Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

War on Iraq

The Colossus of Baghdad: A Mammoth New American Embassy in Iraq

By Tom Engelhardt, Tomdispatch.com. Posted May 30, 2007.


The U.S. is building an embassy in the heart of Baghdad's embattled Green Zone that will be the largest embassy on the planet -- big enough to embody the Bush administration's vision of an American-reordered Middle East.
Advertisement

Of the seven wonders of the ancient Mediterranean world, including the Hanging Gardens of Babylon and the Colossus of Rhodes, four were destroyed by earthquakes, two by fire. Only the Great Pyramid of Giza today remains.

We no longer know who built those fabled monuments to the grandiosity of kings, pharaohs, and gods; nowadays, at least, it's easier to identify the various wonders of our world with their architects. Maya Lin, for instance, spun the moving black marble Vietnam Memorial from her remarkable brain for the veterans of that war; Frank Gehry dreamt up his visionary titanium-covered museum in Bilbao, Spain, for the Guggenheim; and the architectural firm of BDY (Berger Devine Yaeger), previously responsible for the Sprint Corporation's world headquarters in Overland Park, Kansas; the Visitation Church in Kansas City, Missouri; and Harrah's Hotel and Casino in North Kansas City, Missouri, turns out to have designed the biggest wonder of all -- an embassy large enough to embody the Bush administration's vision of an American-reordered Middle East. We're talking, of course, about the still-uncompleted American embassy, the largest on the planet, being constructed on a 104-acre stretch of land in the heart of Baghdad's embattled Green Zone, now regularly under mortar fire. As Patrick Lenahan, Senior Architect and Project Manager at BDY, has put it (according to the firm's website): "We understand how to involve the client most effectively as we direct our resources to make our client's vision a reality."

And what a vision it was! What a reality it's turned out to be!

Who can forget the grandiose architecture of pre-Bush-administration Baghdad: Saddam Hussein's mighty vision of kitsch Orientalism melting into terror, based on which, in those last years of his rule, he reconstructed parts of the Iraqi capital? He ensured that what was soon to become the Green Zone would be dotted with overheated, Disneyesque, Arabian-Nights palaces by the score, filled with every luxury imaginable in a country whose population was growing increasingly desperate under the weight of UN sanctions. Who can forget those vast, sculpted hands, "The Hands of Victory," supposedly modeled on Saddam's own, holding 12-story-high giant crossed swords (over piles of Iranian helmets) on a vast Baghdad parade ground? Meant to commemorate a triumph over Iran that the despot never actually achieved, they still sit there, partially dismantled and a monument to folly; while, as Jane Arraf has written, Saddam's actual hands,"the hands that wrote the orders for the war against Iran and the destruction of Iraqi villages, the hands handcuffed behind his back as he went to trial and then was led to his execution are moldering under ground."

It is worth remembering that, when the American commanders whose troops had just taken Baghdad, wanted their victory photo snapped, they memorably seated themselves, grinning happily, behind a marble table in one of those captured palaces; that American soldiers and newly arrived officials marveled at the former tyrant's exotic symbols of power; that they swam in Saddam's pools, fed rare antelopes from his son Uday's private zoo to its lions (and elsewhere shot his herd of gazelles and ate them themselves); and, when in need of someplace to set up an American embassy, the newly arrived occupation officials chose -- are you surprised? -- one of his former dream palaces. They found nothing strange in the symbolism of this (though it was carefully noted by Baghdadis), even as they swore they were bringing liberation and democracy to Saddam's benighted land.

And then, as the Iraqi capital's landscape became ever more dangerous, as an insurgency gained traction while the administration's dreams of a redesigned American Middle East remained as strong as ever, its officials evidently concluded that even one of Saddam's palaces, roomy enough for a dictator interested in the control of a single country (or the odd neighboring state), wasn't faintly big enough, or safe enough, or modern enough for the representatives of the planet's New Rome.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: war in iraq, iraq, embassy

Tom Engelhardt, who runs the Nation Institute's Tomdispatch.com ("a regular antidote to the mainstream media"), is the co-founder of the American Empire Project and, most recently, the author of Mission Unaccomplished: Tomdispatch Interviews with American Iconoclasts and Dissenters (Nation Books), the first collection of Tomdispatch interviews.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from War on Iraq! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Yet Another Article which Proves the Basic Economic motivations of US Imperialism.
Posted by: yellow on May 30, 2007 1:10 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One of the motives in this war has been the commandeering of the Iraqi economy by US transnational corporate capital at the country's reconstruction phase in order to have an early basis to globalize the Iraqi economy through US corporations. This appears to be the reason for the huge US military presence. Ripping off a country's economy is very unpopular. But it isn't just the trillions of dollars of easily accessable, high grade crude oil that, in most places, lie only 600 meters below the surface. It is also the chance to sell patented GM seeds to thousands of Iraqi grain farmers under the terms of Bremer Order 81, which allows TNCs to patent life forms at the expense of those farmers who are used to saving seeds after the harvest. It is the chance buy up parastatal factories at bargain basement prices that produce everything from soap to ammonia, lay off workers, and produce the stuff very efficiently with cheap foreign and domestic labor to export to western markets who have just eliminated the domestic production of such goods with higher wage labor. Iraq won't just be a source of oil, but of all manner of global economic opportunities for transnational capitalism. This is one reason high unemployment persists in Iraq today. Foreign control of Iraq's economy has reoriented it outward as the middle class fostered by Saddam's autarchic economic policies has disappeared.

Of course the militarization of the country will feed the US MIC and other types of contractors as well. It will also give the US a base from which to project its renewed imperial hegemony. This will all be quite profitable for US firms who will profit from the new Iraqi domestic market. US capitalism is inherently expansionist and the war is a highly contradictory response to the current need for US capital to expand profitable investment opportunities abroad, secure energy resources on a profitable basis, and control a geopolitically strategic area of the world. But you won't hear this analysis from many of the ultra-rightwing populists which have infested the Alternet website.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» MONOPOLY EMPIRE Posted by: Hal
» RE: MONOPOLY EMPIRE Posted by: yellow
» RE: MONOPOLY EMPIRE Posted by: sea4th
» RE: MONOPOLY EMPIRE Posted by: Hal
» RE: MONOPOLY EMPIRE Posted by: yellow
» RE: MONOPOLY EMPIRE Posted by: Hal
» RE: MONOPOLY EMPIRE Posted by: yellow
» RE: MONOPOLY EMPIRE Posted by: Hal
» RE: MONOPOLY EMPIRE Posted by: yellow
» RE: MONOPOLY EMPIRE Posted by: Hal
» RE: MONOPOLY EMPIRE Posted by: yellow
» RE: MONOPOLY EMPIRE Posted by: Hal
» RE: MONOPOLY EMPIRE Posted by: yellow
» RE: MONOPOLY EMPIRE Posted by: Hal
» RE: MONOPOLY EMPIRE Posted by: yellow
» RE: MONOPOLY EMPIRE Posted by: Hal
» RE: MONOPOLY EMPIRE Posted by: yellow
» RE: MONOPOLY EMPIRE Posted by: Hal
» RE: MONOPOLY EMPIRE Posted by: yellow
» RE: MONOPOLY EMPIRE Posted by: Hal
» RE: MONOPOLY EMPIRE Posted by: yellow
» RE: MONOPOLY EMPIRE Posted by: Hal
» RE: MONOPOLY EMPIRE Posted by: yellow
» RE: MONOPOLY EMPIRE Posted by: Hal
» RE: MONOPOLY EMPIRE Posted by: yellow
» RE: MONOPOLY EMPIRE Posted by: yellow
» RE: MONOPOLY EMPIRE Posted by: Hal
» RE: MONOPOLY EMPIRE Posted by: yellow
» RE: MONOPOLY EMPIRE Posted by: yellow
» RE: MONOPOLY EMPIRE Posted by: Hal
» RE: MONOPOLY EMPIRE Posted by: yellow
What's the point?
Posted by: Tom Degan on May 30, 2007 2:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How many billions of taxpayer dollars are going to be wasted building this monstrosity? I always read these pieces before posting a comment but I didn't read this one because I don't have to. (I'll read it later, I promise).

Gee, I have an idea: let's just blow the entire structure to kingdom come and save the Iraqi people the trouble of doing so. This will be an embassy that will never be used - not by us, anyway. To even pretend that America will have any kind of presence in that country five years from now is sheer insanity.

This war is over and we lost it. Do we accept that fact now while the American death toll is at a relatively paltry forty-five hundred? Or, as in the case of Viet Nam, do we stupidly wait until it's almost sixty thousand? Your call.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What's the point? Posted by: yellow
» RE: What's the point? Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: What's the point? Posted by: yellow
averageaussie
Posted by: averageaussie on May 30, 2007 4:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ha! I've finally got it! This is going to be bush's new home when he finally gets his marching orders! Yep, the new butcher of Baghdad should fit in nicely there!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

MORE PROOF WE ARE NEVER LEAVING IRAQ........
Posted by: kc10ken on May 30, 2007 5:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Americans JUST DON'T GET IT YET.........................

WE ARE NEVER LEAVING IRAQ!

let me repeat that again......WE ARE NEVER LEAVING IRAQ!

Hasn't ANYONE read the PNAC game plan for the middle east? WHY do you think we have 14 PERMANENT US Military bases currently under construction (in direct violation of S law) in Iraq? Why do you think we are building the world's largest embassy? Because we're leaving sometime soon? LOL.

We are never leaving Iraq America....despite what our politicians tell us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» OH, WE'RE LEAVING ....... Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: OH, WE'RE LEAVING ....... Posted by: edgar_michel
» Yes, but ... Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: Yes, but ... Posted by: edgar_michel
» Did having troops in Iraq Posted by: xconservative
» RE: Did having troops in Iraq Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: Did having troops in Iraq Posted by: xconservative
» Oh please ... Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: Oh please ... Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: Oh please ... Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: You are right Posted by: yellow
Permanency is their goal...
Posted by: Michael Boldin on May 30, 2007 6:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
but, as history has shown, empires never last forever. I doubt that Iraq is the last they intend to conquer, but it should be our goal to make it so impossible to keep up the occupation that they have no choice but to leave....otherwise we'll soon be looking at wars in other countries. Syria, Iran anyone?

The time to leave Iraq is now. Not next year, or next fall. Now.

Some further thoughts:

"Top-Ten Reasons to Get out of Iraq. Now!" - click here

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Permanency is their goal... Posted by: peacefullaim
The Middle East's next "Wonder of the World."
Posted by: HughScott on May 30, 2007 6:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One of my lingering mental images after the fall of Baghdad was the sight of American troops wandering through an empty Saddam palace, weapons at the ready, eyes wide open in amazement.

Within the next decade, I predict, with the same wondrous expressions, reconciled Shiites, Sunnis and Kurds joined by hordes of Iranian and Syrian tourists will visit Iraq’s newest museum, “The Green Zone,” which will have nothing good to say about the infidel occupiers that built it.

What will retired President Bush have to say then on Memorial Day?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

averageaussie
Posted by: averageaussie on May 30, 2007 6:46 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Further to my post above, lets hope the new administration has enough good sense to appoint bush, cheney, rice, wolfowitz, mccain, giuliani, delay rove, rumsfeld, etc.etc. as ambassadors to Iraq, after serving whatever sentences have been handed out to them. I can just see the bunch of them all sorting out Iraqs problems, just look what they have achieved in the us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WHO is getting the construction contract, the maintence contract, and
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on May 30, 2007 7:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the security contract for this new "embassy"? KBR, Bechtel, Halliburton, Blackwater,.....? Follow the money and you'll see another prime motivation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

191patriot
Posted by: Col. Jackleg on May 30, 2007 7:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Another gross example of the Bush administration "exit" strategy in Iraq. Where is the Democrats response? Where is the media outcry? What do the American lemmings (er voters) say about all this? Its fait accompli brothers and sisters and there ain't a goddam thing any of us can do about it! God Bless Amuricur and give us more nukular killing stuff to impress our Iraqi captives and neighbors.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How does funding for something like this make it through congress?
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on May 30, 2007 7:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Surely Fox News can't say "you dont support the troops" if you refuse to throw so much money into an embassy?

If we need an embassy of this size for any practical reason, then it only shows we have no business being there in the first place. There is no way to justify this. Take our embassy in Egypt, multiply the cost of that by 2 (or 3 tops), adjust for inflation, and that's what our embassy in Iraq should cost! If it is significantly more than that, there is something wrong. Is there such a thing as common sense in washington?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The future IRANIAN embassy to Iraq!
Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma on May 30, 2007 7:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After we're kicked out, I'm sure Iran will appreciate all the trouble and expense we went through.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It isn't all bad
Posted by: willymack on May 30, 2007 8:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Iraqis can use the complex as an amusement park, subsequent to our uncerimonious departure. Among the features there could be a monument to the stupidity of the bushies, composed of those with terminal greed and headed up by a demented halfwit. Think of the cartoon characters that could be created and used as attractions for the benefit and amusement of a people with thousands of years of history and culture behind them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I see the embassy as a symbol of how the military-industrial-complex works.
Posted by: Sojourner on May 30, 2007 9:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, it is huge and likely to grow even bigger; just like our spending on weapons of war.

Taxpayer money (especially since corporations contribute so little these days) is free money, so it has to be spent on something. So we hear about how medical care at the VA and community welfare grants must be cut back. Otherwise "the barbarians will be in your city's streets, tomorrow if not sooner."

Read George Orwell's "1984." It is the roadmap of the neo-cons, along with Machiavelli's "The Prince," whose wisdom is already practiced by the mafia. The only difference is that the former pays lip-service to democracy, while the latter is for royalty. The difference doesn't amount to a hill of beans. And, oh yes, corporate CEOs run their businesses according to Orwell, too.

Without a full time peace party, Big Brother has no opposition.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: Blame your people yellow...it's their fault
Posted by: yellow on May 30, 2007 11:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Charopos,

You back to your trailer and bang yer cousin.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

dirtguy
Posted by: dwaln on May 30, 2007 9:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
On the otherhand - if you take the really long view of history; the post tribal period has consistantly demonstated two things. One, the need to be bigger and tougher than any potentially aggressive competition. And two, the need to organize these un-naturally large groups of people into survival units that keep every body fed and 'pulling on the oars'. Empires, were too big and unsustainable. Nation States are more sustainable in some places than in others. Having all the advantages in this country - while still being falible blunderers in foreign policy - do we not have an obligation to do more than be selfishly and shortsightedly isolationist? Identity is only one of many tools that people have used to try and organize un-naturally large groups of people into survival units that are appropriate to the competitve realities of the times. Remember, the word 'Iraqi' is a recent construct, just like 'Shite', 'Sunni' - if you take the long view. The bottom line is that organizing a tribal species into survivable nationstate size units, that show some semblance of humanity and sustainability, is the challenge of our time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: dirtguy Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: dirtguy Posted by: civilized european
» RE: dirtguy Posted by: civilized european
who's vision?
Posted by: Ahimsa on May 30, 2007 11:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Bush Administration's vision?
Or the American vision?
Are there ANY non-hegemonic American "visions"?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just Part of the Regional Security Plan
Posted by: edgar_michel on May 30, 2007 12:48 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The people building these fantastic structures would not be building them, or investing in them if they believed that they were going to be turned over to the Iraqi's any time soon. I believe that they have concluded that Iraq will be permanently under occupation and that there is nothing the Iraqi's can do to stop it. We may be missing vital military capability assessments that are available to George W. Bush and not us. Remember George W. Bush has authorized 10's of billions of dollars for the development of next generation weaponry, including fourth generation nukes. If this is the case, then there is no de-facto mechanism outside of direct involvement by the American people themselves that will cause the United States to abandon Iraq.

I wish we were using this money squandered by this war to develop fusion energy, which is the only energy prospect that would provide any excess over radiant solar energy that would allow us to continue to develop technologically or to explore beyond our solar system. I wish the United States was using the money applied to the re-ordering of the Middle East to develop positive solutions to real impending crisis like, global warming and the impending sustained decline of oil production, rather than playing 1960’s politics

But the industrial leaders of this the United States in alliance with the industrial leaders of other countries have decided that securing Middle East oil is worth consuming trillions of dollars of their respective peoples capital, well mostly the American peoples capital in order to build these fantastic Las Vegas style playgrounds.

I just can't believe that an embassy that will cost over 5 billion dollars is being built as a disposable edifice, just as I don’t believe that the Al Udeid United States Air Base just outside Doha, Qatar will be abandoned any time soon.

Think of this embassy in conjunction with Dubai and Doha and Bahrain, where industrialists from around the world are investing hundreds of billions.

These new investments have to be protected and the embassy in Baghdad is part of the regional security plan.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ah, a fitting shrine to a Texas-sized dream of Empire!
Posted by: Basenjis on May 30, 2007 12:51 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How gratifying it must be to all supporters of George Bush's war to see this 21st century marvel rise amid the rubble of a liberated and democratized Iraq. And, built on the generosity of our own elected Congress, it rises on hallowed ground that was once known as the very cradle of western civilization. Another great American success story! George has made us all proud.

What a monstrous tribute to the monstrous fantasies of a barely literate, totally incompetent cowboy president, directly complicit in the horrors inflicted on these battered and brutalized ancient people. Even now, trying to survive from day to day in the total hell we have made of their country, these Iraqis are still more of a threat to themselves than they ever were to the richest, most powerful, most heavily armed and militarized country in the entire world. We should hang our heads in shame!

What does it take to get real evil doers impeached?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

once it opens....
Posted by: eosrk on May 30, 2007 1:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
....they better check between the walls to make sure there aren't "suprises" lurking between them, like a bomb.....or something.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And the people
Posted by: TruthBeTold on May 30, 2007 2:13 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
whose lives have been destroyed by hurricanes, forest fires, tornadoes and floods in this country can't catch a break.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No, Have Two American Embassies
Posted by: sofla100 on May 30, 2007 3:37 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They should have two USA embassies, not just one. Why?, well, one could serve the "usual function" of USA embassies. The other one, they could just use a local outhouse. Wining and dining the "commercial class" to secure "American and foreign capital," as well as the usual hangout for the CIA and intelligence boys, that could be the function of the first one, the big, oppulent one. The other one, the "outhouse," that one is for the usual slew of standard (not wealthy) Americans who need some help. You know, robbed and out of money, thrown in the local jail, etc. Especially, it would be the place for independent journalists to go for "information." The oppulent one, that would also be reserved for Colonels and Generals to use for their recreational activities as well. The Sargents and "enlisted scum," they, of course, get the outhouse for what they need. Make sense?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Here's a bit of information straight from the horses mouth
Posted by: ateo on May 30, 2007 5:05 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Rice's senior adviser on Iraq, David Satterfield, said the embassy is not disproportionately expensive and will serve U.S. interests for years. The second-most expensive embassy is the smaller $434 million U.S. mission being built in Beijing.

"We assume there will be a significant, enduring U.S. presence in Iraq," Satterfield said."

Significant, enduring U.S. presence in Iraq. Yep.

Like I keep saying, we're going to be in Iraq in an occupation role until at least 2013 if we can get things stabilized by then. We'll probably have troops based in Iraq for the next 50 years. When I was in the Air Force there was already talk of making Iraq a short overseas tour (1 year) like Turkey or Korea. The country is too chaotic at the moment for that but it's coming down the pipeline.

Everyone talks about the permanent bases that are being built in Iraq but doesn't seem to actually analyze the word "permanent" and what it means.

It means we're not leaving Iraq, we never intended to leave Iraq, the plan was to create a strategic base for U.S. military troops in the Middle East forever - or at least until the oil dries up. Which I've said all along.

With the Democrats using anti-war sentiment to get elected - but not actually doing anything to stop the war - we better all get used to it because the people don't run this country and the elites that do no longer feel the need to even let us think otherwise.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pity
Posted by: Melvin on May 30, 2007 7:30 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
USA; your fucked! Make no bone about it make no exuses.
You live in a corporate Kingdom & have NO guts to change anything.
You are more concerned with who will be the last off the Island & what are the cheapest products at Wall Mart.
I pity you more than I am annoyed at you. Unfortuatley with your decline you will pull down innocents with you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Pity Posted by: Radicalizer
Laugh-In Looks at the News
Posted by: xbj on May 31, 2007 12:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I remember what a laugh it got in 1968 when Dan Rowan, pipe in hand, would sit and read the News, and announce "Dateline 1978, from the Nation's Capitol, HANOI."

Not so funny now. Folks, until we find a way to shut off their gravy train permanently, they will CREATE ENDLESS reasons to stay in the Mideast FOREVER.

Make no bones about it... there is a method to the madness of spreading DU ordinance around Iraq and Afghanistan, and yes, sadly, eventually Iran... the idea is to turn it into a nuclear waste poisoned dead zone, where nothing can live, and robot oil wells, manned by the occasional maintenance crew in biohazard suits, will pump the oil, but only enough to keep prices sky high.

That's the REAL Imperial plan for "democracy" in the Mideast.

Hitler, Stalin, and Mao put together were Beaver Cleaver compared to CheneyCo.

And where will all those people go, you ask?

The Israeli government has the answer: "into the ocean."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» scalar warfare Posted by: Skipper
» RE: scalar warfare Posted by: xbj
An Oasis in need....
Posted by: civilized european on May 31, 2007 3:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yet more money well spent by the American public, an oasis of moral certitude and the center from which the American dream can be propogated throughout the middle east. I do have one negative comment though, that is that there will be 592 million dollars spent on the complex yet as I perused the architects plans I did not see one church indicated! I looked on the architects website and they have previously designed a church, which in my view would fit in perfectly well with the ambience of the embassy . I feel that for the thousands of God fearing Christian citizens who will be working however indirectly for the well being and salvation of the, if I may say, often ungrateful unwashed masses that surround them, a place of worship is an absolute necessity. I suggest that for a few more million dollars one of your megachurches could be built not only as a place to revitalize the faithful but also as a beacon of hope and a reminder that He will return to set things right!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wow! deja-vu!
Posted by: moflard on May 31, 2007 3:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So the Yanks are building the Crusader Castles now. Maybe Bush should look at what happened to the first lot hmm?

And isn't it is so generous of him, giving Al-Q such a lovely big target to aim at; but then his family and Bin Laden's are old friends.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

SJ
Posted by: SJ on Jun 4, 2007 2:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It shows just how arrogant Bush and Co realy are. But so are some of these responses. As the democrates stall (let us not forget some of the attacks on these people was somewhat in progress through Bush daddy and Clinton with war and terrible sanctions. No, the slaughter continues and best we get is the reprts of american lives lost. Still nothing of the millions of Iraqis dead and refugees. What is going on is scarey stuff. The assault on our own republic and constitution, this early start of the elections are ment as a distraction. To put the carrot out to give the illusion help is on the way. People are not even listening to the democrats, not so much what they are saying but what they are leaving out. Any slow withdrawal emboldens these Facists. to even think 08 will be the yr to get our freedoms back? Democrates have promised the powers that be Corps and elite they will win this war on another path. Hillary Clinton pledged to keep Isreals concerns and interests in Jan to IPAC. The anti war movement will have to become history breaking to become effective as it never has and the youth cannot accomplish this teh older generation will have to step up. Edwards just moved into a new home 3/4 the size of football field, after working on hedge funds in the bahamas. Kuchinic says nothing much differant than last election. Cut funding but they won't. And he is marginalized. They are tip toeing and it is obvious. Its true there is every reason to believe they will try another major pwer grab through an insident or bush excersizing his established divine right. If not they are determined to, obviously continue the onslaught. God if they could only be tried for crimes against humanity likethe nazis. The international unrest is growing and EU people are seeing their freedoms dwindling and their standards of living. Something may very well have to give. Loss of middle class and the arrogance of the elite to continue to suport or really push this war onward, evidenced by the medias continuance to supress info and not report. Waiting for the elction is what they want the people to fall for.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]