Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

War on Iraq

The Most Powerful Iraqi: Who is Muqtada al-Sadr?

By Patrick Cockburn, CounterPunch. Posted February 16, 2007.


The Shia cleric al-Sadr draws his influence from channeling the sentiments of the millions of Shia poor, preaching a mixture of militancy against Sunnis and skepticism against Shia elites.
Advertisement

Whatever else the US intended when it invaded Iraq in 2003 it was not to hand power to an Islamic militant in a black turban who denounces Washington and Israel in the same breath. The claim by two American officials yesterday that Muqtada al-Sadr, the radical Shia nationalist cleric, has left for Iran is a measure of how far the US would like to see him out of the Iraqi political scene.

Allegations by US officials in Baghdad have little credibility after almost four years in which they have been repeatedly exposed as untrue. Supporters of Muqtada immediately denied that he was in Iran and either refused to say where he was or asserted that he was in the Shia holy city of Najaf. He has every reason to keep his location a secret, since in the past the US military has said it will either kill or capture him if it can. Two of his most important aides have been killed in mysterious circumstances in the past week.

We may be close to a final confrontation between the US and Muqtada, perhaps the most important political figure in Iraq. The US and Iraqi governments are starting their much-heralded campaign to regain control of Baghdad from the Sunni insurgents and Shia militias, of which the most important is Muqtada's 70,000-strong Mehdi Army. Iraq's borders with Iran have been closed for 72 hours.

Muqtada himself has no doubt that he is under threat. In an interview in January he said: "I have moved my family to a safe place. I have even made a will and I continually move around so they have trouble knowing exactly where I am." He has been trying to avoid becoming a US target. He plays down his own strength. Asked about claims that the army and police are infiltrated by his men, Muqtada said the reverse was true and "it is our militias [that] are swarming with spies. It doesn't take much to infiltrate the army of the people." He denies that the death squads killing Sunni are really members of the Mehdi Army.

Probably, Muqtada and the men around him believe that if he can avoid a direct clash with the US army then he will win in the end. His popularity among the Shia is great. In the past few weeks his men have stopped carrying their weapons so openly in the streets and have closed a number of their offices in Baghdad. But the militiamen are seldom far away. In Sadr City they have only retreated deeper into the vast shanty town of two million people that is the greatest bastion of Sadrist support.

***

The rise of Muqtada has been one of the surprises of the four years since the US invaded. Saddam Hussein must have been astonished as he went to his execution to hear the name: "Muqtada! Muqtada! Muqatada!" shouted by jeering onlookers. Had Saddam realised the potential of this strange, enigmatic young man before the invasion then he would doubtless have killed him, as he did Muqtada's father and two of his brothers eight years ago.

It is difficult to avoid Muqtada's presence in Baghdad. Dressed in his dark clerical robes, he peers menacingly from posters on thousands of walls. His Mehdi Army militiamen control not only Sadr City but much of the capital and southern Iraq. He is an essential prop to the government of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, in which six ministers belong to his movement.

Yet the source of his power has remained a mystery to the US and many Iraqi politicians. Few men have been so consistently underestimated. He is not a great orator, nor does he have huge charisma. His movement has limited resources. Until recently, his militiamen were unpaid and provided their own weapons. He does not have a powerful foreign backer. In spite of US efforts to link him to Iran and claim that he has fled there, he and his movement have traditionally been suspicious of the Iranians, and they of him.

The real source of his vast influence among the Shia of Iraq -- the Sunni see him as orchestrating the death squads that have killed so many of them -- is that he promulgates a blend of religion and nationalism that they find deeply attractive. He comes from the deeply revered Sadr clerical family that provided so many martyrs under Saddam Hussein. Some American commanders may wonder if it is wise for the US to pick a fight with a religious leader regarded with cult-like devotion by millions of Shias. They may also reflect that he is not just popular with the poor masses of Shia Iraq - his picture also hangs on the wall in many Iraqi police stations and army barracks. Some of these will be the very people on whom US and Iraqi commanders will rely in order to regain control of Baghdad.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: muqtada al-sadr, shia, iraq

Patrick Cockburn is the author of 'The Occupation: War, resistance and daily life in Iraq', a finalist for the National Book Critics' Circle Award for best non-fiction book of 2006.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from War on Iraq! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Al-Sadr is a symptom of hate, not a cause.
Posted by: DougScott on Feb 16, 2007 4:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Al-Sadr personifies the hatred many Iraqis have for American troops. The hostility he represents will never be suppressed, not in a hundred years of U.S. occupation.

Bush either doesn’t understand the threat or doesn’t care. What matters to him is his legacy, something else he doesn’t get. Dub-ya is going down in the history books as the worst president ever and nothing he can do in Iraq will change it.

Hugh E. Scott, Vietnam vet, ex-USAF pilot, lifelong registered Republican, Goldwater conservative, author of "George Dub-ya Bush, THE PHONY FIGHTER PILOT" and the creator/editor of the investigative website, www.King-George.biz.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Secularism, discredited by Saddam's failures"
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on Feb 16, 2007 6:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What kind of a crock statement is that? Is that what all this is about, to discredit secularism? Whatever Saddam did had little to do with secularism. The argument sounds like a straw man to me.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Richard Kanegis
Posted by: RichardKanegis on Feb 16, 2007 8:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In October 2004, an Iraqi go-between unnamed by the media, arranged for a ceasefire in Fullujah. US troops pulled back and locals cheared what they thougt was the wars end. John Kerry compained about terrorists hiding in Fuluja. Bush demaded that al Sadr be turned over for trial, which was refused or ignorred by Sunni militants. Now Sunnis and Shei are chassing eachother out of etheir turf and worse.

I demand that Bush, pease others join me, that he withdrw to any future Shia-Sunnin joint couneel. or even al Sadr and a Sunni leader making a joint request for US to leave in the same room

RichardKanegis@aol.com, bananagis@aol.com 215-563-2866

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Reagan/Bush duplicity
Posted by: sausage on Feb 16, 2007 9:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Reagan/Bush policiy of duplicitous dealing with Saddam Hussein gave rise to the al-Sadr family. All during the Reagan/Bush administration of the Eighties, the US deliberately turned a blind eye to Saddam's human rights violations, much as the current Bush and Clinton administrations have done and yet do in respect to the Chinese government, as long as doing so served economic and foreign policy objectives.

If there is any one American president responsible for the ascendancy of the al-Sadr family it is George H.W. Bush.

Remember these George H.W. Bush classics?

"There's another way for the bloodshed to stop, and that is for the Iraqi military and the Iraqi people to take matters into their own hands and to force Saddam Hussein to step aside."
February 15, 1991, inciting Iraqi Intifada of Shi'ites and Kurds.

"Do I think that the United States should bear guilt because of suggesting that the Iraqi people take matters into their own hands, with the implication being given by some that the United States would be there to support them militarily? This was not true. We never implied that."
April 16, 1991 following brutal and bloody suppression of Shi'ite and Kurdish rebellion by Baathist forces loyal to Saddam Hussein

Wikipedia.org/1991 Uprising in Iraq

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: eagan/Bush duplicity Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma
Another US-created "problem"
Posted by: pomes on Feb 16, 2007 10:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here is a short, top-of-my-head, incomplete list of powerful people/groups through recent history whose power was created and supported by the US, Israel, and other western nations. I don't mean by pissing them off, I mean by giving money, support, training and weapons to.

* Al-Sadr
* Al-Queda and Osama bin laden
* HAMAS
* The Shah of Iran
* Noriega
* Pinochet

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]