Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

War on Iraq

Hollywood Has Joined in on the Exploitation of Iraq with New Film

By Dorothy Woodend, The Tyee. Posted June 5, 2007.


The Situation, a film about western journalists in Iraq, doesn't convey the horrors of war but instead exploits it.
Advertisement

The other day my mother said she'd just read a great novel by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie called Half of a Yellow Sun. The story, about Biafra's struggle for independence from Nigeria, chronicles the life and death of one disparate group of people. "It was great because it was actually about something: death, war, survival," said my mother. "But it didn't make anyone pathetic."

Her words echoed in my brain as I watched The Situation, a new film directed by Philip Haas, and written by former war correspondent Wendell Steavenson. The film takes place in current day Iraq (although it was primarily filmed in Morocco) and it makes everybody out to be pathetic. And while this is a major problem, it is not even the film's greatest flaw.

In the film's opening sequence, two young Iraqi boys are accosted by an American military patrol. It's past curfew and instead of sending the boys on their way with a warning, the Americans throw them off a bridge. One of the kids swims to shore, but the other drowns. You might think the plot of the film would hang on this crime and its aftermath, but you'd be wrong. This is merely an aperitif, a little amuse-bouche as it were, for the pottage yet to come.

Hot journalists

While the country threatens to dissolve into a seething stew of civil war, insurgency and occupation, a beautiful blond journalist is falling in love with an Iraqi photographer. The real meat of the story is that of Anna Molyneux (Connie Nielsen), a Western reporter eager to carve a career out of the bleeding beast of a dying nation. Anna is hot on the trail of corruption and violence in Iraq; or perhaps, she's simply hot. Men everywhere take one look at her blond, world-weary beauty and keel over. Quite literally. Her part-time boyfriend is an American intelligence officer named Dan Murphy (Damian Lewis) and the other man in her life is Zaid (Mido Hamada), a fellow photojournalist, and the most sensitive, new age Iraqi man ever conceived in the febrile mind of a screenwriter. It's a Harlequin romance with a little grit thrown in.

Digging for journalistic gold in the film's version of Iraq is pretty simple since corruption is basically in the air, the soil, the water and most especially the people. Everywhere you look, someone is murdering someone else in the name of politics or profit, and the difference is often negligible. Anna's friend Rafeeq (Nasser Memarzia) takes her to the drowned boy's funeral, and she tries to pass him a mysterious letter, which he refuses to accept. The letter, it turns out is from her boyfriend Dan who is trying to enlist Rafeeq for the American cause.

Dan is apparently trying to build infrastructure in the form of hospitals and incubators, but like most liberals, he's a milksop, an ineffectual puddler who does more harm than good. His various white elephant projects amount to very little, except to keep him busy. Meanwhile, the Iraqis themselves are fighting and killing with wild abandon. The local sheikh, Tahsin (Saïd Amadis) keeps his men loyal with money and loose women, while the neighbourhood terrorist, Walid (Driss Roukh), is stealing arms from the police and stockpiling them. All in all, it's a mess, with the American soldiers blindly bumbling about, shooting the shit out of women and children and menacing anyone who even looks at them twice. The message is clear: war is hell, but rebuilding is even worse.

'United in graft and corruption'

The film goes to some length to illustrate how bad people can do good things and good people can do bad things. But whether they're bow-tie wearing college boys armed with freshly acquired doctoral degrees, or old Ba'athists looking to get plum assignments from the Americans, everyone is united in graft and corruption. Each character is compromised, with the possible exception of too-good-to-be-true Zaid, who, by the rules of Screenwriting 101, is therefore doomed.

When the film is laying out the players, it has some interest, but that all goes quickly to hell, as the love story between Anna and Zaid comes to the fore. Love is perhaps the least likely thing to happen in the middle of a firefight, but the film would have you believe that romance can blossom between bursts of gunfire and bombs: a quick glance here, a near kiss there. "You can't kiss me in front of the Mujahideen," says Zaid, before he heads back into the fray. It might almost be funny, if it weren't probably true.

The character of Anna, however, is what ultimately tips the film into bad taste. I'm sure female war correspondents everywhere are shaking their heads. (Lara Logan, I'm looking at you, babe.) When Anna runs off trying to get "the story," as she says, leaving a trail of bodies behind her, her two swains rush after her to attempt a rescue. The fact that Connie Nielsen is not even slightly believable as a war correspondent is part of the problem. But it is Anna's level of solipsistic self-absorption that is ultimately damning. While she whimpers, "Please stop shooting," a little boy is killed right behind her, and she fails to notice.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: hollywood, iraq

Dorothy Woodend reviews films for The Tyee every second Friday.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from War on Iraq! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Timing is everything.
Posted by: HughScott on Jun 5, 2007 3:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Movie critic Woodend wrote, “It is here where the film deserves to be excoriated: the agony of a country in the middle of bloody dissolution isn't entertainment, it's something else entirely."

Who said films had to be “entertainment”?

The term means to “amuse, please or divert.” During my experience as a 71-year-old movie addict, I’ve seen many Hollywood works that did none of those. Stanley Kubrick's “Full Metal Jacket” comes to mind -- a disturbing anti-Vietnam War flick that should’ve made DURING the conflict instead of 15 years later -- which brings me to my main point: Timing.

What’s wrong with a film about “agony” being made when the agony is taking place?

Bush’s unjustified war of choice deserves all exposure it can get, so Americans will finally get pissed off enough to storm Washington and not leave until our troops come home from Iraq. If bad taste gets caught up in the mix, so be it; that’s up to movie goers to determine.

For certain, film critics are not supposed to tell us WHEN movies should be made. That’s something else I will decide after seeing “The Situation.”

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Timing is everything. Posted by: DaBear
» Thanks, DaBear. Posted by: HughScott
» RE: Timing is everything. Posted by: Asses of Evil
Gee. A movie about journalists who are the original exploiters of war themselves.
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Jun 5, 2007 6:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Remember journalists are the ones who:
1) think that they are above 'normal' people. They get to attend special event, get special cards, etc.
2) don't help people. They'll just write about. Or please if I can get the photo of the blue-bottle fly alighting from the eye of the starving black baby with rusty hair and distended belly I could get a Pulitzer.
3) they like to gin up wars for ratings, marketshare, etc.
4) they love to point out the race of every criminal (except when white- unless its a man then it will be pointed out.) Usually it goes: "a large black male is suspected of...." and then show the appropriately scary file footage drawing of a black thug and interview the white women who was a victim.
5) they think they are above the law and will not, and can't be forced, to report crimes. Even those which are violent or in progress.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Excuse me! 70,243 civilian casualties?!
Posted by: umrayya on Jun 5, 2007 11:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The true number is closer to ten times that by now! Why does everyone feel the need to minimize this?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

love/sex and bullets
Posted by: DaBear on Jun 5, 2007 11:55 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unfortunately this is staple for the studio film. It doesn't matter what a screenwriter writes, if it's a war movie, it has to have the steamy love angle at the core (because it's believed that without one the film won't make the non-artist buttloads of money). Every screenwriter has war stories (no pun intended) of the sad day their script got gutted or rewritten (by some snot nosed kid nephew of a friend of a friend of the producer) to include the love and bullets angle where there was none. That's Hollywood and until somebody convinces the Jr. high clueless clique that runs Hollywood that you can make obscene amounts of money and drama without the love and bullets gambit, we're just gonna see more of that kind of schlock.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

They got something right anyway
Posted by: umrayya on Jun 5, 2007 11:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"the American soldiers blindly bumbling about, shooting the shit out of women and children and menacing anyone who even looks at them twice."

At least they got this part right.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the best film on Iraq is Syriana
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Jun 5, 2007 12:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
- though it is a little out of date now.

A better film in Iraq would follow the life of a Blackwater mercenary in Iraq who gets involved in stealing some of those 'pallets of cash' that somehow went missing... all while dodging roadside bombs that leave all his friends in pieces.

Or how about a story based on a Special Forces team that is inserted into Iran? That's be a good movie, too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Well, your first... Posted by: Allison
odd criticism
Posted by: amcarey on Jun 5, 2007 1:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can't really comment on this film because I haven't seen it, but Woodend's criticisms seem a bit odd to me. Is she saying that any fictional account of the Iraq War is by definition distasteful? Would this logic extend to books, plays, television, paintings, sculpture? Or are films about an ongoing war especially offensive? This seems to me an especially rigid view of the role of art in our culture, and while film often provides entertainment, it is also an art form. It may well be that "The Situation" has nothing interesting or constructive to say about the world in which we live, but to discount it as harmful simply because it makes reference to an ongoing conflict is, well, silly.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Anti-War Movie
Posted by: TerryS on Jun 5, 2007 11:29 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I too became turned off by the description
of "Beyond Borders" as a romance among the
dying. In so many movies, real life horrible
situations are used as merely theatre props to
display the wonderfulness of the main characters.

As for the comment:

"Stanley Kubrick's “Full Metal Jacket” comes
to mind -- a disturbing anti-Vietnam War flick
that should’ve made DURING the conflict instead
of 15 years later -- which brings me to my main
point: Timing."

I'm sure "Full Metal Jacket" was made as an
anti-war movie. But from what I've read, this
movie and other similar movies being used as
war porn. Soldiers are being shown "Full Metal
Jacket" and other similar movies to get them
revved up and excited about training and going
into combat. Although the overt message of "Full
Metal Jacket" is anti-war, because it is so
photographically gorgeous and so exciting, it gives
the military an exciting and glamorous sheen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]