Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

War on Iraq

The Real Cost of the Iraq War: 50,000 U.S. Casualties

By Michael Munk, AlterNet. Posted January 4, 2007.


Death is not the only measure of loss in Iraq. What about all of the lost limbs, bloodshed and other casualties that aren't being reported?
Advertisement

To bring the human cost to Americans of the invasion and occupation of Iraq home, antiwar groups across the country are marking mark the 3,000th death of a member of its military components (at this writing the total is 3,004).

But by focusing only on the number of dead Americans we are being manipulated along with the media and public by the administration's determination to minimize the cost in blood of establishing permanent military bases in the heart of the Middle East oil patch.

That public relations strategy consists of prohibiting images of the dead and wounded returning home and those of U.S. casualties in Iraq in the U.S. media as well as aggressive efforts to prevent such coverage by foreign media --including deadly attacks on Al-Jazeera reporters and offices. It also plants stories and interviews, leaks to FOX and other Pentagon-friendly reporters and provides generous payola to foreign (especially Iraqi) news sources.

Still, the most consistent propaganda effort since the invasion aims to keep public attention away from the actual amount of blood being shed by American military victims of the war and their families. That cost now exceeds 50,000 casualties -- a far cry from the 3,000 to which most of the public is restricted to know.

"Casualties" in the military sense is the total number made unavailable for duty from all causes, including deaths and wounds suffered in combat as well as injuries, accidents and illness in a war "theater" such as "Operation Iraqi Freedom" (the official Pentagon name for the invasion and occupation). So whether caused by "hostile" (24,965 as of Dec.27) or "non-hostile" (25,406 as of Dec. 2) causes, the Pentagon's own web sites record a toll of more than 50,000 so far in "OIF."

However, for most Americans who depend on mass media for information, the approaching number of only 3,000 is the only measure of the loss of life and limb the media allow them to know. For the rest of us, here are the facts: The Pentagon reports deaths on a daily basis at although its own total always lags behind the wire services number because it insists survivors must be informed before a dead solider, marine, sailor or airman can be added to the casualty lists. But the Pentagon only reports the wounded on the weekly basis (usually on Tuesdays) at the same site and it reports the non fatal casualties from non hostile causes only monthly and on another website.

From those sources, we can count U.S. military occupation forces casualties as more than 50,371 as of Dec. 27. The total (as above) includes 2,400 killed and 22,565 wounded (which includes both severely and less severely wounded) by what the Pentagon classifies as "hostile" causes. By that date, another 583 military personnel had died from "non hostile" causes such as accidents, suicides (there were 99 "self inflicted fatalities") and illness and, as of Dec. 2, another 24,823 had been injured or become ill seriously enough to require medical evacuation. According the excellent siteIraq Coalition Casualty Count, another 147 U.S. "contractors" have also been killed since they invaded Iraq.

I urge opponents of the war to make the public aware that the actual human cost of the invasion and occupation of Iraq exceeds 50,000 troops and their families who have suffered death and often life-long disability -- of whom the 3,000 are just one tragic part.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: iraq, iraq war, casualties, death toll

Michael Munk is a retired political scientist in Portland, Ore., where his "Portland Red Guide" was published by Ooligan Press.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from War on Iraq! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
misdirection
Posted by: rsaxto on Jan 4, 2007 1:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We get misdirection from the military casualty creators and truth from our beloved minimedias. We also get some peeks from the grossly injured in hospitals. The total grossness of the Iraq calamity is awful indeed. Its criminal creators must be made accountable for their crimes so that this kind of horror creation cannot continue into the far future.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: misdirection Posted by: willymack
Aftermath
Posted by: Tom Degan on Jan 4, 2007 2:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No question about it, America will be paying for this obscene war for generations - or, at the very least, untill the last Iraqi vet has died of old age. Let's see...By my calculation, that puts the year at 2104 - give or take a year or two.

What is the real death toll anyway? Of course we know nothing of the number of service people who have subsequently died of their injuries months or years after they were carried off the battle field. Have their deaths been reported? What's the real number of dead? C'mon, George! C'mon, Dick! Come clean!

We know now that the number of Iraqi men, women and little children killed in this catastrophe far exceeds the original tally. It is now estimated to be at least 654,000.

654,000????? That's 30,000 more than were killed in the entire American Civil War! Ouch! This DOES get a tad embarrassing, does it not? The fact is, we may not know the whole truth about this giant war crime for decades - maybe not even in our lifetime - but here's what we do know: George W. Bush is a war criminal and must be held to account for his crimes against humanity. This obvious (to me) fact will even become apparent to the American people as 2007 grinds on and desperately needed hearings in a Democratically controlled House and Senate expose the truth about what these hideous bastards and bitches (Hi, Condi!) have done to our once-great country.

Make no mistake about it: The trillion dollar shithammer is going to hit the fan in 2007. It's going to be that kind of year.

Pray for peace.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
"The Rant" by Tom Degan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Aftermath...after maths Posted by: Captainmagic
» RE: Aftermath Posted by: andyc
» Only in America Posted by: braxxian
» To Braxxian: Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: To Braxxian: Posted by: ConnecttheDots
» WOW Posted by: Conservasaurus
It's going to get worse
Posted by: Democritus on Jan 4, 2007 5:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
More effective body armor cuts down on fatalities, but it results in more survivors with serious injuries. Our VA hospitals are again going to be filled with young men and women with missing arms, legs, and eyes--just as they were during the Vietnam war. No matter how this administration spins it, as the total number of these wounded increases, the human cost of this war will become evident, and the American people will wake up and put it to an end. Unfortunately, I don't see that happening in 2007.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It's going to get worse Posted by: bloggeddowninMKE
a golden opportunity for the hawks
Posted by: Beck on Jan 4, 2007 6:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush's surge presents a golden opportunity to the hawks posting here and elsewhere: the chance to put their own bodies on the line and show what they're made up. With all the fear expressed on this site and all the admonishments to those of us who oppose Bush's policies, the tension generated by remaining safely at home while danger is mounting must be enormous. The cognitive dissonance created by fighting with words instead of action must get increasingly uncomfortable. It will be a great relief to share the sacrifice, I would imagine, and any country willing to go to war without shared sacrifice seems to be missing a crucial part of its soul and conscience, just as a person willing to let others fight for causes they think are important while remaining safe seems to have split themselves off from their own conscience, and even their own emotions. How anyone can live in the kind of fear often expressed here and remain passive is surprising, to say the least. We military families have shouldered this burden long enough. Now that there is a surge and more sacrifice about to be asked for, there should be more sacrifice from those who have been claiming a threat too great to walk away from. I don't notice yet, though, any of the hawks responding to this article, or to the one regarding the surge, just as I don't notice any argument any longer over women in combat. I guess it's easier to argue that they shouldn't be there when nothing much is going on, but once there is combat, and they are in in midst of it, a man sitting back here claiming they don't belong just might be subject to the criticism that if he were there himself, she wouldn't be there herself, filling his spot.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The toll rings for family as well!
Posted by: Conservasaurus on Jan 4, 2007 6:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
KIA and wounded for sure tell the story, but not the entire story. Consider family members of those klled and wounded and one can begin to understand the far reaching effect military service has.

a recent "Washington Post" article. --- At a Pentagon service to mark the fifth anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks, Marine Gen. Peter Pace, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said that more than 1.3 million troops had been deployed to support the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. That is almost one in every 230 Americans.

In a USA Today-Gallup poll in October, 11 percent of respondents said they had a close friend, family member or co-worker who was wounded or killed in the Iraq war; an additional 43 percent had a friend, relative or colleague who had served in it.

That article also detailed this account:
“The grenade is in the truck," McGinnis yelled. Then he ducked down and backward, pinning the device between his body and the radio mount just before it went off.

"He had time to jump out of the truck. He chose not to," Thomas said, according to official military accounts of the incident. McGinnis's action saved Thomas and three other soldiers from "certain serious injury or death."

McGinnis's father, reflecting on his family's loss, wrote that his son went to war not to die but "to fight and win and come home to us and marry and grow old and have children and grandchildren."

"But die he did, and his mother, dad and sisters must face that fact and go on without him, believing that someday we will meet again."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Additional Casualties
Posted by: inanaturallight on Jan 4, 2007 6:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The article and comments appear to have missed another group of "hidden casualties" of the war... how many articles have we read about our soldiers (our children) coming home with PTSD and related emotional "scars"- the articles we read are often of suicides, but even those that don't choose "that way out" may be disabled for life. These casualties are not only ignored, it seems the military is adamant in denying that they exist.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Additional casualties
Posted by: Maryanne on Jan 4, 2007 6:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And what about those Americans and Iraqis (as well as other nationalities working in Iraq) who have been exposed to depleted uranium? Consider what is happening to those first responders of 9-11 as a result of the pollutants they inhaled while cleaning up the site.

We are in for a long list of casualties from Iraq as the years go by

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Additional casualties Posted by: Belgarion
IT HELPS TO CARE
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Jan 4, 2007 8:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sadly, not a lot of people are in search of 'real' numbers. I got a rude awakening recently when I mentioned the approaching 3000 mark. "That's what they volunteer for" he said. This from a Criminal Justice major and now police officer! The indifference shocks me. The media won't touch that part of the war. All I hear about is Bush's legacy and how we can still win. Win what? This has to be pushed in people's faces like ads for cell phones. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: IT HELPS TO CARE Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: IT HELPS TO CARE Posted by: Belgarion
A few suggestions...
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Jan 4, 2007 8:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1) The National Guard is just that - not the International Guard, aka Bush&Co's oilfield protection service. The Louisiana Nat'l Guard should have been in New Orleans for Katrina, along with all of their equipment.

2) The Iraq war is illegal as it was based on a series of deliberate lies and deceptions engineered by the Iraqi National Congress and Dick Cheney. Hopefully John Conyers will keep his promise to expose the whole business to the American public in by holding hearings on the matter.

3) The anti-war movement should follow the suggestion of Lt. Watada and start a program to provide financial support for the families of soldiers who refuse to serve in this illegal war. This will allow soldiers to speak their minds without having to worry about their families becoming homeless refugees.

4) The independent press should make a far greater effort to interview soldiers about their experiences in Iraq - what they did, what they saw, and what they thought about it. There is a news blackout from most of the country, since it's so dangerous for reporters to work there - so talk to the people who were there.

5) The whole business of private contractors in Iraq needs far more attention - are they being paid by the US government? Are they primarily involved in the oil business (i.e. does Kellog, Brown and Root / Halliburton still hold the sole contract for Iraqi oilfield services?). What about the private military contractors in Iraq - who is paying for their services and why?

This whole war can be summed up in one sentence - it is a desperate effort to secure control of Mideast oil supplies by a gang of international criminals.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What about mental health?
Posted by: stasso on Jan 4, 2007 9:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hoping against hope to be wrong, I'd venture to say that the problems related to mental health these veterans will face in the years ahead, will surpass anything we have ever encountered. (I cannot help wondering how many Timothy McVeys are incubating)
Wrong as this war is and has been since its insane and dishonest inception, each serviceperson who fought in it without committing crimes or abuses deserve all the support, respect, love and TLC each and every WESTERNER can give them in big and small ways.
We, the comfortable and unaffected civilians can and, in my opinion, should prevent another Viet Nam at least when welcoming these fighters home.
Never soon enough, of course.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Will the twins jump into the surge?
Posted by: Mamarianne on Jan 4, 2007 9:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Where are the Bush twins? Are they going to enlist and join the surge to project daddy's legacy? What do those two young women do to contribtute to the war effort or society in general? Do they support themselves? Does anyone know???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Where is the Iraqi Body count
Posted by: bookie on Jan 4, 2007 11:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The cost of this war is more than just American lives. Why aren't we being given an accounting of Iraqi lives lost and wounded? Where's the account of how many Iraqi children who have died, or been crippled, or been orphaned?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Iraq Vets Come Home Physically, Mentally Butchered by Aaron Glantz
Posted by: rwa on Jan 4, 2007 11:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"According to documents obtained by the National Security Archive at George Washington University, 25 percent of veterans of the "global war on terror" have filed disability compensation and pension benefit claims with the Veterans Benefits Administration.

One is a Jul. 20, 2006, document titled "Compensation and Pension Benefit Activity Among Veterans of the Global War on Terrorism," which shows that 152,669 veterans filed disability claims after fighting in Iraq or Afghanistan. Of the more than 100,000 claims granted, Veterans Administration records show at least 1,502 veterans have been compensated as 100 percent disabled.

Pentagon studies show that 12 percent of soldiers who have served in Iraq suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder. The group Veterans for America, formerly the Vietnam Veterans of America Foundation, estimates 70,000 Iraq war veterans have gone to the VA for mental health care.

New guidelines released by the Pentagon released last month allow commanders to redeploy soldiers suffering from traumatic stress disorders."

Full article:

http://www.antiwar.com/glantz/?articleid=10262

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

State side training accidents
Posted by: larry278 on Jan 4, 2007 1:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It would be interesting to see a count of GI's killed or injured & discharged because of injuries due to training accidents. Does one count them since the injured get VA benefits including medical care, education & compensation for these injuries?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A comment from a REAL leftist
Posted by: Dboy on Jan 4, 2007 3:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At least these American Christian Soldiers are pointing their guns at Iraqis instead of Americas. We're next. One more dead means one less soldier to assist the police state here at home. This is a volunteer army. Everyone of these soldiers made a choice to go invade foreign countries, and terrorize, abuse, rape, and murder innocent people. If they come home in a bag, it's due to their ideology.

Dboy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» WE ALLINS LOVE IT HERE AT YALTANET TOO Posted by: cheneybush2008
bobvz@cox.net
Posted by: Robert Veasey on Jan 4, 2007 11:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I know hundreds of the casualties you speak of. Loss of limbs, loss of sight, loss of hearing, some burned pretty badly.

I'd say the common denominator amongst the vast majority of them is that they don't complain. They were part of a 'volunteer' force. They knew there would be risks. They knew there would be the possibility of being put into harm's way. Some of them with artificial limbs have volunteered to go back (Truly prosthesis has come a long way in the last few years). I'm not saying all...but a sizeable majority still feel that the mission was worth it and the true story has yet to be told.

You do great injustice to their service and to their sacrifices with the kind of commentary in your article.

Shame on you and this country for abandoning this fight and once again turning our backs on another nation we made promises to. Shame on us.

You want to see a bloodbath. Nothing you write of compares to the bloodbath that will ensue when we abandon this fight and return our men to their homeland. Like Vietnam where millions subsequently perished, the Middle East will be ten times worse.

You say - who cares? That's there and here is here.

Well if that's your attitude about the death of millions of our fellow human beings..then shame on you fifty times fifty times over.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: bobvz@cox.net Posted by: cheneybush2008
» Shame on you bub Posted by: lessbread
50 MILLION SLAVES FREED, YET VICHY FRENCH SCUM SOCIALISTS WHINE.
Posted by: cheneybush2008 on Jan 5, 2007 1:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
OUR TROOPS ARE VOLUNTEER FREEDOM FIGHTERS, GET IT LEFTARDS?

SWEET JEEZES LIBERALS ARE COWARDLY LITTLE PHUCKERS.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]