Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

War on Iraq

A Cure for Yellow Ribbon Patriotism

By Robert Weitzel, AlterNet. Posted January 12, 2007.


The story of a Vietnam vet illuminates where the rally cry "support our troops" originated, and what it has come to mean now.
Advertisement

A man I once knew survived his tour of duty in Vietnam. In the privacy of a rented house trailer he drank alone until he finally had the "courage" to kill himself. I don't know if he saw combat. He never said. I only assumed he had because when he spoke, what he said had the finality of a trigger pull. To my mind, there is only one way to acquire such certainty.

I only saw him on the weekends when he made beer runs for my high school buddies and me. We gave him a six-pack and ten minutes of our time for his trouble and then left him as we had found him, sitting at his kitchen table pulling on an unfiltered cigarette and sipping a lukewarm beer like he had all the time in the world.

I didn't see him after high school, and he was dead by the time I next thought to ask about him. I don't know that he was a casualty of the war. He might have traveled the same road regardless of Vietnam. But then, he might not have.

Like most returning Vietnam vets before the release of the POWs, he was not given a hero's welcome. Hero was a word we seldom used back then; unlike today, we didn't toss it out like confetti on the deserving and the undeserving alike.

He came back instead to an indifferent, if not hostile, country. He and his fellow vets were slipped into the country singly or in small groups so as to diffuse throughout the population the "cure" they carried in their marrow, rendering it as ineffectual as a homeopathic dilution.

The "cure" these soldiers brought back from Vietnam was a potion distilled of moments: moments of bravery and sacrifice and sorrow, of bowel-loosening fear, of dehumanizing anger and hostility, of unasked and unanswered questions, moments too damaging to the soul to ever find release in confession.

It was a potion that if used thoughtfully could inoculate the nation against the disease of the god Mars. But it was ignored along with the soldiers. Vietnam vets, like the man I knew, were left to overdose on the potion in their own private hell.

The rally cry "support our troops" was born of a sincere desire to separate our feelings for the soldiers from our feelings for the war. It was meant as a mea culpa to the Vietnam veteran and a promise that we would never again make our soldiers the scapegoats for the machinations of the power elite. As a statement of concern for the wellbeing of the individual soldier, "support our troops" is unassailable.

But like the word hero, the vitality of the sentiment expressed by "support our troops" has been sapped by mindless iteration and the Machiavellian genius of warmongers. It has become little more than a patriotic platitude on par with "God Bless America" and a euphemism for "support our war." As a balm to the national conscience for once again consigning our troops to the killing field, it is the battle cry that leads and sustains our country in an unjust war.

In a recent Military Times Poll, only 35 percent of our troops approved of the Bush administration's handling of the Iraq war, while only 23 percent believed Congress was looking out for them. The troops are telling us they do not feel supported by the politicians who sent them to the killing field for a dose of the "cure."

Against the advice of both retired and active duty military leaders, President Bush's new strategy for winning the war in Iraq is expected to include a "surge" of 20,000 to 40,000 additional troops to help quell the sectarian violence unleashed by the illegal invasion and botched occupation of that country.

A November 2006 survey by WorldPublicOpinion.org revealed that 72 percent of Iraqi Shias believe the presence of U.S. occupation forces only exacerbates an already lethal situation and wants them out of their country within the year, while 91 percent of Sunnis approve of attacks on U.S. troops.

Our troops, our top military leaders, and the Iraqi people are sending a clear message. It is time to for the United States to "cut and run."

Yellow ribbon patriots finally have an opportunity to support our troops in a meaningful way. They can begin by removing their magnetic yellow ribbon bumper stickers, by listening to the troops and helping to get them home, and by demanding that those who took the country to war with lies and deception be held to account.

All Americans will continue to abdicate their responsibility to the living and the dead and the wounded troops if they are unwilling to inoculate themselves with the "cure" brought home from the killing field.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: yellow ribbons, veterans, patriotism, war in iraq

Robert Weitzel is a freelance writer whose essays regularly appear in the Capital Times of Madison, Wis. He has also been published in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Skeptic magazine, and Freethought Today. He can be contacted at: rweitz@tds.net.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from War on Iraq! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Democratic Congressman reintroduces bill for military draft in US
Posted by: rwa on Jan 12, 2007 2:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
By Joe Kay
"Charles Rangel, the Democratic chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, reintroduced a bill on Thursday that would institute a military draft for all legal residents of the United States between the ages of 18 and 42.

In his press release announcing the move, Rangel—a liberal Democrat who claims to oppose the war in Iraq—made clear that the central motivation for the bill is to alleviate the strains on the military, which will be further overextended as Bush moves to increase the number of troops in Iraq. A draft would also provide sufficient cannon fodder to use in Iran, Somalia, North Korea or any other country...

Rangel claims to be opposed to the war in Iraq, as well as the plan to introduce more troops. He is attempting to justify his draft bill by couching it in the language of “equality of sacrifice.” The draft is necessary, he wrote in his press release on Thursday, because “if Americans are to be placed in harm’s way, all of us, from every income group and position in society, must share the burden of war.”

Indeed, Rangel’s bill would require that a significant portion of the population take up this “burden of war.” Not only is he calling for a draft of all residents between 18 and 42—an age range that far exceeds previous drafts and would include immigrants as well as US citizens, women as well as men—but his bill would also deny all deferments for college students.

If such a measure were actually put into law, it would mean something on the order of 100 million people subject to conscription. Rangel’s bill provides that those not selected for the military would be required to carry out some other form of “service,” such as policing or border patrol.

The various demagogic arguments for the draft advanced by Rangel at one point or another are merely covers for policy the aim of which would be to provide more cannon fodder for present and future wars waged by the American ruling elite.

A real campaign against the occupation of Iraq would take the form of a demand for the withdrawal of US troops. This demand has not been raised by the leadership of the Democratic Party...

The question of the draft is the subject of serious discussion within the political and military establishment, though this discussion is occurring largely behind the backs of the American people. When Rangel stated in November that he planned to reintroduce his bill as soon as the new Congress started, his position received prominent media coverage. This was a highly conscious move, intended as a trial balloon to gauge public reaction and prepare the population for the possibility of a draft.

It is the Democratic Party that has particularly been pushing for discussion on the reintroduction of military conscription. Calls for some form of “universal service” were ubiquitous in the policy documents of leading Democratic strategists during the lead-up to the November elections.

While there is enormous concern within the ruling elite over the potentially explosive domestic consequences of a draft, there is equally great concern over the deterioration of the military as a consequence of the protracted Iraq occupation. Volunteer recruitment is down as a result of public opposition to the war, and yet both the Democrats and Republicans enthusiastically support a permanent increase in the size of the military. The military has already been forced to relax its standards in order to meet its recruitment quotas.

The question of the draft will now become an issue for discussion within the political establishment, as it conspires new ways to force the American population to kill and be killed in the interests of the ruling elite.

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2007/jan2007/draf-j12.shtml

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Many more Vets like your friend...
Posted by: MonkeyBoy on Jan 12, 2007 2:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My cousin returned from Viet Nam in '73 with a drug habit and mental problems that have kept him from holding anything besides menial labor jobs the past 30+ years. He has been in and out of institutions, and now has apparently slipped through the cracks of society. His immediate family has not seen him in over 5 years, since he walked out of a mental hospital.

In the late 70's, I worked for about a week with a Viet Nam Vet who had been shot in the head in combat. He had a steel plate in his head, and a very big scar. He only lasted one week on that job, because he would shake uncontrollably at times and get very pale. I'm guessing that maybe he was exposed to Agent Orange at some point in the jungle.

A lot of vets become homeless after a few years of trying to fit back into society. I'm afraid that many, many more Iraq and Afghanistan vets will face the same fate, or worse. Many Gulf War vets have serious health problems due to exposure to DU dust, and who knows what else.

The bottom line is, these people were merely pawns in the wars brought on by the Elites of the world. Their insatiable greed is the root cause of this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Yellow Ribbon" mentality was stolen in the first place
Posted by: xbj on Jan 12, 2007 2:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The authors of "Tie A Yellow Ribbon", the song that gave birth to the entire "Yellow Ribbon" phenomenon in the first place, were writing about a CONVICT returning from PRISON (an update on the "The Green Green Grass of Home" theme), and it had nothing to do with the military, EVER.

Until it was STOLEN.

How appropriate. And typical of cannon fodder.

And not realizing for a single moment that the color yellow has always been associated with cowardice. And, according to THEIR way of thinking, far more appropriate for returning AWOL cowards than returning heroes.

Geniuses.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A STICKER ON A CAR SEEMS TO CLEAR THE CONSCIENCE
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Jan 12, 2007 2:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Early on in mid March '01 there were so many stickers and American flags that it seemed blasphemous. Well the stickers faded and fell off and the flags just disappeared. The sticker and flag crowd "supported the troops". I reminded a few of them that they were supporting the country that made the stickers and flags. These people still can't find Baghdad on the map. Have no idea how many troops have been killed. But they are pleased with themselves. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"yellow ribbon patriots": perfect
Posted by: Beck on Jan 12, 2007 3:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've been waiting for someone to come up with a name like this for those who think this war is fine and that the country actually is in danger, yet have no compunction themselves to become involved in any way; no inconvenience, no loss of freedom, and certainly no fear of joining in the risk of death, dismemberment, and mental trauma that the military faces at war. Another poster recently had a similar good phrase, "skin in the game." Anyone "supporting" the troops and Bush and his policies should certainly be willing to join in.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WTF?
Posted by: DaBear on Jan 12, 2007 4:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He and his fellow vets were slipped into the country singly or in small groups so as to diffuse throughout the population the "cure" they carried in their marrow, rendering it as ineffectual as a homeopathic dilution

"homeopathic dilution"? Why malign a legitimate medical practice in an anti war thingy? What, the 138 double blind studies in Germany, India, Netherlands, UK and Sweden don't matter because they weren't conducted by 'Mer'kaans? How dumb.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: WTF? Posted by: Dboy
Hell no, my son won't go!!
Posted by: fluffmuffinmom on Jan 12, 2007 7:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As the mother of a 20 year old son who is my only precious child, the thought of a draft keeps me in constant state of panic and awake at night suffering from cold sweats. Using the threat of a draft around as a way to make a political point is cruel not only to mothers like myself, but to our sons. Please stop!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hell no, my son won't go!! Posted by: MonkeyBoy
» RE: Hell no, my son won't go!! Posted by: azmtnman
» Let them eat lead Posted by: moflard
Hell no, my son won't go!!
Posted by: fluffmuffinmom on Jan 12, 2007 7:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As the mother of a 20 year old son who is my only precious child, the thought of a draft keeps me in constant state of panic and awake at night suffering from cold sweats. Using the threat of a draft as a way to make a political point is cruel not only to mothers like myself, but to our sons. Please stop!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hell no, my son won't go!! Posted by: TheMatrix
» RE: Hell no, my son won't go!! Posted by: armybrat8
» RE: Hell no, my son won't go!! Posted by: azmtnman
Consequence of the 2004 Bush Sweep
Posted by: IamB on Jan 13, 2007 6:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One must remember that the red states, who supply many of the troops to the armed services, voted overwhelmingly for George W. Bush to be president in 2004. No hanging chads. No Supreme Court decision. They want their president to be George W. Bush.
Rather than to assume that these voters were ignorant, or foolish, or gullible, perhaps the correct approach is to respect their right to choose a leader who advocates an elective invasion of a non-threatening country. There does not seem to be any polling data that shows the military to have voted en masse for Senator Kerry. One could argue, with a preponderance of evidence, that the United States military, and their families, chose this course for their loved ones. They are willing to put their loved ones in harm's way, to sacrifice their blood for Bush's elective war.
I live in a red state. Many in my community have family members in the military--and there are plenty of yellow ribbons on cars here. Their patriotism is no less sincere than yours, I am sure. These are people as intelligent as you, and they don't feel that they've been fooled or are unsupported by President Bush.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» and they may pay with life Posted by: drblack
» Great point! Posted by: Dboy
Those yellow ribbons
Posted by: kclaf on Jan 13, 2007 6:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A friend of mine asked a merchant who sold the ribbons how much of the profit was given to our women and men who were in the military. He looked at her like she was crazy! Now, I am sporting a yellow magnetic 'Question War' actual question mark sticker on my car. I've had several people say they loved it and asked where I happened to find it. I found it at www.questionwar.com website if anyone is interested in looking there. I support our people who are in the military, I simply do not support the greed and lies that got them where they are.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

They volunteered to die for oil and money
Posted by: drblack on Jan 13, 2007 9:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am sick of the we must support our troops crap. If no one was foolish enough to join the American invasion force then we would have no war. I knew a guy who has since been killed in Iraq whose wife pushed him into the Army for the college benefits.
She regrets it now. I knew for a fact that if bushie were elected we would attack someone.
It was sad that the Drafted vets of vietnam war were treated so terribly...they had no choice.
If another WW2 comes along I will be at the front of the recruitment line. This war was and is wrong and is all about getting BP,Shell and Exxon access to Iraqi oil.
This war has made America less safe ,weaker in all ways and has created more terrorists then anything else.
To support or fight this war results in a weak and less free America.
I feel sad for those who have been duped to fight:but I do not support them until they come home.
In fact the only true way to support our troops is to get them out from between the warring factions in Iraq.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» WWII hmm really? Posted by: Dboy
» RE: WWII hmm really? Posted by: Lloyd Drako
An alternate interpretation of yellow ribbons - pt I
Posted by: ssegallmd on Jan 14, 2007 6:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't agree with your interpretation of the following:

"The rally cry "support our troops" was born of a sincere desire to separate our feelings for the soldiers from our feelings for the war. It was meant as a mea culpa to the Vietnam veteran and a promise that we would never again make our soldiers the scapegoats for the machinations of the power elite. As a statement of concern for the wellbeing of the individual soldier, "support our troops" is unassailable."

The use of the term "Support Our Troops" was nothing as innocent or as helpful as a promise to treat the troops better. This is America and the neocons that you're talking about here. Nothing is said without having a secret meaning or purpose. People aren't spoken to. They're handled with expedient language that occasionally intersects with the truth whenever the truth happens to be the most tactically profitable thing to say.

In this case as in virtually all others involving this government, it's pure propaganda, in this case designed to make any criticism of Bush's war effort count as a criticism of the enlistees. It's an old trick of theirs. They did the same thing by conflating hatred of Bush with hatred of America.

"Support Our Troops", like the bible and the flag, are all just marketing gimmicks now. What else could they be in a nation with exactly one value: accumulating wealth and power by any means are good and justify any course of action that furthers that end. Period.

No other considerations whatsoever - not integrity, tradition, compassion, community, justice, truth, decency, having an inhabitable planet - not a one figures into any decision at any level, although they all get plenty of lip service because that is expedient too.

CONT.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bush War Veterans
Posted by: Jeanne on Jan 14, 2007 1:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As ever, the poor and underclass are overrepresented amongst active duty forces serving in shooting zones. After they have paid with life or limb, they are discarded. Support for those who return, irreparably altered, is too little and too hard to come by. The Bush War Vets will suffer the same fate as every group of war veterans, they will be out of sight and out of mind when the conflict is over. Their post-Bush War needs will go ignored and unfunded. If they don't die there, they'll just fade away here. Young people should be aware of this before they sign up to serve.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bush War Veterans Posted by: armybrat8
monitor recruiting at your local school
Posted by: Mamarianne on Jan 15, 2007 6:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a teacher, I have seen first hand that military recruiters are made welcome in the public schools. They come bearing gifts--pens, folders, key chains, book covers. They speak of opportunity for education and travel. They are ready with early decision paperwork. They supply ready-made answers for young people so that they can respond to worried parents or peers. They look cool and strong, and they offer in-crowd status to teens who are on the fringes of high school hierachy. They are well-trained. They know what to say and whom to say it to. Their message is seldom countered by alternate views.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yellow ribbons
Posted by: MartianBachelor on Jan 21, 2007 7:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There's a relatively simple principle of logic which says in so many words that a statement is meaningless if its opposite is meaningless or inconceivable.

Since you never hear anyone say "I don't support the troops", the converse phrase carries no real meaning beyond what one wants to project onto it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]