Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

War on Iraq

How Jesus Endorsed Bush's Invasion of Iraq

By Damon Linker, Doubleday. Posted October 28, 2006.


In the lead up to the invasion of Iraq, Bush needed the approval of religious leaders to shore up his religious base and a group of Catholic theoconservatives were happy to help him do just that.
0385516479.01.sclzzzzzzzv1140838678
The Theocons: Secular America Under Siege by Damon Linker (Doubleday, 2006).
Advertisement

The following is an excerpt from Damon Linker's new book The Theocons: Secular America Under Siege (Doubleday, 2006).

For much of the past 25 years, a small group of Catholic intellectuals has worked to inject its radical religious ideas into the nation's politics. The leader of this theoconservative movement is Father Richard John Neuhaus. In the pages of his monthly magazine First Things, Neuhaus and his ideological allies set the theocon agenda on a range of policies. Michael Novak of the American Enterprise Institute argues that the American founders were orthodox religious believers who thought of the United States as a Christian nation -- and that American-style capitalism perfectly conforms to Catholic social teaching. Robert P. George of Princeton University insists that abortion, euthanasia, embryonic stem-cell research, and same-sex marriage (and perhaps even contraception and masturbation) should be outlawed. And George Weigel of Washington's Ethics and Public Policy Center uses Catholic just-war reasoning to justify neoconservative foreign policy. As the U.S. began to prepare for war in Iraq in 2002, the theocons set out to provide theological justification for the coming conflagration.

Around the time of the January 2002 State of the Union speech -- when President Bush broadened the scope of the "war on terror" to include an "axis of evil" consisting of Iraq, Iran, and North Korea -- the mood on the American right began to grow fierce. What had been a uniform chorus of patriotic support for the president and the Afghanistan campaign quickly evolved into a frenzy of bellicosity. Some columnists denounced deterrence and stability in favor of unilateral preemptive war to overthrow hostile regimes. Others openly advocated American imperialism. Still others proposed that the United States act to topple the governments of a series of sovereign nations in the Muslim Middle East, including Iraq, Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia. And these were the intellectually respectable suggestions, published in mainstream newspapers and long-established journals of opinion. Farther down the media hierarchy, on cable news, Internet websites, and Web blogs, conservatives of all stripes closed ranks, unleashing a verbal barrage on any and all who dissented from a united front in favor of unapologetic American military muscle. The participants in this endless pep rally were insistent on open-ended war, overtly hostile to dissent, and thoroughly unforgiving of the slightest criticism of the United States abroad. They were dismissive of complication and analysis, defensive by default, worshipful of "manliness," admiring of swaggering bluntness, contemptuous of doubt and indecision, addicted to hyperbole, eager to expose "appeasement," and prone to paranoia. Self-congratulation and self-righteousness ruled the day.

The theocons contributed to this atmosphere of pro-war hysteria in several ways. Neuhaus established himself as the rare priest who would grant interviews to National Public Radio in order to defend the justice of invading Iraq. Weigel spoke on college campuses about the administration's firm grasp of the just war tradition. And Novak traveled to Rome to lecture Vatican bureaucrats on the importance of deposing Saddam Hussein and transforming Iraq into a democratic oasis in Middle East. But by far the most significant theocon statement on the invasion of Iraq was Weigel's "Moral Clarity in a Time of War," which he delivered as a lecture in the fall of 2002 at the Catholic University of America Law School before publishing it as a lengthy essay in the January 2003 issue of First Things. The essay was clearly written to provide moral and theological justification for the Bush administration's Iraq policy in every one of its details.

Weigel's case for war ran as follows. In the post-September 11 world, the "peace of order" among nations is fundamentally threatened by international terrorist organizations and rogue states that traffic in weapons of mass destruction. In an ideal world, the UN would possess the means and the will to deal with these threats through the use of coercive military force. But, alas, the UN is deficient in both means and will. Luckily, the United States possesses both in abundance, just as it recognizes the unique responsibility for maintaining global order that flows from its status as the world's preeminent military power. America thus has the solemn duty to act as the worldwide enforcer of international justice -- including the punishment of those who flout the peace of order -- regardless of whether the other nations of the world recognize the legitimacy of such action. In serving as providentially appointed prosecutor, judge, jury, and executioner of international justice around the world, the United States furthers its own good (at home and abroad) as well as the good of all decent human beings on the planet. The unilateral overthrow of the government of Saddam Hussein is one example of such righteous American action, but it is hardly the only likely or defensible one to take place in the near future.

When Weigel provided the Bush administration with this moral and theological go-ahead for unilateral war with Iraq (as well as with any number of other rogue states around the world), he was well aware that most religious leaders and a great many public intellectuals both in the United States and abroad did not share his assessment of the situation. Based on any number of considerations -- suspicion about administration evidence of the Iraqi threat, a desire to allow UN inspectors to complete their work, fear that an invasion would spark a regional conflagration, doubts about America's ability to manage an occupation and transition to a decent and stable post-Hussein political order -- these writers had concluded that the coming invasion would fall far short of meeting the standards for a just war.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: linker, theocons, bush, christ, iraq

Damon Linker is the former editor of First Things and the author of The Theocons: Secular America Under Siege (Doubleday, 2006).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from War on Iraq! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
American Foreign Policy
Posted by: davinci on Oct 28, 2006 12:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The concept of total war and total victory is one of the great flaws of US foreign policy. It hasn't changed much since 1950. To the American mind it is implausible that other nations should have positive and legitimate political aspirations. The mind of the American statesman (this term seems like an oxymoron today) seems to have a lot in common with the American legal profession. It also seems the caliber of American leadership hasn't helped much either; this administration still beleives it can only engage the world with its military muscle. And lastly, it is insane that our politicians should allow the interference of crackpot fundamentalists to influence American diplomacy. But then a good number of them are crackpot fundamentalists themselves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Wake Up and Smell the Pigs Posted by: eyeman
» RE: Wake Up and Smell the Pigs Posted by: willymack
» RE: Wake Up and Smell the Pigs Posted by: lively56
You want open borders, pope-siekins? Open your own!!
Posted by: Pat Kittle on Oct 28, 2006 12:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Could this be the same bunch of racketeering pedophiles who tell their gullible "flock" to have lots of kids because the Earth can support 40 billion people and God will provide for all?

Apparently they've confused the US with their deity, because we're expected to open our borders and do the providing.

You'd think they could at least open the Vatican's borders, but nooooooooooo. Only in this case does the Pope seem to appreciate the concept of "finite carrying capacity."

Utterly beyond parody, isn't it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Open borders Posted by: derfb1
» RE: Open borders Posted by: willymack
» RE: Open borders Posted by: AdamG
» RE: Open borders Posted by: babs
» RE: Open borders Posted by: AdamG
» RE: Open borders Posted by: yellow
» RE: Open borders: YELLOW Posted by: SamFox
» RE: Open borders: YELLOW Posted by: yellow
» RE: Open borders: YELLOW Posted by: Pat Kittle
» RE: Open borders: YELLOW Posted by: AdamG
» RE: Open borders: YELLOW Posted by: Pat Kittle
» RE: Open borders: YELLOW Posted by: AdamG
reckless
Posted by: rsaxto on Oct 28, 2006 12:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
NEOCONS + THEOCONS = FASCISM. This book makes it clear that we need to replace these reckless immoral beasts with a decent government.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bush prepares for Martial Law, please read this:
Posted by: LeftWright on Oct 28, 2006 1:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Go to:

http://signs-of-the-times.org/signs/editorials/ signs20061027_BushMovesTowardMartialLaw.php

(Please delete space after last "/")

Stand against ignorance, fear and hatred. Work with your neighbors to restore American democracy.

The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Algodees
Posted by: algodees on Oct 28, 2006 1:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ideas such as these crackpots espouse are plainly the result of their ignorance of the world and it's history. Can any policy built on lies ever produce good and just results? Herr Goebels understood about the Big Lie. Just keep repeating it and eventually we will all believe it. It is time we had some leaders who have travelled and understand the other nations and peoples. Look what these ignorant and arrogant fools have wrought.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Algodees ]Don't blame them. Posted by: rnagisetty
In A Matter That Must Shame God, Himself
Posted by: Tom Degan on Oct 28, 2006 2:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That title is borrowed from something Kurt Vonnegut wrote over thirty years ago in a collection of essays called, "Wampeters, Fomas and Grandfalloons". I can't, for the life of me recall the subject of that particular piece but its title seemed so appropriate for what's being discussed here.

Apparently, the fact that the Vatican, twice, under two different popes has vehemently condemned the obscenity that this country is now committing in Iraq in the strongest language printable - means not a thing to these foolish men. As a somewhat lapsed but still believeing member of the Church of Rome let me just say this: any Catholic who supports this war should hang his or her head in shame. I had many reasons for the invasion of Iraq - most of them secular - but the biggest reason was the fact that invading that country, which was a threat to no one but itself - Shock and Awe - flew head-on into the face of my Catholic faith.

It wasn't a "just war". Any thinking person could see that from the first day of the invasion. This was a power grab for the administration of George W. Bush. They wanted to control the oil flowing out of that part of the world and Iraq conveniantly happened to be sitting on what was believed to be the second largest oil reserves on the planet. Had its main export been galvanized bicycle clams, trust me, we wouldn't be there today. This wasn't a war about bringing "freedom and democracy" to the Middle East. Since when has the USA given a hoot in hell about democracy in the Arab world or anywhere elese for that matter. Remember, democracy was ended in Iran over half a century ago - not by religious fanatics - but by the administration of Dwight D. Eisenhower. The Bush Mob are only in power because they were able to steal two elections. Since taking power they have sent our Constitution through the sausage grinder. Are you actually naive enough to believe that they give a damn about freedom?? This was a war that was launched for one reason and one reason only: GREED.

Three months ago, I wrote what I believe to be a fairly rational (for me) essay on the subject called "Christ vs Conservatism: A Serious Conflict". If you'll go to my site (there is a link below) and under "Archives" click on "7/21/06", you'll be able to read it in its entirety.

Pray for peace.
Work for peace.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
"The Rant" by Tom Degan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Correction Posted by: Tom Degan
Pope John Paul II
Posted by: fg on Oct 28, 2006 3:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If memory serves, Pope John Paul II told Bush on three separate occasions and to his face that he disagreed with him on Iraq.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Pope John Paul II Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: Pope John Paul II Posted by: tlees2
» RE: Pope John Paul II Posted by: Ocean tides
Well, well, well....
Posted by: zipper696 on Oct 28, 2006 3:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Did anyone pick up the fact that this bunch's weblog is called "ON THE SQUARE" ??

For info, this is a standard question that a Mason would ask to another person "Are you on the square?" to see if the other was a Mason...

Hardcore Catholics + Masons = New World Order ???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Well, well, well.... Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: Well, well, well.... Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» RE: Well, well, well.... Posted by: aonghus36
jefhadist
Posted by: jefhadist on Oct 28, 2006 5:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Clever title and seriously deranged picture. But fortunately, it wasn't "Jesus" endorsing this conflagration anymore than "Jesus" endorses anything. It's seriously messed up "theo-addicts" who love to manipulate others with their supposed "holiness," "charisms," and mental-midgetry. Jesus wouldn't have touched this war....any war... with a ten foot cross. Onward christian theocons, my ass.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: jefhadist Posted by: Tom Degan
» seriously deranged picture Posted by: kww355
» RE: jefhadist Posted by: grumpyoldman
When Was The Catholic Church Ever A Force For Peace?
Posted by: Douglas on Oct 28, 2006 5:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
During its long and inglorious history the Catholic Church has been responsible for untold mass murder and genocide. It murdered millions of Jews and Muslims during the various crusades, burned several million "witches" at the stake during the middle ages, murdered around a million Cathars (the first act of European genocide) in the fourteenth century, murdered millions more during the Inquisition, burned and otherwise murdered millions of Protestants during the counter reformation, and committed wholesale murder of millions of natives Americans and forced millions more to convert to Catholicism at the point of the sword in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. One would have thought that the current shameless Pope, who is undoubtedly knowedgeable of his own church's ungodly and murderous history, would have been embarassed to point out recently that Islam had been spread at the point of the sword when his own Catholic Church must surely hold the record for using the sword to convert others. When in its long and inglorious history has the Catholic Church ever been an advocate of peace? Is there any other institution currently extant on the earth that has been guilty of as much mass murder and genocide as the Roman Catholic Church?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Tom: Wrong Picture
Posted by: R.I.P. on Oct 28, 2006 6:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Somehow they got their photos of the man from Nazareth mixed up with Jesus H. Christ (no relation)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Tom: Wrong Picture Posted by: symcokid
» Jesus picture Posted by: kww355
Its God's Plan
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Oct 28, 2006 6:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
we need this war because 1000 years ago a child fell down a well and has been living down there waiting to arise and bring judgement to the world. We need this 12th Iman to rise up from the well, riding on a flaming horse, to bring justice to the world and kill all the jews, christians, and infidels. Bush/Cheney's war is only designed to bring out the Madhi, peace by upon him, and is according to Allah's win, peace-be-upon-him.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Wilco Posted by: edith
» RE: Wilco Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» Oh Yeah Posted by: edith
» RE: Oh Yeah Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» Kain(translate yourself) Posted by: edith
» RE: Its God's Plan Posted by: JSquercia
» Be A Klown, Be a Klown Posted by: edith
otto
Posted by: otto on Oct 28, 2006 7:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks to Damon Linker for bringing all this to light; I had no idea that there was that much "Catholic influence" on things and thought it was all the Christian right in general - inclluding many Catholics. And I consider myself fairly well informed on things in both areas - a formally active and now married priest who has been active in social justice causes most of my life. I can see where their type of thinking comes from; in seminary days the arguement that it was more merciful to torture heretics in the Inquisition to save their souls seemed to make sense to me. The Crusades were a noble and just cause "for Christ"! WE (God and US) were coming from a higher source of knowledge. Now I still hope and have confidence that God is still managing to build His Kingdom in some strange and mysterious way - even through all the mistakes and stupid paths that we all take. The Church (i.e. both Rome and Christians in general) has to learn that this "Kingdom of God" ("Reign of God" is a better term, as the ladies point out to us!) is more important than they are and takes first place!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Inflated Intellectuals? Posted by: edith
Neuhaus isn't the Church
Posted by: Thinker on Oct 28, 2006 7:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'd like to emphasize that the neocons weren't the Church. The Vatican refused to endorse Iraq, and did hold to the doctrine of the "just war". No war today can meet the demands of a just war as it's impossible to conduct a war without involving the civilian population.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Neuhaus isn't the Church Posted by: Basenjis
Charism of Political Discernment...enjoyed by WHOM?
Posted by: mdruss42 on Oct 28, 2006 8:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
-DULY CONSTITUTED PUBLIC AUTHORITIES- WOW! Does that mean the dog catcher too?

Did I miss something? Did someone offer $5,000,000 for the nuttiest, most outrageous, reactionary, religious proposals? As if the marriage of the Dominionists, with their stoning and back-to-slavery factions, and the Dominationists, with their dreams of the world-as-their-private-oyster was not nutty enough.

MAY WE, IN THE NEAR FUTURE, OR I WILL NOT GET TO SEE IT, AND I REALLY WOULD LOVE TO, HAVE OCCASION TO BE GRATEFUL TO THE SOCIOPATHIC GANG IN WASHINGTON FOR SHINING A VERY BRIGHT SPOTLIGHT ON THE VARIOUS SERIOUSLY DANGEROUS NUTJOBS PRESENTLY OPERATING IN OUR SOCIETY.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The road to hell is paved with the skulls of priests
Posted by: Carl Street on Oct 28, 2006 8:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As ususal, the problem is not that God is on anyone's side; rather it is that NO ONE is on HIS...

I am a strong, practicing Catholic and, unlike many other alleged "Christians" and "Catholics" recognize that the core of our religious faith and spiritual obligations is expressed clearly and concisely in the Sermon on The Mount -- "Whatever you do to the least of MY bretheren, ye have done it to ME."

DAMNATION shall be the lot of those who fail in this regard -- the words of Jesus in Matthew 25:41 are are clear, concise, and unequivocal. There is NO waffling or consideration for religious rank. In fact, Jesus was clear that even those who cast out demons in HIS name would be subject to damnation; and that the final judgement would NOT be based on religious protocols and ceremonies; rather, that it would be based on one's actions towards one's fellow human beings.

Any Catholic or Christian that hopes to take refuge in some kind of religious Nuremburg defense (I was only following the orders of my priest) will be sorely disappointed. You have been given the word of GOD and to try and use some kind of religious lawyering loophole will fail. And, keep in mind all the lawyers will already have preceeded you into the gates of hell anyway.

Those who believe that Jesus would endorse war, torture, and weaponry expenditures while millions suffer privation are securing their own eternal damnation.

Carl Street
carl_street@cjstreet.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wake Up, See Clearly, Speak Plainly
Posted by: wawa on Oct 28, 2006 8:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thomas Jefferson weeded out the miracle stories from the gospels and clarified the teachings of Christ in
The Jefferson Bible: The Life and Morals of Jesus of Nazareth

1. Be just: justice comes from virtue which comes from the heart.

2. Treat people the way we want to be treated.

3. Always work for PEACEFUL resolutions, even to the point of returning violence with COMPASSION.

4. Consider valuable the things that have no material value.

5. Do not judge others.

6. Do not bear grudges.

7. Be modest and unpretentious.

8. Give out of true generosity, not because we expect to be repaid.

9. Being true to one's self is more important than being loyal to one's family...those who think they know the most are the most ignorant......




"Soon after I had published the pamphlet "Common Sense" [on Feb. 14, 1776] in America, I saw the exceeding probability that a revolution in the system of government would be followed by a revolution in the system of religion... The world is my country, all mankind are my brethren, and to do good is my religion."-Tom Paine


"If enough Christians followed the gospel, they could bring any state to its knees." - Father Philip Francis Berrigan


Public Service message from
WeAreWideAwake.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The problem... Posted by: stormchilde1975
When the man comes around...
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Oct 28, 2006 8:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Every time I hear of religious rightie fascists, I recall what Johnny Cash had to say:

The Man Comes Around Lyrics

and I heard as it were, the noise of thunder
and one of the four beasts sang,
come and see, I saw,
and behold! a white horse...


There's a man going around taking names
And he decides who to free and who to blame
Everybody won't be treated all the same
There'll be a golden ladder reaching down
When the Man comes around

The hairs on your arm will stand up
At the terror in each sip and in each sup
Will you partake of that last offered cup?
Or disappear into the potter's ground
When the Man comes around

Hear the trumpets, hear the pipers
One hundred million angels singing
Multitudes are marching to the big kettledrum
Voices calling, voices crying
Some are born and some are dying
It's Alpha and Omega's kingdom come

And the whirlwind is in the thorn tree
The virgins are all trimming their wicks
The whirlwind is in the thorn tree
It's hard for thee to kick against the pricks

Till Armageddon no shalam, no shalom
Then the father hen will call his chickens home
The wise man will bow down before the thrown
And at His feet they'll cast their golden crowns
When the Man comes around

Whoever is unjust let him be unjust still
Whoever is righteous let him be righteous still
Whoever is filthy let him be filthy still
Listen to the words long written down
When the Man comes around

Hear the trumpets, hear the pipers
One hundred million angels singing
Multitudes are marching to the big kettledrum
Voices calling and voices crying
Some are born and some are dying
It's Alpha and Omega's kingdom come

And the whirlwind is in the thorn tree
The virgins are all trimming their wicks
The whirlwind is in the thorn tree
It's hard for thee to kick against the pricks

In measured hundred weight and penny pound
When the Man comes around.

"and I heard a voice in the midst of the four beasts
and behold! a pale horse
and its name that sat on him was death
and hell followed after him..."


Beats Yeats, I think.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Alternet & Religion - Just Can't Get Enough . . .
Posted by: JCR on Oct 28, 2006 9:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am willing to wager that Alternet almost evenly divides its time between Religion and the War in Iraq although in this article you get two for the price of one. What a bore, er I mean, boon for readers. This article happens to single out Catholics, something I find interesting given Alternet's (aka OpenTheBorder.org) highly favorable view of unlimited legal and illegal immigration of Catholic Latinos among others. I mentioned this yesterday in another thread on marriage rates among immigrants.

I'm a liberal like most readers here (that is when I'm not burning crosses and hunting down immigrants on the border with my Minutemen buddies) so I cannot help but see the blatant hypocrisy. I have never so much as read one criticism or suggestion that perhaps a huge influx of Catholics into this country is the last thing we need. Of course all Alternet sees are more potential Democratic Party adherents so in that case all is forgiven. We all understand the economic and humanitarian issues. We all know that immigrants are looking for a better life and performing necessary jobs but let's not forget what baggage many bring with them. Bent on criticizing Christians, Alternet ignores the fact that most people entering the US are bringing with them a brand of Catholicism that makes the homegrown variety look tame.

All you pro-choicers get ready to say farewell to safe, legal abortions. Think this current administration is over the top - wait until more hardcore old-world Catholics join the evangelical right in a crusade to stamp out any hopes of gay marriage. Let's say goodbye to steady reproduction rates and hello to 5 kids per family. Think of all those good Christian and Mormon families with 5 and 6 kids; now magine more of the same. Think more superstition, intolerance of gays/lesbians and women's rights and less compassion despite the intended teachings of Jesus. I actually live in a Latin American country where abortion is 100% illegal even in many cases where it is necessary to save a woman's life. It is not illegal to grab a woman's ass or breasts on the street and "GOD commands men and women to have many children". Before you all label me a Latino-hating bigot consider the hateful/"stereotypical" things many of you along with Alternet have written regarding Christians or Israelis - that should be enough to silence most.

Intent on highlighting the evils of the Christian right I also noticed that Alternet didn't mention the hatred issuing from Australia and England over the last couple of days. Australia's leading Imam blamed women for their own rapes - comparing them to pieces of meat left out on the street for hapless men to stumble on and rape going on to say that if they were in their homes and wearing appropriate Muslim attire like good little theists then those poor men would not be tempted to ravage them like the pieces of meat they are. Similarly, Hypocrisy.org missed the story in England where one leading Imam stated that death was a fitting punishment for gay men. We know Falternet feels that Islam gets a bad rap as it is but Christians and Jews alone can be targeted all the live long day while important stories like these are dismissed because Alternet is 100% PC 100% of the time? Of course I expect the same claptrap about "radical Muslims only hate us because of the war" except these particular statements from Australia and England had nothing to do with war. How about a little criticism where it's due? ALL RELIGIOUS NUTS NOT JUST OUR HOMEGROWN VARIETY!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Yup Posted by: edith
» RE: Yup Posted by: JCR
» RE: Yup Posted by: lively56
» RE: Yup Posted by: JCR
» RE: Yup Posted by: lively56
» RE: Yup Posted by: davewuxi
Christian Zionism: An Egregious Threat to U.S. - Middle East Understanding
Posted by: rwa on Oct 28, 2006 11:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
By The Council for the National Interest
10/27/06 "CNI" — -- Christian Zionism, a belief that paradise for Christians can only be achieved once Jews are in control of the Holy Land, is gathering strength in the United States and forging alliances that are giving increasingly weird shape to American policy toward the Middle East. The nature of the movement and its detrimental impact on policy was the subject of the 22nd Capitol Hill public hearing presented by the Council for the National Interest yesterday.
A new Zogby International poll commissioned by the CNI Foundation shows that 31 percent of those surveyed in the national poll strongly believe or somewhat believe in the ideas behind Christian Zionism, defined as “the belief that Jews must have all of the promised land, including all of Jerusalem, to facilitate the second coming of the messiah.” Other polls bear similar messages, that 53% of Americans believe that Israel was given by God to the Jews (Pew), and that 59% of the American public believes the prophecies contained in the Book of Revelations will come true (CNN/Time.)

The international implications of such beliefs are profound, as an increasing number of Americans believe that God sets foreign policy goals. Rev. Robert O. Smith, Lutheran pastor at the University of Chicago, one of the speakers at the hearing, discussed the development of this belief that dates to the 19th century and how it has received a powerful new impetus with the founding this year of a new group of the Christian right called Christians United for Israel (CUFI). And yet while it works closely with Jewish Zionist organizations in the US, including the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, to promote the continued occupation of Palestine by the Israel (land God has given the Jews), it works just as effectively in dehumanizing the original inhabitants of the Holy Land, both Muslims and Christians.

Another speaker, Rammy Haija, who teaches at Radford University, drew attention to the necessity in the Christian Zionist dogma for the Israelis to retain control not only of the whole of the occupied territory but also all of Jerusalem. Christian Zionists have pushed the militarist policies of both Israel and the U.S. in an effort to secure the Holy Land in preparation for the coming of the “promised land.” As part of this strategy, the U.S. occupation of Iraq is deemed absolutely necessary.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Sounds Like God's A Nerd! Posted by: edith
Preacher shopping
Posted by: bookwoman on Oct 28, 2006 12:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Bushes have a tradition of going preacher shopping (finding a clergyman who will give you the answers you want) when you decide to go to war. Back when Bush '41' was planning to start Desert Storm, The Most Reverend Edmund Browning, the then Presiding Bishop of the Episcopal Church to which Bush '41' belonged as a cradle member, went to him with a delegation of clergy and asked him to consider not getting involved in Kuwait.

Having been asked, by the head of his church, not to involve U.S. troops in this war, Bush decided that he needed a friendly clergyman to back him up. He visited Retired Presiding Bishop John Allin who immediately told him that attacking the Iraqis occupying Kuwait was a great idea. With this approval of a former Bishop in hand, Bush '41' initiated Desert Storm.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I suspect the good Father
Posted by: JSquercia on Oct 28, 2006 12:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I suspect the good Father will be surprised when he finds himself among the GOATS and NOt the SHEEP . He was so pleased that some of his words made it into Bush's speech .
I seem to remember PRIDE being one of the seven Deadly sins .

Perhaps the father should reread that verse that says a Bad Tree can NOT bear GOOD Fruit . If ever there was a bad tree this gang in the whitehouse qualifies . Hell they are a forrest of bad trees

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

God Bless America
Posted by: eyeman on Oct 28, 2006 1:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here they go again,
The Yanks in their armoured parade
Chanting their ballads of joy
As they gallop across the big world
Praising America's God.

The gutters are clogged with the dead
The ones who couldn't join in
The others refusing to sing
The ones who are losing their voice
The ones who've forgotten the tune.

The riders have whips which cut.
Your head rolls onto the sand
Your head is a pool in the dirt
Your head is a stain in the dust
Your eyes have gone out and your nose
Sniffs only the pong of the dead
And all the dead air is alive
With the smell of America's God.

Nobel Prize Poet Harold Pinter January 2003

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Jesus MIA
Posted by: fatherbernie on Oct 28, 2006 1:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is unfortunate that Catholics and non-Catholics alike can get such a distorted view of Catholic social teaching from the likes of Neuhaus and the severely compromised United States Conference of Catholics Bishops that a Catholic bashing response begins to develop.
Thankfully Neuhaus and Novak and the USCCB represent politics and not theology. The Catholic Church officially teaches and has done so since Vatican II, the near impossibility of just war let alone the convoluted and unchristian mind game called “the just war theory.” If one follows the teachings of Jesus then just war is sinful poppycock at best and demonic evil at worst.
What is missing here is the idea that Rome runs this American Catholic Church. The church here is as fundamentally right as Falwell and Robertson (and lets not forget either self righteous Graham in the equation either.) John Paul II called the Iraq debacle morally wrong, not a bad idea mind you, but morally wrong. As head of the church, in a statement on faith and morals, he should have been listened to , even if said position was not ex cathreda e.g. from the seat of authority as it were. Unfortunately we are dealing with the complicit USCCB who wear American flag underwear perhaps of many different styles. Like the House or Senate or Court or Jeff Gannon's White House, raging pedophiles may exist in this assembly as they reflect the population and not the religion. Prelates like to pass that buck up to Rome but sadly the buck stops here ...... HERE.
As an Old Catholic priest, I often find an easy target for my criticisms in Rome but I must be careful about generalities. The conservative American Catholic desperately wants an “American Church” so he or she can bathe in the narrowness of American thought with comfort. I live near Philadelphia and I will tell you that the meat packers, the large farms, the mushroom growers, the landscaper, and the working middle class (who is cleani