Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

War on Iraq

Representative Confronts American Empire on House Floor

By Rep. Jim McDermott, AlterNet. Posted May 26, 2007.


Rep. Jim McDermott rescues some history from the memory hole and puts Iraq into context: It's always been all about the oil.
Advertisement

Editor's note: After a week that saw Democrats cave to the White House in the worst possible way on Iraq, we thought this speech, offered on the House floor by Rep. Jim McDermott, D-Wa., last Wednesday, was worth highlighting. In a brief, five-minute commentary, McDermott does something almost unheard of in Washington: He looks at an issue in its larger historical context instead of pretending it just sprung up overnight like mushrooms after a rainfall.

Mr. Speaker:

This president and vice president have vowed to repeat the mistakes of history, and they have put into motion a plan to do just that in Iran, even as the House is about to send the president a box of blank checks for Iraq, against the will of the American people.

The history is worth knowing.

In 1953, the United States and United Kingdom launched Operation Ajax, a covert CIA operation to destabilize and remove the democratically elected government of Iran, including then Prime Minister Mohammed Mossadegh.

Why? Oil.

Under Mossadegh, the Iranian government decided to reclaim Iran's rightful ownership of its national oil treasure, which had been exclusively controlled by the British who were taking 85 percent of the profits.

Oh, and by the way, the U.K. also kept the books secret, merely telling Iran what its 15 percent take was.

As soon as Mossadegh began to reclaim Iran's oil treasure, it was all over. Operation Ajax was set into motion.

The U.S. embassy in Tehran provoked phony internal Iranian dissent, while the Brits engineered an Iranian financial crisis by orchestrating a global boycott of Iranian oil. We brought down the Iranian government and installed the Shah.

For two decades, we propped up the Shah against the will of the Iranian people. It was all about controlling Iran. It still is. Today, ABC News is reporting exclusively that this president has authorized a new covert CIA plot to bring down the Iranian government.

I ask unanimous consent to enter into the record the journalism produced by chief investigative reporter Brian Ross and Richard Esposito of ABC News.

This is their lead sentence in the story.

"The CIA has received secret presidential approval to mount a covert 'black' operation to destabilize the Iranian government, current and former officials in the intelligence community tell the Blotter on ABCNews.com."

We’re back in 1953, and that worked out so well.

Of course, the vice president wanted to invade Iran, so we can be sure he will spin new tales of fear in coming days to keep his preferred option, invasion, very much alive.

The president knows only one way -- my way or the highway.

His vice president knows only one way -- invade and seize control of what you want -- and he wants the oil treasure of Iraq and Iran to become wholly owned subsidiaries of the western oil companies he so favors.

With Iraq in civil war, the president has authorized a secret plan to repeat the doomed mistakes of history in Iran.

How many billions of reconstruction money for Iraq will be siphoned off for the deconstruction of Iran?

The American people are virtually shouting at us to pay attention and get our soldiers out of Iraq, now.

Vast sums of U.S. taxpayer money are flowing into Iraq and billions of U.S. dollars are missing.

The special inspector for Iraq reconstruction told a San Antonio newspaper last week that corruption in Iraq is endemic and debilitating.

But, Prime Minister al-Maliki has granted ministers and former ministers immunity from prosecution by Iraq’s Commission on Public Integrity.

And, in turn, the ministers can shield their own employees from prosecution.

And, a government that has been told by this president and vice president to pass an oil law that transfers control -- and profits -- to Western oil companies, just like the good old days in Iran.

Overthrowing Iran in 1953 was all about oil. Invading Iraq was all about oil. And the new secret plot against Iran is all about oil.

Oil is the only benchmark this president and vice president want, and they will keep American soldiers fighting and dying until an oil law is passed in Iraq that gives Western oil companies control of the spigot.

It is time to unmask the latest doomed plot to overthrow Iran and past time to get out soldiers out of Iraq.

Nothing less than protecting our troops is acceptable.

Thank you.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: iraq, mcdermott

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from War on Iraq! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
There must be some mistake
Posted by: Germanicus on May 26, 2007 1:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I mean that someone who speaks so honestly on American foreign policy can actually be a member of Congress defies belief. We only need another 400 like him to have something resembling a representative legislature.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: There must be some mistake Posted by: Edward George
The betrayal of democracy is mostly about appeasing class interests
Posted by: Universal on May 26, 2007 4:55 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The long history of corrupting, "betraying", democratic principles and standards, "capitulating" appeasing corporate interests, through our fascist foreign policies, the overthrow of national democratic movements, for military dictators, whether in Vietnam, Korea, Indonesia, Latin America, Africa or the Middle East, became boilerplate policies during the Cold War. These related words above were used also by Keith Olbermann in his description of what we have done with our own democracy. Go to truthout to see and hear: The Entire Governemtn Has Failed Us....
linked text

The corruption, not only of democracy at home, for elite and dictatorial elites abroad, also involved mislabeling these fascist cold war policies as the struggle for Democracy against Stalinism, also mislabeling, the term Communism, like Democracy, the way Hitler used "Socialism" like toilet paper, to justify German Corporate Fascism, to hoodwink and corrupt ideology, the way middle layers, have always corrupted, in the service of oligarchy. Similarily, Bush, like all his predecessors, democrats and republicans, used, corrupted "Democracy" like toilet paper, to justify Amerikan Corporate Fascism, with the Corporate media cheerleading these imperial policies during the Cold War, just as they did in the Post Cold war period.

Keith Olbermann uses the correct analogy, "the Neville Chamberlain moment" to describe this institutional corruption, appeasement, betrayal, of Democrats, and their capitulation to, not only George, but to the policies of the Cold War, now Post War period, their loyalty to Amerikan corporate and fascist policies that always were present, but now have become exposed, the shroud lifted, where Class interests, not democratic interests, was always about serving corporate and imperial policies of an oligarchic Empire. He correctly points out that the way the History books teach Neville Chamberlain's betrayal to Germany's corporate fascism, and Hitler, is too narrow, implying an individual failure, when in fact it is an instiutional failure, by a whole range of actors and agents, the corrupted middle layers, by oligarchy, who themselves become the corrupted class of Neville Chamberlains, in Spades, capitulating, betraying appeasing class standards, while claiming falsely democratic standards.

This betrayal is not a new revelation, or only applies to Iraq, "the Entire Government has failed", to use Olbermann's words, since the revolutionary liberals of the Enlightenment, who overthrew the Feudal class system, had their goal as the fully developed middle layers, without class masters, and exploited classes below, as the agency, and mechanism, which would reproduce between itself and the nation state, the link to an international revolutionary democratic social principle, and self reproducing universal mechanism, instead of the corrupted, transformed class liberals who reproduced class nationalism, and imperial corporate policies. The original betrayal took place, once the commercial classes, put property rights over universal rights, and seized hold through a state, with its class laws in place, the Napoleonic Laws of Order, thus inserting an oligarchy, between its middle layers and itself. The betrayal of the French Revolution was accomplished, when Commericial Capitalism, had in place the imperial policies by Napoelon, the very first capitalist Empire and thug who marched into Europe and Russia, alienating all the intellectuals, revolutionary liberals, who initially supported the French revolution with its revolutionary goals. Beethoven tore up his musical piece and renamed it Eroica, and called Napoleon, just another mere, failed man. Beethoven, and the post-Enlightenment intellectuals rejected these class Liberals, hence the movement towards Marxism, reclaiming the universal democratic values. My website: linked text

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Be sure to be seated off of the field when the games begin.
Posted by: ssegallmd on May 26, 2007 5:38 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Americans don't recognize a dictatorship when they live in one. I guess if nobody calls himself or herself fuehrer, there's no way for Americans to tell.

Look at Cheney. What is he if not a dictator? How does the description of America's involvement in Iran and Iraq above under this regime differ from a dictatorship? It's corporate driven, militarily enforced, and not up for debate or discussion, traitor.

The American citizens have no part in it except to pick up the bill. You, as nephew to your Uncle Sam, are paying for an army to deliver Middle Eastern oil to companies that regularly and openly cheat and gouge you.

Did you think that you’d be sharing in the booty, maybe in the form of some of that oil money repaying the American people for funding the catastrophe? Think again. "Free" oil (free to big oil, that is, but not to you) won't cause oil prices to fall. Why should they? This isn't a free market. The invisible hand has been cut off at the wrist.

Big oil in America is the definition of an oligopoly, and it's unholy alliance with the neocons, combined with fixed elections and the flagrant disregard of the will of the citizens (and throw in the assault on truth, anti-intellectualism, nationalism, religious chauvinism, etc.), is the very definition of fascism.

I'm sorry to say, however, that it is as it should be, given the American people. Americans have been negligent stewards of their democracy, and now it is gone. We were repeatedly warned from the past to remain ever vigilant, and which principles to defend.

But those principles, embodied in law as expressed and implied rights, were recently shit-canned by the trembling American people into a political black hole faster than emails at the RNC in exchange for a false sense of security promised by obvious liars like Bush and Giuliani. Americans didn't even get the magic beans that the idiot boy in the fable got for his cow. They got invisible magic beans.

I'm sorry, but you reap what you sow, and the price for irresponsibility and moral cowardice is the boot on the neck. Those are the rules, and everybody has access to them, even if they choose to remain ignorant of them. People have got to read more than Harry Potter, or they will become children politically, too - no rights. You drop a ball it falls. Americans dropped the ball. This is political physics. Or political biology if you will: natural selection. The American people will pay for their civic dereliction, and that is just.

I for one refuse to share that destiny, so I am arranging for my emigration, and have been for a while. I wasn't derelict, and I wasn't fooled, and I refuse to share in the consequences of this cruel stupidity. Neither were most of you reading these words.

The people that deserve that are the nasty people who repeatedly voted for Republicans in the face of all kinds of red flags. They will go down with this ship, and rightfully so. As willing victims of their oppressors, laboring under the influence of a romantic but defective conception of patriarchy and patriotism, their fates are sealed by their own blind "faith" in America. That's the dereliction part.

In the immortal words of Dean Wormer, "Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life." Grab a couple of Big Macs, a sixer, turn on American Idle (sic), and laissez le bon temps rouler!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How refreshing to hear an intelligent man in Congress
Posted by: Bluecat on May 26, 2007 6:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I greatly admire a person who will stand up and with intelligence and facts speak with force and conviction for the majority of the American people versus the twenty-eight percent who think that life is beautiful under bush. People who deny it is about the oil, which still equals power ,are delusional. The coup has occurred, what will the fall-out be? Thank you Mr. McD. for trying!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another reason to abolish the CIA
Posted by: mgloraine on May 26, 2007 6:58 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Excellent observations, well stated by Mr. McDermott. It's good to know that 20th Century history has not yet been entirely forgotten or rewritten.
It would not be difficult to continue the history lesson to include some of the other smashing successes of the CIA, like the United Fruit "revolutions" in Central America (which gave us the term "banana republic"), the Bay of Pigs, the assassination of Salvador Allende, the entire Iran-Contra scandal, etc.
It's a lengthy list of failures, backfires, and plots running amok. And those are just the obvious debacles they were unable to hide or deny.
Although the mission of the CIA is supposedly to gather intelligence (what a great idea!), it seems that historically they have been used instead to meddle illegally in the affairs of sovereign nations abroad, and to violate the rights of Americans here at home.
The United States does not and should not need a Gestapo. If we can't accomplish our objectives through legal, ethical means, maybe we need to re-examine the objectives rather than finding a way to break or bypass the laws.
It also seems rather intuitively evident that people in other parts of the world would be less likely to bring violence and terrorism to the US if the US were not actively bringing violence and terrorism to their home town.
Leaving a Gestapo lying around for a bunch of gangsters like the Bush Mob is a guaranteed recipe for international adventurism such as the present Iraq Project, and evidently the upcoming Iran Project.
The CIA needs to go on the (ever-lengthening) "clean-up list":
1. Impeachment
2. Removal from office
3. War-Crimes trials
4. Eliminate electoral college
5. Terms limits for Supreme Court Justices
6. Abolish NSA
7. Abolish CIA
8. (add your favorite clean-up item here!)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Democrats cave in the worst way possible"
Posted by: WitchyNy on May 26, 2007 7:11 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
About time Alternet. I remember Jim from Washington (state).
He is one of the few good guys. That is if he did NOT vote for the 93 billion additional dollars to continue to fund this war.
We can no longer just call it Bush's war-it is now the Democrats war too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» But... Posted by: kwalla
The Patriot and The Oil
Posted by: icurhuman2 on May 26, 2007 7:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That America has been actively interfering in the affairs of other nations for the express purpose of taking those nation's assets, whether it be copper in the case of Chile, or oil, gas, gold, silver, platinum etc, in the case of any nation that has any, including the entire Middle East, is common knowledge to anyone who lives outside of America. There is no revelation in hearing any declaration of intent regarding the Iraq war. Any denial of the truth is impossible, except between Americans.

For a nation supposedly far more advanced and democratic than any other, the general ignorance of the American population regarding the policies of its own government is far beyond staggering. The oft-used excuse that Americans are insulated from the world through some kind of institutionalised stupidity, actively promoted by the plutocrats, doesn't carry weight anymore. It is too easy today to get any information you like, all you need to do is look for it, and sometimes you don't even need to do that, sometimes it will just come to you like a maniac with a knife... maybe in a blog when you least expect it.

The other excuse, gaining more credit lately, is that the media that would alert the population is mostly in the pocket of the policy-makers, and, even that they are the policy-makers behind the scenes. However, although businesses have had a lot to do with actual invasions, assassinations, and changes-of-governments, as Pepsi and AT&T did with the installation of the dictator Pinochet, they aren't the cause of mass-blindness in the general population.

The answer to "why a shuttered American view of the world?" actually comes from the most basic of American standards, and, the most basic of human weaknesses; patriotism in the former, and pride in the latter. From birth, Americans, all Americans, are taught from kindergarten that patriotism is the most important thing required to be a good citizen, and, with a hand over their hearts, swear allegiance to their soil and banner no matter what blood is spilled in the name of national pride, prestige, or claim to pillage.

This brings us to the unspoken truths that permeate the fractured social conscience of the most gluttonous, avaricious and morbidly bloated culture, and empire, that has ever reigned. What are these truths? There are so many that to list them would be pointless, but they would range from war atrocity denials to denying the consuming fallibility of unchained ambition and the hypocritically pompous feigned- righteousness of its leadership.

You can shove the facts, point-by-point, down the throats of every American Joe Q Public but you can't make them think about it. The United States of Denial is a little like the Fool's Paradise, where ignorance may be bliss, but to be able to deny the truth entirely is real paradise.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Patriot and The Oil Posted by: johnuw93
Amen
Posted by: Robba29 on May 26, 2007 7:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
McDermitt! Too bad nobody was wathcing/listening. I wish every paper in the country ran this--its not long, but, it could, and that's a big could, open people's eyes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Innocent Blood for OIL.....
Posted by: picket on May 26, 2007 7:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We know....we knew. Our oppressors have hearts of stone. Have we been out-foxed or will we live to see justice for the traitors of the USA?

Ask those running for the President about ....CAGING.....a dirty dirty Voter Suppression Crime played on innocent Americans in 2006. MSM has been bought and sold so will those citizens called "stupid" ever hear???

1/18/07..USDA says 35 million Americans have "very low food security" ...Hello..that means HUNGRY.

"A stony adversary, an inhuman wretch, incapable of pity, void and empty from any dram of mercy". Wm Shakespeare

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

two must-read articles on this subject
Posted by: wefearwhatwedontunderstand on May 26, 2007 8:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Last summer, Tom Engelhardt posted these excellent articles about past and present black operations and their chilling effects. These should be added to the required reading list about our "foreign policy" that has been suggested by Ron Paul.
The Swift Boating of America By Greg Grandin
Thirty Flew into the Cuckoo's Nest: The Tangled Web of American "Intelligence" By Tom Engelhardt

Grandin's article begins,
"An illegal war, torture rooms, warrantless wiretapping, manipulated intelligence, secret prisons, disinformation planted in the press, graft, and billions of reconstruction dollars gone missing: just when it seemed that the Bush administration had reached its corruption quota comes a new scandal. This one is a bribery case involving defense contractors, Republican congressmen, prostitutes, secret Hawaiian getaways, Scottish castles, and -- wait for it -- the Watergate Hotel. At its center is the just ex-Executive Director of the CIA, Kyle "Dusty" Foggo, whose sole qualification for being appointed to that post by just ex-Director Porter Goss seems to have been his ability, while head of the Agency's Frankfurt post, to hand out bottled-water contracts to friends and show junketing politicians a good time.

Don't fret though if you are having trouble separating this particular crime from other Republican offenses. There's a good reason -- they're all one scandal, part of the same wave of militarism, fraud, and ideology that has swamped American politics of late. While this wave of scandal seems now to be heading for tsunami proportions, its first swells date back decades. Just take a look at Dusty's résumé.

After his zealotry got him booted from Sears' security and the San Diego police department, Foggo drew on his collegiate Young Republican connections to land a job in the early 1980s with the CIA. His first mission was in Honduras, then the staging ground for Ronald Reagan's secret paramilitary war against Nicaragua's leftist Sandinista government. In addition to his official duties, Foggo helped his old college buddy Brent Wilkes -- the defense contractor now implicated in the ongoing bribery case involving former Republican Congressman Randy "Duke" Cunningham -- bring conservative cadres down to Central America. There, he introduced them to anti-Sandinista rebels, better known as Contras. It seems that, even then, a lot more than anti-Communist solidarity was on the agenda. Three of Wilkes' former friends now claim that these trips included partying with prostitutes. "

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nu Plages
Posted by: irifi on May 26, 2007 8:46 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Untied We Stand!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"War for oil" is just a diversion
Posted by: rwa on May 26, 2007 8:51 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Isn't it revealing that you have to go back decades to get to the examples of U.S. imperial hegemony that are cited? Let's try to develop a CURRENT analysis.
The whole "war for oil" dogma falls apart when you consider the cost to the U.S. of maintaining occupations (a drain that IS a REAL threat to America). Abundant offshore and heavy oil resources are available throughout the world at a production cost of $15 - $30/barrel. It's the difference in costs that should be considered when evaluating if war for oil pays. At the present cost of $1,000/barrel for Iraqi oil it isn't very competitive. In fact, it is doubtful that the U.S. can persuade China to continue to finance this ongoing loss. How much more $1,000 oil can the U.S. afford?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: "War for oil" is just a diversion Posted by: Joshua Holland
Republicans claim war for oil is a "Conspiracy Theory"
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on May 26, 2007 9:42 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So far, two Democrats have apparently managed to speak the truth: Dennis Kucinich also had a one-hour speech that addressed the Iraqi hydrocarbon law:

It's All About Oil
by Dennis J. Kucinich, Znet


This war is about oil.
We must not be party to the Administration's blatant attempt to set the stage for multinational oil companies to take over Iraq's oil resources....

The Administration has once again misled Congress by mislabeling the draft law as an oil revenues distribution law, just as the Administration misled Congress about the Iraq war.

The war in Iraq is a stain on American history. Let us not further besmirch our nation by participating in the outrageous exploitation of a nation which is in shambles due to U.S. intervention.

The fact is that except for three scant lines, the entire 33 page "Hydrocarbon Law," is about creating a complex legal structure to facilitate the privatization of Iraqi oil...


What was the Republican response to this? "It's a silly conspiracy theory!" - do they actually expect anyone to believe that? No - but they do expect the corporate media to continue to provide cover for the real goals of Bush&Co. in the Middle East.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Oil, water, drugs and endless resource wars
Posted by: apple pie on May 26, 2007 10:03 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oil is a crucial component of why we invade soveriegn nations and wage war. But we should not forget water or drugs either. I have little doubt that American and other corporations will engage our military to fight for water in the future, the process has already started in South American nations. As our biosphere continues to collapse fresh water will increasingly become defined as a commodity, to be brought, sold and warred over. As far as drugs go, well there is the Golden Triangle of Burma and Laos, Afghansitan, Noriega's Panama, and Columbia, all areas that have experienced the heavy atrocity-colored hand of American military 'pacifications' over the past forty years.

And then there is the Congo (former Zaire) where American made weapons, payola, and advice have doomed multiple generations of humans to endless slaughter, rape, and terror. But our cell phone companies need the coltan. Not to mention diamonds, uranium, and precious metals.

Does our existence demand these wars? Does our culture rest only on the proppings of lifeless commodities? Is this the only way that Americans, the richest and most insulated people on the planet, can attain happiness?

Or is it just another lie perpetuated by corproate interests and their vast propaganda mills?

Yes, it is good that Jim Mcdermott is speaking the obvious...but to what end? Are we able, as a people and a culture, to change this mad course we are on?

Where is the debate on consumption and the increasingly violent corporate death spiral?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» the obvious Posted by: Coleman
If the Iraq War isn’t about oil, then consider these AMAZING coincidences.
Posted by: HughScott on May 26, 2007 11:11 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush, Cheney and UN Ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad all worked in the petroleum industry. Not coincidentally, in 2001, Cheney held secret talks with prominent oil company executives to set White House energy policy.

Previously, in 1997, Cheney and Khalilzad helped form the rightwing subversive organization, Project for a New American Century (PNAC). Some critics have dubbed PNAC's imperialist goals the "Cheney strategy," which employs State Department initiatives to gain global energy control by the Big Four American/U.S.-connected oil giants -- Chevron. Exxon-Mobil, BP and Royal Dutch Shell. Simply put, the PNAC/Cheney strategy is aimed at controlling the world’s major oil and natural gas deposits.

George W. is connected to PNAC through his brother, Jeb, a 1997 founder.

Regarding Iraq, Steve Forbes, an original PNAC member, recently stated he wants the IMF out of the country and private oil companies in.

Particularly noteworthy is Ambassador Khalilzad, who worked for Unocal as a high-paid consultant. He also served as a Chevron board member.

When Bush 41 was president, Khalilzad worked for fellow PNAC founder Paul Wolfowitz in the Defense Department. Prior to Gulf War 1, Wolfowitz and Khalilzad advocated regime change in Iraq to gain control of its vast petroleum reserves.

After Khalilzad left the DOD, he worked for the Rand Corporation, a conservative think-tank that performed research for the U.S. military, DOD and American intelligence community. Not surprisingly, Unocal was a Rand client.

While consulting for Unocal, Khalilzad participated in talks with the Taliban on Afghan oil and gas pipeline infrastructure, escorted a delegation of Taliban leaders that visited Unocal headquarters in Texas, and called for the United States to support their regime.

During the Clinton years, Khalilzad conducted risk assessments for Unocal on their proposed 900-mile pipeline project to transport natural gas from Turkmenistan to Pakistan through Afghanistan. Even as the Clinton administration began to recognize the repressive nature of the Taliban regime and its links to Osama Bin Laden, Khalilzad called for U.S. engagement with the Taliban.

The history of Unocal’s Middle East adventurism was featured in a Washington Post story headlined, “How Afghanistan Went Unlisted as a Terrorist Sponsor.”

The article said Unocal hired Henry Kissinger and former U.S. ambassador John Maresca for advisory work. Marcesca later became a Unocal vice president. Robert Oakley, former U.S. ambassador to Pakistan, was hired by Unocal as well for advisory work.

PNAC member Richard Armitage, Deputy Secretary of State under Colin Powell, also performed Unocal contract work. No stranger to the pipeline business, Armitage was a member of the Burma/Myanmar Forum, a group that received major funding from Unocal. In 1997, he was implicated in a lawsuit filed by Burmese villagers who suffered human rights abuses during the construction of a Unocal pipeline. Halliburton, under Dick Cheney, also performed contract work on the Burmese project.

For AlterNet visitors unfamiliar with PNAC who desire more information about the greatest threat to liberty-loving Americans since the Cold War ended, visit the non-profit investigative website, FreedomCentralUSA.

For AlterNeters aware of PNAC, the website provides an alphabetical list of 225 PNAC signatories including Democratic hawks with liberal skins -- such as Clinton's former Secretary of State Madeline Albright.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thank you Mr. McDermott
Posted by: persian on May 26, 2007 4:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Iran had a democratically elected govt. with free press and a elected parliment (majlis) between 1950-1953. Prime minster Mossadegh was secular and friendly toward u.s. His only fault was that he was an iranian nationalist who refused to compromise his nations' interests. U.S and U.K with the help of some in iranian military overthrew his government. Operation ajax succeeded in bringing back the shah's dictatorial rule to iran from 1953 thru 1978.
Shah's secrect police (savak) with help from CIA and Israel's Mossad was brutal and efficient.Savak managed to destroy all opposition except the one originating from islamic seminary schools in city of Qom. I believe the islamic revolution was the unintended outcome of CIA's Ajax operation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bush IS working to get our soldiers out of Iraq!!
Posted by: kwalla on May 26, 2007 10:42 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"The American people are virtually shouting at us to pay attention and get our soldiers out of Iraq, now."

Oh, but apparently he's planning on sending them to Iran...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The islamic revolution was the unintended outcome of CIA's Ajax operation.
Posted by: boing007 on May 27, 2007 5:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For over 50 years the CIA and other secret agencies have provoked unintended and intended consequences worldwide.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Amazing problems with the war for oil theory
Posted by: rwa on May 27, 2007 7:19 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In order to maintain high prices, supply must held back. Think about the timely shut down of the BP Alaska pipeline just when supply began to exceed demand. In fact, vast quantities of oil are available at a $30/barrel cost of production in Venezuela, this heavy oil will be developed when a market emerges that is free of the threat of $25 oil. Cornering the world's oil supply is simply a far fetched idea that could never be accomplished. Most of the world's known reserves are in Venezuela, Canada, and Russia (once you include heavy oil), so control of M.E. oil is not the bonanza that is presented. In fact the world is awash with un-explored offshore fields and previously underdeveloped areas such as Cuba, Cambodia, and indeed most of the southern hemisphere.The argument that M.E. oil is critical due to it's cheap cost of production dissolves when examined in the reality of current oil prices that range from $55 - $70. Having oil at $1.50 is good for undercutting the competition, but why would big oil want to bring oil prices down? This certainly has not been their M.O.

U.S. policy prior to the invasion was restriction of Iraqi oil exports through sanctions. That doesn't fit well with the beleif that they were after the oil. Rather their goal was the supression of Iraqi oil reaching the global markets.

There is a case to be made for "war against oil". As in any street gang territory dispute, the ability to limit competition is some thing to fight for. The general promotion of fear and fascism also can be sustained as an outcome of the Global War on Terror. However, once you analise the real world reserves of oil in their full abundance it becomes obvious that "controlling" them would be a pipe dream and accomplished only through complete world domination anyway. Reducing current production by stirring up problems here and there is still a profitable game, but this can be accomplished through sanctions, naval embargoes, or black ops for very little cost (either financial or in lives). Therefore it remains that the real purpose of the occupations is to prevent any credible opposition to Israeli expansion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Surely, others also know
Posted by: Democritus on May 27, 2007 7:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If Reps. McDermott and Kucinich know that our invasion of Iraq was about controlling their oil, and our planned destabilization of Iran is also about oil, then surely others in Congress must know about it, too. In the case of those Republicans who support Bush and Cheney, come what may, we can only surmise that they agree with them and would be willing to sacrifice blood--although not theirs--for the benefit of the oil industries. Do the Democrats who vote to keep funding the Bush/Cheney war also know what McDermott knows? If so, they seem to be in collusion with the oil-hungry Republicans; if not, then perhaps they're too stupid to continue to hold office. What about Nancy Pelosi? She is not stupid. So why is the impeachment of Cheney and Bush not on the table? Don't tell me that she, too, has ties to the oil industry. Please, Nancy, say it isn't so.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Memorable Day Salute to the Architects of Gulf War 2 and Other Republican Hawks.
Posted by: HughScott on May 27, 2007 9:57 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
George W. Bush: Went AWOL during the Vietnam War and lied about it to get elected.
Dick Cheney: Dodged the draft, never served and bragged about getting five deferments.
Scooter Libby: Dodged the draft and never served.
Donald Rumsfeld: Evaded overseas duty while a Navy instructor pilot.
Paul Wolfowitz: Dodged the draft and never served.

Other noteworthy Republican hawks who NEVER served in uniform, much less saw combat.

National Security Advisor Stephen Hadley
White House Legal Counselor Dan Bartlett
White House Press Secretary Tony Snow
Former White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan
RNC Chairman Ken Mehlman
Former RNC Chairman Ed Gillespie
Former Bush 43 Administrator of Iraq Paul Bremer
UN Ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad
Supreme Court Judge Antonin Scalia
Supreme Court Judge Clarence Thomas
Former Attorney General John Ashcroft
Former Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist
Former Majority Whip Mitch McConnell
Senator Orrin Hatch
Former Senator Rick Santorum
Senator Richard Shelby
Senator Jon Kyl
Former Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott
Former House Majority leader Dennis Hastert
Former House Majority Leader Dick Armey
Representative David Dreier
Former Representative Tom Delay
Representative James Sensenbrenner
Former Speaker Newt Gingrich
Former Representative JC Watts
Florida Governor Jeb Bush
New York Governor George Pataki
NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg
Jack Kemp
Rudy Giuliani
William Bennett
Bill Kristol
Rush Limbaugh
Bill O’Reilly
Sean Hannity
Ken Starr
Gary Bauer
Ralph Reed

I, Hugh Scott, Vietnam veteran and ex-USAF pilot with a family history of honorable military service going back to 1776, thank all of you for not serving in America’s armed forces. They deserved a lot more than what you had to offer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Brave War Heroes All Posted by: cashelboylo
Back in the real world:
Posted by: rwa on May 27, 2007 10:12 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pipeline to carry Iraqi crude to Iran



By Mohamed Hameed



Azzaman, May 26, 2007



Iraq has accepted an Iranian offer to build a pipeline connecting its terminals and refineries to the prolific Iraqi oil fields in Basra.


Assem Jihad, Oil Ministry’s Information Officer said, the agreement was reached during a meeting between Oil Minister Hussain Shahristani and the Iranian ambassador in Baghdad.

Initially, the pipeline will carry 200,000 barrels of Iraqi crude to Iran.


The countries will soon form a joint committee on how to implement the project, Jihad said.

However, Jihad declined comment on financing and duration of execution.


But said Shahristani has invited Iranian firms to invest in Iraq and present their offers to build new refineries in the country.


The government has said it would extend Iranian firms preferential treatment because many of them are still operating in southern Iraq despite the flight of other foreign companies.

www.azzaman.com/english

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

McDermott is not the only one that knows!
Posted by: common intelligence on May 27, 2007 11:08 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Actually McDermott not alone except he is only one of a few that have spoken out, and had their knowledge buried by the media. The media is controlled far greater thanthe Natzis had. And with the whithering attention span of Americans constantly being pushed to the next distraction, individuals become isolated in their knowledge and ability to assemble the truth. There are only those few that have been keeping up with the whole treaterous overthow our country, our home land, has been going though that realize the impact the NeoCons have plotted over the years. We see and yell and scream on deaf ears yet have been labled by the media indirectly, as conspirasists.
The dumbing down of America is what the program of "No child left Behind" is really about. Computer technology is how it is implimented so that people "believe" that the thinking is all unnecessary", therefore why?

I wish there was a God, but this whole black hole now happening to humanity, from the Oil to world wide decline in resources is makinds ingnorant creation.

Since Oil power is at the root of the whole environmental & economic problem, the personal economic model that people are so seemingly locked into must be changed by individuals.

So many times we hear the problems expounded on, yet no answers or action! So here again I am compelled to say, "Stop participating", as much as we can. The answers are simple. STOP feeding the monsters, STOP Buying the stuff and all the materialistic crap. Slow your lives down. It is the speed of consumption that is making all we see happen.

It's like as the Military fund that just got voted in again. If politicians would have not given in, who the hell cares if Bush just vetos it again. Who cares if the hole damn congress is shut down in a stalemate. Shut the whole damn WAR (sorry I ment Invasion) down. The sooner Americans face the music of truth the sooner the fascist will loose control.

Stop buying in the stock market, insurances, There is no Insurance just the leaching off of the 5% of the population that are lead to believe they can have their American Dream. IT'S JUST A GAWN DAMN DREAM, idiots (present readers excluded!)

Homes use to be a place you lived and passed on to the family. Now they're just investments bought, improved and sold for a make believe profit for diminishing dollar value.

This might seem like it's a bit off the Oil subject, but it's not!
It's the same.
The only political effort that will change the NeoConGame is revealing the truth of 911. Voting in new politicians won't change a thing unless this is brought to the top of the Table.
Impeach Cheney first, then Rove, Wolfowitz, etc,.etc,...

Stop buying Velero Gasoline too, that's a Bush holding company.
There are so many things people can do but are ignorant of and just plan complacent.
Enough is enough. (sorry for the ranting but people have to get mad as hell or nothing will happen. Remember, if the NeoCons ever initiate mashal law we will all be labled Insurgents as are the Iraqis that want us out of their country. Go figure.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cheney's Leer & the Glint on the Cross
Posted by: cognitorex on May 27, 2007 12:45 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cheney's Leer & the Glint on the Cross

Among all of Dick Cheney's distasteful contorted facial expressions the one that was most chilling and evil, which I wish that I had not seen, was the leer he transmitted to a GOP faithful audience when he disclosed that AQ in Iraq now numbers fifteen thousand.
His leer fully transmitted that he used the propaganda lies, that AQ was connected to Iraq, to get our guns and oil companies into Iraq. It also transmitted the, to him, deliciously evil twist that the lie has now morphed into the truth.
That AQ is now several thousand strong in Iraq is a grotesque result of the pathetically naive Neocon misadventure. It's also a plank in their arguments that we need to stay.
"The dolts, (meaning the American public and the MSM), don't have a clue as to what evil we will employ to accomplish our goals," is what the leer beams to the mightiest of the Bush base.
...as the sunlight flickered on the cross in his lapel...

---Craig Johnson---cognitorex blog
(photo source: The Future of Television)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not New
Posted by: Jeanne on May 27, 2007 6:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But, as someone posted, not news. This information never gets out through mainstream media. It's not reported on the "news" that the vast majority of brain-dead US consumers watch. It's too much work to look to the internet sites for news (they think the internet is for shopping and porn), and they certainly are not going to read the newspapers (which don't report it anyway), or, god forbid, read a book. So, how the hell are the masses to know? Indeed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

By Now Many of You have become Familiar with a Fascist Named RWA.
Posted by: yellow on May 28, 2007 1:14 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He has incessantly spewed his right-wing populist nonsense about how the Iraq War can't be over oil but must be a war for Israel pure and simple.

He tediously brays on like a donkey about how the cost of the war and occupation exceeds the value of the oil taken out of the Iraqi fields and is thus utterly uneconomic as a war for oil. Never mind that this statement is entirely false. The numbers work out in favor of big oil!! The real issue, however, is that big oil is not footing the bill for the war and occupation. That is being done by the US taxpayers. RWA has been told this numerous times by several people but willfully ignores this point as it is inconvenient for his silly case that the war has nothing to do with oil.

He also points out that there is abundant cheap oil in the Western Hemisphere. Aside from the fact that the most current estimates of all the Iraqi oil fields contain more oil that all the remaining reserves of the Western Hemisphere combined, Iraqi oil is cheaper to extract and refine. The "Arab Sweet" of the Iraqi oil fields is more expensive but also yields more gasoline per barrel (42 gallons of crude oil) extracted. The reason that the tarsands of Canada features such cheap oil is that it is of very low quality and very expensive to refine to the quality of gasoline required. The Persian Gulf oil has always been prefered.

RWA also claims that Neo-cons run the entire show in Iraq including oil policy and that oil companies aren't benefiting because the oil isn't being sold. This claim is wrong, Iraqi oil is already in the hands of US oil firms and production is proceeding the extent possible. The war and the speculation is also increasing the value of the oil pumped out by the US firms. An anecdote by Greg Palast will explain the oil firm's strategy. The Neo-cons, it is said, wanted to privatize the oil well in Iraq as soon as possible. Soon after Bush put Phil Carroll, the CEO of US/Shell between 1993 and 1998, in charge of policy planning for the Iraqi Oil Ministry, the policy was abandoned. The Neo-conservatives plan was to privatize the oil and then start pumping like crazy in order to force the Saudis, who are the regions swing producers, to match the production levels to make up for income through volume that was lost in per barrel price levels from the higher supply. Other producers would be forced to follow suit and "oil prices would fall over a cliff" leaving OPEC in disarray and the US with loads of cheap oil to spur its economic recovery. But as Mr. Carroll explained Neo-con free market dogmas and agendas were no welcome in the new oil sector. The oil fields were kept public to prevent foreign competitors hands off them while keeping production low in order to keep oil prices as high as possible. In the end, Mr. Carroll and the oil firms trumped the wily Neo-cons.

RWA has made very little sense but he knows nothing but his own prejudices. He has even claimed that the blood for oil argument is one of the "official" ones to distract from the real purpose of Israeli hegemony. This is an outrageous claim and quite ignorant. RWA is a stupid fascist and Jew-baiter pure and simple. He is better ignored than taken seriously.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yellow
Posted by: rwa on May 28, 2007 8:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When you resort to name-calling, you are committing the logical fallacy of ad hominem attack. This invalidates your rebuttal to them and leaves it standing. It also makes you look really afraid.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Yellow Posted by: dkm
» RE: Yellow Posted by: dkm
» RE: Yellow Posted by: yellow
» RE: Yellow Posted by: yellow
» I live outside the US, Posted by: justaguy
» RE: I live outside the US, Posted by: yellow
» You're calling me an imbecile? Posted by: justaguy
» This is like pulling teeth. Posted by: justaguy