Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

War on Iraq

The Stunning Costs of Keeping a Soldier's "Boots on the Ground" in Iraq

By Jon Basil Utley, Foreign Policy in Focus. Posted October 9, 2008.


It takes half a million dollars per year to maintain each sergeant in combat in Iraq.
Advertisement

It takes half a million dollars per year to maintain each sergeant in combat in Iraq. Thanks to a Senate committee inquiry, an authoritative government study finally details the costs of keeping boots on the ground. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO), in its report Contractors' Support of U.S. Operations in Iraq, compared the costs of maintaining a Blackwater professional armed guard versus the U.S. military providing such services itself. Both came in at about $500,000 per person per year.

News reports of the study have largely focused on the total cost of U.S. contractors. The 190,000 contractors in Iraq and neighboring countries, from cooks to truck drivers, have cost U.S. taxpayers $100 billion from the start of the war through the end of 2008. Overlooked in this media coverage has been the sheer cost per soldier of keeping the army in Iraq. This per-soldier cost is more comprehensible and alarming than the rather abstract aggregate figure.

Whether in maintaining U.S. soldiers or private-sector contractors, the costs of occupation are enormous. With no end in sight, unending foreign wars do have one clear consequence: the eventual bankruptcy of the United States.

Breaking Down the Costs

The cost of a sergeant is complicated to calculate. His or her actual cash pay is $51,000-$69,000 per year, which puts sergeant pay in the middle of the pay grade, according to another CBO report, Evaluating Military Compensation. Non-cash benefits — pensions, medical care, child care, housing, commissaries — likely double this amount, even during peacetime. Pensions are the biggest ticket item. The average retirement benefit for a soldier or sailor who stays in for 20 years equals $2.6 million, if he or she lives to the age of 77 (though most soldiers don't stay in the service long enough to get this benefit).

A major portion of the $500,000 figure comes from the "support staff" and rotation system that allows for recuperation, training, and accumulated vacations after each year in combat. It's allocated on the basis of one or two sergeants in the United States backing up each one overseas. The CBO report does not, however, factor in bonuses for re-enlistment, which offers tens of thousands of dollars for soldiers with special skills. Nor does the report calculate operating or equipment costs per soldier. The $500,000 figure applies to personnel costs alone.

"Support staff" refers to headquarters management and specialized skills supervising the enlisted men. To make the comparison the CBO identified a hypothetical Army unit that could deliver roughly the same caliber of men as the Blackwater guards. This "would require about one-third of an Army light infantry battalion — a rifle company plus one-third of the battalion's headquarters company." This support staff would "include not only command elements, but also medics, scouts, snipers, and others who functionally correspond to some of Blackwater's supervisory and specialized personnel."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: iraq, costs of war

Jon Basil Utley is associate publisher of The American Conservative. He is a writer and adviser for Antiwar.com, a chairman of ConservativesForPeace.com, and a contributor to Foreign Policy In Focus.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from War on Iraq! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Every dollar paid out is borrowed.
Posted by: Last Chance on Oct 9, 2008 4:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So, when will the international bankers decide to stop funding Bush's War and demand payment on its multi-trillions in debt?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How much can we afford if we're broke?
Posted by: MTguy on Oct 10, 2008 4:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In my household, when I don't have the money for something substantial, I save for it until I can buy it -or- borrow money to get it and pay as I CAN afford it.

In Iraq, we just keep paying and borrowing but we never pay any of it back.

Anybody else see that as a weakening of National Defense?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Is W going to bust every body in Iraq to E-1
Posted by: 8 nontheist on Oct 10, 2008 7:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is it true that the Chinese have gotten an asurrance from W that the USA will no longer deploy any military person to Iraq if that person has a rank of E-2 or higher?
Un-named sources say, on back ground, that China demanded that the USA stop sending E-2's & above to Iraq before China would buy any more US backed financial instruments. The USA can't remain in Iraq unless the Chinese buy more 20 year bonds which pay 20% interest compounded daily. W eagerly gave the Chinese assurance that no E-2 or above will ever again be deployed to Iraq. All US forces who hold the rank of E-2 or higher will be sent back to the USA starting on 10/25/08. No one save E-1's will be in Iraq after 11/15/08. The savings will in no way diminish the combat readiness of US troops in Iraq.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]