Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

War on Iraq

One Soldier Against the Empire

By Elizabeth de la Vega, Tomdispatch.com. Posted November 4, 2006.


Move over, G.I. Joe and Han Solo -- Sgt. Ricky Clousing gives a whole new meaning to 'profile in courage.'
43779story
43779_story
Advertisement

I look forward to the day when Mattel makes a Sgt. Ricky Clousing action figure.

As the mother of sons born eight years apart, I spent nearly half my adult life surrounded by -- and stepping on -- action figures. They were everywhere: a phalanx of tiny knights in shining armor on the windowsill; Batman and Robin frozen in an ice tray; and GI Joe guys in camouflage among the hosta. One Christmas, Luke Skywalker and Han Solo even ended up in the manger scene along with Jesus, Mary, and Joseph, two cows, three sheep, and several Ewoks. My kids spent hours and hours in a fantasy world populated by villains and heroes of every description except one; there were no peace heroes.

I met a peace hero at Camp Democracy in Washington, D.C. not too long ago: Sgt. Ricky Clousing. He will not remember me, but I will not forget him. On a brilliant, blessedly unhumid day, Ricky sat on a makeshift platform within shouting distance of the Lincoln Memorial and told a story that was simultaneously agonizing and inspiring to hear.

On September 11, 2001, Ricky was working in an orphanage and "building some roads and stuff" in Thailand. When his stint as a volunteer ended, he made his way to Germany where he met American soldiers returning from Afghanistan. Caught up in the wave of post-9/11 patriotism, he decided he would join the Army rather than return to college in his native Seattle. That way he could serve his country and have money for his education when he got out. Two years later, having completed basic training and intensive language instruction at the Monterey Defense Language Institute, Sgt. Ricky Clousing found himself in Baghdad, an interrogator with the 82nd Airborne Division out of Ft. Bragg, North Carolina.

As a tactical interrogator assigned to question detainees at the scene of infantry raids, Ricky did not witness the abuse of prisoners at Abu Ghraib. What he did witness, however, was hardly less horrifying: American soldiers indoctrinated to view Iraqis as less than human, as "ragheads" or worse; American soldiers out on the streets of the Iraqi capital ramming the cars of Iraqi civilians for sport; American soldiers laughing as they slaughtered the livestock of local farmers; and American soldiers shooting an Iraqi teenager who had simply made a wrong turn.

Ricky was on patrol when he saw a boy, "probably 18 years old, a small maybe high-school age kid" turn down a road his unit was attempting to secure. The teenager, Ricky said, was quite visibly terrified at the sight of "a whole bunch of Americans with big weapons" staring him in the face. He started turning the car around, but didn't get very far. This is how Ricky described what happened next:

"One of the soldiers in the turret of the humvee behind me just opened up fire on the machine gun on the vehicle. As the vehicle was turning away, all I heard above my head was "pop, pop, pop, pop." This was my first deployment, my first combat experience was that moment right then, and just the sound of machine guns going off over my head. He popped about five or six rounds in the side of the vehicle. Myself and two of the other guys ran over to the vehicle, smashed the window, and pulled the guy out to provide first aid on him... I was looking down at this kid who had just been shot in the stomach for no reason really -- he was trying to leave...I was still just standing there in shock, looking down at this kid, and he looked right up at me. And his mouth was foaming. His stomach was falling out in his hands... I was looking down at this kid, this young boy who was just trying to drive around town and took a wrong turn and tried to go the other direction, was shot at and killed, and I'm looking down at him now. And we made eye contact for about five seconds, and he just looked at me with the most empty, terrified look in his face that will never leave me in my whole life I'm sure."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: war, iraq, veterans

Elizabeth de la Vega is a former federal prosecutor. Her pieces have appeared in The Nation, the L.A. Times, Salon, and Mother Jones.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from War on Iraq! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
He made a major mistake
Posted by: Intraspecto on Nov 4, 2006 12:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As an interregator he no doubt did a good job. However, he really has no reason to complain, as he did VOLUNTARILY JOIN the Army, and then signed on to be an INTERRORGATOR none the less. Plus he was put with crack troops whose first thought is to kill.

I mean come on, its like joining the infantry and then saying "I did not do this to kill", or "I just did it for the college money" On top of that, he made the decision to go AWOL, then turn himself in. It just makes him look even worse. What an idiot.

War hero? Possbily, and as a vet I wont dare step on his service, as I have served in combat during AWOT as an infantryman. He just needs to serve his time and get out. He probably should not have joined as he did, but that is an issue of being overly nationalistic, and probably impulsive.

However, even I will heartily agree that the system is flawed and we need to end the war before it spirals out of control anymore, we just cannot do it like this fellow is doing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: He made a major mistake Posted by: paul_revere
» RE: He made a major mistake Posted by: sprachenlehrer
» RE: He made a major mistake Posted by: Kevin R. Hoskins
» RE: He made a major mistake Posted by: kattmann
» RE: He made a major mistake Posted by: popsicle67
» RE: He made a major mistake Posted by: OligarchyNot
Yes, he's young, impulsive and made a mistake
Posted by: LeftWright on Nov 4, 2006 2:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think as he reflects on his actions and his beliefs he may realize that he is a pacifist.

The 82nd Airborne Division is an aggressive war fighting machine, like the marines, and not a proper or useful tool for occupying a country. This all comes back to Rumsfeld's decision to go lean and mean AND do it on the cheap. And we know how criminally flawed that decision was.

The invasion and occupation of Iraq is and remains illegal according to accepted international law. It is an unprovoked war of aggression. That the U.S. MSM did not make this point overwhelming clear in the run up to the invasion is a damning indictment of our "culture".

Clousing's not a war hero, but an anti-war hero in his own small way. I'm sure he's learned more about who he really is and what he really wants from life while in Iraq and now sitting in the brig than he would've in college. Life is learning.

I would encourage everyone to reach out to this young man and all others who find they can no longer support a war they didn't understand when they joined.

This is just one more example of how the 9/11 Myth has been used to destroy lives.

The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

real criminals
Posted by: rsaxto on Nov 4, 2006 3:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We should put the real criminals, Cheney and all the rest, in jail for life for all they can think of to do with their government is to commit mass murder in a war designed purely by greed. A government which puts decent people in jail and glorifies mass murder genuinely qualifies as terrorism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Yep! Posted by: WhuThe?!?
» RE: Yep! Posted by: rsaxto
» Maybe I'm just too harsh Posted by: WhuThe?!?
too bad he could not see all this for what it is, earlier.
Posted by: WhatNow? on Nov 4, 2006 4:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
War is a Racket

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You can refuse orders that are treasonous or insane, right?
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Nov 4, 2006 7:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Generaly military procedure is to follow orders given by one's commanders. This is also important when it comes to sailing a ship; after all coordination matters.

If you see that the captain has lost his mind and is preparing to crash the ship on the rocks, whether by intent or through incompetence, then the correct course of action would be to lock the captain in the brig and return the ship to the nearest safe harbor.

The age of empires and military occupation of foreign countries is over, and the leftover war dogs from the past century are just going to have to learn to live with the new circumstances. Soldiers signed on to defend the country, not to go around raiding other countries for their resources.

Bush likes to claim that military control of the Mideast is a matter of national security. As this soldier recognized, that's a load of bull. It's a matter of protecting the interests of Bush's cronies in financial and oil markets.

There are two parties to the military contract - the individual and the state. If either party neglects their responsibilities, then the contract is null and void, and serious consequences result. In this case the state has been at fault; thus under these conditions soldiers are justified in going AWOL, and citizens should support them.

This guy didn't make any mistakes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

He made no mistake
Posted by: gigowiz on Nov 4, 2006 8:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Had the young Iraqi been attacking instead of trying to turn around and go away, I'm sure Ricky Clousing would have been firing his weapon, too. Clousing's conscience has a problem with the senseless killing of the young man as well as the other senseless acts he witnessed. President Bush's characterization of the war on terror as being evil (them) against good (us) plays a huge part in this as evidenced by the lack of our outrage at the killing, wasteful spending, redefinition of torture, and permeation of fear. Unless we recognize we are witness to senseless acts the good vs evil mantra and fear give us leave to allow the administration to do anything in the name of fighting terrorism.

GIGOwiz

It's like we've come full circle. Native Americans were the first unlawful enemy combatants.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

gathaiga
Posted by: gathaiga on Nov 4, 2006 9:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
An excellent piece. Thank you Ms. de la Vega. I suspect there would have been less negative comments from the "military experts" had it been written by a man. Thank you again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Waking Up from the Lies
Posted by: sofla100 on Nov 4, 2006 9:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Look, we saw this in Vietnam and are seeing it again. Has everyone forgotten or maybe they just aren't as old as I am? This kid took the lie hook, line and sinker. Like thousands before him. Our glorious leader GW you know had most of America fooled with the WMD and Iraq ties to Al-Queda line, propogated by America's own version of Pravda, FOX News. So this young man then thought he was doing something proud, noble, and you know, "fighting the terrorists." But, as legions of Vietnam Vets found out before him, the USA had sound them all down the river. A war based completly on lies. And as winning becomes more impossible frustration mounts, and with it the atrocities. The racist stereotypes that lead to US troops engaging in torture and outright murder. Mostly all covered up but ocassionally surfacing in the press. So, this kid figuered it out. Don't criticize him for it. Many thousands still believe the lie, including perhaps our own President (unless he is just disingenous which is possible because he seems so stupid, but who knows?)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

dinar
Posted by: dinar on Nov 4, 2006 10:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is my undersanding that if one witnesses a violation of ethics in war (I know, even using the words war and ethics in the same sentence is ludicrous), one is supposed to report it. The Nurenberg trials emphasized that credo.
The new Vanity Fair article reports that neoconservative architects of the New American Century (founded in '97, with invading Iraq a priority)blame a dysfunctional administration for the Iraqi disaster. If enough people hear about this in time, it should help on Tuesday.
See my "Dry Drunk Stays The Course" editorial in my online weekly http://www.eyeonthehamptons.com on why Bush stays the course.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm a little disturbed...
Posted by: YeahToast on Nov 4, 2006 2:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
at all the soldier-bashing that seems to be de rigeur lately around here. Yes, soldiers sign up for a variety of reasons, not all of them altruistic; yes, soldiers are "volunteers" (although anyone who's ever been in a recruiter's office knows that sometimes the things you volunteer for aren't what you thought they were). But ultimately soldiers are tools of foreign policy who have little or no say in how they are used. Unless SGT Clousey is fortunate enough to get a pardon (and I hope he does), that dishonorable discharge is going to follow him around for the rest of his life, complicating his right to vote, his ability to get a job (DD's show up on background checks), his credit rating, even his ability to buy a rifle or trade on the NYSE.

To the poster who said Clousey "signed up as an interrogator": I'd bet money (based on Clousey's expressed views and background) that he actually signed up to be an interpreter, thinking he'd be doing Civil Affairs/reconstruction type stuff, and ended up doing interrogations. This kind of thing happens in the military all the time- I'm a medic by vocation and training but am currently assigned to Base Defense, Geneva Conventions be damned.

What this ends up meaning is that people like myself (a National Guardsman who signed up as a medic during the Clinton years, and has since been "stop-lossed" for two years) or the young kids who signed up after 9/11 in a rush of patriotism are finding out they've been sold a bill of goods, and discovering that the price for getting out of one's contract is very high. Three months in the stockade is nothing, and I'd do it tomorrow to get home with my conscience (and extremities) intact. But I don't want to ruin the rest of my life in the process. I respect SGT Clousey's choice and wish him well, but the path he's chosen is not an easy one and he may come to regret it.

There is one other item which needs to be addressed- war crimes committed by individual soldiers, such as what Clousey witnessed, or the various cases at Abu Ghraib, Hamdaniyyah, etc. These may be clearly, obviously war crimes, but the current system incentivizes both enlisted soldiers and their leaders to keep their mouths shut. Any company commander who has one of his soldiers commit a war crime under his command can expect a very negative OER (Officer Evaluation Report), so only a few commanders blessed with a great deal of integrity report them (mostly Marines, I've noted). This problem is systemic and needs to be addressed.

So here's what I'm trying to say: unless they are directly responsible for a war crime (in which case they should be prosecuted to the fullest extent possible), blaming soldiers for what has occurred and continues to occur in Iraq is foolish. That's similar to blaming the hammer when you hit your thumb- it didn't do it on its own, now did it?

Cheers!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I'm a little disturbed... Posted by: RudiTuzla
» Great posts, guys, thanks Posted by: LeftWright
» RE: I'm a little disturbed... Posted by: digitalspy
» RE: I'm a little disturbed... Posted by: YeahToast
» RE: I'm a little disturbed... Posted by: digitalspy
The RIGHT thing
Posted by: boardsailor on Nov 4, 2006 2:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have been visiting Ricky at the brig on Camp LeJune every weekend since he arrived. Based on my personal interactions with him I believe he did the right thing. He obviously began to see clearly the folly of war, in particular THIS war which anyone who thinks clearly can see was started with "faulty intel" . By that I mean the questionable intelligence of an administration who didn't understand what they were starting and obviously still can't grasp what they're doing.

Ricky took a stand for truth and his faith. When I sit across the table from him I see VERITAS tattoed on his arm. I commend him and all the others who're willing to refuse to serve in this illegal, immoral war. It takes more guts to say NO! than to never take a stand for what is right and true. Anyone can just slide on through and do their time. Taking a stand makes heroes out of regular people.

The perspective of a Viet Nam era member of Veterans For Peace, USAF 66-71

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Fearless Manatee Hunter
Posted by: fearlessmanateehunter on Nov 4, 2006 3:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good job...! This was a good story and it hits me where it counts. I too will make room in my manger and in my shelves for these couragous young men and women. They are exactly what gives this jaded old man hope for a better tomorrow. Not for me, I've had my day in the sun and I'm grateful, but for those who haven't lived their future.

Our hope lies with the next generation and I see them, I respect them and I'm proud of them. I know that they will come through, I know that they will carry the legacy of our forefathers and mothers. I know that they will DO THE RIGHT THING...

Regards,

The Fearless Manatee Hunter,
Killer of the Gentle Sea Cow

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Military Ethics: The Truth
Posted by: sofla100 on Nov 4, 2006 7:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I served in the military in a medical specialty for 8 years during Gulf War I. Here is the deal with war crimes. Of course, it is considered unlawful to shoot someone unarmed and who has surrenedered. But in real life, such as what I saw on the "highway to hell" was that the military killed thousands of retreating Iraqi's (fleeing from Kuwait back to Iraq) by bombing them. I also saw that thousands of other Iraqi soldiers never even had a chance to surrender, there being in the war area made them an automatic threat so they were just shot down immediately. And this was and is how military policy works. You always shoot first and ask questions later. And, if you do ask questions, it is absolutely true that the military brass will say that the person who was shot was correct to be perceived as a threat. That is by virtue of being in a war zone, having an "appearance" of being aggressive, and down to even a bulge in the pocket. So, shooting virtually anyone, including civilians who get in the way or are in the wrong place, is acceptable and justified. I saw this repeatedly, I also saw how everyone would make jokes about it. And I had to get out. I also saw from when I was recalled as a reservist and in Somalia just before getting out (by finally being allowed to resign) that when soldiers are frustrated and morale collapses, as is happening in Iraq now, that everyone starts to get kinda crazy. Your losing, your desperate, and everyone can be the enemy. There is also a very negative perversity in military culture. It's a constant degradation of anything positive about life, about women and the female as this is considered as weak, and it is often mixed with racist overtones. I have absolutely no doubt that serious atrocities by US forces are now going on in Iraq. Nobody signed up for this. Anybody getting out is doing what is right and proper for America and to save their own soul.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

deaudonnee
Posted by: deaudonnee on Nov 4, 2006 9:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When our 18-year-old nephew was getting ready to ship out for Afghanistan, I took him aside and gave a strongly worded "lecture" about how to treat people over there - they are not the "evildoers" that bush wants you to believe, I told him, and I expect you to treat them as human beings. After he left I found out that his dad, my brother, had given him virtually the same speech. He came back, never shot anyone, and I am guessing (hoping) that he was a nice as he could be to the native people and their families. bush is the evildoer and he's tried to get our boys and girls to think in his twisted way, may he rot in hell.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Deja Vu All Over Again
Posted by: anambrose on Nov 5, 2006 12:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the chain of command does not exert leadership and if the orders from the top are deliberately vague or worse wink and nod specific then these killings are the inevitable result. All soldiers from the lowliest private, and I count myself as one, on up have sworn an Oath to defend the Constitution. How are we to do that if the chain of command from the top is busy destroying it? In Vietnam we had way too many cycling into the combat MOS's in order to make the hard rank they could otherwise not earn and in an all volunteer system promotion does not come swiftly or easily unless combat creates rapid attrition. The field rank officers were worse as they needed to get their tickets punched so they could go on to Flag rank. The Flag ranks were happy to have the Las Vegas style jackpot being handed to them by the largely willfully ignorant civilian leadership. Now we have a criminal civilian leadership totally corrupting the military and they've been at this since Vietnam. Military culture values the personal aggression needed to defeat an enemy. Killing in combat is the sanctioned taking of human life that we give medals for when it's done in battle. If it was done here at home they'd be on death row. So this always needs to be under rigid control.The history of every Insurgency shows that it always produces this type of murder. It's exactly what the insurgents want. So doing it is not doing anyone a favor other than for the very people you're trying to defeat. That's the result of institutional fatigue for having a war micro managed by Rummy and the VP with the Joint Chiefs along as Stooges and window dressing for those inspiring and enlightening Press Conferences. You also have to deal with up front the fact that you will also attract people into the combat arms who enjoy killing and unless they have some inner governor or some imposed rule they can't just shut it off. A broken chain of command is one that by omission or commission promotes this behavior as a substitute for real
and effective use of force. The berserker mentality was used in Vietnam and justified by those seeking the requisite body count.They were told it was needed to prove we were winning. It was also not lost on it's practitioners that the bodies needed to pile up in order for them to get promoted. They don't call it that now but that's very close to what's going on. Since the services have gone all volunteer there is even more of an us vs the civilian culture that's further isolated from the rest of America. This man will be abused and accused of breaking faith with his brothers and sisters but someone had to step over the thin gray line and thank Our Founding Fathers and Mothers that he has.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Outrages on Human Dignity": The Ongoing Electronic Neuron Violating Fascist Movement
Posted by: etisoppa on Nov 5, 2006 4:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This Movement has been going since 1990. When are you people going to start confronting this other outrage on human dignity?? When?? It is the backdrop that makes all the above listed possible yet you all refuse to report on it, talk about it much less confront it. Like all Fascist Movements its script has already been written. History has already written its script for you. The technology and wordings might change, but all Fascist Movement are run by and recruited from the same twisted, bag-full-of-issues demographics. Do not be blinded-up by ANYTHING, avert the disaster, CONFRONT and STOP the situation.

Let Mayors, city councils ordinary citizens declare their towns and cities 1984 Free-Zones where you can talk about and confront this issue in safety of numbers, if those are the reasons holding you all back.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cost of Iraq war estimated at over two trillion dollars (one million lives?)
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Nov 5, 2006 12:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The more than Two Trillion War, Nieman Watchdog - Linda Bilmes and Joseph E. Stiglitz

The sooner this military occupation is brought to an end, the better everyone in the US will be (except the oil company CEOs and their bankers, maybe) - so going AWOL from the military, under these conditions, is the patriotic thing to do.

If the fascists are sent back to their plush Washington think tank complexes, then any AWOL soldier will certainly be pardoned by the next government, as the Vietnam era vets were.

If the massive assault on our civil liberties (Al Gore at the Guardian UK) suceeds in turning the country into a fascist state, you won't want to live here anyway. The surveillance society in Britain and the US (BBC) is already very entrenched; we've go constant video camera surveillance, active RFID chips for tracking movements, 'sweep it all up' electronic monitoring of all cell phone and internet-based communications, and the use of undercover police to infiltrate, observe and influence domestic political organizations.

There is such a thing as legitmate military service, but you don't want to be taking orders from Rumsfeld's clown headquarters. If you wouldn't work for East Germany's Stasi, why would you work for Rumsfeld and Bush?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Move over, Sargeant, you have some good company!
Posted by: keefus55 on Nov 5, 2006 1:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, the good Sergeant needs to move over, because it now appears some influential others share his views about the civilian leadership in the US Military.

The Army Times, in an absolutely UNHEARD of editorial appearing in their November 4th edition, has now openly called for the ouster of Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. As I said, such a call is ABSOLUTELY WITHOUT PRECEDENT in a newspaper that is regularly for sale at every checkout in every Army Post Exchange in the world and is one of the most popular military publications read by the troops.

For those so interested, you can read the editorial in its entirety here:

http://www.armytimes.com/story.php?f=1-292925-2333360.php

It now would appear that the military "house of cards" built by Mr. Bush and his Cabal is now collapsing down around their ears.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Big Difference: War for Profit/Strategic Objectives and War for Self-Defense
Posted by: sofla100 on Nov 5, 2006 1:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Modern wars fought by the USA, like Vietnam and Iraq, are not fought for self-defense. They are fought to pursue "US strategic objectives," which is also a cover word often for pursuit of influence in foreign markets, influence of other countries, for oil, and the like. Now in a real democracy, if you have to have a military, the only legitimate use of it is for self-defense. In a pure and literal sense. When 911 occurred and the USA attacked Afghanistan, you could argue an element of self-defense was involved. However, the exact links between actual attackers on 911, the Taliban itself and the government of Afghanistan, were never actually determined. And, of course, Osama is still at large. Now, with Iraq, there is not even the argument of some kind of possible defense the USA had with Afghanistan. The Iraq debacle is pure and simple US aggression. The insrugents see themselves as defenders of the country. Of course, no WMD was found, but even if it were found, this would have still been a dubious basis for the US war to begin. As it is the USA is an occupying Army of a soverign state. This is also a big reason many of our soldiers are so upset and disgusted. It would be a lot different if it were fighting attakcers coming into Florida or something. But Iraq? The impact of the difference of war for profit/objectives and defense cannot be underestimated. Our soldiers feel "dirty" in this war, because it is a "dirty" war.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]