Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

War on Iraq

CBS Silences General Dissent

By Amy Goodman, King Features Syndicate. Posted May 30, 2007.


Listening to retired U.S. Army Maj. Gen. John Batiste, you sense his intense loyalty to the military where he served 31 years. So why did CBS News fire him as a paid news consultant?
Advertisement

Listening to retired U.S. Army Maj. Gen. John Batiste, you sense his intense loyalty to the military. He commanded the Army's 1st Infantry Division in Iraq, capping a 31-year Army career. So why did CBS News fire him as a paid news consultant? A straight answer from CBS seems as elusive as those Iraqi weapons of mass destruction.

The short answer: Batiste appeared in a television advertisement sponsored by VoteVets.org, a nonpartisan group that advocates for veterans. In the 30-second spot, he said, in part: "Mr. President, you did not listen. You continue to pursue a failed strategy that is breaking our great Army and Marine Corps. I left the Army in protest in order to speak out. Mr. President, you have placed our nation in peril."

Batiste is one of the six retired generals who called for the resignation of then-Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld in the spring of 2006. Of those generals, he alone both served at a high level in the Pentagon and commanded 22,000 troops in Iraq. Despite a promised promotion to three-star general, which would have made him the second-highest-ranking officer in Iraq, Batiste made the difficult decision to retire and speak out.

In his book and documentary "War Made Easy," media critic Norman Solomon explains the impact these retired TV generals have on the national debate:

In the run-up to the war in Iraq, the failure of mainstream news organizations to raise legitimate questions about the government's rush to war was compounded by the networks' deliberate decision to stress military perspectives before any fighting had even begun. CNN's use of retired generals as supposedly independent experts reinforced the decidedly military mind-set even as serious questions remained about the wisdom and necessity about going to war.

In 1999, when the U.S. was bombing Yugoslavia, I asked Frank Sesno, vice president of CNN: "Why pay these generals? And have you ever considered putting peace activists on the payroll? Or inviting them into the studio to respond to the drumbeat for war?" He replied: "We've talked about this. But no, we wouldn't do that. Because generals are analysts, and peace activists are advocates."

That's not far from the reason CBS gave for firing Batiste. According to a cbsnews.com blog, CBS News Vice President Linda Mason explained, "We ask that people not be involved in advocacy." Generals, it seems, are analysts when they agree with the war plan, and advocates when they oppose it. Political blog the Horse's Mouth reported that CBS News consultant Michael O'Hanlon clearly advocated for President Bush's troop surge but didn't get tossed. O'Hanlon, a senior fellow at The Brookings Institution, told the Horse's Mouth he "would be personally gratified to see Batiste back on CBS."

CBS is not alone in icing out perspectives critical of the Iraq war, especially when it mattered. Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting, a media watchdog group, did a study analyzing the major nightly newscasts for the two weeks surrounding then-Secretary of State Colin Powell's speech for war before the United Nations on Feb. 5, 2003.

On the major evening newscasts on ABC, CBS, NBC and PBS, FAIR found 393 interviews on the issue of war, of which only three were with antiwar leaders. This when a majority in the U.S. either opposed war or supported more time for inspections. This is not a mainstream media, but an extreme media, beating the drums for war.

When I spoke with Batiste, he shied away from political commentary. He was focused on the issues: the safety of the troops, the situation in Iraq. He says we need "a comprehensive national strategy," including "the tough diplomatic, political and economic measures." Instead, he says, the U.S. is "depending on our military almost entirely to accomplish this ill-fated mission in Iraq."

Batiste is a lifelong Republican. His father and both his grandfathers were in the military. "You see, we got this war terribly wrong. I'm not antiwar at all." Moveon.org circulated an online petition demanding CBS restore Batiste, which more than 230,000 people signed.

Batiste's crime is obvious: He dared to dissent, directly contradicting the endlessly repeated assurances reported by the network news that Bush takes his military advice from his generals on the ground, not from Congress or public-opinion polls.

CBS News has reached a new low when it censors even a pro-war Republican retired general merely for criticizing the president. The power that the broadcasters have amassed, their craven servility to the Bush administration and its failed wars, and their refusal to offer airtime to dissenters all amount to a direct threat to our democracy, a far greater threat than Saddam's imagined WMDs.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: iraq war, cbs, batiste

Amy Goodman is the host of the nationally syndicated radio news program, Democracy Now!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from War on Iraq! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
CBS cans Rather, Batiste and promotes Couric?
Posted by: haystack1317 on May 30, 2007 11:29 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With Fox News, you know what you're getting. With CBS, there's still some claim to legitimacy stemming from the network's long history, but, in reality, they are undermining our free press on a daily basis. I'm not a fan of Dan Rather, but, while me might have given way to emotion at times, he seemed to understand (or maybe remember from a distant past) that a journalist's job is to get to the truth regardless of the trappings in which it's been surrounded. Katie Couric is basically Dana Perino for the private sector. She is to a real journalist as a Whopper is to filet mignon.

General Batiste doesn't want to reassociate himself with CBS. He has said that clearly. I would prefer that the thousands who signed the petition to get him re-hired would have signed a pledge, instead, saying "we will not watch CBS for one month under any circumstances."

There is a great post on youtube of Robert Kennedy Jr. speaking in New York a few weeks back, with Greg Palast, etc. Kennedy lays out a very interesting survey result. When Republicans who got their facts from Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, etc., were asked if they believed that Saddam Hussein was connected to Al Qaeda and/or had weapons of mass destruction, many answered positively and thus supported the war. When asked, however, if they thought the war would be justifiable, hypothetically, if Saddam was NOT connected to Al Qaeda and did NOT have weapons of mass destruction, etc., then 84% said the war was not justifiable. That is the same percentage as Democrats. The difference was that the majority of Republicans believe distortions of the facts because that is all they have exposure to.

Given this truth, it is as disturbing as ever that CBS is belying it's history and continuing to align itself with the forces that limit public exposure to facts and information.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Myth vs Fact
Posted by: NoPCZone on Jun 1, 2007 7:00 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
CBS likes to draw on the legacy of Edward R Murrow and other greats that worked there once, but that was a few companies ago. The CBS of today is just a brand name for a lame collection of products consumed by a shrinking group of geriatrics. The destruction of the once-proud CBS News is an object lesson for all of the stupidity that has brought America to the sad state it is in today- a declining and marginal democracy served by a timid and ineffective toady press.

The CBS of today is run by former Warner Brother's exec (movies) and CBS News is run by a sports producer that got his crack at the big time because of who his father was. The controlling shareholder family made their money in theaters and amusement parks. Sounds like a place very sensitive to the needs of journalists, right?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bush fired generals who spoke out back in 2001 and replaced them with yespeople.
Posted by: maxpayne on Jun 2, 2007 9:20 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And this was long before 9/11. CBS badly wants all the dirty money they can get so expect them to stoop to the same dishonesty that Fox News exhibits although as someone pointed out, with Fox News the enemy is clear whereas with CBS they're sneaky devils as can be.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Some of the general's comments are rather strange..
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Jun 2, 2007 12:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
MAJ. GEN. JOHN BATISTE: First off, we need a comprehensive national strategy with an interagency process that is well led, focused and synchronized to accomplish what we’re trying to achieve.

Batiste claims that this is all about 'fighting Islamic terrorism" - which is just a blatant lie - it's all about getting their hands on Iraqi oil.

Diplomatically, we need to be making up lost ground, speaking with friends, allies and enemies, to galvanize support to accomplish what we’re trying to do.

What we're trying to do? What is that - sieze the Iraqi oilfields for the benefit of multinational oil corporations and their shareholders?

"Economically, we've never gotten off dime one to change the attitudes of the Iraqi people to improve their quality of life and give them alternatives to the insurgency."

Well, no. That certainly wasn't the plan being promoted by the World Bank, the IMF, ExxonMobile, Shell, BP, Chevron or BearingPoint - the plan was to set up a puppet dictatorship run by Chalabi or whoever, which would ensure access to the oil, while keeping the Iraq people in poverty - worked in Guatemala, didn't it?

"Mobilizing the country is fundamentally important to accomplish what we’re doing. We haven't done any of that. From properly resourcing the military..."

What is that, a call for more people to join the military so they can be sent overseas to kill for the oil corporations?

General Petraeus, his officers and men are doing unbelievable work in Iraq. We owe them all a great debt of gratitude. But a fact is, without a national strategy that makes sense and without mobilizing the country, we got to think about America first.

What? Petraeus is one of the architects of the escalation of the war, and a psyops/propaganda maniac as well. Why support that creep?

Batiste is now the CEO of a steel corporation, which means he's following the military-industrial revolving door strategy. The good corporate general? Whatever.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Amy Goodman, stop being a hypocrite.
Posted by: gretavo on Jun 4, 2007 9:55 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Really, how dare you criticize anyone for their biased coverage? When will you give the appropriate level of attention to the issue of 9/11? Not by interviewing a bunch of kids alongside the editors of Popular Mechanics, but with actual experts? You are just as deceptive as CBS the way you pretend to be honest and caring of the poor and downtrodden. You just have a slightly different role to play in this farce.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]