Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

War on Iraq

Terrorism's Training Grounds

By Zelie Pollon, AlterNet. Posted October 28, 2005.


Are U.S. tactics destroying terrorists -- or merely creating more? One intelligence officer gives us a look inside the new petri dish of terrorism that is Iraq.
Advertisement

BAGHDAD, Iraq -- Yousif Hassen has bloodshot eyes and a too-tight orange jumpsuit. He is sitting in a sterile interrogation room, chain-smoking cigarettes otherwise prohibited, and describing the day when he was arrested by Iraqi officials, then brought to an American detention facility.

"I had just returned from a business trip in Amman and was I driving home from dinner when I was stopped on the street by Iraqi police," said the Jordanian Iraqi and importer of household electronics.

"They told me they were looking for a grey Mercedes. 'But my Mercedes is not grey,' I told them." Then they saw that the lifelong resident of Iraq had a Jordanian passport. Only when he arrived at the Brigade Internment Facility (BIF) run by the Second Brigade 10th Mountain Division did Hassen learn he was suspected of meeting with terrorists and having direct connections to Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the Jordanian terrorist mastermind.

"I was so surprised," he said of the accusations. "I have been threatened by many people because I'm a successful businessman. But Americans are a source of my business; why would I do anything to them?"

"We used to call it DWI: Driving While Iraqi," said Staff Sgt. Michael Nowacki, a military intelligence officer who strongly recommended the prisoner's release after his initial interrogation. Yet Hassen was not released.

Military officials call it a matter of security. Nowacki says it's an example of the arbitrary and dragnet-style arrests by the U.S. military in Iraq -- a style that is more likely to create more terrorists than destroy them.

"I've actually had a commander tell me 'If I arrest 10 people and one of them is bad, then I'm doing my job.' But what about the other nine?" Nowacki said.

"These people are living day to day, and when the men are in prison their family doesn't have any income. ... If there were legal recourse in this country, these kinds of things would never happen."

The 32-year-old, blue-eyed patriot -- a U.S. policeman from the Illinois National Guard -- has become an unlikely advocate for Iraqi victims' rights. He came to Iraq with a fervent desire to protect the flag and a belief that Iraqis were intrinsically bad. "I hated them," he said flatly. "I also had never met one, or ever sat down and talked to one." By the end of his tour Nowacki couldn't stand what he saw. The practices are not only wrong on principal, he said, but also counterproductive to the U.S. mission.

"Arbitrary detentions make the people hate us and want to fight us. If they respect us, they'll be less likely to want to kill us," he said. "I want our mission in Iraq to be successful."

Nowacki, more than most, sees the long and arduous road ahead.

The Brigade Internment Facility (BIF) sits at the outer edge of Camp Victory by the Baghdad Airport, surrounded by barbed wire and dust covered trees. The temporary detention facility held up to 160 detainees around last year's election, but normally has a population between 40-60. They are held in 8-man cells and given a mattress, blanket, slippers, prayer rug and a copy of the Koran. The hallways reek of stale sweat. Nowacki and his team interrogated well over 700 detainees during his tour, averaging about 200 a month.

In the beginning there were big success stories: criminals caught red-handed and caches of weapons exposed. Then began a flood of seemingly innocent civilians who were not released despite his recommendations detailed in intelligence reports. Nowacki began to feel uneasy.

There was the retarded man accused of high-level surveillance activities (Division said retarded people can be used as tools by sophisticated terrorists); the Jordanian businessman accused of being a Zarqawi accomplice (Nowacki said 90% of people with foreign passports are sent to Abu Ghraib despite a lack of corroborating evidence); or the Baghdad University professor who spoke against the U.S. occupation (despite a plea by the University president to the U.S. Embassy, the U.S. had not released the professor, arguing he is anti-coalition).

In all these cases, Nowacki recommended release.

"Let's just say we've busted enough bad guys to be able to tell who's telling the truth, but often they'll [higher officers] go for the informant over military intelligence."

U.S. officials call it a matter of national security.

"It's a tough call and commanders want to err on the side of caution," said Lt. Kristen Boyden, who works with human intelligence sources for the 10th Mountain Division. "We'd rather detain them and possibly step on their supposed civil rights than let them go, and then have them kill a soldier. The worst case [if they're innocent] is they'll spend a couple months in Abu Ghraib."


Digg!

Zélie Pollon is a US-based freelance journalist and founding member of the Independent Press Association. This was her second trip to Iraq. Visit www.baghdadproject.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from War on Iraq! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
For What its Worth
Posted by: tuff_bird on Oct 28, 2005 2:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"There's something happening here
What it is ain't exactly clear
There's a man with a gun over there
Telling me I got to beware


I think it's time we stop, children, what's that sound
Everybody look what's going down.."

--Stephen Stills/Buffalo Springfield

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: For What its Worth Posted by: HuckFinn
» RE: For What its Worth Posted by: cstriker
» RE: For What its Worth Posted by: esactun
» RE: For What its Worth Posted by: jwg
» What a load of CRAP! Hucky Posted by: Michiganman
» RE: For What its Worth -- I believe Posted by: AdamSelene11726
» RE: damn Posted by: montana freeman
The theory of guilt and innocence
Posted by: Samantha Vimes on Oct 28, 2005 5:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When I was a young girl, I read that the standard set by our Founding Fathers was "I would rather let nine guilty men go free than send an inncoent one to jail." Now the ratio is reversed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The theory of guilt and innocence
Posted by: Samantha Vimes on Oct 28, 2005 5:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When I was a young girl, I read that the standard set by our Founding Fathers was "I would rather let nine guilty men go free than send an inncoent one to jail." Now the ratio is reversed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Civil Rights are non-existent outside our borders
Posted by: cstriker on Oct 28, 2005 6:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For a country that was founded on "...all men are created equal", we really don't seem to believe it. Many of us think of civil rights as something that was earned through fighting and death. For the most part that is true, but now that we have those rights shouldn't we be extending them to all that we meet? As I see it, if we are there to "spread democracy" then the civil rights go with it.

But noooooooo. If you aren't American, or a co-conspiritor of ours, you have no rights. We are basically sending the message to many of these people that they are less than human. We talk about how arrogant the Germans or French are, when in truth we are the arrogant ones. Arrogant enough to think that the same rules that apply to us here don't apply to everyone world wide when we occupy their country.

As for who is a criminal, I wonder how many terrorists have joined the Iraqi police forces and military groups that we are training. It would be a very easy way to gain access to weapons and victims. And I would be inclined to do it if my father had been held in a prison, innocent, for 3 or four months while my baby brother died of starvation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Same thought here too... Posted by: Michiganman
gathaiga
Posted by: gathaiga on Oct 28, 2005 7:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The answer to the first question in your piece is: "Does a bear shit in the woods?"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: gathaiga Posted by: polyquats
» RE: gathaiga Posted by: crusty
I beleive
Posted by: esactun on Oct 28, 2005 8:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That you're rather wrong. There's no clash of cultures; the clash is between reason/enlightenment and religion/dark ages. Our own government is going to the wrong side.

The enemy within is far more dangerous than the one without.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How about making sense
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Oct 28, 2005 9:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anytime force is used there will always be a backlash. The
laws of inertia applies to people as well as objects. When I come to town and stomp your butt two things happen. First,
a beatdown of major proportions,then, a hate-down of even bigger makings. Your friends and family will want to come to my town and hunt me down. If they can't find me they'll settle for anyone from my town that crosses their path. That means folks from my town will go back and start more trouble. Round and round it goes until everyone's dead,maimed,to weak to fight. This is our world policy. All the enemies we are facing today.We took on as helpers 25 years ago. Everything installed by force get removed by force. That's why we need to get off the killing train. Until we do,you can plan on not having grandchildren. Plan on always choosing
between failed systems that will bring quick death or just one that's just slower.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: How about making sense Posted by: cstriker
Dear deaf ears...
Posted by: Habaro on Oct 28, 2005 2:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...or is that DUMB ears? Regardless, may this fall on either you, as so many of my posts often do:

Here is an insurgent tactic that the deviant in me thought up--as I'm sure did many would-be insurgents--on the eve of the Iraq war. Its f-ing brilliant in its simplicity and I'll bet its happening right now on a fairly widespread basis, over there. Let's call it the Kill Two Kurds With One Phone technique (sorry, that's the best pun I could come up with--I realize it doesn't much involve actual Kurds, but work with me, people...). Anyways, it goes like this:

Step 1 (the only step): Anonymously frame your pro-American neighbor, by making a call to the Iraqi police and [convincingly] claim that he's helping the insurgency (it would help to have several other co-conspirators make this same claim via phone or note in a drop box, etc.---but remember, you gotta make it seem plausible, so you may have to do a little homework). Now, given the mental state of paranoid-laden Coalition, its all down hill from here...Once he gets scooped up by the occupational forces, he'll go through the wringer and very likely rethink his pro U.S. posttion. If in the unlikely event, he is released, he'll be much more apt to switching over to the insurgency side--and at the very least, he will quit helping the Americans altogether.
In the more likely scenerio, however, he simply does NOT get released (as shown in the above article). THIS is the ultimate win-win situation for the insurgents, because now the pro-American guy is in jail AND his friends and family understandably become outraged--instantly increasing the insurgents' recruitment base a good...tenfold? This is how the terrorists can regulate a state of utter confusion and paranoia while maintaining a relatively squeaky-clean image amongst the Iraqi staus quo: By setting up the Americans to unwittingly do all of their dirty work for them.

This is of course, a very brief synopsis. I could go on forever with the details.

Someone please tell me why this would not work or why it is not the case. I'd really like to know. Mind you, I don't expect a reply...sorry I couldn't quote more pre-packaged literature or data on this matter, as I've come to realize that most of you have trouble starting from scratch.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Dear deaf ears...I'm a genius Posted by: Michiganman