Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

War on Iraq

The Washington Iraq Peace March: A Protest to Be Proud of

By Karen Houppert, TheNation.com. Posted January 29, 2007.


In a protest event that organizers estimated at almost half a million, citizens of all stripes demanded an end to the occupation of Iraq.
Advertisement

WASHINGTON, DC -- A dazzling sun beamed down on peace activists from around the country who gathered on the National Mall Saturday to demand an end to the Iraq War. Beneath this benevolent sky, the event read as much like a victory parade as a protest march. These were not the angry demonstrators who took to the streets of New York City in February 2003 in an attempt to avert a war, or the beaten-down and beleaguered ones who marched through US cities in March 2005 to protest US occupation of Iraq, or the slightly bedraggled group who last Spring tied US spending on the Iraq occupation to mismanagment of the crisis as they traced Hurricane Katrina's path in a three-state "March to New Orleans".

Estimates of the crowd size vary -- CNN put it at "tens of thousands" and event organizers insist nearly half a million showed, DC police declined to speculate -- one thing is certain: Today's marchers were as satisfied as cats who stole the cream, cats who were almost ... celebrating.

"Before, we were a minority marching to convince a majority that occupying Iraq was a terrible idea," says Hany Khalil, spokesperson for march organizers, United for Peace and Justice. "But today, for the first time we are out in force representing a majority of Americans who want us to get out of Iraq."

United for Peace and Justice, a coalition representing 1,400 national and local groups, has orchestrated protests since before the war begin in March 2003. Today, its lineup of speakers ranged from celebrities like Susan Sarandon, Sean Penn and Tim Robbins to political familiars like Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Ca), Rep. John Conyers (D-MI) and Rep. Lynn Woolsey (D-CA). Standing beside a flag-draped coffin, the speakers were almost uniformly optimistic. "It's healing time. It's hope time," the Reverend Jesse Jackson said, exhorting the crowd to "keep hope alive."

For this day anyway, the peace movement seemed to have called a cease-fire in its ongoing debate over how to allocate its limited resources: Is it better to work in electoral politics and propel antiwar representatives to Congress or take to the streets with shows of grassroots power? Saturday's protest organizers apppeared to concede these are complementary tactics: grassroots organizing has indeed shifted public opinion against the war; this shift in public opinion, coupled with some strategic work to get antiwar politicians into office has clearly paid off.

Conyers acknowledged the impact of the November elections. "[George Bush] is the commander of the military but he's not the commander of the citizens of this country," he said, to roars of approval. "Not only is it in our power to stop George Bush, but it's our obligation."

"The women of this nation spoke loud and clear in November," Feminist Majority Foundation President Eleanor Smeal reminded the crowd. "They said 'no' to this war." Speaker after speaker referred to the elections as a referendum on the war and insisted the American people had sent a clear mandate to Congress: End US occupation of Iraq. The clock is ticking on that mandate. Nowhere was this more evident than among the military families, vets, and soldiers whom this peace movement has always made room who have been front and center in this and protests. Dozens of military families crowded on stage at one point to speak of personal experiences in Iraq orwhat it was like to lose a family member to this war. More filled the backstage overflow area because they couldn't fit, and Iraq War veterans in camouflage were evident in this crowd.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: protest, iraq, washington dc

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from War on Iraq! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Too many to be ignored
Posted by: feduphoosier on Jan 29, 2007 1:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is the first time I've ever done this. I climbed onto a bus from Indiana (16 hours each way) to attend the massive peace march in Washington D.C this Saturday. Like many other average Americans... it has simply gotten to the point where phone calls, petitions and letters feel useless. I knew I had to go that extra mile this time, because no one was really listening.

I couldn't believe how large the crowd was by the time of the rally - it stretched as far as the eye could see in every direction, and still more people kept pouring in. It was massive. People were climbing trees, trying to photograph the crowd from above, and they were shouting down that it appeared we packed the entire mall - and stretched back as far as the Washington Monument.

From the ground, it was impossible to say how many people were there. I do know that it took over 3 hours to march around the Capitol building, and that it was hard to maintain a constant forward movement as we carried our community banner through the sea of churning, chanting humanity (and so many creative signs!)

As I walked by Federal buildings gleaming in the sunlight, I had the oddest sensation... I thought to myself 'so this is what democracy really feels like.' I knew Congress saw us this time. It was wonderful to finally feel like I was making a difference. Our media, and yes our government, go out of their way to make us feel trivial and insignificant. But when we come together, we have teeth.

On the way home, someone from our bus bought a newspaper in Columbus, OH. When we read the pathetic AP news release, we were once again disillusioned - and frustrated. 10s of thousands? Try hundreds of thousands. Try taking an aerial photo, AP. TRY to tell the truth, for a change.

We were frankly stunned that they were trying to get away with that '10s of thousands' lie again. Surely they realized that most of the people in the crowd brought cameras, the foreign media was there, and that all of Washington D.C. knows the truth as well.

This time, the lie cannot stand. We hit critical mass this time, and for every one of us - our families, friends, co-workers, churches and communities were supporting us at home, and receiving dispatches from DC. Soon everyone will know how large the demonstration really was, and that, once again, corporate media tried to cover it up, trivialize it.

It won't work this time. We peacefully over-ran our Capitol Saturday, and believe me -- we were seen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Already Has Been Posted by: NoPCZone
» No offense, we need a new offence. Posted by: George Wilson
» Not if CNN can help it Posted by: WhuThe?!?
» Par for the Course Posted by: mirimac
» RE: Par for the Course Posted by: feduphoosier
» RE: Needs to be Said: Posted by: oregoncharles
» RE: Too many to be ignored Posted by: Jay Bob
» RE: Too many to be ignored Posted by: wernersi
It will be ignored
Posted by: Bobsays on Jan 29, 2007 3:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This demo didn't even come close to the one the British had prior to the Iraq war. And that demo made no difference. Demos don't work in and of themselves. You have to stop cooperating with the actors who make the whole machine work. And that would be the Democrats. They will facilitate the attack on Iran and they will ensure this war in Iraq drags on and on. Mark my words, we will still being complaining about the war one year from now, two years from now, three years from now...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It will be ignored Posted by: feduphoosier
» RE: It will be ignored Posted by: feduphoosier
» RE: It will be ignored Posted by: badkitty
» No coverage in Europe Posted by: Bobsays
» RE: No coverage in Europe Posted by: werewolf
» RE: No coverage in Europe Posted by: badkitty
» RE: No coverage in Europe Posted by: feduphoosier
» RE: No coverage in Europe Posted by: Talpone
» RE: No coverage in Europe Posted by: feduphoosier
» RE: It will be ignored Posted by: Lauren
» RE: It will be ignored: Not? Posted by: oregoncharles
» A voics from the other side.. Posted by: Conservasaurus
Visible to the World
Posted by: pcushniesr on Jan 29, 2007 3:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Besides being visible to those in the halls of power, the protest was visible to the world so that people in other countries will know that not every American is a fool. Unable to attend myself, I wrote to my representative, Rosa DeLauro, and my two senators, Christopher Dodd and, yes, even Joe Lieberman, urging them to pay attention to what was going down and to let them know that I was in full support.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Anti-War Groups Working Together
Posted by: Merchant_Of_Menace on Jan 29, 2007 4:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a signer of the Appeal for Redress (www.appealforredress.org), I came to Washington, D.C. as a concerned citizen, as a voter, and as an American to make my voice heard on Capitol Hill, along with other signers, active-duty members of the military, IRRs, prior service from several eras of our history, and military family members to let it be known that, as witnesses to the real effects of a useless and wasteful war, the time has come for U.S. Soldiers, Sailors, Marines, and Airmen to come home.

And it was a beautiful day, in more ways than one.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This Changes Nothing!
Posted by: MAD on Jan 29, 2007 6:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What's that you say? Perennial "rebels" Sean Penn, Susan Sarandon, Tim Robbins and Danny Glover were on hand? I actually appreciate what Penn did in Iraq some years ago but this is not the time for celluloid sponsorship - average Americans need to do this on their own.

While I understand the impetus of this gathering and I'm sure it was a hoot and all, let's be brutally honest about something: this protest accomplished exactly fuck all. The loss of the House and Senate, sinking approval ratings, heavy criticism domestically (increasingly from the conservatives themselves) and from abroad should have long since conveyed this simple message: Bush, Blair and Howard royally screwed the pooch and it has cost us hundreds of thousands of lives. Bush and his cronies certainly didn't take notice and if it isn't already apparent by the words and actions of the Democrats that they plan on hiding under the covers until '08 rolls around, it should be. Thanks Nancy "impeachment is off the table" Pelosi.

Dumb fuck Americans will never change. How many times must we sigh in resignation as we come to the realization that Dems and Republicans are just two sides of the same greedy, corporate coin? We can continue to address the symptoms of a decrepit and decadent electoral system or we can reform it once and for all and take the fucking money out of elections, and with it, some of the incumbency it implies. After all, this war certainly isn't being waged on our behalf, now is it? It's being fought for Exxon, Chevron, Halliburton, GE, Northrup, General Dynamics, etc. Just for fun, google these companies and find out how much they contributed to the last two Bush campaigns.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: This Changes Nothing! Posted by: feduphoosier
» RE: This Changes Nothing! Posted by: alternetrose
» RE: This Changes Nothing! Posted by: feduphoosier
» RE: This Changes Nothing! Posted by: Lauren
» RE: This Changes Nothing! Posted by: Conservasaurus
Jane was there too.
Posted by: diogenes on Jan 29, 2007 10:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After a 34 year hiatus, Jane Fonda spoke out because "silence was no longer an option", and she explained that she had kept quiet for fear that she would do more harm than good. There are still, to this day, well intentioned people who believe that she was the enemy. She was NOT the enemy, the vietnamese were not the enemy, the enemies were the war criminals who dwelt inside the beltway. Cheney and Rumsfeld were there, but most people forget that. Jane apologized, but all she was doing was to trying to stop the atrocities! She had nothing to apologize for. At least McNamara had the grace (ten years after) to admit that he was wrong. Demonstrations are worthwhile, and they need to be a major part of getting those inside the beltway to listen to the people, but the best way is to throw the bastards out of office, and the best way is to read what a Republican, a member of Mensa, a multiple-crendentialed computer expert has to say about it. Find it here: http://www.chuckherrin.com/archive.htm, then put it into action. HAVA, the PATRIOT act, the Clean Air act, the Healthy Forests act, the Military Commisions act, NCLB and all the rest of the lies and deceptions will be recinded but there will still be the horrible legacy of the Bush Administration. There's no cure for that, but at least we can trust our elections again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dejavu - all over again!
Posted by: Conservasaurus on Jan 29, 2007 11:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That was a pretty impressive turn out.. I'll hold back about traitor Hanoi Jane for a moment.

But as the past has a way of repeating itself.. no matter how right or wrong the policy on Iraq is.. if the people do not support it, it will fail .. The military can bring this to a conclusion that meets the basic goals..security etc at some cost.. if that cost is too much then it wont work.. the people decide when is enough and I have to say that a few more demonstrations such as that would demand a drastic alteration of course in Iraq... That should have opened Bush's eyes..

As for Hanoi Jane..she should be tried.. the pig that she is!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Dejavu - all over again! Posted by: diogenes
» RE: Dejavu - all over again! Posted by: Conservasaurus
Another perspective
Posted by: fanny666 on Jan 29, 2007 12:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
link

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Another perspective Posted by: alternetrose
An international perspective
Posted by: leesean on Jan 29, 2007 1:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Avaaz.org: The World In Action was one of the organizations present at Saturday’s march. While tens of thousands of people converged on Washington to voice their opposition to the War in Iraq, over 87,000 more people from 198 countries signed an online petition pledging to march virtually from their own homes around the world, standing in solidarity with the marchers in Washington, and representing an immerging global movement for peace. Avaaz.org supporters at the event carried banners and flags representing a cross section of the countries represented in the virtual march.

For more information and photos of the event please visit:
http://www.avaaz.org/blog/en/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Beware FOX news
Posted by: braxxian on Jan 29, 2007 1:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For any who don't know it yet beware FOX news. This orginisation is the unoffical propoganda arm of the Republican party. Already some of the smug presenters that litter their shows have sneered at the protesters and called them a bunch of left-wing loones.

FOX and its so called fair and balanced coverage is the greatest tribute to outright propoganda since the Nazi spin maching of world war two.

America beware.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Beware FOX news Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Beware FOX news Posted by: feduphoosier
Forget FOX, Beware of CNN
Posted by: seltzer on Jan 29, 2007 7:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think most AlterNet readers are well aware of how hideous FOX News is. The media source we should really focus on is CNN. The essential point to remember is this: The more dramatic and exciting an event, the more people tune in. And what could be more dramatic and exciting than a war? Especially a war against evil? Anyway, it was clearly in CNN's interest that the U.S. go to war, b/c with higher ratings come higher rates for advertising, and therefore more money for network executives. We shouldn't be surprised that there were so few CNN stories prior to the Iraq invasion about just what a moronic idea invading actually was. Sadly, the old journalistic axiom "if it bleeds it leads" still applies. CNN is not alone here. All of the mainstream media has benefited from this awful tragedy. It's not a true conspiracy, just corporate self-interest doing what it does best: looking out for the bottom line.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Reminds me of a song
Posted by: willymack on Jan 29, 2007 7:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This could be the start of something great!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

1960's redux
Posted by: dikaiosyne on Jan 30, 2007 7:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It was so wonderful to see all the aging hippies from the 1960's out there in Washington D.C. Brought a tear to my eyes to see the old hackneed Vietnam war protesters trying to get up enough strength to call down damnation on the Bush administration. The only things missing was Joan Baez and Jerry Garcia and their friends doing a rendition of Kumbaya. As one poster has already stated this demonstration of around 100,00 (not a half mil) will be and should be totally ignored. I did enjoy the hysteria and histrionics from some of the speakers. Reminded me of the May-Day concert and riot of 1970. Hairy legged femi-nazis and lesbo activists pumping their fists into the air (fortunately only in the air as opposed to ....well...you know) and their cadre of girly men and the usual assortment of race hustlers and poverty pimps giving comfort and support (but only for the purposes of promoting their own agendas or to just get some face time in the media). It really was fun to watch and listen too. I'd have thought that after all these years that the rhetoric of the anti-war movement would have changed with the times but I could close my eyes and listen and find myself reliving those inglorious days of the 1960's. Hope you guys do it again real soon. You just can't beat this for pure fun entertainment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I am a smelly hippy!! Posted by: feduphoosier
» RE: 1960's redux Posted by: illusionless
No Coverage in Europe cont. (and the sorry state of U.S. Media)
Posted by: feduphoosier on Jan 31, 2007 5:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bringing this down from above, its getting a bit congested.

Thank you Talpone for the German links posted under 'No Coverage in Europe." Especially the Der Spiegel coverage... as it turns out, this kicked off a late night quest on my end.

I can't read German. I can, however, look at the photos. I noticed with great interest that some of them were from Reuters - but we never saw them in American papers. (Took me a second, but I finally figured out that 'weiter' means 'next', and 'zurück' means 'back.' )

The DPA photo of Jesse Jackson taken from the stage (and showing the crowd below) is excellent - perfect angle. It would make a decent entry in the NPPA photo contest. Normally that would have burned up the wire - famous public speaker and Civil Rights activist in the nation's capitol, on stage, looking down thoughtfully at a casket draped in the American flag, and surrounded by crowd holding signs. Amazing that it wasn't carried in the country of its origin, self-described as a Democracy. "Land of the free," eh?

As a former journalism major, this sort of thing makes me crazy. Its one of those kick in the teeth moments when you realize just how bad its gotten here in the last few years - Europe owns us in the Democracy game. As a former journalism major, this sort of thing makes me crazy. Its one of those kick in the teeth moments when you realize just how bad its gotten here in the last few years - Europe owns us in the Democracy game. And yes I know... its wartime! Its always going to be wartime - from here on out, always wartime. We are now engaged in a never-ending war on evil; obviously we won't return to normal, peace time Democracy for... well... ever. How do you win a war on evil? You don't. Especially when its an inside job.

Remember all of those photojournalism classics that came out of Vietnam? They were integral in ending the war. Now Americans can see grainy, cell phone photos - in Newsweek - of Saddam hanging, but not see this photo of Jesse Jackson at a peace rally. Notice the Reuters photo page - the glaring leap from January 26th to January 29th. Notice they covered the March for Life rally. Now notice... when given a chance to show what WE think is news (Reuters has a 'You Witness News' program,) the recent photos are all of - surprise - the DC march. Yet somehow Reuters didn't run any of their own?

Thank you Bill Clinton and of course our beloved, crooked Congress, (Telecommunications Act of 1996) for handing our media over to 6 owners... its pretty obvious they're signed on for the global domination game. Guess its no accident that Murdock is funding Hillary's war chest - a rather obvious IOU. Goebbels would be so proud ("Propaganda has only one object - to conquer the masses. Every means that furthers this aim is good; every means that hinders it is bad.") That, and envious he didn't live in the mass communication age. Who knows, Hitler might just have pulled it off. Everyone in Europe and the United States would be too busy reading about American Idol to even notice Poland had been invaded; it might have taken weeks, if Britney Spears became pregnant.

Sorry for the Nazi example, but the parallels are striking. Germany passed through that fire and came out the other side. We saw the entire thing go down, but we're walking right into the same, dark pit of hatred, fascism and global domination.

I barely recognize my country anymore.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Do Our Rulers Perceive Us As Harmless?
Posted by: shinseiji on Jan 31, 2007 11:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was at the march. I tend to agree with http://www.counterpunch.org/jw01292007.html

There were no more than 200K in my estimate, a respectable showing for the East Coast but nothing to shout about. I saw 200K show up just in San Francisco for the 2003 demos in the leadup to the war. Good sign was, contrary to what the far right trollers might post here, there were a lot of young people in attendance.

Central DC, like any big city financial center, is dead as Arlington cemetary on the weekends. Consequentially, weekend gatherings such as this do nothing to disrupt business as usual, and the sign of this is that it meets with no repression. They therefore will merit little attention from the rulers. Compare this with the "Battle of Seattle" in 1999 where the organizers came with the intent of disrupting WTO operations. Because they succeeded in this, they were met with a brutal and violent repression by the liberal mayor backed by the Clinton Fed Democrats, who had sent their own operatives to cooridinate with the local authorities.

If the organizers weren't prepared to march across Arlington Bridge to the Pentagon (always open for business 24X7!) then for these weekend things, they should plan an extensive march through the working class African American neighborhoods on the east side of town. All just east of the Capitol building. Yes, it would require a little "work and effort" to get there, but would be much more impressive than the pathetic little U-turn around the (empty) Capitol.

But I'm sure that a lot of foreign visitors had their tour experiences "enhanced".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Undoubtedly. Posted by: feduphoosier