Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

War on Iraq

The American Empire's $650 Billion Bailout Already Passed Congress

By Chalmers Johnson, Tomdispatch.com. Posted September 29, 2008.


If we don't cut back our ever-increasing military spending in a major way, the bankruptcy of the United States is inevitable.
Advertisement

Let's start with the money the Bush administration has already thrown at the war in Iraq. According to the June congressional testimony of William Beach, director of the Center for Data Analysis, the war has cost $646 billion so far. The new defense budget for 2009 tacks on another $68.6 billion for Iraq and Afghanistan in the coming year. However, military expert Bill Hartung of the New America Foundation puts a conservative estimate of the costs of a single week of the Iraq War at approximately $3.5 billion (or about $180 billion a year).

In other words, the war in Iraq will cost far more in the next year than the Iraq portion of that $68.6 billion Congress is about to pony up in the defense budget, and so will be funded, as has long been true, through supplemental war bills submitted by the Bush administration (and then whatever administration follows). In other words, sometime in 2009 the direct costs of the war the Bush administration once predicted would cost perhaps $50-60 billion in total will stand at more than $800 billion, or $100 billion above the cost (if all goes well, which it won't) of the bailout of the financial system now being proposed in Washington.

Estimates of the true long-term costs of the President's war of choice, including payments of health care and veterans benefits into the distant future, soar into the budgetary stratosphere. They range from the Congressional Budget Office's $1-2 trillion to an estimate by economists Joseph Stiglitz and Linda J. Bilmes of up to $4-5 trillion. So we're talking somewhere between one-and-a-half and seven bailouts-worth of taxpayer dollars flowing into the morass of disaster, corruption, and carnage in Iraq.

And here's another curious bit of information: Just the other day, the website ThinkProgress pointed out a strange glitch in Iraq planning. The Bush administration, deep into negotiations with the Iraqi government, evidently managed to wheedle an extra year's time for the prospective withdrawal of American combat troops from Iraq; its negotiators pushed the date from 2010 -- the year suggested by both Barack Obama and Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki -- to 2011. According to Maliki in an interview with an Iraqi TV station, this change came from the administration's concern over the "domestic situation" in the U.S. (that is, the needs of the McCain campaign).

"Actually," said Maliki, "the final date was really the end of 2010 and the period between the end of 2010 and the end of 2011 was for withdrawing the remaining troops from all of Iraq, but they asked for a change [in date] due to political circumstances related to the [U.S] domestic situation so it will not be said to the end of 2010 followed by one year for withdrawal but the end of 2011 as a final date." So we're talking about another perhaps $150-180 billion in 2011 -- or approximately the full suggested initial payout in the Washington bailout plan of at least one key Democrat. This gives the phrase "presidential politics" new meaning. Now, just imagine for a moment the situation we might be in if there had been no Iraq War. We could have bailed ourselves out many times over.

As Chalmers Johnson, author most recently of Nemesis: The Last Days of the American Republic, the final volume of his Blowback Trilogy, has pointed out for years, the Pentagon, the military-industrial complex, and America's wars are in the process of bankrupting us. How strange then that, as he indicates below, no one in the mainstream even blinks when a staggering new Pentagon budget sails through the House of Representatives and then, by voice vote, through the Senate just as negotiators in Washington are scrambling to find a similar sum to deal with a catastrophic financial meltdown; nor does anyone in the mainstream bother to make any connection between that budget and the funds we don't have available to use elsewhere, or between the looting of Iraq and the looting of our financial system (and, in both cases, of course, the looting of the American taxpayer). -- TomDispatch editor Tom Engelhardt


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: empire, defense spending, bailout

Tom Engelhardt, editor of Tomdispatch.com, is co-founder of the American Empire Project and author of The End of Victory Culture.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from War on Iraq! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Stop the Madness ... Cut the Military Budget by 60%
Posted by: mmckinl on Sep 29, 2008 12:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Both Obama and McCain say they want a bigger military ... that's just craziness...!

We need to elect politicians that will tell Americans the truth and that is that our military budget will bankrupt our treasury and our morality.

Our founding fathers warned us specifically about standing armies ... It's time we took heed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
» pale Yellow Posted by: weathered
A trillion here, a trillion there ...
Posted by: taxidriver on Sep 29, 2008 4:51 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And pretty soon you're talking real money.

So much for the peace dividend.

And related to this is our arming of the world with advanced weaponry, some of which may come back to haunt us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pathetic
Posted by: GreyFoxThree on Sep 29, 2008 5:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wow, that is pretty pathetic isnt it? Just keep throwing money at everythign while the common man suffers. What a pathetic joke.

is your ISP watching?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If your ISP is watching and you are worried about it then just give up the ghost now.
Posted by: Nightstallion on Sep 29, 2008 6:10 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These, penis osculaters and clitoris lickers all; who serve this government are traveling the same road you are. Eventually they will screw up and become expendable too, just like you. They do not realize this of course because the training they take to be where they are precludes thinking for personal individual welfare and that of their own families.

No one gets out of this planet alive that is the name of the game currently. Even if you live a millennium it isn't forever and you are not safe. Safe is a figment of an embattled imagination looking for surcease.

It is your imagination that gives you safety not any real thing. No weapons, no might, no rock you hide under, no space station you inhabit is ever going to be SAFE, LITTLE MAN! This earth could have been a paradise it is not because you imagined a safety that does NOT EXIST!

What you have done to insure your Security and false safety is to hand over your personal freedoms to an American version of the Shutzstaffel headed by Michael Chertoff. You have let the leaders of this country have their own private police force in the form of Blackwater. Did it really never occur to any of you that these strike teams could be loosed on American People accused of Civic Disobedience?

Personally, I think 99.9 percent of the American People were born with their cerebrum lodged in their large intestine and the first time they had to eliminate excreta they lost their minds!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

So how much more money will gubbmint keep borrowing from China?
Posted by: maxpayne on Sep 29, 2008 7:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And I wish they'd just flip the foreclosure switch and get this country the FUCK over with it. As long as this country is dominated by macho egotistical mania mentality, empire/military spending will only increase. This country needs mentality cleansing !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ralph Nader
Posted by: Sedona96 on Sep 29, 2008 7:26 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Will end the war . . . wasteful spending, corporate control and bring the government back to the people!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» But Posted by: socialpsych
Dr. Demento
Posted by: willymack on Sep 29, 2008 8:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Back in the heyday of AM radio, a disc jockey who called himself Dr. Demento brocast his madcap fun over stations such as KDWB in Minnesota, and KGWB in San Francisco. He was a harmless comedian, and was actually FUNNY. The current-day mcnut and the wicked witch of the North ain't so funny. I can only hope their insanity isn't contagious.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Duped Again
Posted by: sasquuatch55 on Sep 29, 2008 9:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The rich ,gambling pigs of Wall Street, the skimming,blood sucking bankers,investment CEO's,Fascists,senators,representatives,and all their lobbyists will all make out on this bailout;The taxpayers will foot the bill and assume the debt,and will see no benefit.Most Americans are against the bailout, but our so called Representatives are ignoring us. Both parties are corrupt( with a few exceptions). The assholes have perfected the use of fear(that they have scripted) to further rape this country,and turn us into a slave nation. Welcome to Plantation U.S.A.(as I have heard it called).Revolution seems to be our only option. But, we are "cowering tools". We need to man up and stand up.

It's even effecting world markets,and numbers show alot of them are sceptical of the effect of the bailout.

Hopefully things will work out,,but the track record of the current Admin is in the crapper and they don't know shit (eccept,bilk,cheat,lie,steal,ect.). True lowlife criminals.And the military/industrial complex,Bushco organized crime policies are sucking us dry while they wallow in their illgotten texas pie, with shit eating grins on their faces.
We need a big change in Washington,but even if Obama wins, his hands will be more or less tied dealing with the mess that will be dumped in his lap. I hope he can bring the changes that are needed, and can undue Ws' non policy,policies and it's damages.
I'd like to try the trickle up theory,as oppossed to the disasterous trickle down foolishness,which we all know does not work.Put the money into main street and into the consumers/spenders pockets who will do more for the economy,as ALL the money will start circulating faster and do more to restore the whole economy quicker than helping out a very select few. A perfect time to redistribute the wealth to a more balanced and productive society.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Two big thumbs down on the Bush/Paulson bailout plan.
Posted by: NoMcCainPalin on Sep 29, 2008 9:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was a bailout bill fence-sitter until the House started debating the Bush/Paulson plan today on C-SPAN.

Leaning towards approval, I suddenly fell off the fence into the "Not no, but HELL NO!" side.

A representative from Texas gave me the shove I needed to make a stand by asking rhetorically. "Who will administer the bailout plan?"

ANSWER: Because of its enormity, the plan's management will be OUTSOURCED to the same greedy Wall Street gang that got us into this mess.

Unfuckingbelievable!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

While everyone is focused on the Presidential Election
Posted by: Quannah on Sep 29, 2008 10:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and the Wall Street bailout, this Defense bill flew under the radar. Chalmers Johnson is correct.

The House is voting on the bailout bill as I'm typing this post... will be interesting to see how it goes. But the Defense Authorization Bill passed easily. Talk about a government giveaway! It means more money to Haliburton. More money for KBR. More money for Blackwater. More money for all the contractors who live on the largesse of the Federal Government, yet how much of that is going to help the military personnel who are actually fighting this ill-conceived war for these criminals?

Our entire system is topsy-turvy.

We need a complete overhaul, as the government is completely and totally FUBAR!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The OTHER other bailout...
Posted by: fanny666 on Sep 29, 2008 11:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't forget that the Budget which just passed the House includes an $25 BILLION BAILOUT for the Auto Industry... you know, the guys who respond to rising gas prices by making more and more SUVs and muscle cars...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

oversightlessness
Posted by: cbishopp on Sep 29, 2008 11:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This unchecked spending has been going on for a long time and for years we all thought it was just a greedy mistake or just a lack of oversight but as this administration winds down I have come to the conclusion that Bush and co, in fact, have done a great job!
I mean, think about it, almost every operation they have undertaken has been a success. From large scale terrorist attacks to the destruction of public education to the fleecing of the treasury to the pilfering of the public savings to the expansion of government to the taxation of the poor to the explosion of gas prices to the dismantling of the military to the gutting of oversight committees, no stone has been unturned.
The intention was to steal as much as possible, to deceive the population, to exploit the fear and good will of people all over the world and there was no hesitation to explore any and every possibility of transferring the wealth of this nation into private hands. This was accomplished with deft skill and manipulation and now they want more.
These guys are good.
Good enough to not be convicted and walk away scot free, literally.
With all this new money it will not stop here. History shows that anyone who makes profit from war will continue to make war and the Bush family has made profit from war for generations.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The bankruptcy of the United States is inevitable time to look for new euphemisms
Posted by: vsargis on Sep 29, 2008 2:09 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am sure they will find a way to tell us that there is no such a thing as the USA going bankrupt, only “Low Financial Security” or LFS. This is the same administration that declared on November 16th 2006, there officially is “no hunger in the United States” because they have ended hunger by changing the name; hunger is now called “Low Food Security” or LFS. Is it any wonder instead of waging wars on hunger poverty and unemployment our government is maximizing security of the nonexistent WMDs! Talk about the administration’s priorities! It is definitely not for the people, or in the interests of the people! It is run by the Elites, economic elites and the political elites who are running the show. This is no democracy! The so called Democracy in this country is a euphemism for big business and their interests! “..exempt off-duty American troops from Iraqi law” I am not surprised, flouting the law comes naturally to this administration. Why else would they need the Supreme Court to select their president?
The Pentagon is not only good at stealth bombing; it is also good at stealth stealing the tax payer’s money!!!! Lets take control of our treasury and exercise direct democracy!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I wish the right wingers would...
Posted by: Grandma Crabby on Sep 29, 2008 2:58 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...remember that the Soviet Union collapsed largely because of their own mismanagement of their economy and the high cost of fighting Bin Laden in Afghanistan.

It had little to do with Ronnie "tough guy" Reagan and his orders to tear down this wall.

So now they are bankrupting us in war for pursuit of oil...I mean, worldwide freedom. (Gosh, what an embarrassing mistake! Sorry!)

I mess around on YouTube making comedy videos poking fun at the den of of thieves, I mean the government. (Gosh, another embarrassing mistake!)

So go get yourself a laugh and help me pass videos around. The views on my YouTube channel suck! It's kinda embarrassing honey and I need your help to get my ratings up!

Luv,
Granny

Granny's crazy videos = Go get a chuckle!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hegemony and Meddling
Posted by: beautifulady2003 on Oct 4, 2008 7:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's actually very simple, really. Instead of the US government's claim that the rest of the world is overrun with crazy, radical people looking to destroy us because "they hate us for our freedoms," the opposite is actually true. The US looks to destroy whomever it disagrees with and whomever it perceives is standing in its way in its quest for world domination. There is no reason for the US to be tampering with Afghanistan and Pakistan; if bin Laden were there, why haven't they been able to capture him yet? How, logically, can one man be so amazingly elusive? And why the insistance that Iran is building a nuclear weapons program, when this is not supported by the facts? In fact, the US hates Islam, fears it, and wants to obliterate it so that it can proceed with its plans to run gas and oil pipelines to the far east from the Caucasus to China, without any opposition. As in Iraq, the US has made Islam the enemy, has created an adversary to justify its continued genocide on the Muslims. With Zionist support from Israel, the US is bent on world domination, not seeing that it is now too weak to accomplish its task. All the death and destruction so far has accomplished nothing. It is a continual state of hate and greed, and it doesn't matter who wins the White House because the agenda is carved in stone. It was tattooed into the brain of every school child from the end of World War II to the present. The belief in American exceptionalism, of entitlement, of "the American Way," is so entrenched that it has become the means by which America will eventually destroy itself.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]