Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

War on Iraq

Does the Military Send Sick Soldiers to War?

By Nina Berman, AlterNet. Posted November 3, 2006.


The Army wanted to make an example of Anthony Vanderpool. But what they may have done was make a mentally unbalanced man even worse.
43611story
Advertisement

The government's own military doctors knew that Spc. Anthony Vanderpool was mentally unbalanced. He had been admitted to the Bronx and Manhattan Veterans hospitals for major depressive disorder, dizziness, spells, auditory hallucinations and suicidal ideation, according to his V.A. records.

And this was before he even went to Iraq.

"I have a lot of anger. I never should have gone, " said Vanderpool, a Army National Guardsmen with 16 years prior service in the Army, Army reserves, Navy, Navy reserves and Air Force. "They didn't care. They wanted me because I was infantry," he said.

Vanderpool spent 10 months in Iraq on meds, not sleeping, depressed, paranoid, suicidal until he finally "spun out of control," forcing his command to acknowledge that he was too sick to be in a war zone. Off he went to Ft. Polk, La., for five months of medical treatment, and in December 2005, he was honorably discharged due to a "personality disorder."

Since then, he has been living a marginal life in Bay Shore, N.Y., single, no children, unemployed, finding himself increasingly isolated and depressed, and vomiting almost daily. He has been hospitalized for attempted suicide, and a recent review of his medical records show that was prescribed a daily dose of Zoloft for depression, Seroquel and Buspirone for anxiety, Zolmitripitan for migraines and Omeprazole for acid reflux. He attends a Veterans Administration post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) outpatient program twice a week.

Vanderpool's story is not unique

"The DOD admits they are sending mentally unfit soldiers into combat in Iraq," said Steve Robinson of Veterans for America. "This is not supposed to happen; the military should not have deployed this veteran to the war; what were they thinking and what does it say about the overstretched military?"

In May, the Hartford Courant reported that service members with preexisting PTSD were being sent back to Iraq, and some of those afflicted had committed suicide.

The situation galvanized Sens. Boxer, Kennedy, Lieberman and Clinton to sponsor an amendment to the last Defense Appropriations Bill in June calling for more thorough mental health screening, evaluation and detailed guidelines on what precludes deployment to a combat zone.

But the final legislation, passed in mid-October, dropped an original provision that would have required screeners to take a mental health history and refer a service member to a specialist if the service member indicates a mental health issue prior to deployment.

Such a provision might have helped Spc. Vanderpool who said that when he was activated by the National Guard and then deployed to Iraq, he told his superiors that he had a history of psychological problems, but these issues were ignored or dismissed. Once in Iraq, they got worse.

"The military should treat combat stress and psychological injuries as medical conditions. Instead, the military treats our injured soldiers as if they lack moral fortitude and improperly sends them back into battle," said Robinson.

"They said I was malingering, that I was a baby, wah, wah, wah wah, " said Vanderpool of his treatment by 1st Sgt. Daniel J. Bien, of Delta Company 101 Cavalry, at Camp Liberty, Baghdad.

Interviews with Vanderpool and members of his guard unit paint a picture of a command that refused to admit anyone was physically or psychologically sick.

"He (Sgt. Bien) didn't believe anybody was hurt," said Vanderpool's former platoon mate, Spc. Danny Gomes.

Added Sgt. Dallas Eccleston, who saved Vanderpool's life during an ambush,"There were people developing problems over there and people not believing them." He went on to describe Sgt. Bien as "definitely a suck-it-up kind of guy."

Bien responded in an email that "soldiers with documented mental illness are not mobilized for war; rather, they are discharged from the Army."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: war, mental health, army, military, soldiers

Nina Berman is a photographer and the author of Purple Hearts: Back From Iraq.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from War on Iraq! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
It's no surprise
Posted by: greekTowner on Nov 3, 2006 1:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The ones at the top (Bush Cheney Rumsfeld Rice) are mentally disturbed as well. They are sick. This country is sick.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It's no surprise Posted by: popsicle67
sick
Posted by: rsaxto on Nov 3, 2006 2:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No matter how sick Vanderpool is he isn't half as sick as the depraved Bushies are.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: sick...and what about the rest Posted by: Captainmagic
Authoritarian hierarchies
Posted by: Annarisse on Nov 3, 2006 3:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Authoritarian hierarchies are notoriously slow to admit that there can be real, non-physical reasons why a person might be unfit for whatever the authority tells them to do. Until our culture comes to the realization that depression and other mental illnesses are not laziness or malingering, but real, chemical imbalances that can be dramatically affected by environment, we're going to continue to have this problem.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

When did Spc. Vanderpool develop this psychological disorder?
Posted by: bornxeyed on Nov 3, 2006 5:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The government's own military doctors knew that Spc. Anthony Vanderpool was mentally unbalanced. He had been admitted to the Bronx and Manhattan Veterans hospitals for major depressive disorder, dizziness, spells, auditory hallucinations and suicidal ideation, according to his V.A. records.

These are classic CNS adverse effects of the antibiotic Cipro and the other chemotherapeutic agents of the fluoroquinolone class of antimicrobials - the standard prophylactic and treatment for Anthrax, as well as the sister class of anti-malarial drugs such as Lariam.

I wouldn't be surprised if this soldier was perfectly healthy (having a 16 year military career) before being assigned station in Iraq. I wonder how many other soldiers stationed there that are now diagnosed with mental and PTSD conditions are actually suffering the lingering, practically permanent effects of this class of drugs.

Its interesting to note that George Bush and Cheney et. al. were also given Cipro before the Anthrax scare of Fall 2001(how did they know?) I wonder how many of them have been living with, and making decisions based upon, mentally ill psyches caused by that preventative measure.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Correction in detail Posted by: bornxeyed
Problem with society
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Nov 3, 2006 5:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
not just in the Army. Men, in particular, will not admit when they have mental problems especially depression. One reason why suicide-completion rates are higher for men (esp white men). I guess this is slowly changing but still for any 'manly' profession, like a soldier, it is hard to admit 'weakness' and the system doesn't like to admit 'weakness'. Having said that simple depression wouldn't, necessarily make you an ineffective soldier and wouldn't make you inelligble. But 'visions' that's sounds worse than even major depression. I wouldn't want him on a battlefield unless we are going back to the 'berserker' model of warfare!
ps: on a lighter note. Remember Catch-22? If you don't want to go into a killing zone then, by definition, you can't be crazy!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Scraping The Barrel
Posted by: NoPCZone on Nov 3, 2006 6:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They are running so short of warm bodies over at the DoD that Sailors and Airmen (Navy & Air Force) are being re-tasked to play infantry over in Iraq.

Shortly after the invasion of Iraq the Army started re-tasking support soldiers to jobs that they were not well trained or equipped to do- such as Infantry and Military Policing. Then came the stop-loss back door draft.

Next came the lowering of recruitment standards, allowing people with prior gang involvement and criminal records to enter the service. This is a huge change from the late 1980's when the average Army recruit had higher ACT/SAT scores than the average college freshman.

Earlier this year the Navy replaced many sailors with Master-at-Arms rating from many duties stateside and in Europe so that they could be deployed to Iraq. Similar things have been done to Airmen from disbanded units in the restructuring Air Force.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Scraping The Barrel Posted by: albrechtkrausse
Sgt. Bien and death wishes
Posted by: dkm on Nov 3, 2006 6:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wonder how many more there are like Sgt. Bien. To verbally and psychologically abuse a soldier who has a weapon and training in how to use it is pushing your luck. When you have a soldier who is borderline crazy, you are really pushing your luck. It has occurred to me that it would not be a good idea for people like Bush or Rumsfeld to appear before a group of soldiers in Iraq unless those soldiers had been disarmed beforehand and some sort of barrier was placed between them and the person responsible for them being there in the first place. I keep expecting to see that someone has taken a shot at a Washington politician who went to Iraq to "support the troops."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sgt. Bien and death wishes Posted by: Captainmagic
They will be reformed and transformed,
Posted by: symcokid on Nov 3, 2006 6:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and if there isn't anything wrong with them with them when they go in many of these soldiers will be sick when they get out. Basically, all they have to do is invade another sovereign nation to find out whether, "they are with us or against US", and do a little killing for the Red, White and Blue - no questions asked!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Malingering ?
Posted by: Jimbo on Nov 3, 2006 7:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of course anyone can self admit to a hospital with suicidal tendencies and auditory hallucinations. If he stated having auditory hallucinations then they wern't true hallucinations as he was aware of them. Maybe he just doesn't want to return to Iraq. Who could blame him ? Avoid Iraq and collect a disability check - sounds like a nice alternative.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Malingering ? Posted by: Jamesberry
US Military Policy At Work
Posted by: sofla100 on Nov 3, 2006 8:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The military doctrine of Combat Stress Control calls for soldiers who start to show symptoms of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder to be given rest for 24-72 hours and then returned to the front. The military claims psychological research support this even though that research is dubious. This doctrine is designed to "preserve the fighting force" and nothing more. It is essentially designed to provide warm bodies to be used as cannon foder. After witnessing wholesale murder, torture, and as American soldiers are now being ordered themselves to engage in war crimes (ie, "kill all males of military age") thousands of Iraqi vets are being crippled psychologically. After discharge, many are now showing up on Americas streets, homeless, disabled and with severe mental problems. And you can bet as this war goes down hill for the USA even further, as more and more "hajis" have to be killed (as they must be enemy sympathizers), the situation is only bound to get much worse.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

gentlewoman
Posted by: lokicat on Nov 3, 2006 9:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyone concerned with male depression and male violence needs to read I Don't Want To Talk About It by Terrence Real. Try his website, too. This is not a commercial plug but someone whose father had PTSD and depression from WWII and his war experiences ended up impacting all six of his children for the worse.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Using soldiers as guinea pigs: vaccines, uppers and downers, etc.
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Nov 3, 2006 9:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This tale is remarkably similar to the forced use of vaccines in the US military. The anthrax vaccine in particular is dangerously unpredictable and also requires six inoculations and a yearly booster injection to remain effective.

Uppers and downers are also heavily used by the military - amphetamine is used to stay awake and downers are used to sleep. The long-term effects on soldier's health doesn't seem to be a concern. Agent Orange in Vietnam was handled similarly; experimental drugs and vaccines (and depleted uranium munitions) are the modern version.

Poisoning US Troops: Anthrax, Lies and Vaccines by Heather Wokusch

Producing such vaccines is the reason behind the planned expansion in US biosafetly-level four facilities for biowarfare research. It's also worth noting that bioweapons can be genetically engineered to be resistant to antibiotics and vaccines - in fact, Battelle Memorial Institute of West Jefferson, Ohio (right next to where the Daily Show has been broadcasting from!) has done such "proof-of-concept' work; for example they produced a vaccine-resistant strain of anthrax; they'vre produced powdered anthrax at Utah's Dugway Proving Ground - and they're the vaccine manufacturer for the US Army.

Hmmm.. maybe this Washington Post story has something to do with all this:

FBI Investigates Possible Financial Motive in Anthrax Attacks,By Susan Schmidt and Joby Warrick
Washington Post Staff Writers Friday, December 21, 2001; Page A21


Value of Project Bioshield and other 'biodefense program' contracts: at least $10 billion.

Even if you wanted to spend that much money, the real threats to the public include HIV and AIDS, drug-resistant tuberculosis, spreading malaria associated with global warming, and the crumbling or non-existent public health infrastructure. Project Bioshield ignores these issues in favor of huge grants to Big Pharma. Those are grants, not loans.

Bush seems to think the most important thing is making sure that pharmaceutical shareholders continue to 'earn' hefty returns on investment. More corporate welfare - with particularly spooky overtones of bioweapons research as well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I don't get it
Posted by: theracerace on Nov 3, 2006 10:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So it's wrong to send a mentally disturbed person off to kill people, but it's right to turn mentally healthy people into psycho killers who are to go off and kill people.

Oh, I get it NOW.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I don't get it - what? Posted by: symcokid
» RE: I don't get it - what? Posted by: albrechtkrausse
You are paid to stop a bullet ...
Posted by: AdamSelene40 on Nov 3, 2006 11:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You are payed to stop a bullet
It is a soldier's job they say
Then you goes and stops a bullet
And they goes and stops your pay

That's the Spoon River Anthology ... a Veitnam era play ... but Rudyard Kipling's British Imperial poetry is full of the same thoughts as is Robert Service's work from WWI.

Sure, ideally every soldier 'on the line' ought to be able to defend himself ... but as long as he can stand and draw fire, he is still more useful than an untrained, uninlisted civilian NOT drawing fire.

Hence: as Secy Rumsfield has told us, we got to war "With the Army we have" ... and inevitably some of the equipment and some of the personnel are sub-standard. To military planners, that's not a problem: It's all part of the pragmatism that is the Art of War. Didn't they tell you?

How about "War is Hell?" Did you think that mean: "Goodness gracious war is a most unpleasant and trying experience." Something like "War is shucky-darn -- but it makes for good cinema ?"

General Sherman was a Christian at a time when Christians believed in Hell, the Devil and Eternal Damnation. When HE said "War is Hell." or "War is bestial, you cannot refine it," he was saying no more and NO LESS than what he believe to be the bald, literal and absolute truth. War is the habitation of demons and lost souls where landscapes of horror and acts of depraved cruelty are the norm -- saving graces the exception.

(If that's how an honest soldier in a time when soldiers were highly honored thought about it -- imagine a Pacifist's gut reaction to the Chickenhawk Warmongers of the Project for a New American Century and their Iraq adventure.)

Now, on this story, the good news is
1) The guy didn't hurt anyone else -- sad to say, returning combat vets are almost as dangerous to their family and community as released felons ... about 4x as likely to commit an act of violence or sexual abuse.

2) He may get some help ... in the past, combat induced post traumatic stress disorder filled the skid rows, jails and asylums -- and for noone could quite get their minds around the idea that something as fine, noble and neccessary as War could make so many men go off the rails.

3) The case presented for your consideration is horrible enough to pay attention to, yet not so horrible that the mind recoils in denial and disbelief.

My personal opinion: since the 'cost of war' includes an awful lot of this sort of thing, not to mention the blindings, brain damage and amputations -- the decision to use military force ought to be a very much more serious matter than it was this time around.

There probably ought to be some sort of universal penalty for telling ourselves: We are a Nation At War ... This is a War Presidency -- for example an automatic , 10% (per annum, pro rated monthly) War Surcharge on Income and Capital Gains taxes, plus automatic War Tax on gasoline equal to twice the sum of all other excise taxes on fuel.

Then we'd see a lot less hand wringing and crocodile tears over "our brave boys and girls" and a whole lot more accountability for their lives and the purposes their 'service' is put to.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No profit without chaos
Posted by: eddie torres on Nov 3, 2006 1:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When things break, US GDP is 'positively affected'. Resources must be consumed in order to proceed.

When things don't break, US GDP is 'neutrally affected'. No additional resource consumption is necessary.

The Iraq war has given America 150,000 agents of chaos. Remember all those armoured car and bank robberies in the 1970's? Unbalanced lone gunmen running amok on college campuses?

Veterans. Be proud, Soylent Green nation. Profit is at hand.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» thanks for the LOL, eddie torres Posted by: LeftWright
Sgt Ronald Stroh
Posted by: mrny838 on Jan 18, 2007 7:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I personaly served with these people. I cannot sit by and listen to soldiers like gomes and vanderpool complain about how they were treated when the only reason they joined the army was for there own selfish reasons. When our country finally asks these men to give back, they are instantly not capable of being a soldier anymore. All Gomes did was complain about everything, refused to perform his duties, and cry about his internet connection in his trailer, where he spent %90 of his entire tour in iraq, while the rest of us risked our lives for eachother. Vanderpool was in the same situation as Gomes. The major difference is Vanderpool had a longer service record. No one in our command was perfect, but the fact remains, you do your job like everyone else. Vanderpool was planning to get out on disability so he could collect a check for the rest of his life and he was willing to take it as far as he had to to get it. I will forward this to the rest of the unit and you can hear from most of the guys who were with these men, and then you will get a clearer picture of there credibility.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]