Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.
Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.
A 'Transition' to Failure
Also in War on Iraq
Would You "Shoot an Iraqi" in Cyberspace?
Gabriel Thompson
Why Robert Gates is a Terrible Pick
Katrina vanden Heuvel
Does the Status of Forces Agreement Spell Doom for Kurds?
Mohammed A. Salih
Iraqi Parliament Approves Status of Forces Agreement
Rumsfeld's Attempts to Rewrite Himself on the Right Side of History Are Laughable
Gary Brecher
For Baghdad's Factories, the Occupation is a Major Drag on Business
In the first presidential debate, President Bush insisted over and again that the way to win the war in Iraq is to be "steadfast and resolved."
"We've got a plan in place," he said. "The plan says there will be elections in January, and there will be. The plan says we'll train Iraqi soldiers so they can do the hard work, and we are." What Bush failed to mention was that his plan – which is, in effect, staying the course – will only increase the Iraq Wars already horrific human and economic costs borne by both Americans and Iraqis.
There is no better proof of the consequences of the Bush "plan" than the grim reality on the ground three months after the so-called "transition" of power. Since June 30, U.S. military casualties have risen dramatically. The death rate for non-Iraqi contractors has doubled. The Iraqi resistance has quadrupled its forces.
The centerpiece of the administrations plan is to improve the Iraqis fighting ability, allowing American troops to take a back seat in combat operations and eventually pull out of Iraq. But the Iraqi police and National Guard have largely failed to provide security for the Iraqi people and the situation appears to be only worsening.
The death of 34 Iraqi children in a car bombing on the same day as the debate underscored the grim fact that it is the Iraqis who are paying the highest price for this war. These children, seeking candy from U.S. soldiers, were casualties of a war that puts anyone who is physically near or associated with a U.S. soldier at risk. At least 13,000 Iraqi civilians have died so far. (If the data for the Iraqi dead is incomplete, it is because the U.S. government has consistently refused to tally the civilian death toll.) Members of Iraqs security forces are being killed at a higher rate than before the transition." At least 127 were killed in June and July 2004, raising the total body count since January 2004 to more than 700.
While the toll of the war on Iraqis has not been well documented, the cost of the occupation-by-another-name in U.S. lives painfully clear. Over 1,000 U.S. soldiers and their families have paid the ultimate price for the Iraq War. And just as the number of deaths has risen for Iraqis since the transition, so has it for the U.S. The total number of U.S. soldiers killed and wounded during these three months stands at 747 per month, exceeding the pre-transition rate of 449 casualties per month prior to June 30.
The high casualty rate reveals the insurgency as stronger than ever. The monthly average of insurgent attacks on U.S. and Iraqi forces. more than doubled from 1,005 in the eight months prior to the transition, to 2,150 in the months since the "handover." And many, including U.S. Army Lt. Gen. David H. Petraeus, believe that it is likely that insurgent attacks will escalate as Iraqs elections approach.
The Pentagon has acknowledged that the number of insurgents is on the rise. In November of 2003, the Pentagon estimated that there were 5,000 Iraqi resistance fighters. In September 2004, the number had risen to 20,000. The British Deputy Commander of the forces in Iraq estimates the resistance may be double that number. The rise is even starker when we factor in the additional 24,000 Iraqi resistance fighters who have been detained or killed.
With the insurgency showing no signs of abating, soldiers are forced to endure lengthy deployments that now average over 320 days. At least 45,000 troops have been given stop loss orders which, like a form of the draft, keep soldiers in service beyond the agreed-upon term of enlistment. Reservists and National Guardsmen are also feeling the effects of the war in their pockets as 30 to 40 percent of them are now earning a lower salary when they leave to seek civilian employment. Just in Washington states Thurston County alone, where Fort Lewis military base is located, more than 250 military families rely upon food stamps.
Erik Leaver is the policy director for the Foreign Policy In Focus project at the Institute for Policy Studies("http://www.ips-dc.org"). Hes one of the authors of a recently released IPS and FPIF report titled "A Failed 'Transition': The Mounting Costs of the Iraq War."
Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from War on Iraq! Sign up now »
| More Opinion: | ||
|
How to Reframe the Poverty Debate Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace: The policy discussions we're currently having about poverty will not lead to much progress. By Margy Waller, The Mobility Agenda. December 2, 2008. |
What Does Barack Know About Peak Oil? Environment: The economy may go back up, but the decline in oil production can't be stopped. Does the president-elect know this? By James Howard Kunstler, Kunstler.com. December 2, 2008. |
Obama: Close, Don't Repackage, Guantanamo Rights and Liberties: If Congress chooses to rebrand Guantanamo with a legal gloss, it will legitimize the indefinite imprisonment of people without charge. By Michael Ratner, Jules Lobel, The Nation. December 1, 2008. |