Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

War on Iraq

Islamic Bomb-Making Militants the Big Winners in Iraq Occupation

By Patrick Cockburn, Independent UK. Posted July 7, 2007.


From the moment foreign armies were ordered into Iraq, al-Qaeda was bound to be the winner.
carbomb614

Car bombs have almost as long a history as the car. What has changed since the invasion of Iraq is that bombers targeting civilian targets in the West now have a popular base and access to expertise in the Sunni community of Iraq.

The invasion was seen as an attack on Muslims as a whole by at least some Muslims in every country, who are willing and able to construct and deliver bombs. From the moment foreign armies were ordered into Iraq, al-Qa'ida was bound to be the winner.

US spokesmen have long blamed al-Qa'ida for every attack in Iraq but in fact the Salafi, proponents of a puritanical and bigoted variant of Sunni Islam, and the Jihadi, willing to wage holy war, belong to many groups,

The al-Qa'ida of Osama bin Laden was a surprisingly weak organisation in Afghanistan and Pakistan before 2001. To make the blood curdling videos of militants training that are frequently shown in documentaries, al-Qa'ida had to hire local tribesmen.

It is in Iraq that al-Qa'ida has come into its own. The US proclamation of the group as its most dangerous enemy served only as effective advertising among young Sunni men. Such denunciations also made it much easier for al-Qa'ida to raise money in Saudi Arabia and the Gulf.

The three car bombs used in Glasgow and London are far inferior to anything used in Iraq. This is an ominous pointer for the future because Iraq is now full of people who know exactly how to make a highly-effective bomb - and the means to detonate it. It is only a matter of time before this knowledge spreads.

The expertise of the Iraqi bombers attained a high level almost as soon as the first explosions occurred in Baghdad in August 2003. The Jordanian embassy was attacked and then the UN headquarters. Assassination by suicide bomber began with the killing of Mohammed Baqir al-Hakim, the leader of the largest Shia party, the Supreme Council for Islamic Revolution in Iraq, along with 85 of his followers in Najaf. By November, Jihadists were able to attack half a dozen targets at the same time.

There also appeared to be an endless supply of suicide bombers from Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Egypt, Syria and almost every state in the Arab world. The one Muslim country that suicide bombers did not come from was Iran, though the Iranians have been far more vigorously denounced than the Sunni states that produce the bombers.

In the immediate aftermath of the latest bombings in the UK there were immediate suspicions that Iraqi methods had spread. The opposite is true. It is surprising, given that one of the alleged bombers comes from Jordan, home to one million Iraqi refugees, that they did not know more about making a bomb. It is the political not the technical influence of the Iraq war that we are now seeing.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: iraq, terror, al qaeda

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from War on Iraq! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Just my opinion
Posted by: Temporary on Jul 7, 2007 12:27 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The war in the middle-east should end RIGHT NOW, unless...

both sides want to win AT ANY PRICE, wich means killing both themselves, and the local civilian population! There is now "victory" in the middle-east anymore! Only DEATH, wich most likely will spread to Europe and America through immigration as the fighting escalates!


The dead...

Death in Afghanistan

Death in Iraq


And the ultimate price of victory!

The price of victory in Iraq

The price of victory in Afghanistan


Maybe it's time for the US and Iran to take a little break. Some wars are just not worth winning!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Just my opinion Posted by: richholland
» The war is over buddy! Posted by: Temporary
» RE: Just my opinion Posted by: Conservasaurus
Thanks, George
Posted by: Sparks56 on Jul 7, 2007 3:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Immediately after 9/11 al Qaeda was on the way out. What support they had was crumbling. Many thought they had gone too far. The US invasion of Iraq was a godsend. (allahsend?) It was a recruiter's dream come true. George Bush and the boys elevated Osama bin Laden from minor folk hero to demi-god. Al Qaeda went from a shrinking gang of zealots to a world-wide revolutionary movement drawing in new recruits from every level of Moslem society, and financial support, overt or covert, from every Moslem nation.
Osama thanks you, George. Was this a mistake? Or did the Cheney/Rumsfeld cabol have this in mind all along?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» If you ask my... Posted by: Temporary
» RE: Thanks, George Posted by: CatDad
» RE: Lousy Memory Posted by: kbest
Is this the best you could find on Iraq car bombs?
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Jul 7, 2007 11:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While the corporate media has done an atrocious job of covering the Iraqi war, this piece is also a jumble of suppositions which doesn't reveal much of interest.

The Washington Post did a far better job of covering the situation in Iraq today:

Suicide Bombings Kill Nearly 150 in Iraq, U.S. Reports Deaths of 8 American Soldier

By Sudarsan Raghavan
Washington Post Foreign Service
Saturday, July 7, 2007; 11:54 AM

BAGHDAD, July 7 -- Suicide bombings across Iraq killed nearly 150 and injured scores, including a massive truck assault in a northern Shiite village that ripped through a crowded market, officials said Saturday.

The violence came as the U.S. military on Saturday reported the deaths of eight American soldiers over the past two days, all killed in combat or by roadside bombs in Baghdad and the western province of Anbar. A British soldier was reported killed in fighting in southern Iraq.

The worst carnage unfolded in the Shiite Turkoman village of Amarly, 50 miles south of Kirkuk, when a suicide bomber rammed a truck laden with explosives into the central market, which is near a police station, officials said. The attack killed at least 115 people and wounded at least 210, according to district and hospital officials, adding that they expected the death toll to rise.


How does this compare to the "shocking tale of the alleged British car bombers"? Alleged being the key word here, as no charges have been filed. Given the British and US habit of generating false intelligence for propaganda purposes, who knows who planted these non-lethal amateur bombs? Perfect for scaring the population without causing any real harm, weren't they?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

British National Party busted for chemical terrorist weaponry!
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Jul 7, 2007 1:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
See Chemical Weapon Terrorist Plot Thwarted in the UK

"Robert Cottage, 49, a member of the British National Party, is standing trial in Manchester for amassing material for chemical bombs – and instructions for making them — in his home. The prosecution said Cottage was acting on the instructions of a fellow BNP cadre, David Jackson, a respectable 62-year-old dentist from Lancashire…The two allegedly planned the chemical bomb attacks as part of a “war between the Asian culture and the White culture,” Mrs. Cottage testified. In the UK, “Asian” is used to denote those of Pakistani origin – overwhelmingly Muslim – and by extension most other Muslims of less-than-alabaster hue.
The deadly terror plot that you haven’t heard of, courtesy of the BNP – our very own Nazi party-in-waiting."

P.S. This was from the Guerilla News Network, which allows readers to make editorial decisions through a voting system - and they tend to have slightly better articles than Alternet (which isn't so bad, to be sure)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Success or Failure Depends on Your Objective
Posted by: radical53 on Jul 7, 2007 5:02 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
George W. Bush has ruined everything he has ever been in charge of. If this is his objective, Iraq is his greatest achievement to date. Fortunately, US Presidents are limited to 2 terms now. His opportunity to totally ruin the United States will soon end with his work only partially completed. It will take many years to recover from the 8 years of George W. Bush, if we ever can. The U.S. and the future of the entire world have been dealt a powerful blow. Bush's achievements are not to be underestimated.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Reality jolt Posted by: Col. Jackleg
» RE: eality jolt Posted by: Conservasaurus
» Conservasaurus Posted by: Col. Jackleg
» RE: Conservasaurus Posted by: Conservasaurus
» "Democratic Wars" and LBJ Posted by: CatDad
When did it start!
Posted by: Conservasaurus on Jul 8, 2007 5:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
“It is the political not the technical influence of the Iraq war that we are now seeing”

Not true… the sad aspect of these bombing in England is that there are extreme Islamics that are influencing the much more numerous moderate/normal if you will Muslims.

It has little to do with Iraq. If it weren’t the Iraqi war then it would be some other extremist rallying point. What set off the 9-11 atacks.. or the USS Cole bombing or the numerous other Embassy/Hotel terror bombings – all of which led up to the latest incursions into the mid east.

Extreme Islamics are a hate fill group who’s ONLY purpose is world domination through terror. Ignoring it, hoping it will go away will never work. War in Iraq will never work. Political efforts with Arab countries is really what will ultimately contain the spread of radical islam.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Right-wing history starts on 9/11
Posted by: Joshua Holland on Jul 8, 2007 9:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It has little to do with Iraq.

That's Conservasaurus' opinion. It's nonsense -- backed by nothing but Fox Newscasters' opinions.

The opposite view is backed up by every serious study done on what motivates people to commit terror attacks. That is, the University of Chicago's Robert Pape -- who studied every suicide attack committed in the world between 1980-2004 -- studies conducted by the Israeli and Saudi governments; by Chatham House and the International Institute for Strategic Studies (the UK's two leading defense think-tanks) and the opinions of 87 of the top 100 foreign policy experts in the U.S.

If it weren’t the Iraqi war then it would be some other extremist rallying point. What set off the 9-11 atacks.. or the USS Cole bombing or the numerous other Embassy/Hotel terror bombings – all of which led up to the latest incursions into the mid east.

Right-wing history begins on 9/11. Among the reality-based, things happened before that day.

The U.S. and its allies have had troops in these countries for decades, have propped up some cruel and barbaric governments that we liked and staged coups to take down some of the most popular and progressive governments that we didn't. We have provided $140 billion dollars to Israel and vetoed countless security council esolutions regarding the occupied territories. These are concrete grievances -- nobody is seriously trying to impose anything on us except the idea that we don't command the planet.

It would be nice if the other side were honest enough to acknowledge this reality, and then we could have an open and forthright debate about whether the policies are worth the wholly predictable and inevitable "blow-back" they engender. Make the argument that they are if you believe it, because denial and historical revisionism do not provide a good basis for policy-making.

Extreme Islamics are a hate fill group who’s ONLY purpose is world domination through terror.

Their only purpose is to get us to withdrawal from their countries. We're the ones who are into the global domination thing. That's why there are 737 U.S. military bases around the world. I don't see any Arab armies occupying my local 7/11.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The world according to Josh! Posted by: Conservasaurus
Muslim Fanatics v. Western Civ
Posted by: Examerikan on Jul 8, 2007 11:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wars in last 150 years

1860-65: American civil war (360,000)
1886-1908: Belgium-Congo Free State (3 million)
1899-02: British-Boer war (100,000)
1904: Germany Vs Namibia (65,000)
1904-05: Japan Vs Russia (150,000)
1910-20: Mexican revolution (250,000)
1911: Chinese Revolution (2.4 million)
1911-12: Italian-Ottoman war (20,000)
1912-13: Balkan wars (150,000)
1915: the Ottoman empire slaughters Armenians (1.2 million)
1914-18: World War I (8 million)
1917-21: Soviet revolution (5 million)
1928-37: Chinese civil war (2 million)
1931: Japanese Manchurian War (1.1 million)
1934: Mao's Long March (170,000)
1936: Italy's invasion of Ethiopia (200,000)
1936-37: Stalin's purges (13 million)
1936-39: Spanish civil war (600,000)
1939-45: World War II (55 million) including holocaust and Chinese revolution
1946-49: Chinese civil war (1.2 million)
1946-49: Greek civil war (50,000)
1947: Partition of India and Pakistan (1 million)
1948-1973: Arab-Israeli wars (70,000)
1948-: Kashmir's civil war (40,000)
1949-: Indian Muslims Vs Hindus (20,000)
1950-53: Korean war (4 million)
1954-62: French-Algerian war (1 million)
1958-61: Mao's "Great Leap Forward" (30 million)
1960-90: South Africa Vs Africa National Congress (?)
1961-2003: Kurds Vs Iraq (180,000)
1962-75: Mozambique Frelimo Vs Portugal (?)
1964-73: USA-Vietnam war (3 million)
1965: second India-Pakistan war over Kashmir
1965-66: Indonesian civil war (200,000)
1966-69: Mao's "Cultural Revolution" (11 million)
1966-: Colombia's civil war (31,000)
1967-70: Nigeria-Biafra civil war (800,000)
1968-80: Rhodesia's civil war (?)
1969-79: Idi Amin, Uganda (300,000)
1969-02: IRA - Northern Ireland's civil war (2,000)
1969-79: Francisco Macias Nguema, Equatorial Guinea (50,000)
1971: Pakistan-Bangladesh civil war (500,000)
1972-: Philippines Vs Muslim separatists (120,000)
1972: Burundi's civil war (300,000)
1972-79: Rhodesia/Zimbabwe's civil war (30,000)
1974-91: Ethiopian civil war (1,000,000)
1975-78: Menghitsu, Ethiopia (1.5 million)
1975-79: Khmer Rouge, Cambodia (1.7 million)
1975-89: Boat people, Vietnam (250,000)
1975-90: civil war in Lebanon (40,000)
1975-87: Laos' civil war (184,000)
1975-2002: Angolan civil war (500,000)
1976-83: Argentina's military regime (20,000
1976-93: Mozambique's civil war (900,000)
1976-98: Indonesia-East Timor civil war (600,000)
1976-: Indonesia-Aceh (GAM) civil war (12,000)
1979: Vietnam-China war (30,000)
1979-88: the Soviet Union invades Afghanistan (1.3 million)
1980-88: Iraq-Iran war (1 million)
1980-92: Sendero Luminoso - Peru's civil war (69,000)
1980-92: El Salvador's civil war (100,000)
1980-99: Kurds Vs Turkey (35,000)
1982-90: Hussein Habre, Chad (40,000)
1983-2002: Sri Lanka's civil war (64,000)
1983-2002: Sudanese civil war (2 million)
1987-: Palestinian Intifada (4,500)
1988-2001: Afghanistan civil war (400,000)
1988-2004: Somalia's civil war (550,000)
1989-: Liberian civil war (220,000)
1989-: Uganda Vs Lord's Resistance Army (30,000)
1991: Gulf War - large coalition against Iraq to liberate Kuwait (85,000)
1991-97: Congo's civil war (800,000)
1991-2000: Sierra Leone's civil war (200,000)
1991-: Russia-Chechnya civil war (200,000)
1991-94: Armenia-Azerbaijan war (35,000)
1992-96: Tajikstan's civil war war (50,000)
1992-96: Yugoslavia's civil war (200,000)
1992-99: Algerian civil war (150,000)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Western Civ wins Posted by: Examerikan
impeachment
Posted by: gsaephanh on Jul 13, 2007 1:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Call in your vote TODAY for impeaching Bush and Cheney at this number: 202-225-0100

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s office is taking calls voting for Impeachment of Bush/Cheney at 202-225-0100. PLEASE CALL TODAY. At the toll free capitol switchboard #s below, you can also call your particular district’s congressional representative to insist that they support impeachment for Cheney. E.g., for Rep. Dennis Kucinich’s H Res 333 for Cheney; please say:

“In addition to supporting Kucinich’s bill H Res 333, I would also support a similar Impeachment Resolution against Bush, especially after the disgraceful Scooter Libby sentence “commuting” and the following issues: wiretapping, torture, numerous 9/11 intelligence misrepresentations, the continued occupation of Iraq, gross negligence during Hurrican Katrina, the Valerie Plame CIA leak, […list your other grounds…] ..”[see resolutions on tab #2 for other grounds for impeachment]).

LANIC requests that Americans call today…Not tomorrow or next week. Every call adds to the extraordinary grasswoots and nationwide movement’s pressures on House Speaker Pelosi to act now .before further innocent lives are lost in Iraq and elsewhere. Last week 28 Americans lost their lives. Over the July 4, 2007 weekend over 400 Iraqis lost their lives…

SEND MAIL TO HOUSE SPEAKER NANCY PELOSI: Attn: Nancy Pelosi, House Representative/Speaker of the House, 235 Cannon H.O.B., Washington, DC 20515 ; Pelosi’s Fax # 202 225-8259

Pelosi’s e-mail address :

Americanvoices@mail.house.gov

CC her at: sf.nancy@mail.house.gov

Please send her a pro-impeachment email and a specific call to endorse H Res 333. Note: On Saturdays/Sundays, Pelosi’s office has a comment line at which you can leave a voicemail. Your message will be transcribed and relayed to her. Please do encourage your family/friends to contact the same number. Refer them to www.bcimpeach.com for the actual telephone #s & contact info.

Find out who your Congressional representative is and call that person. For toll free numbers to your Congress rep: (800) 828 – 0498; (800) 459 – 1887; or (866) 340 – 9281. You will be connected once you name your congress person. The staff aid should take detailed notes and provided to the Congressional representative.

Final Note: Please say “I support Impeachment based on ____. I’d like to know where “[representative name]” stands on this issue.” Let’s strike while the Libby fury keeps the iron hot! Please call and Act Now!

PLEASE ALSO CONTACT THESE KEY CONGRESSIONAL REPS RE IMPEACHMENT:
Representative Capitol Phone Capitol Fax
Howard Berman 202-225-4695 202-225-3196
& 818-944-7200 818-994-1050

MAILING ADDRESS FOR BERMAN
Congressman Howard L. Berman
14546 Hamlin Street, Suite 202
Van Nuys, CA 91411

Henry Waxman 202-225-3976 202-225-4099
Loreta Sanchez 202 225-2965 202-225-5859
D. Watson 202 225-7084 202-225-2422
LindaSanchez 202 225-6676 202-226-1012
L. Solis 202 225-5464 202-225-5467
A. G. Eshoo 202 225-8104 202-225-8890
L. Roybal/Allard 202 225-1766 202-225-0350

http://www.bcimpeach.com/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]