Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

War on Iraq

In Biggest Oil Sale Ever, Iraqi Government to Put 40 Billion Barrels of Reserves Up For Grabs

By Terry Macalister and Nicholas Watt, The Guardian. Posted October 13, 2008.


BP, Shell and ExxonMobil are being given access to eight oil fields, which represent some 40 percent of Iraq's oil reserves.
Advertisement

The biggest ever sale of oil assets will take place today, when the Iraqi government puts 40 billion barrels of recoverable reserves up for offer in London.

BP, Shell and ExxonMobil are all expected to attend a meeting at the Park Lane Hotel in Mayfair with the Iraqi oil minister, Hussein al-Shahristani.

Access is being given to eight fields, representing about 40 percent of the Middle Eastern nation's reserves, at a time when the country remains under occupation by U.S. and British forces.

Two smaller agreements have already been signed with Shell and the China National Petroleum Corporation, but today's sale will ignite arguments over whether the overthrow of Saddam Hussein was a "war for oil" that is now to be consummated by western multinationals seizing control of strategic Iraqi reserves.

Al-Shahristani is expected to reveal some kind of "risk service agreements" that could run for up to 20 years, with formal offers to be submitted by next spring and agreements signed in the summer.

Gregg Muttitt, from the UK-based social and ecological justice group Platform, says he is alarmed that the government is pushing ahead with its plans without the support of many in Iraq.

"Most of the terms of what is being offered have not been disclosed. There are security, political and reputational risks here for oil companies but none of them will want to see one of their competitors gain an advantage," he said.

Heinrich Matthee, a senior Middle East analyst at the specialist risk consultant Control Risks Group, also believes there are many pitfalls for those considering whether to make an offer.

"Currently it is unclear which party in Iraq is authorized to award a contract and at the same time to deliver its side of the bargain," he said. "Any contract with an independent oil company will be subjected to opposition and possible revision after pressure by resource nationalists."

Oil companies will find their reputations at risk from the actions of their Iraqi counterparties, such as joint venture partners, suppliers and agents. They will also have to contend with oil smuggling and the possibility that the ruling alliance could collapse, Matthee said.

He said that if the conspiracy theory that western oil companies egged on U.S. and British governments to invade Iraq were true, the plan could backfire on them and benefit rivals in Asia instead. "It is possible the American army has provided the economic stability that will encourage Malaysian, Chinese and other Asian companies to become involved," he said.

There is no precedent for proven oil reserves of this magnitude being offered up for sale, said Muttitt. "The nearest thing would be the post-Soviet sale of the Kashagan field [in the Caspian Sea], which had 7 billion or 8 billion barrels."

China's state-owned oil group, CNPC, has already agreed a $3 billion (£1.78bn) oil services contract with the government of Iraq to pump oil from the Ahdab oil field.

The deal is the first major oil contract with a foreign firm since the U.S.-led war and was followed up by an agreement with Shell, potentially worth $4 billion, to develop a joint venture with the South Gas Company in Basra.

This deal has also triggered controversy. Issam al-Chalabi, Iraq's oil minister between 1987 and 1990, questioned why there had been no competitive tendering for the gas-gathering contract and claimed it had gone to Shell as the spoils of war.

"Why choose Shell when you could have chosen ExxonMobil, Chevron, BG or Gazprom?" he asked. "Shell appears to be paying $4 billion to get hold of assets that in 20 years could be worth $40 billion. Iraq is giving away half its gas wealth and yet this work could have been done by Iraq itself."

The Baghdad government says it aims to increase crude oil production from 2.5 million barrels a day to 4.5 million by 2013, but faces internal opposition from regional governors and political opponents.

The sale today comes as oil prices have plummeted after stockmarket turmoil on Friday. The price of crude fell by more than $4 at one point to $75 a barrel -- the lowest point since September last year and a sharp drop from its peak of $147 in July. Opec, the oil producers' cartel, has called an emergency meeting to agree a cut in output to bolster prices in spite of protestations from politicians including Gordon Brown. Brown said on Friday: "We've had some success in getting the price of oil down: the price this morning is roughly $80, about half what it was a few months ago. I want these price cuts passed on to the consumer as quickly as possible.

"I'm concerned when I hear that the Opec countries are meeting, or are about to meet, to discuss cutting production -- in other words, making the price potentially higher than it should be.

"I'm making it clear to Opec it would be wrong for the world economy and wrong for British people who are paying high petrol prices and high fuel prices to cut production and therefore keep prices high."

A government source said: "The one chink of light has been the fall in the price of oil. The last thing we want is to head into a difficult period with a return to high oil prices. People need to act responsibly."

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: iraq, iraq occupation, exxonmobil, bp, iraqi oil, shell

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from War on Iraq! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Nope, not about oil.
Posted by: EinMD on Oct 13, 2008 7:27 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Absolutely, positively, not about oil.

At all.

Pinky swear.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The progeny of Columbus continues with genocide, pillage, and destruction
Posted by: PakiBoy on Oct 13, 2008 7:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The insatiable greed of Europeans and thier descendents won't be satisfied until the earth is completely destroyed.

I'm sure Americans find 1.2 million dead Iraqis as worth the price for securing Iraqi oil reserves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

helmburger
Posted by: Helmburger on Oct 13, 2008 8:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We do not need Opec to hike up the price of oil.

Oil has gone to $140 because there were potential 5 million barrels
of exports missing from world markets since 2003: 2,5 from Iraq and
and 2,5 from the North Sea.

Mr. Brown was in on both: Invading Iraq and overtaxing North Sea
oil which resulted in lower production.

Remember October 2004 and 2006: the price was brought down for the elections. Once over Norway has swiftly cut down production by nearly 0.5 mbd: the liferafts on the oilrigs were
claimed to be faulty. Same thing will happen again in Nov 2008.

And President Obama will assure you that we save the planet
by cutting down on hydrocarbons.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I can't wait.....
Posted by: Captainmagic on Oct 14, 2008 2:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
to be a western oil worker in that big friendly place they call eracke.....Mmmmmm..yep i will just mosse on up to them thar friendly folks and show em how it's gonna be around here. Why i betcha they will welcome me with open arms (sound of cocked rifle). My colleagues must really be happy for me because they recon I should grow an extra pair of eyes for the back of my head so ifin i miss sompthin from up front i will see it comin from the rear...very thoughtfull my friends. And as a bonus they recon not only will i be able to feel my hair standing on end , I will be able to see it too...how cool is that, and I should also be able to see that thar fenomenon...phenomenam...shit..i can watch my skin crawl as well....

Yup. Erak is a mighty fine big country..I can see me as a western oil worker spreading myself around in this place.


Can't YOU!!!!!!

Captain OUT

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Reasons to Doubt the Official Story about the 9/11 Attacks
Posted by: 911FalseFlag on Oct 14, 2008 5:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Reasons to Doubt the Official Story about the 9/11 Attacks
The more you study the facts and the circumstantial evidence surrounding the 9/11 attacks, the more you doubt the official explanation of the attacks given in the 9/11 Commission Report. Most all the necessary information is, or has been, available through the major media.
Go to www.911insidejob.net

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No lines!
Posted by: Karl.Ben on Oct 14, 2008 6:55 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'd rather us have access to those reserves than China - and so does everyone else especially when they'd be waitng on gas lines.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: No lines!...and Posted by: Captainmagic
Mission Accomplished
Posted by: hadashito on Oct 17, 2008 2:21 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's about all the Cheney's buddies are going to get. The big prize is out of thier reach. In the meantine, the greedy Cheney bastards are on the verge of losing Afghanistan. Heckofajob, boys. Choke on it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bush bandits
Posted by: sicntired on Oct 17, 2008 7:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush has been responsible for one uncalled for and illegal war,failure to prosecute the one war the world agreed on(Afghanistan),trashed the economy and made billionaires out of his friends in Iraq at the same time.It's no coincidence that the family business is in oil.The revenue from the first four years(in Iraq) is lost and unaccounted for and now he's pillaging Iraq before he leaves with his tail between his legs.A pretty stellar record for one less than intelligent puppet president.You have to know he didn't come up with any of this high end thievery.He has also degraded the American Image world wide and left the country open to all kinds of abuses of power and process.Add torture and extraordinary rendition to the package and it almost defies belief.Don't forget Guantanamo.As a Canadian I am the citisen of the only democracy that has refused to pull it's citisens out of that hell hole.! prime minister living up 1 presidents ass.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]