Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

War on Iraq

Did Bush Really Want to Bomb Al Jazeera?

By Jeremy Scahill, TheNation.com. Posted November 28, 2005.


Given the very public temper tantrum Bush directed at the Qatar-based television network, it may not be 'outlandish' to believe he intended to bomb Al Jazeera.
Advertisement

On November 22, Britain's Daily Mirror published a startling allegation: In an April 2004 White House meeting with British Prime Minister Tony Blair, President Bush proposed bombing the Arab TV network Al Jazeera's international headquarters in Qatar. The report was based on a memo stamped "Top Secret" that had been leaked by a Cabinet official in Blair's government.

Is the allegation "outlandish," as the White House claims? Or was it a deadly serious option? Until a news organization or British official defies the Official Secrets Act and publishes the five-page memo, we have no way of knowing. But what we do know is that at the time of Bush's White House meeting with Blair, the Bush Administration was in the throes of a very public, high-level temper tantrum directed against Al Jazeera. The Bush-Blair summit took place on April 16, at the peak of the first U.S. siege of Falluja, and Al Jazeera was there to witness the assault and the fierce resistance.

A day before Bush's meeting with Blair, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld slammed Al Jazeera in distinctly undiplomatic terms:

REPORTER: Can you definitively say that hundreds of women and children and innocent civilians have not been killed?
RUMSFELD: I can definitively say that what Al Jazeera is doing is vicious, inaccurate and inexcusable.
REPORTER: Do you have a civilian casualty count?
RUMSFELD: Of course not, we're not in the city. But you know what our forces do; they don't go around killing hundreds of civilians. That's just outrageous nonsense. It's disgraceful what that station is doing.

What Al Jazeera was doing in Falluja is exactly what it was doing when the United States bombed its offices in Afghanistan in 2001 and when U.S. forces killed Al Jazeera's Baghdad correspondent, Tareq Ayoub, during the April 2003 occupation of Baghdad. Al Jazeera was witnessing and reporting on events Washington did not want the world to see.

The Falluja offensive was one of the bloodiest assaults of the U.S. occupation of Iraq. On April 5, 2004, U.S. forces laid siege to the city after the killing of four Blackwater mercenaries days earlier. When the U.S. forces, led by the First Marine Expeditionary Force, attempted to take Falluja on April 7, they faced fierce guerrilla resistance. A U.S. helicopter attacked a mosque, hitting the minaret and killing at least a dozen people. Within a week, some 600 Iraqis were dead, many of them women and children. By April 9, some thirty Marines had been killed and Falluja had become a symbol of resistance against the occupation.

What was more devastating than the direct resistance U.S. forces encountered in Falluja was the effect the story of the local defense of the city and the U.S. killing of civilians was having on the broader Iraqi population. A handful of unembedded journalists, most prominently from Al Jazeera, were providing the world with independent, eyewitness accounts. Al Jazeera's camera crew was also uploading video of the devastation for all the world, including Iraqis, to see. Inspired by the defense of Falluja and outraged by the U.S. onslaught, smaller uprisings broke out across Iraq, as members of the Iraqi police and army abandoned their posts, some joining the resistance.


Digg!

Jeremy Scahill is a correspondent for the national radio and TV program Democracy Now!. He has spent extensive time reporting from Iraq and the former Yugoslavia, where he covered the 1999 NATO bombing.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from War on Iraq! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Kill The Messenger
Posted by: Tom Degan on Nov 28, 2005 3:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's already been established that a couple of years ago the Amerikan Army assualted a hotel that had been housing journalsists who had been critical of the US occupation killing at least one reporter. The Pentagon claimed that shots were being fired at them from within the hotel but a videotape of the tank that delivered the fatal blow clearly shows that no such attack was in taking place.

This begs the question: When are we going to hand the First Fool over to the Hague for these war crimes?

By the way, did you see him pardening that turkey on Thanksgiving? How cute and Heartwarming! I just couldn't help but think about the parden that he refused Karla Faye Tucker a number of years ago. I've had issues every president of my lifetime. Never, though, has the very sight of the chief executive been physically repulsive. Can you believe we've come to this?

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
tomdegan@frontiernet.net

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» not exactly Posted by: oldsmobile
» RE: Kill The Messenger Posted by: AngryWhiteFemale
» RE: Kill The Messenger Posted by: Doubtom
» RE: Kill The Messenger Posted by: cold2touch
choirboys
Posted by: jambro on Nov 28, 2005 4:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... however much i despise preaching to the choir, a note to alternet readers, who by & large are "dissidents" from Washington's current ruling regime. Don't forget Bill Clinton whose policies and actions would probably not have differed much from Bush, only more sophisticated in both its global & domestic media & PR packaging.

That said, all of us need to go out from the choir room away from the congregation and out beyond, into the bars & gyms, places where people hang out & start conversations.

One good opener might be "ol george sure had it right, we should have bombed al Jazeera to rubble, wipe out those arab journalists & smashed any other uppity press that don't toe the line. Too bad that chicken shi* Brit Blair talked him out of it."

See what response you get ... don't worry about your image, if all else fails & you are in a place where everybody is nice & politically correct, then you are in the wrong place anyway, so then say "just joking!" I go look for some rednecks!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: choirboys Posted by: bluegull
» RE: choirboys Posted by: bluegull
choirboys
Posted by: jambro on Nov 28, 2005 4:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... however much i despise preaching to the choir, a note to alternet readers, who by & large are "dissidents" from Washington's current ruling regime. Don't forget Bill Clinton whose policies and actions would probably not have differed much from Bush, only more sophisticated in both its global & domestic media & PR packaging.

That said, all of us need to go out from the choir room away from the congregation and out beyond, into the bars & gyms, places where people hang out & start conversations.

One good opener might be "ol george sure had it right, we should have bombed al Jazeera to rubble, wipe out those arab journalists & smashed any other uppity press that don't toe the line. Too bad that chicken shi* Brit Blair talked him out of it."

See what response you get ... don't worry about your image, if all else fails & you are in a place where everybody is nice & politically correct, then you are in the wrong place anyway, so then say "just joking!" I go look for some rednecks!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: choirboys Posted by: Doubtom
ooops did not finish, keys faster than fingers
Posted by: jambro on Nov 28, 2005 4:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Q. why take a reverse psychological approach? A. you can figure it out if you're smart enough to read alternet.

But letting someone else take the counter argument, allows you to strategically & tacticlly use your knowledge & language to make ambiguous points that allow for human reason to intrude into passion. Play your audience ....

... this not dishonest as this is war, battles for truth & good sense, taking the linguistic, symbolic, & discursive high ground, is important in this struggle where many good people are on the line, and perhaps waiting for an opportunity to be sensible, or be on safe ground to voice their dissent...

... after all, do the media spin doctors & massage artists play fair with our common language, or twist plain words into codes for subtexts that cover their asses but sneakily make their point, pounding in in through mass production, reproduction & repetition until it takes on the life of a "factoid" something heard so often that it seems to most people to be factual ....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» PREACHING TO THE CHOIR Posted by: dmstern
agitator church and state
Posted by: eileenflmng on Nov 28, 2005 5:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's not just Al Jazeera and some muckracking journalists
"that the Bush Administration views...as enemy combatants"

But ANY thinking American who does not fall for their spin and are DOING SOMETHING about it on WAWA:

www.wearewideawake.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Of course he did
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Nov 28, 2005 7:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush says one day," Look if we can bomb this Arab newspaper,we can stop their desenting views,plus we could 'spin' it so it seems like Al Quida did it'.
This President, the National Security Counsil and the Pentagon are responsible for the outright lies used to perpetrate this crime of serving a Vendetta.
For the last 100 years we've elected nothing but cold blooded killers. As long as we allow this farce to stand as leadership
we are all guilty of crimes against humanity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» It's a TV station Posted by: Lone Pawn
» RE: It's a TV station Posted by: chromosome.crawl
» RE: It's a TV station Posted by: blueneck
» RE: It's a TV station Posted by: Falang
» RE: It's a TV station Posted by: polyquats
» RE: It's a TV station Posted by: jeffrey7
We'll be lucky...
Posted by: NamVeT on Nov 28, 2005 7:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
to have the next presidential election. I think that ole' georgie halibush is going to fucking declare martial law for some concocted "terrorist" incident or another. Better to get them out now (IMPEACH) before the frat "C" boy bombs something that really pisses off the world! Such a sad state of affairs we are in. How did this happen? How could we have let this happen?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: We'll be lucky... Posted by: jeffrey7
Duuuh....
Posted by: Asses of Evil on Nov 28, 2005 9:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As the article, and Juan Cole have written, he has already bombed Al Jazeera. The very fact that newspapers have been discouraged from printing pictures of US and Iraqi deaths, that Monkey Prez still hasn't been to a US soldier's funeral, the fact that reporters were embedded with the military; the fact that we don't hear about heroics of soldiers-or the killing of Iraqis (or US soldiers)-indicates an administration putting a premium on privacy. People need to WAKE THE FUCK up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Well, since it hasn't actually *happened* yet
Posted by: Lone Pawn on Nov 28, 2005 11:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And since it was predicted it would happen last election as well, I'd say cries of "How could the world be so bad as I imagine it might become in the next three years" would best be answered with "It isn't." We will of course have the '08 election, and the '06 as well, and Democrats will win both.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Well, I'm a dumbass. Posted by: Lone Pawn
US Wouldn't Think Twice
Posted by: decembrist on Nov 28, 2005 1:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.... about killing and bombing civilian targets "that are making them look bad," such as journalists and news broadcasters.

The US bombed Serbian Television in 1999, killing 10 workers at that station. I guess it's where the phrase "the war of ideas" has taken us. If an idea, or a t.v. image can be considered a weapon, I guess we can respond with a cruise missile. This despicable slide is hand in hand with our torture policy and CIA prisons.

If you haven't seen the documentary "Control Room" I suggest you that you do. Excellent film about al-jazeera and the opening days of the invasion, with great interviews of US PR soldiers and aljazeera newsmen and women. The film is capped by the US attack on the station's office in Baghdad, which killed Tareq Ayoub.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Freedom of information! Bush Style!!
Posted by: stoney13 on Nov 28, 2005 5:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here's how Bush is protecting freedom of information!!! As soon as something gets a little too close to the truth!! SILENCE IT!!!

After all my posts disapeared I wasn't going to come back here, but fuck it!! As long as I got something to say, I'll say it!! If it disapears, well I'll know that the neocons aren't the only ones with a cencorship agenda!

Kinda makes me feel betrayed though!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I find a lot of people here who are angry and speak their minds
Posted by: ShaSpirit on Nov 28, 2005 10:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I certainly say what I think and will use an occasional swear word, since it really fits in that moment and no other word will say what if feel so well. Our so called curse words have a function too express the emotion we feel when speaking of things we feel passionally about. I have not experienced my comment going away though. Mostly people are letting off steam, because we feel so helpless to stop these mad men.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

agitator church and state
Posted by: eileenflmng on Dec 1, 2005 5:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
correct me if I err, but so far AL JAZEERA IS THE ONLY MEDIA OUTLET TO REPORT THAT THE FOUR CPT HOSTAGES IN IRAQ WERE TAKEN:

"As the result of the actions of the U.S. and U.K. government due to the illegal attack on Iraq and the continuing occupation and oppression of its people. Christian Peacemaker Teams (CPT) has worked for the rights of Iraqi prisoners who have been illegally detained and abused by the U.S. government. We were the first people to publicly denounce the torture of Iraqi people at the hands of U.S. forces, long before the western media admitted what was happening at Abu Ghraib. We are some of the few internationals left in Iraq who are telling the truth about what is happening to the Iraqi people We hope that we can continue to do this work and we pray for the speedy release of our beloved teammates."

so does WAWA, read more on the 11/30/05 blog:
http://www.wearewideawake.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]