Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

War on Iraq

Iraqi Oil Law Gives Cover for Corporate Profit

By Emad Mekay, IPS News. Posted March 2, 2007.


Under Iraq's pending oil law, as much as two-thirds of Iraq's known reserves would be developed by multinationals, amounting to mass theft from the Iraqi people.
Advertisement

The U.S.-backed Iraqi cabinet approved a new oil law Monday that is set to give foreign companies the long-term contracts and safe legal framework they have been waiting for, but which has rattled labour unions and international campaigners who say oil production should remain in the hands of Iraqis.

Independent analysts and labour groups have also criticised the process of drafting the law and warned that that the bill is so skewed in favour of foreign firms that it could end up heightening political tensions in the Arab nation and spreading instability.

For example, it specifies that up to two-thirds of Iraq's known reserves would be developed by multinationals, under contracts lasting for 15 to 20 years.

This policy would represent a u-turn for Iraq's oil industry, which has been in the public sector for more than three decades, and would break from normal practice in the Middle East.

According to local labour leaders, transferring ownership to the foreign companies would give a further pretext to continue the U.S. occupation on the grounds that those companies will need protection.

Union leaders have complained that they, along with other civil society groups, were left out of the drafting process despite U.S. claims it has created a functioning democracy in Iraq.

Under the production-sharing agreements provided for in the draft law, companies will not come under the jurisdiction of Iraqi courts in the event of a dispute, nor to the general auditor.

The ownership of the oil reserves under this draft law will remain with the state in form, but not in substance, critics say.

On Feb. 8, the labour unions sent a letter in Arabic to Iraqi President Jalal Talbani urging him to reconsider this kind of agreement.

"Production-sharing agreements are a relic of the 1960s," said the letter. "They will re-imprison the Iraqi economy and impinge on Iraq's sovereignty since they only preserve the interests of foreign companies. We warn against falling into this trap."

Ewa Jasiewicz, a researcher at PLATFORM, a British human rights and environmental group that monitors the oil industry, told IPS in a phone interview from London that, "First of all, it hasn't been put together in any kind of democratic process... It's been put through a war and an occupation which in itself is a grotesquely undemocratic process."

The law was prepared by a three-member Iraqi cabinet committee, dominated by the Kurds and the Shiites. It is now expected to be ratified by parliament because the powerful faction leaders in the government have cleared it.

The first draft was seen only by the committee of the Iraqi technocrat who penned it, nine international oil companies, the British and the U.S. governments and the International Monetary Fund. The Iraqi parliament will get its first glimpse next week.

Concerns about the process are compounded because of the ongoing disputes in Iraq over the legitimacy of the Iraqi cabinet and the Iraqi parliament, which have been constructed by the occupation-created governing council, which itself was created in 2004 along sectarian lines.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: iraqi oil law

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from War on Iraq! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
How can we end the Iraq war?...and prevent war growth to Iran?
Posted by: Benjamin Dover on Mar 2, 2007 4:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am writing to you for help. It appears that democracy has utterly failed in the U.S. The majority of Americans are against the Iraq war and want our troops brought home , yet even after the virtual referendum on the war (2006 election) that radically changed the makeup of congress , our ‘representatives’ are unable to pass even a wimpy non-binding statement against the war.

Iraq has an enormous stockpile of oil – oil that the entire global economy is dependent on . The war really is all about oil and our control of it . The troops suffer the consequences of our oil addiction : 3,161 Americans have been killed and a staggering 23,417 Americans have been wounded in Iraq. Although more Americans have died in Iraq for fake retribution for 9/11 than in 9/11 itself , this toll on human life pales in comparison for the death toll among Iraq’s civilians: 655,000.

Life in Iraq now is simply dismal– violent, insecure, and worse than under Saddam. Iraq is occupied by a foreign military that continues to commit atrocities, war crimes, and torture. Not surprisingly, the Iraqi people hate us. In fact, partaking in this illegal war of aggression has turned the international community against us . Most alarmingly, it has actively forced people to become terrorists. Terrorism has expanded 700% since the invasion of Iraq . Terrorism is simply a method of warfare or a tactic – you can not win a ‘war against a method’....and now we want to attack Iran?!?!!?

Continuing the Iraq war is clearly insanity - attacking Iran is even less sane. Please ask yourself “How can I stop the Iraq war?” and then – do it!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why is this news? Of course the Iraq people will be screwed.
Posted by: DougScott on Mar 2, 2007 5:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why should any sensible person not believe that U.S. and British oil companies would suck Iraq dry, given the opportunity. Now they have it, thanks to ex-oilman Bush and his side-talking sidekick, Dick Cheney, also a former oilman.

And don't forget our ambassador to Iraq, Zalmay Kahilizaid, a former pipeline consultant for Unocal.

Hugh E. Scott -- Vietnam vet, ex-USAF pilot, author of "George Dub-ya-Bush, THE PHONY FIGHTER PILOT," and the creator/editor of www.King-George.biz -- the ONLY website with hardcopy proof of White House corruption.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» More on the Unocal connection Posted by: DougScott
Correction
Posted by: paschn on Mar 2, 2007 6:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As of yesterday, 3/1/2007. Air America released some info on the ACTUAL number of your fellow drones that were duped into murdering for profit. the VA has released statements setting the number of wounded at over 200,000 of "our boys" fighting tooth and nail to protect OUR FREEDOM from a horrible HUGE nation of 26,000,000 souls, (about 1,000,000 less now since "our boys" started teaching 'em all about democracy) in a nation the size of one of our states. the D.o.D. a few months ago accidently posted the true, ( or true-er) total of "our boys" killed at over 20,000.
And the amazing part is that murdering swine still has about a 30% approval rating.
A nation of sheep, led by a cartel of whores, controlled by big business and Israel. Welcome, to the REAL Evil Empire.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Correction Posted by: geoXIXXX
It's about Oil, stupid
Posted by: boing007 on Mar 2, 2007 7:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is now time to organize a worldwide movement to
support the Iraqi people against the coup d'état of
the United States of America. The Middle East is like
a rag doll, with competing interests on all sides ripping
it to pieces.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Iraq War Crash by Justin Raimundo
Posted by: rwa on Mar 2, 2007 7:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... According to the estimates of economic experts, the Iraq war drained off one trillion dollars from the U.S. stock market before the first shot was fired. After the war was "won," however, the real costs began to kick in, which economists Linda Bilmes and Joseph Stiglitz estimate at another trillion bucks (in direct costs), and possibly two trillion when all the other variables are factored in. The Bilmes-Stiglitz study shows that one of the costs of the Iraq war has been that stock prices have been tamped down considerably:

"The surge in corporate profits in the last couple of years has not been accompanied by an increase in stock prices of the magnitude that would have been expected. Robert Wescott estimates that the value of the stock market is some $4 trillion less than would have been predicted on the basis of past performance. Assuming that the major factor contributing to that is the increase in oil prices, and that 20% of that increase in oil prices is due to Iraq leads to a cost of some $800 billion. This is several times the increase in the direct energy costs over the next few years."

The prosperity we lost is not as great as it might have been: this is due entirely to the war. Resources that might otherwise be engaged in the peaceful production of consumer goods are diverted and frozen in the form of fighter jets, aircraft carriers, and cluster bombs, whose only product is death. What characterizes war, aside from the mass death and horror, is sheer waste. We have seen the body-bags come home, and their increasing number has made us sit up and take notice. Once the economic consequences begin to kick in, however, we're likely to hear some real howling.

There are two ways to finance a war: one is by directly increasing taxes. This is never popular, either with the people or the politicians, and so the latter have hit upon a successful subterfuge: inflation. They simply set the government printing presses to running at high speed, sell more government securities overseas, and impose a "hidden" tax – one that falls disproportionately on those least able to afford it. But then again, don't the downtrodden masses always suffer the most in wartime? Isn't it always the elites – in government and in the think-tanks, with their soft white hands and social distance from the battlefield – who dream up the wars, and the hoi polloi who fight them?

The Chinese panic is being diagnosed as the "cause" of our own apparent meltdown, but this mistakes the symptoms for the underlying disease. The name of our affliction is debt, and that burden has increased by over 30 percent since our venture into empire-building was launched. The Chinese are – or, have been – buying that debt, but the bursting of the Shanghai bubble could soon cut off that supply of income – and then where would we get the money to pay for the biggest military build-up in world history?

full article

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

More about the Unocal/Bush administration connection
Posted by: DougScott on Mar 2, 2007 10:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I mentioned the Unocal connection in an earlier comment to this article. Here is more information for bloggers who rightly believe U.S. energy companies encouraged Gulf War 2:

Afghan PM Karzai was involved in an aborted Afghanistan pipeline deal that would have benefited the Taliban and Al Qaeda.

And then there's Valerie Plame outer, Richard Armitage.

No stranger to the petroleum industry, Armitage was a member of the Burma/Myanmar Forum group that received major funding from Unocal. He was later implicated in a lawsuit filed by Burmese villagers who suffered human rights abuses during the construction of a Unocal pipeline.

Halliburton, under Dick Cheney's stewardship, performed contract work on the same Burmese project. Another Unocal associate was Robert Oakley, former U.S. ambassador to Pakistan and later the U.S. special envoy to Somalia.

Ironically, my late geologist father, Ed Scott, worked for Unocal (formerly Union Oil of California) for 47 years. He was vice president of exploration of Union's Canadian subsidary and retired in La Brea, CA, where he managed Unocal's research division. A staunch believer in energy conservation, he warned me many times about the dangers of a Middle East war over oil.

The above information is from my 2004 book, "George Dub-ya Bush, THE PHONY FIGHTER PILOT."

When you have time, please visit my investigative website, www.King-George.biz -- the only one with hardcopy evidence of White House corruption.

Cheers, Hugh E. Scott

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Timeline for the withdrawal of troops?
Posted by: DennisDalrymple on Mar 2, 2007 10:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The U.S. Congress is blissfully unaware of the impending seizure of Iraqi oil, if ExxonMobil can get away with it. They are also unaware of the real reason the Bush Administration with not give a date certain when US Armed Forces will leave Iraq. It's clear the date of withdrawal is never, or at least until the oilyarchy can take all of the oil that's inconveniently under Iraq soil.
DD
New York City

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

War For Oil - Two great short videos
Posted by: mcooley on Mar 2, 2007 11:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please check out this video - one of the better "BIG PICTURE" ones I have seen. This is only 50 minutes long, and would be a great tool to help tell your family and friends to wake up and see what is really has been going on since Bush took over.

"Oil Smoke & Mirrors" offers us a sobering critique of our perceived recent history, of our present global circumstances, and of our shared future in light of imminent, under-reported and mis-represented energy production constraints.

Through a series of impressively candid, informed and articulate interviews, this film argues that the bizzare events surrounding the 9/11 attacks, and the equally bizzare prosecution of the so-called "war on terror", can be more credibly understood in the wider context of an imminent and critical divergence between available global oil supply and increasing global oil demand.

The picture "Oil, Smoke & Mirrors" paints is one of a tragically hyper-mediated global-political culture, which, for whatever reason, demonstrably disassociates itself from the values it claims to represent.

While the ideas presented in this film can at first seem daunting, it's ultimate assertion is that these challenges can indeed be met and perhaps surpassed if, but only if, we can find first the courage to perceive them..."

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8677389869548020370

Only 50 minutes - a real eye opener - Please check this out!

Then watch this next one, only 35 minutes, and it does a very good job of connecting all the dots between Bush and his BIG LIE, Oil, 911, Iraq, PNAC, Anthrax Attacks, War on Terror.
The soundtrack is a bit nutty, but the facts we all have been reading about are clearly outlined in a format easy to follow- "Empire of Oil: The Hidden History of 911":

http://tinyurl.com/yqczuh

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

passive people are our greatest threat
Posted by: MISSING on Mar 2, 2007 2:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wake up, the only alternative to oil is a permanent depression. Three thousand dead will look like a blessing compared to what a depression will do. There is a finite supply left and we are the superpower, and a democracy that will only elect people who promise us more. Don’t like your leaders, well maybe you should vote. Just look at our voter turn out when our county is at war.

I know there are many of you who think we can conserve our way out of this, but guess what happens when you free up more energy? Population growth, and we all know that this world can not sustain anymore people. Imagine if everyone wasted energy and it cut our time of energy in half, then theoretically we would have less people when we ran out. Of course global warming would occur sooner and much worse so it wouldn’t matter anyway.

The only way out of this mess has to include population caps along with carbon caps otherwise we are just allowing more energy for more people. Why do you think so many religions don’t care about the environments? Ultimately you have to accept population control and religions can’t grow with out babies. We have to fundamentally change our civilization overnight. Do we have the ability and intellect to do this? Yes, but we won’t as long as we have our wresting, NASCAR, porn, fast food and the like dumbing us down and taking our mind off the fact we are headed to the gas chamber.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Iraq Labor vs. ExxonMobil, BP and Shell
Posted by: katinmn on Mar 5, 2007 6:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.truthout.org/issues_06/022207LA.shtml

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

New Iraq Oil Law
Posted by: boing007 on Mar 8, 2007 12:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To the victors belong the spoils.
The coup d'etat has worked very well indeed.
Next stop Iran.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]