationship, he was a Chevron board member. When Bush 41 was in office, Khalilzad worked for Paul Wolfowitz in the Defense Department. Prior to Gulf War 1, both men advocated the use of military force to overthrow Saddam Hussein, a PNAC objective as well.

After Khalilzad left the DOD, he worked for the Rand Corporation, a rightwing think-tank that performed research for the U.S. military, DOD and American intelligence community. Not surprisingly, Unocal was a Rand client.

While consulting for Unocal, Khalilzad participated in talks with the Taliban on Afghan oil and gas pipeline infrastructure, escorted a delegation of Taliban leaders that visited Unocal headquarters in Texas, and called for the United States to support their regime.

During the Clinton years, Khalilzad conducted risk assessments for Unocal on their proposed 900-mile pipeline project to transport natural gas from Turkmenistan to Pakistan through Afghanistan. Even as the Clinton administration began to recognize the repressive nature of the Taliban regime and its links to Osama Bin Laden, Khalilzad called for U.S. engagement with the Taliban.

Unocal also hired Henry Kissinger and former U.S. ambassador John Maresca for advisory work. Marcesca later became a Unocal vice president. Robert Oakley, former U.S. ambassador to Pakistan, was employed as a Unocal consultant as well.

Richard Armitage -- PNAC member and Deputy Secretary of State under Colin Powell -- also performed Unocal contract work. No stranger to the pipeline business, Armitage was a member of the Burma/Myanmar Forum, a group that received major funding from Unocal. In 1997, he was implicated in a lawsuit filed by Burmese villagers who suffered human rights abuses during the construction of a Unocal pipeline. Halliburton, under VP Cheney, also performed contract work on the Burmese project.

I could go on and on about the White House being controlled by oil company executives, but instead, I will relate the feelings expressed by my father, as told to me many times. The influence on government energy policies by petroleum companies would have concerned him greatly. For certain, Dad, who was honest to a fault, would not have wanted oilmen in the White House.

If alive today, Ed Scott would be the first to say that oilmen are greedy people, care little about social issues and pledge loyalty to themselves, not the U.S. Constitution. To me, that pretty much sums up the Bush administration.

Hugh E. Scott, Vietnam vet and editor of the nonprofit investigative website, King-George.biz, which features 60 cartoons, photos and other Bushwhacking illustrations.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The only way to fight our US government and Corporate America against this oil stealing is
Posted by: maxpayne on Jul 9, 2007 8:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
to stand up and do the following:

1. Legalize and allow INDUSTRIAL HEMP to penetrate the market even if it means replacing petroleum all the way.

2. Fund and make affordable alternative renewables such as solar, wind, geothermal, hemp, tidal, etc ...

3. Fund and make public transportation more affordable and enjoyable so that people will not be encouraged to drive their gas guzzlers. Hint: Light rail.

4. Stop condescending people for not conserving and make conservation more motivating and rewarding.

5. Make business, media, and government reform a high priority.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

operation don't have a clue
Posted by: eosrk on Jul 9, 2007 9:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that's were Bushco now stands.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Iraq oil law? Business as usual.
Posted by: Sojourner on Jul 9, 2007 9:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Especially for Bush, whose pattern as President has consistently been to ask for the moon and settle for exhorbitant returns. (With a GOP-controlled congress, he got the moon, and the congress in turn lined its pockets.)

The actual role to be played out by our troops is no longer clear to me. In this interview, we heard about withdrawal. Is it in today's news or yesterday's that a major figure in Iraq is in a panic over the growing pressure to pull out the troops? He's predicting civil war. Telling Iraqis to arm themselves.

While our troops die, the Bushites are in the catbird seat. They can say, "Give us the amount of oil we demand or else we will do with our troops what you do not want."

It's the way Americans do business. The only difference between the corporations and the mafia is that the corps get laws written to protect them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

THE REASON BUSH-CO STARTED THIS WAR... TO STEAL THE OIL..,"The Iraqi oil law"
Posted by: wmGreybeard on Jul 9, 2007 10:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are many excellent post here; among solutions, I find this one very good--"The only way to fight our US government and Corporate America against this oil stealing is...." a few comments above

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No surprises here... unless you've been gullible
Posted by: ibemee on Jul 9, 2007 12:29 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have tried and tried to point out that ...AIPAC-Pelosi and the congressional-zionists held up both the mandate to Stop The War and the Impeachment that we voted for in 2006.... SIMPLY TO STALL EVERYTHING UNTIL THESE VERY LONG, LONGTERM OIL CONTRACTS ARE IN THE BAG! Another thing I have been pointing out for a long time is that Maliki will be DUMPED because he has been a cheney/bush puppet, but has lately been caving-in to his Iraqi people's demands to protect their oil. (their ONLY source of income) and that is NOT acceptable to president dick cheney! He will use the SSB to cause MALIKI TO BE DUMPED 'FROM WITHIN'.
(or probably assassinated)
...AND HERE COMES CHALABI-THE-COCKROACH AGAIN!!

Do not believe anything you read in the NYT. It is one of the major propagandist tools in the fascist-bushCo monopolized media. They use half truths to shape the lies for the gullible.

// ps ~ what's the "SSB"?
SSB - Rumsfeld's super secret agency

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Crime and Payment at Exxon-Mobil
Posted by: hankedson on Jul 11, 2007 8:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
See my article on Exxon's unbridled pursuit of obscene fortune no matter how much harm to humanity and our planet is caused in the process. Find "Crime and Payment at Exxon-Mobil at: http://hankedson.squarespace.com/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

impeachment
Posted by: gsaephanh on Jul 13, 2007 1:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Call in your vote TODAY for impeaching Bush and Cheney at this number: 202-225-0100

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s office is taking calls voting for Impeachment of Bush/Cheney at 202-225-0100. PLEASE CALL TODAY. At the toll free capitol switchboard #s below, you can also call your particular district’s congressional representative to insist that they support impeachment for Cheney. E.g., for Rep. Dennis Kucinich’s H Res 333 for Cheney; please say:

“In addition to supporting Kucinich’s bill H Res 333, I would also support a similar Impeachment Resolution against Bush, especially after the disgraceful Scooter Libby sentence “commuting” and the following issues: wiretapping, torture, numerous 9/11 intelligence misrepresentations, the continued occupation of Iraq, gross negligence during Hurrican Katrina, the Valerie Plame CIA leak, […list your other grounds…] ..”[see resolutions on tab #2 for other grounds for impeachment]).

LANIC requests that Americans call today…Not tomorrow or next week. Every call adds to the extraordinary grasswoots and nationwide movement’s pressures on House Speaker Pelosi to act now .before further innocent lives are lost in Iraq and elsewhere. Last week 28 Americans lost their lives. Over the July 4, 2007 weekend over 400 Iraqis lost their lives…

SEND MAIL TO HOUSE SPEAKER NANCY PELOSI: Attn: Nancy Pelosi, House Representative/Speaker of the House, 235 Cannon H.O.B., Washington, DC 20515 ; Pelosi’s Fax # 202 225-8259

Pelosi’s e-mail address :

Americanvoices@mail.house.gov

CC her at: sf.nancy@mail.house.gov

Please send her a pro-impeachment email and a specific call to endorse H Res 333. Note: On Saturdays/Sundays, Pelosi’s office has a comment line at which you can leave a voicemail. Your message will be transcribed and relayed to her. Please do encourage your family/friends to contact the same number. Refer them to www.bcimpeach.com for the actual telephone #s & contact info.

Find out who your Congressional representative is and call that person. For toll free numbers to your Congress rep: (800) 828 – 0498; (800) 459 – 1887; or (866) 340 – 9281. You will be connected once you name your congress person. The staff aid should take detailed notes and provided to the Congressional representative.

Final Note: Please say “I support Impeachment based on ____. I’d like to know where “[representative name]” stands on this issue.” Let’s strike while the Libby fury keeps the iron hot! Please call and Act Now!

PLEASE ALSO CONTACT THESE KEY CONGRESSIONAL REPS RE IMPEACHMENT:
Representative Capitol Phone Capitol Fax
Howard Berman 202-225-4695 202-225-3196
& 818-944-7200 818-994-1050

MAILING ADDRESS FOR BERMAN
Congressman Howard L. Berman
14546 Hamlin Street, Suite 202
Van Nuys, CA 91411

Henry Waxman 202-225-3976 202-225-4099
Loreta Sanchez 202 225-2965 202-225-5859
D. Watson 202 225-7084 202-225-2422
LindaSanchez 202 225-6676 202-226-1012
L. Solis 202 225-5464 202-225-5467
A. G. Eshoo 202 225-8104 202-225-8890
L. Roybal/Allard 202 225-1766 202-225-0350

http://www.bcimpeach.com/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]