Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

War on Iraq

Bechtel Bails on Iraq

By Antonia Juhasz, AlterNet. Posted November 14, 2006.


After making billions and then pulling out of Iraq, the company has big plans for raking in more lucre in Bush's Middle East Free Trade Area.
Advertisement

Last month, the Bechtel Corp. became the first major U.S. contractor to announce that it was pulling out of Iraq. Bechtel's departure marks yet another significant failure for Bush's economic invasion of Iraq. It does not mark, however, the end of Bechtel's adventures in the Middle East as the company looks to take advantage of the Bush administration's expanding U.S.-Middle East Free Trade Area.

Bechtel received a quiet "request for proposals" from the Bush administration more than a month before the war began, which ultimately yielded the company $2.4 billion for work on electricity, water, sewage treatment, bridges, highways, airports, hospitals, schools and more.

It is virtually impossible to assess the performance of any one company working in Iraq. Only one independent monitoring agency exists, the special inspector general for Iraq reconstruction (SIGIR), a congressionally mandated office tasked with oversight of all U.S. spending on Iraq reconstruction. Of the 13,578 projects planned and paid for by the U.S. government for work in Iraq, SIGIR has assessed just 65.

But even this limited oversight allows us to debunk claims made by Bechtel. For example, the company reports that it rebuilt "war-damaged bridges on key highways." But SIGIR's October report to Congress finds that "no bridge or expressway projects have been completed" in Iraq.

Bechtel also claims that it failed to build a key maternal and children's hospital in Basra because of "security concerns." While SIGIR, on the other hand, makes clear that it ordered Bechtel to be dropped from the $50 million project after the company misreported its progress and went $90 million over budget and a year and a half behind schedule.

SIGIR's October report also allows us to clearly assess the overall failure of U.S. reconstruction in Iraq. In the electricity sector, less than half of all planned projects in Iraq have been completed, while 21 percent have yet to even begin. The term "complete," however, can be misleading as, for example, SIGIR finds that the electricity sector has been hampered by the failure of contractors to build transmission and distribution lines to connect new generators to homes and businesses. Thus, nationally, Iraqis have just 11 hours on average of electricity a day, and in Baghdad, the heart of instability in Iraq, there are between four and eight hours on average per day.

While there has been greater success in completing water and sewage projects (79 percent are complete), electricity controls both water and sewage in Iraq. Therefore, the fact that 80 percent of potable water projects are reported complete does little good if there is no electricity to pump the water into homes, hospitals or businesses.

The health care sector is truly a tragedy, with just 36 percent of planned projects reported complete. Just 12 of 20 planned hospitals are complete, while only six of 150 planned public health centers are serving patients today.

What went wrong? U.S. Air Force Col. Sam Gardiner, author of a U.S. government study of the likely effect that U.S. bombardment would have on Iraq's power system in 2003, answered the question well when he said, "Frankly, if we had just given the Iraqis some baling wire and a little bit of space to keep things running, it would have been better. But instead we've let big U.S. companies go in with plans for major overhauls."

Companies like Bechtel entered Iraq with hopes of cashing in on much more than reconstruction contracts. As Cliff Mumm, head of Bechtel's Iraq operation, said in December 2003, Iraq "has two rivers, it's fertile, it's sitting on an ocean of oil. Iraq ought to be a major player in the world. And we want to be working for them long term."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: iraq, bechtel, war profiteering, free trade

Antonia Juhasz is a visiting scholar at the Institute for Policy Studies and author of "The Bush Agenda: Invading the World, One Economy at a Time" and contributing author with John Perkins to the forthcoming book, "A Game as Old as Empire: The Secret World of Economic Hit Men and the Web of Global Corruption." TheBushAgenda.net.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from War on Iraq! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Kleptocracy Now
Posted by: edith on Nov 14, 2006 12:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great article. The kind of hard facts documetation of the deliberate destruction of Iraq so that leeches like Bechtel can "rebuild" it (but not rebuild it.) That's Bush-think.

This ripoff of US taxpayers and destruction of a modern nation's infrastructure (Iraq's) should be a prime target for investigatory hearings by the new House Reform Committee under Henry Waxman (D-CA).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Naomi Klein
Posted by: underwaterexplosions on Nov 14, 2006 12:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wrote an article, that I think was actually on this website, a while back that outlined and explained in detail all that is happening over in Iraq in terms of American economic imperialism. Of course, the corpocracy wants the oil, but they really had even bigger spoils in mind when planning this whole charade. There will be no McDonald's in Tikrit in the near future. Did they really believe that they could get away with it? The Japanese are docile and were easily duped, the Iraqis are no pushovers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Where's Riley?
Posted by: eddie torres on Nov 14, 2006 1:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Interested to watch next year for interaction between Nancy Pelosi and Riley Bechtel, seeing as Bechtel's HQ is downtown San Francisco.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

greedy
Posted by: rsaxto on Nov 14, 2006 2:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When greedy folks in the government (Bushies) work with greedy corporations we can expect numerous catastrophies in Iraq or anywhere else this misbegotton USA hegemony infects. The world is now fully aware of this gross corruption and devastation and no decent nation wants to be infected with the gross American greed of bombing and national subversion by corporate control freaks. The USA needs to stop making bombs and other subversive munitions its most important product.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: greedy Posted by: symcokid
The Scandal To Come
Posted by: Tom Degan on Nov 14, 2006 4:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When the American people are finally awaken to the reality of what the invasion of Iraq was all about, they'll rise up in mass outrage. This was all about the riches and treasure that could be exploited in that country. What they ended up accomplishing was Iraq's total destruction. Face it: that country is dead and it's never coming back. The reverberations of the damage that the Bush Mob has done to that part of the world will be palpable a century and a half from now. That the a significant number of the American people were unable to perceive the corruption, stupidity and utter incompetence of the First Fool prior to the election of 2000 will be a cause of national shame and embarrassment for generations to come. This isn't just a failed administration. We're now in catastrophe mode.

The most pathetic thing of all is watching Poppy Bush, as he's done Lord knows how many times throughout his life, try to bail his son out of another fine mess he's gotten himself into. Somewhere in the void, Stan Laurel and Oliver Hardy are laughing.

My advice to Bush and Cheney would be to hire the best lawyers that money can buy - NOW. Don't wait until the impeachment process begins; they'll have alot of work to do. Alot of people are going to be going to federal prison for a very long time. They (and Donald Rumsfeld) should also avoid traveling abroad, Europe in particular. They're not very hospitable to war criminals in that part of the world. Just a thought.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
"The Rant" by Tom Degan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The people will not wake up. Posted by: colinmeister
» RE: The Scandal To Come Posted by: mdruss42
» Maybe... Posted by: Scientz
» RE: The Scandal To Come Posted by: edith
United States that couldn't see past their borders
Posted by: pingoo on Nov 14, 2006 6:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It still strikes me to this day that Americans had no idea that their government was taking them for a ride. The fact that these kind of articles are starting to come out now is great. Better to find out later than never. But to most people from outside American borders, that the Iraq war (and also Afghanistan) was part of another US imperial manouver was obvious from the very beginning.

I hope that now that you find your nation bogged down in another war - probably even more complex war than the Viet Nam - and that you are paying the price with blood from your own people, you will learn your lesson and think harder the next time your government decides to invade another nation regardless of its 'percieved threat'.

Most importantly, now that the Dems have won the election it is NOT time to relax. Keep them on their toes and make sure that this catastrophic policy making most of you agreed to is reversed as soon as possible.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Think harder? Posted by: badkitty
IT'S PAYBACK TIME
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Nov 14, 2006 7:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bechtel, Halliburton, KBG, GE, etc shoud all be audited(at their own expense) for billing practices in Iraq. All over charges must be repaid in 30 days to a fund for veterans of the Iraq war and their widows and children. Please don't anyone tell me it can't be done. Yes it can .Alot of people won't like it, but they'll just have to get over it. They can't be allowed to walk away and wait for the next war to get even richer. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: IT'S PAYBACK TIME Posted by: JCR
» RE: IT'S PAYBACK TIME Posted by: VZEQICVA
Is this a 'phased withdrawal' of the contractors? Or just another snow job?
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Nov 14, 2006 8:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great article. The electricity, water and sewage are what matter to the Iraqi people - but the oilfields and pipelines are what matter to the oil corporations. Iraq's oil output has been restored to 2.5 million barrels per day from a pre-war maximum of 3.5 million barrels. The money from Iraqi oil sales goes into "the Development Fund for Iraq" and numerous media reports show 'pervasive leakage' of money by unknown routes. Bechtel was partially paid out of that fund.

What does this look like? Invade Iraq based on 'evidence' cooked up by the "Iraqi National Congress" - a set of dissident Iraqi crooks - and then set up a 'fund' that sells Iraqi oil and funnels the profits to your corporate cronies. Give the INC members their cut (they're all building villas in Europe). Then have your Republican allies in the Senate fire the Special Inspector General for oversight.

Iraq, unlike Vietnam, has rich resources that US companies covet - only 1/4 of Iraq's discovered oilfields are currently producing oil, for example. There are large areas that are unexplored and may contain undiscovered oilfields. Iraq's oil production could surpass that of Saudi Arabia or Russia, possibly - and because of this 'great wealth', the Iraqi people get to live in conditions of constant warfare.

As far as global warming goes, it'd be better for Iraq to keep it's oil production at lower levels (that would help keep prices high, so why not?)

The American people are well misled about this state of affairs by the US media and politicians (notice the absence of much discussion of 'government contracts' in the current 'troop redeployment' debate - though it looks promising). The Iraqi people are well aware ot it, and the Iraqi insurgency points to the theft of Iraqi resources as justification for their ongoing attacks.

Highway robbery doesn't make you popular.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Surf's Up!
Posted by: monkeywrench on Nov 14, 2006 8:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Henry Waxman is a good and honest man, and a real fighter; but he is only one. Keep in mind that there are a significant number of Democrats that owe their offices to the campaign contributions made to them by the very same corporations that are cashing in in Iraq. Add them to the known corruption on the Republican side, and it becomes clear that there will be little real, substantive action taken without MASSIVE pressure from us, "The People."

Start banging out your e-mails and letters, folks, and hit those phones; it's time for a populist tsunami to hit Washington.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Fearless Manatee Hunter
Posted by: fearlessmanateehunter on Nov 14, 2006 8:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
ALRIGHT FOLKS, The dems won the elections and now it's time to make sure that they perform... We need to stay on top of them, we need to push and push hard.... This bipartisanship crap..... Forget about it....! We are dealing with a bunch of savage war criminals and liars and thieves. Let's not forget that. We need to put pressure on our newly elected to get us out of Iraq, not in 4 to 6 months but now... We need to put pressure on them to go after the Corporations that have a strangle hold on the American People... We need to put pressure on them and let them know that they will be held accountable.... Please let us not rest or we will find that our new Democratic Majority will go the way of the Republican Party... It's up to us.... ;-)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Time to get busy, brothers and sisters
Posted by: LeftWright on Nov 14, 2006 9:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some non-violent things we can do, starting right now:

VIGILS

Start vigils tonight outside politician’s offices, especially key House and Senate leaders. Demand that your state return to a paper verifiable election process. Optical scan has worked great in my precinct for years.

PROTESTS

Combine larger scale protests with the vigils. We should start with large monthly protests on the 11th of each month (and/or the second Sunday of each month). These protests can graduate to a continuous state by creating a pool of protesters who protest in shifts with a support system bringing food, etc. The eastern Europeans have shown the way here.

Use postcards to flood your elected officials with clear, concise statements of your dissatisfaction with their performance on the critical issues.

BOYCOTTS

Start with targeted boycotts of key institutions/industries, beginning with the MSM who ignore the key issues facing us. Demand that they cover these issues, give them two weeks to show that they are covering the stories we need to have covered, then if they don't cancel your subscriptions. Flood them with postcards, too. Then just shut them down by not buying what they're selling.

STRIKES

The last phase is to begin with targeted strikes, beginning with "Stay Home Sundays" in support of the Sunday protests. Then add rolling strikes in specific regions and against specific industries. Increase the frequency, size and duration of these strikes until we peacefully force the changes we have to have. Once again, flood the strike targets with postcards.

It's especially important that progressives reach out to all segments of our society, especially recent immigrants (particularly native Spanish speakers) and disaffected conservatives who are horrified by the neocons.

Let's keep it non-violent, brothers and sisters. Let others be violent and show their true colors and desperation.

Stay in the light and fight for what's right.

The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.

Be well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

GOP wants to dismantle SIGIR
Posted by: launcher on Nov 14, 2006 6:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fortunately, the power upset in the House and Senate will prevent SIGIR from fading into obscurity, as originally planned by the Republican greedies.

See links
here and
here
(Hmm, that top one is "alertnet.org" not "alternet.org". Funny...)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bechtel and the Iraq War.
Posted by: yellow on Nov 14, 2006 11:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
According to CorpWatch chief Prateep Chatterjee, Bechtel's pre-War profits had slumped from what they had been previously. Bechtel profits hit a record high in 1999 at over $15 billion. By 2002, after the economic slump brought on by the 2001 recession and 9/11, Bechtel's profits hit a low of just over $11 billion. After the March 2003 invasion of Iraq and a flurry of no bid contracts from which Bechtel and Halliburton benefitted handsomely, profits swung back up over $16 billion. War profiteering is nothing new. I have read in many sources that Bechtel didn't do work that was paid for by various agencies of the US Federal Government. Southern Exposure did a great article on Bechtels boondoggling in the primary school reconstruction program. Many of the schools they were paid to replaster and paint went undone and expensive fans were imported from a US based Bechtel supplier at a high markup cost to expand Bechtel's profit margin while comparable quality fans from a Syrian supplier at a small fraction of the cost were rejected. Such things give the US croney contracting system a very bad name and make the entire war effort seem like sheer war profiteering.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

gtash
Posted by: gtash on Nov 15, 2006 5:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Does anybody remember Sec of State Charles Shultz and SecDef Cap Weinberger?

Does anybody remember which party they worked for and which President?

Does anybody remember which Construction Corporation they were executives in?

Does anyone notice how many alumni of that Administration are floating around the halls of government now?

Does anyone believe long after you and I are gone, Bechtel will still be around churning out the kindred spirits of Schultz/Weinberger for insertion into government and politics for their own business purposes?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

gtash
Posted by: gtash on Nov 15, 2006 5:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sorry, it is George Schultz. Apologies to Snoopy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Woof Posted by: edith
» RE: Woof Posted by: aonghus36
Juhasz misrepresents the facts
Posted by: Bechtel spokesman on Nov 16, 2006 11:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Antonia Juhasz’s latest screed against Bechtel, “Bechtel Bails on Iraq,” rests on a series of falsehoods and misrepresentations.

The first and most obvious is her outlandish claim that Bechtel lied about rebuilding “war-damaged bridges on key highways.” As evidence, she cites an inspector general’s report that makes no mention of Bechtel and that refers to a set of unrelated projects paid out of a separate fund. Anyone wanting the facts on the Al Mat, Khazir, and Tikrit bridges need only check the U.S. Agency for International Development’s web site at http://www.usaid.gov/iraq/accomplishments/bridges.html.

She also claims falsely that the same inspector general “ordered Bechtel to be dropped” from a project to build a children’s hospital in Basrah after Bechtel “misreported its progress and went $90 million over budget.” In fact, the inspector general did not criticize Bechtel’s performance, cited Bechtel’s repeated reporting of cost and schedule issues to USAID, and never “ordered Bechtel to be dropped” from the project. (The inspector general did recommend that work on the project be halted until further reviews could help ensure a successful project – something USAID and Bechtel had already decided in May, 2006. Bechtel transferred the project to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in October, shortly before our contract for work in Iraq concluded.) Juhasz also misleads readers into thinking that Bechtel spent $90 million over the budget; in fact, our spending remained well under the original $50 million budget cap.

The estimated cost to complete the hospital has risen significantly, mainly due to the extraordinary difficulty of operating in a conflict zone. Her snide dismissal of “security concerns” on the hospital project, implying that these were simply Bechtel’s excuse for incompetence, shows heartless disregard for the 24 people working on the project who were killed by rival militia or criminal gangs in the city, where an official state of emergency currently is still in effect.

Juhasz further claims falsely that Bechtel wasted five months doing a country-wide assessment rather than rebuilding. At USAID’s direction, we did spend two—not five—months assessing Iraq’s needs and then prepared an integrated implementation plan so that money was spent on the highest priority needs. At the same time, however, we began significant rebuilding work, including construction of the Al Mat bridge bypass and dredging and reopening Iraq’s only deepwater port at Umm Qasr, so emergency food supplies could enter the country.

Juhasz’s prescription for Iraq’s reconstruction needs is to make “billions” of dollars “immediately available to Iraqi companies and workers” without any assessments, planning, or oversight. Evidently she has never read the Federal Acquisition Regulations, which require contractors to follow specific accounting and auditing requirements unknown to Iraqi firms. Nor has she taken to heart the inspector general’s warnings that “corruption threatens to undermine Iraq’s democracy.” Nor has she absorbed the fact that Bechtel hired Iraqi subcontractors to perform the great majority of our work in – after carefully screening their qualifications, evaluating their bids, and supervising their work in the interests of both Iraqis and U.S. taxpayers.

Bechtel’s work in Iraq for USAID was independently inspected and approved by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, audited by the Defense Contracts Audit Agency, and subject to further review by the General Accountability Office and the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction. We stand by our record.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]