Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

War on Iraq

I Was A PR Intern in Iraq

By Willem Marx, Harper's. Posted September 18, 2006.


In this astonishing confessional by an Oxford graduate who worked in the green zone of Baghdad, we see the perversity of the American version of a 'free press' in Iraq.
091806story
I Was A PR Intern in Iraq
Advertisement

Last spring, during my final semester at Oxford, a cousin wrote to tell me that she was planning to work for an American company in Iraq over the summer. She suggested I join her. The company was called Iraqex, and it claimed on its website to have "expertise in collecting and exploiting information; structuring transactions; and mitigating risks through due diligence, legal strategies and security." Iraqex was also looking for summer media interns, my cousin pointed out, who would "interact with the local media" in Baghdad and "pitch story ideas." This was almost too good to be true.

I have wanted to be a reporter, and particularly a foreign correspondent, ever since I was given a copy of John Simpson's Strange Places, Questionable People as a teenager. In this memoir, Simpson recounts his many adventures as a BBC reporter: lying in a gutter at Tiananmen Square in 1989, his camera rolling as bullets zipped by; being arrested during the revolution in Romania; and broadcasting from Baghdad in 1991, with U.S. bombs exploding around him. Inspired, I began writing for my high school paper, eventually becoming its editor, and at Oxford, where I majored in Classics, I joined the staff of a campus weekly. (Simpson had edited a quarterly at Cambridge.) By the time I heard from my cousin, I was already slated to begin journalism school in the fall, but I was yearning for some John Simpson-type real-world experience. In fact, Simpson had actually spent years toiling in the BBC's London office before being sent overseas. And here I might be able to get a break right out of college.

I submitted my internship application within days. (Yet by then my cousin's parents had decided she couldn't go to Baghdad and Iraqex had changed its name to Lincoln Group.) After an anxious wait, I was called by one of the company's employees. He was young, himself just out of school, and he ended our short interview by asking whether I would be able to stay focused on work "with mortar fire at the end of the street." I was honest about my credentials. I had been to the Middle East, having vacationed in Egypt and Syria a couple of years before. During a spring break, friends and I had cycled some two thousand miles from Geneva to Damascus. And at university I had handled the pressures of translating Cicero and Polybius. But, I admitted, I couldn't say for sure about the mortar fire. He seemed to think this would be fine.

I soon received phone calls from both of Lincoln Group's founders, Paige Craig and Christian Bailey. Craig, a former Marine, told me that he had spent a great deal of time in Iraq and spoke very generally about the company's important work there. When I asked about security, he assured me that for them this was not a problem. Other foreign companies drove around the country in massive 4 x 4 armored vehicles, basically advertising themselves as targets. But Lincoln Group, he said, operated "under the radar," with employees dressed as locals and Iraqis manning the front offices.

Christian Bailey, like me, was an Oxford man. Yet whereas I had whiled away my time in pubs, he had set up an expensive Bloomberg computer terminal in his dorm room and successfully played the stock market. Although Bailey initially described the media internship as the perfect launch pad for my journalism career, he later offered me a position working on private equity projects in Washington. It was not my dream to become a financial analyst, I had to tell him. I wanted to spend the summer in Baghdad working with real Iraqi reporters. Bailey said he understood but would have to get back to me. A month later, in June, I was told the media internship was mine.

I was flown across the Atlantic to meet my new employers. In downtown Washington, I was surprised by the ubiquity of fresh-faced young men, their blue short-sleeved buttondowns tucked neatly into khakis. Lincoln Group had its headquarters above an Indian grocery on K Street; a small placard in the building's foyer read: visitors to lincoln group/iraqex, 10th floor, should be announced in advance. On the tenth floor, electricians wired lights in some rooms while in others suited men conferenced behind glass walls. The company's head of human resources, who had only just been hired herself, told me with a weary smile that things had been crazy lately.

Paige Craig popped in to see me as I filled out work papers in a tiny waiting room. Shaking my hand with a mighty grip, he uttered something to the effect of "welcome aboard." He was very well built, with short, tidy hair and the tight khaki trousers and shirt of a military man. As he strode away, he seemed purposeful. Bailey, by contrast, was baby-faced and slight, his sandy-brown hair cut in a Bill Gates bob. In his corner office, we chatted about Oxford. He had studied economics and management at Lincoln College. When I asked whether his college had inspired the company's new name, he shrugged. "Partly," he said cryptically. He did say that Lincoln Group was rapidly expanding and that it offered incredible opportunities for bright young people like me: stock options were available to employees after just three months, and I might consider staying on after the summer. Christian Bailey hadn't yet been to Iraq himself. Although he had planned numerous trips, he said, something always came up that kept him in D.C.


Digg!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from War on Iraq! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
nice
Posted by: rsaxto on Sep 18, 2006 1:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a nice fleshing out of what really goes on in the US propaganda war in Iraq. It is so mickey mouse and corrupt the way the Bushies do their propaganda that it is no wonder that the whole Iraqi effort has come to be perceived by most Iraqis as another reason the USA should completely withdraw from Iraq asap. It seems that everything the Bushies do is simply propaganda piled on top of propaganda, completely smothering the truth and adding to death/injury. US failure abroad is becoming so obvious in so many areas that we should simply abandon all overseas bases for they are all failing in one way or another. The Bushies have failed: impeach the Bushies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just reading this made me feel dirty
Posted by: Lizmv on Sep 18, 2006 2:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It makes me wonder how many years it is going to take to unravel the mystery behind the Bush Years. I took a look at the Lincon Group website - http://www.lincolngroup.com/ It's like stepping into the Twilight Zone.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is insulting to those of us who work with integrity
Posted by: Bobsays on Sep 18, 2006 5:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I worked in communications for an international agency, we bent over backwards to make sure what we did was accurate, free of lies and manipulation and all our activities were fully transparent. Because of this we built extraordinary trust with our local colleagues.

I left that gig feeling proud, not dirty. I still can look back at a great time and when I returned to the country recently, I was stopped on the street and patted on the back by locals, not punched in the face.

It makes me sick to the stomach to see so-called legitimate governments breaking the rules like this. I applaud this writer for telling it like it is. I thought the information revolution would improve the quality of resources out there, but I have seen nothing but a monumental escalation in telling lies and spin.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Snobbery among scoundrels
Posted by: Moonray on Sep 18, 2006 5:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's amusing, but not surprising, that such companies still select pampered Ivy League types for entry-level positions. The stratum of our society that controls our intelligence agencies and major corporations apparently cannot let go of its snobbery -- even when it would make much more sense to hire veteran military PR types to do those jobs.

I am as appalled as anyone by Dick Cheney's PR efforts in Iraq, but the thought of some future CIA station chief getting his baptism of fire in such a manner is nevertheless vaguely satisfying. One can only hope that the interns packed plenty of Perrier and brie to get them through the hard times.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Because the snots will do it Posted by: Bic Pentameter
Your Tax Dollars At Work
Posted by: NoPCZone on Sep 18, 2006 7:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Public money, filtered through well-connected people, hiring kids from the 'best' schools to spread lies and disinformation for the US government. Sounds like it was a cluster **** as well. The fact that nobody is really surprised is telling.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I SMELL A PUNK...
Posted by: charlieparisek on Sep 18, 2006 7:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh my! What a plot.

An eager beaver journalist 'wannabe' with Oxford credentials set against the background of a shattered Baghdad under the boot of a brutal, sinister occupying force. Bright-eyed and bushy-tailed, he might "even...improve the situation in Iraq..."

Great drama! Call me cynical but I smell a punk.

Firstly, I never thought that Oxford produced such an absurdly naive sort. Iraqex, through it's parent company the Lincoln Asset Management Group, "...enjoy select relationships in Congress, the Bush administration, Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC), Export-Import Bank of the United States, and the U.S. Department of State.” (sourcewatch.org.)

This alone should have been cause enough for anyone even remotely optimistic about working productively with the US in Iraq to run madly in the opposite direction. But perhaps in the face of "dark eyes wide with interest that whispered, "That's very sexy", even I may have forgotten my first-class education and succumbed to the lure of the beast.

But for a $1,000 monthly stipend?

It is no question that the US government has set up a privately run propaganda arm in order to feed distortions to both Iraqi and world media. And it could be true that the author served in Iraq as a minor functionary in this effort. What is questionable here is the author's account of being an integral part of this arm. The massive blocks of cash, Gina riding shotgun, the Glock and Iranian submachine guns held at the ready, not to mention the oh-so tidy ending. All these require further vetting.

Has AlterNet properly vetted this article? Please advise before I call this story an over-dramatized piece of shit.

Thank you very much.

Charlie Parisek
Tokyo, Japan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I SMELL A PUNK... Posted by: glitchsystem
» Hmmm... Posted by: Wesley69
» RE: I SMELL A PUNK... Posted by: radagast_23
» What?!? Posted by: Wesley69
» It's possible Posted by: HeroesAll
What does the author want us to take away from this?
Posted by: techphile on Sep 18, 2006 11:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So he went to Iraq becasue he thought that he would help the Iraqi people. That sounds disengenous to me. I don't see how the lying to them and discredting their media with fake stories helps the Iraqis.

So he wanted to be a journalist, I thought that one of the first principlas was that you report the news not fake it. If he wants to be a propagandist he can have a great career.

So he did some cloak and dagger stuff & might one day be able to work for one of the intelligence agencies, maybe he also dreams of being a Lawrence for the new century.

Ultimately I wonder what we are supposed to take from this article?

That the US & it's european allies have been planting stories in the Iraqi & domestic press casting their actions & misactions in a favourable light?

Are we supposed to be either in shock, awe, or happy that the writer took a low paid job in Iraq as a mouth piece for the US military?

Should we be angry that the job was offered to a foreign ivy grad instead of an american one since the company gets federal funds?

Are we supposed to congratulate the author for his insight at the end and his refusal to take the better paying job they offered him?

The field of journalism is very hard and full of challenges and we need more journalists with integrity all over the world who see their duty as being to present their country men and women the truth that their governments want to hide so that the whole world can become more democratic.

I will not claim that this is easy or something that even very ethical reporters are able to do all the time. However a true lover of the truth would choose not to do that.

If he wants to be a hack or a mouth piece for other people like Valerie Plame, Bob Woodward or the thousands of reporters bought and paid for all other the world by differing security organs he will have a bright future. He and all his friends will even beleive that he is a brilliant man fullof insight, wit. However outside that circle the general public will finally get the measure of the man.

It is true that many journalists like Gary Webb who only care about the truth do not have as much wealth or as great careers as the folks in the media/government/industry circle jerk but they do have integrity.

If you integrity & professionalism matters more to you than anything else I salute & respect you you have picked a tough row to hoe. But if you will schill for Bush's shillings then all I can say is that in my opinon you know the value of a few things and the worth of even less.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Chin Up
Posted by: eddie torres on Sep 18, 2006 12:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Typical American response to bad news: shoot the messenger. Marx, if you're in journalism for the money, the money is in the US. Learn to pander to the average Ohio slob when exposing partisan absurdity. See Vulliamy's 'Dark heart of the American dream' and 'Farewell America,' Klein's 'Children of Bush's America,' Harding's 'Into The Heart of Suburbia,' Hunt's 'Nowhere land,' McNulty's 'Needles and haystacks,' Holthouse's 'A Few Bad Men' and 'In the Heart of America's Love Affair with Firepower,' and Burkemann's 'Journey to the heart of Bushlandia.'

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Iraqex ties
Posted by: bloomsberry on Sep 18, 2006 3:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr. Marx, a minute with Google would have solved all your problems. Iraqex clearly is not a wire service or newspaper.

Iraqex is financed in part by the Arab Bankers Association of North America. Now Google OPIC, and the other alliances in the Iraqex company description below.

Here is the full Iraqex company description:

About the Company

Iraqex was formed with the backing of Lincoln Asset Management Group with the assistance of a cadre of investors, to pursue private sector opportunities in Iraq. Iraqex brings a unique combination of expertise in collecting and exploiting information; structuring transactions; and mitigating risks through due diligence, legal strategies and security. Iraqex has developed subsidiaries and private equity investments in Iraq spanning commercial real estate! , manufacturing, metals, transportation, and communications.

Iraqex recently won the three-year contract to provide all Public Relations, outreach, and media monitoring & analysis for Coalition Forces across Iraq. This is a major project with vital importance to achieving success in the goal of brining the Iraqi people elections to choose their own future.

Iraqex benefits from strong relationships in Iraq, the U.S. and internationally. In Iraq, it has cultivated relationships with the Iraqi national government, municipalities, tribal leaders, prominent families, and the business community. Iraqex has a thriving network of offices from Basra in the South to Zakho in the North and employs over 300 Iraqis. In the U.S., Iraqex enjoys select relationships in Congress, the Administration, OPIC, ExIm Bank, and the U.S. Department of State.

More information is available at www.iraqex.com.

Mr. Marx, do you really think that your readers are that stupid to believe your naive claims, or are you really that stupid?

Who are you really, and what is your agenda?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Iraqex ties Posted by: mjacoubs
Honesty tends to draw the fire of the media establishment
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Sep 18, 2006 7:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Congratulations are due Mr. Marx on his honest description of events in a very typical modern public relations environment.

The only people I have a hard time believing are those who claim that public relations is 'really okay' and just sometimes 'gets misused'.

I think most Americans would be astonished to discover just how pervasive propaganda strategies are (and recall, propaganda works by providing a limited view of accurate information, in contrast to disinformation, which is the generation and distribution of outright lies).

Would you be surprised to learn that your 'liberal talk radio host' is actually taking payments from corporate America to spin the news in a certain direction? Would you be surprised to find that the 'university expert' who is promoting, say, water privatization on the radio was actually hired for that express PR purpose by the university? Just look at what Helwet-Packard got up to with their recent spy scandal - that's the norm these days. Look at all the video news releases, etc. etc.

Still, there are ways to distinguish between truth and falsehood.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who said anything about lies?
Posted by: amtpoo on Sep 18, 2006 8:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Were any lies published in the planted stories? In all the comments, I see reference to the government's "lies." Can someone please prove to me that the content itself were lies?

What the military is doing with "IO" in Iraq is texbook doctrine. More specifically, what the journalist was supporting is Psychological Operations, and a definition can be found in Joint Publication 3-13, Joint Doctrine for Information Operations.

Here's a doctrinally correct definition of PSYOP:

PSYOP are actions to
convey selected information and
indicators to foreign audiences. They
are designed to influence emotions,
motives, reasoning, and ultimately, the
behavior of foreign governments,
organizations, groups, and individuals.
PSYOP have strategic, operational, and
tactical applications, including truth
projection activities that support military
deception operations. (1) At the
strategic level, PSYOP may take the
form of political or diplomatic positions,
announcements, or communiqués. (2) At
the operational level, PSYOP can
include the distribution of leaflets,
loudspeaker broadcasts, radio and
television broadcasts, and other means
of transmitting information that
encourage enemy forces to defect, desert,
flee, or surrender. Persistent attacks can
have a synergistic effect with PSYOP,
accelerating the degradation of morale
and further encouraging desertion. (3)
At the tactical level, PSYOP include the
use of loudspeakers and other means to
promote fear or dissension in enemy
ranks. (4) PSYOP forces also may
shape attitudes and influence behaviors
through face-to-face communication. In
addition, PSYOP may support military
deception operations.

This information is out there for anybody to read. I also recommend reading: Public Affairs and Information Operations: A Strategy for Success and a PRSA memo on wartime communication.

I don't condone the actions of the Lincoln Group, but planting stories aren't as sinister as many of you make it out to be.

Just some food for thought.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Who said anything about lies? Posted by: MrVetinari
No Pulitzer for Willem Marx?
Posted by: cold2touch on Sep 19, 2006 11:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Willem Marx does not have what it takes to be a journalist, unlike Judy Miller.

I must say I thoroughly enjoyed this piece about the Operation Rapid Ripoff.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

nice reading, but I don't believe it...
Posted by: igor on Sep 19, 2006 2:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... because his contract with that Lincoln group must have had a strong non-disclosure clauses.

Do I believe that the kid, who is yet to establish his career and earn a place in this men's world would risk to ignore those clauses, especially after what he was witness to ?

I don't believe it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yellow journalism
Posted by: gwk on Sep 20, 2006 8:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First of all it's on the internet.
Second it's written by a trained journalist like Dan Rather perhaps.
Come on folks sensationalism sells now and how else to boost your resume than to uncover a huge propaganda machine.
I've spoken with real soldiers who have been under fire in Iraq and American propaganda is not the problem there it's the fanatical power hungry mulas and imams that prevent peace and truth in the primitive part of the world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

cut to the chase
Posted by: davidg on Sep 30, 2006 7:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a budding journalist, get to the point.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Tsk, tsk....
Posted by: Zemiti on Jan 2, 2007 4:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is something incredibly surreal about Marx's self-belief in his altruistic motives! Perhaps he reflects exactly what's warped about the Western psyche; that we are doing what's best under the circumstances for other people who do not really appreciate our actions!!!...as an Oxford type, he should have known better, isn't that the true value of upper-crust education and grooming?; to sometimes dilute the truth in the interest of maintaining and upholding (class) self-serving interests in a mock belief of doing things for the "general good"?; the steady hand, cool head and detached demeanor under pressure, upper crust types rarely if ever become revolutionaries! The lure of hard-core journalism should lead him to look no further than directly within the corridors of our own organs of state, wherein a huge mountain of a challenge lies for any bona fide news hound; instead of taking the easy option of the stage-managed and manipulation of ready prepared news-scripts and well planned political crisis's. What this article highlights is that the full truth will never be revealed/exposed/known on what has informed countless military actions and sanctions throughout the years. With journalism like this, why bother even offering it as a University course when we have re-gurgitated the whole ethos of the Goebels propaganda machine. Join the military stupid, Uncle Sam has a job for you...erstwhile the Military Business Vehicle Machinery...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]