Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

War on Iraq

Bush's '16 Words' Were False

By Jason Leopold, AlterNet. Posted April 20, 2006.


A newly declassified State Department memo provides the first hard evidence that the Bush administration manipulated and ignored intelligence in their thirst for war.
Advertisement

Sixteen days before President Bush's January 28, 2003, State of the Union address in which he said that the US learned from British intelligence that Iraq had attempted to acquire uranium from Africa -- an explosive claim that helped pave the way to war -- the State Department told the CIA that the intelligence the uranium claims were based upon were forgeries, according to a newly declassified State Department memo.

The revelation of the warning from the closely guarded State Department memo is the first piece of hard evidence and the strongest to date that the Bush administration manipulated and ignored documents information in their zeal to win public support for invading Iraq.

The memo says: "On January 12, 2003," the State Department's Bureau of Intelligence and Research (INR) "expressed concerns to the CIA that the documents pertaining to the Iraq-Niger deal were forgeries."

Moreover, the memo says that the State Department's doubts about the veracity of the uranium claims may have been expressed to the intelligence community even earlier.

Those concerns, according to the memo, are the reason that former Secretary of State Colin Powell refused to cite the uranium claims when he appeared before the United Nations in February 5, 2003 -- one week after Bush's State of the Union address -- to try to win support for a possible strike against Iraq.

"After considerable back and forth between the CIA, the (State) Department, the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Association), and the British, Secretary Powell's briefing to the UN Security Council did not mention attempted Iraqi procurement of uranium due to CIA concerns raised during the coordination regarding the veracity of the information on the alleged Iraq-Niger agreement," the memo further states.

Iraq's interest in the yellowcake caught the attention of Mohamed ElBaradei, the head of the International Atomic Energy Association. ElBaradei read a copy of the National Intelligence Estimate and personally contacted the State Department and the National Security Council in hopes of obtaining evidence so his agency could look into it.

ElBaradei sent a letter to the White House and the National Security Council (NSC) in December 2002, warning senior officials he thought the documents were forgeries and should not be cited by the administration as evidence that Iraq was actively trying to obtain WMDs.

ElBaradei said he never received a written response to his letter, despite repeated follow-up calls he made to the White House, the NSC and the State Department.

Vice President Dick Cheney, who made the rounds on the cable news shows that month, tried to discredit ElBaradei's conclusion that the documents were forged.

"I think Mr. ElBaradei frankly is wrong," Cheney said. "[The IAEA] has consistently underestimated or missed what it was Saddam Hussein was doing. I don't have any reason to believe they're any more valid this time than they've been in the past."

As it turns out, ElBaradei was correct, the declassified State Department memo now shows.

Monday's declassified State Department memo was obtained over the weekend by the New York Sun under a Freedom of Information Act request the newspaper filed last July. The Sun's story Monday morning, however, did not say anything about the State Department's warnings more than a week before Bush's State of the Union address about the bogus Niger documents.

The memo, dated June 10, 2003, was drafted by Carl Ford Jr., the former head of the State Department's Bureau of Intelligence and Research, in response to questions posed in June 2003 by I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Vice President Dick Cheney's former chief of staff, about a February 2002 fact-finding trip to Niger that former ambassador Joseph Wilson undertook to investigate the uranium claims on behalf of the CIA.

The memo had originally been drafted in June in response to Libby's questions about Wilson. But after Wilson wrote an op-ed in the New York Times July 6, 2003, in which he disclosed that he had personally investigated the Niger uranium claims and found that they were false, Powell requested further information from his aides. Ford went back and retrieved the June memo, re-dated it July 7, 2003, and sent it to Powell's deputy, Richard Armitage.


Digg!

Jason Leopold is the former Los Angeles bureau chief of Dow Jones Newswires where he spent two years covering the energy crisis and the Enron bankruptcy. He just finished writing a book about the crisis, due out in December through Rowman & Littlefield.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from War on Iraq! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
AND SO IT GOES...
Posted by: Captainmagic on Apr 20, 2006 12:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Only in America would you find these people still at there posts. At every level the current pervaers of death and destruction....your government, is, to say the very least...catastrophic. Your education burns your health industry burns, your financial structure burns and your credibility burns, Iraq burns, Iran burns. mothers and their children burn, brothers burn sisters burn whole communities burn.... do you get what we see....do you rail with rage when your family is wrent assunder and a freckle faced kid is struck dumb with incomprehensible shock from the horrors in Iraq..and you want to repeat this in Iran..look long and hard into the eyes of your children and then look to your White House....They are treating you with contempt..WE treat you with contempt...for it is to YOU that we are looking very hard at...it is time....enough is enough..yesterday is not fast enough...and only you can do it...True America where are you?

Captain OUT!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: there never was a true america! Posted by: Captainmagic
» But many other countries have evolved! Posted by: Steven Wanzell
» Well, America The Puritan Posted by: Steven Wanzell
US corporate media has abdicated all responsibility
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Apr 20, 2006 1:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Recently, foreign media outlets have reported steady increases in online visitors from the US. Maybe more of us have figured out that the media system in this country is almost completely corrupt, is ruled over by the financial sector and is incapable of reporting stories that conflict with those interests.

If you look at (for example) the Sydney Morning Herald, the UK Guardian and BBC, Asia Times Online, etc. you come across many stories that simply aren't reported in the US. Even if a story is reported, if the corporate masters of the press don't like it, it gets buried. During the Clinton era the daily headlines were always on Ken Starrs latest statement about stained garments - and now, the stories that should lead to Bush's impeachment are run once on the center pages and then buried. This is due to editorial control, and the editors take their orders from the corporate board of directors. The notion of an independent liberal free press is very quaint. These same corporate forces are now trying to control the 'alternative press' - look at the recent takeover and gutting of New York's Village Voice.

When we see (just for example) that the Carlye Group (arms financiers, among other things) has a member on the board of the New York Times, it doesn't take much imagination to realize that major economic forces (such as arms manufacturers, investment banks and oil producers) have a serious vested interest in controlling the information that reaches the American people.

The conclusion is that we live in a multi-tiered propaganda state - some of which is designed to distract and stupefy, some of which is designed to paint a rosy picture of US economic and military activity - all of which is designed to keep the truth from the people. What is the antitode? Actual investigative reporting - the kind where you ask questions, not the kind that begins, ad naseum, with "Today American officials said..."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Parallax View Posted by: Steven Wanzell
The Real Question...
Posted by: OneFUSM on Apr 20, 2006 5:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Find out who made the forged documents. We already know the why.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» My best guess is the Vatican... Posted by: SeverelyJaded
» RE: My best guess is the Vatican... Posted by: Judy in Big Thicket
» Your Vatican Posted by: Steven Wanzell
» RE: The Real Question... Posted by: willymack
» RE: The Real Question... Posted by: EQdi
» RE: The Real Question... Posted by: watchdog
GWB...
Posted by: woodford54 on Apr 20, 2006 5:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is a liar, a moron, a war-monger, a vengeful/mean 14 year old, a fundamentalist who orders the killing of innocents, and I could go on. So we are very clear on who he is. But the most important question of our lifetimes is, "Who are we?" Because if we are worth saving then we need to start acting and clean up this country and start by making AMENDS to those we have harmed. And the list is a long one. Don't just talk..... TAKE ACTION! NOW!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: GWB... Posted by: willymack
» RE: GWB... Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: GWB... Posted by: woodford54
14 words
Posted by: medstudgeek on Apr 20, 2006 5:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is a Neo-Nazi reference to mein kampf, because the first sentence of mein kampf has 14 words in it. Surely one of our many parodists can do something with this and Bush's '16 words' ?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Do we really need more parodies? Posted by: Steven Wanzell
So what ????
Posted by: Cannoliamo on Apr 20, 2006 7:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You obviously don't understand, .... it doesn't matter!

The truth is insignificant to the neocon ideology. The only thing that matters is that Saddam Hussein and his henchmen were not allies to the US and would have (if they were able to) developed WMD and ballistic missile technology and used them against us if given the opportunity (plus they controlled vast oil reserves and were not christians).

Keep in mind, the Bush Administration is NOT interested in fair and unbiased decisions. Many of these people believe the earth is 6000 years old, Adam and Eve were the first humans, Noah saved all the animals with his ark while god filled the oceans, Jesus died for their sins so they can go to heaven when they die, etc. etc. etc. Truth is FAR less important to them than the preservation of their dogma, their wealth and their security. Attacking Iraq was necessary in this regard and no rationale or historical review will ever convince them otherwise.

Are you sure you're not a communist?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: So what ???? Posted by: watchdog
Bait and switch
Posted by: cycledco on Apr 20, 2006 8:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the same State of the Union address Bush talked of the cost of drugs for HIV infection being under $300/year. Yet when he instituted his program he outlawed the use of generics, which cost under $300, and stipulated brand names which cost multiples of it.

The high drug costs and the rediculous abstinence requirements have hamstrung treatment of HIV in Africa. You don't get what is advertised with these people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Understatement of the millenium Posted by: Steven Wanzell
There never was a true America
Posted by: willymack on Apr 20, 2006 8:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our greatest gift to the world was, and is an IDEA. The fact that most of humanity is too dim-witted and self-absorbed to put the idea to good use is a continuing tragedy, and could well lead to humanity's demise.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: There never was a true America Posted by: Lincoln fan
Frank Espada
Posted by: fespada on Apr 20, 2006 9:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The hijacking of the term "America" is but one of many historical myths. Yes, there is an America, and it is composed of an entire continent, with a multitude of cultures, languages, customs, and histories.
It is the height of hubris to claim naming rights which exclude 80% of the population of this geographic entity. But it is a good clue to the horrors that the ruling elite has brought on the world in the name of "democracy". For it is a great cover for the "Have Mores" who have engineered "regime change" whenever the target regime threatens to go its own way, and, in particular, when it makes any attempts to do what is best for its people. Read William Blum's Rouge Nation for an expert analysis of this history of lies and death.

So that nothing should surprise us, for they have been with us from the start.

The real question is: When are we going to say: "I'm not going to take it any more?" I propose the following: on a set day, preferably on a week-end, when most of us are home, that we all stick our heads out our windows and let loose with a roar which will be heard all the way to Washington. It may not bring down this bunch but it will certainly make us feel a bit better, in order to be able to deal with the next outrage.

Frank Espada

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Frank Espada Posted by: Lincoln fan
Bush...The Abominable President...
Posted by: aussidawg on Apr 20, 2006 3:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Come on now, E-NUFF of this beating around the bush (sorry, no pun intended...really) but we all know that Bush lied about the circumstances to get us into Iraq. There have been so many investigations into this, it's simply become maybe a drop of new news into the ocean of lies previously uncovered. Of course now, we are being introduced to a brand spanking new set of bullshit lies to prepare for Iran. Face it, this pathetic excuse for a dictator lies about anything and everything. Now, the thing to do is began the tedious process of getting our government back. It is time to start twisting the thumbscrews on our Senators and Representitives and let them know that in NO WAY will we accept anything less than aggressive legal action to rid our government and country of this parasite and all of his brood. They must understand that, kinda like Bush's War on Terror, they are with us or against us with the latter being at their own peril. IF, and only if enough of us write or call and demand, in no uncertain terms, that these whimps that wanted to represent us do so, or face charges themselves, will we even began to make progress. I know right now that someone will repond that this action will be futile and there is nothing we can do. Well, if we do nothing, one thing is certain, and that is that nothing will happen. There are different levels of action that we as citizens of this country can initiate, and the first of those levels is peaceful, legal recourse. We all know what the options after this are.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Both Bush, Kerry lie
Posted by: nbrown on Apr 20, 2006 4:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good job showing Bush lied.

But before we rush to the Democrats, let's consider how they vote for the war as well.

And more specifically, that John Kerry lies about his Iraq withdrawal position.

We're getting screwed by both parties. I don't think either one of them, then, is the answer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Both Bush, Kerry lie Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: Both Bush, Kerry lie Posted by: nbrown
» RE: Both Bush, Kerry lie Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: Both Bush, Kerry lie Posted by: kryptx
Where is the Shock, Awe, and Outrage...?
Posted by: tanstaafl28 on Apr 20, 2006 9:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What exactly is the difference between a President who gets caught with his pants down, and one who is caught in a lie that has led to the wounding, maiming, and deaths, of tens-of-thousands of people?

Only the shameful silence...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

16...thousands...millions
Posted by: rsaxto on Apr 21, 2006 2:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Bushie lie machine is setting new records for presidency lies. While many presidencies have told many lies the Bushies have pushed the numbers from 16 to thousands to millions of lying words. It's not govenment of the people, by the people and for the people it is millions of lies for the richest of the rich and millions of deaths if we don't end this presidency soon.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Interesting...
Posted by: clntbrtn on Apr 21, 2006 2:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wow! Jason Leopold has written some great fiction here. Too bad he continues to try to pass it off as journalism. :(

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Undermining of Morality & The Squandering of It's Wealth
Posted by: foodnotoil on Apr 23, 2006 12:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
ok, first of all, everyone keeps saying this is the first hard evidence, multiple times, for multiple cases... The reason that the last set of evidence fell on deaf ears, was not because it wasn't hard evidence, ...it's because no one gives a damn in the first place... So each time you come out and say this is the first hard evidence, ...you are validating in other people's minds that the last set of evidence that you claimed was hard evidence, was in fact bogus, and therefore is skewed/lying information attempting to misdirect away from source issues... So go ahead, ...say it's the first hard evidence; ...but don't be a dip$hit by ignoring previous evidence... What part of provocateuring by painting US planes in UN colors to get them shot down don't you get...? You have to include MULTIPLE existing sets of evidence, and that's how you build a case...

...further, might I add, that's also how you build a case for impeachment...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who Cares Anymore?
Posted by: dlf on Apr 24, 2006 6:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why does it matter if he lied? People lie all the time to promote their agenda. Lies abound all over this magazine. Depending on your point of view the lie becomes the truth. When not lying it's okay to infer. When not inferring it's okay to deflect. When not deflecting it's okay to ignore. It's the new intercourse of discourse. So since both sides are doing it, why does it matter anymore?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

16 words? The man's entire PRESIDENCY is a lie
Posted by: xbj on Apr 29, 2006 5:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not only his Presidency... his entire LIFE.

Must feel really good to be the most hated man in the world when all you've been was a mentally deficient puppet and frontman for absolute evil. Truly takes a sociopath.

My empathy makes me try and try again, but I can only imagine. It's been a long time since I was a 13 year old liar and loser. I never stuck a lit firecracker up a frogs' ass though or sliced open a living cat, that's for sure.

But then it wasn't my Dad who engineered AIDS and the tainting of WHO smallpox vaccine that is causing the holocaust of 100 million people worldwide from AIDS, either.

Absolute evil runs deep, and "the American way of life is not negotiable."

To Christ, everything was negotiable except the truth. Therein lies the difference.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bil
Posted by: Bil on Dec 31, 2006 9:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
new1
new2
new3
new4

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]