Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.
Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.
The Other Shoe Drops: bin Laden Weighs in
Also in War on Iraq
Would You "Shoot an Iraqi" in Cyberspace?
Gabriel Thompson
Why Robert Gates is a Terrible Pick
Katrina vanden Heuvel
Does the Status of Forces Agreement Spell Doom for Kurds?
Mohammed A. Salih
Iraqi Parliament Approves Status of Forces Agreement
Rumsfeld's Attempts to Rewrite Himself on the Right Side of History Are Laughable
Gary Brecher
For Baghdad's Factories, the Occupation is a Major Drag on Business
It is interesting that Osama bin Laden explicitly said that it doesn't matter to al Qaeda whether Bush or Kerry is president. Only the degree to which the U.S. gives "liberty" to the Muslim world matters to al Qaeda, he says. (I'll have things to say about this diction below, but it is bizarre that a mass murderer who helped run the Taliban state is talking about "liberty.)
Does the appearance of the video help or hurt Bush? It is a double-edged sword. On the one hand, it is a painful reminder that Bush dropped the ball, left the fight against al Qaeda half-finished, and ran off to the Iraq quagmire, so that bin Laden is still at large three years after he killed 3,000 Americans and hit the Pentagon itself. That can't be good for Bush. On the other hand, because so many Americans confuse Bush's swagger and aggressive instincts with being "strong on terrorism," any big reminder that al Qaeda is out there could actually help W. It shouldn't, but it may well.
He begins by addressing the U.S. public directly (this passage is translated by J. Cole):
On the reason for the war, addressing the U.S. public, bin Laden says, "I say to you that security is an important pillar of human life, and that free persons do not neglect their own security, contrary to the allegations of Bush that we despise liberty. He should let us know why we did not strike at Sweden, for instance (if that were true). It is well know that those who despise liberty do not possess lofty-minded souls like the 19, God bless them. We only waged battle with you because we are free persons, and we cannot sleep knowing that injustice is being done. We want to regain freedom for our nation. As you damage our security, we will damage yours."
Some of the rest of the statement is given by The Associated Press:
He said he was first inspired to attack the United States by the 1982 Israeli invasion of Lebanon in which towers and buildings in Beirut were destroyed in the siege of the capital.
"While I was looking at these destroyed towers in Lebanon, it sparked in my mind that the tyrant should be punished with the same and that we should destroy towers in America, so that it tastes what we taste and would be deterred from killing our children and women,'' he said.
"God knows that it had not occurred to our mind to attack the towers, but after our patience ran out and we saw the injustice and inflexibility of the American-Israeli alliance toward our people in Palestine and Lebanon, this came to my mind,'' he said.
bin Laden suggested Bush was slow to react to the Sept. 11 attacks, giving the hijackers more time than they expected. At the time of the attacks, the president was listening to schoolchildren in Florida reading a book.
"It never occurred to us that the commander in chief of the American armed forces would leave 50,000 of his citizens in the two towers to face these horrors alone,'' he said, referring to the number of people who worked at the World Trade Center.
Juan Cole is Professor of History at the University of Michigan.
Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from War on Iraq! Sign up now »
| More Opinion: | ||
|
How to Reframe the Poverty Debate Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace: The policy discussions we're currently having about poverty will not lead to much progress. By Margy Waller, The Mobility Agenda. December 2, 2008. |
What Does Barack Know About Peak Oil? Environment: The economy may go back up, but the decline in oil production can't be stopped. Does the president-elect know this? By James Howard Kunstler, Kunstler.com. December 2, 2008. |
Obama: Close, Don't Repackage, Guantanamo Rights and Liberties: If Congress chooses to rebrand Guantanamo with a legal gloss, it will legitimize the indefinite imprisonment of people without charge. By Michael Ratner, Jules Lobel, The Nation. December 1, 2008. |