Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace

Editorial: Making Wal-Mart Change Its Ways

By Don Hazen, AlterNet. Posted November 7, 2005.


In Round II in the battle to make Wal-Mart honest, progressive media gets into the act with a unique editorial collaboration.
Advertisement

Filmmaker Robert Greenwald's new documentary, The High Cost of Low Price, has opened to glowing reviews. The group Wal-Mart Watch is keeping the heat on the giant retailer by leaking an internal memo which shatters Wal-Mart's healthcare reform myth.

Instead of listening to its critics, Wal-Mart has created a "war room" to fight the charges, hiring a gaggle of high-priced PR types who are thrashing about and creating media opportunities for the good guys in the David and Goliath struggle. (A joke making the rounds is that Wal-Mart's PR blunders are the result of hiring too many folks from the Kerry campaign.)

Now, welcome to Round II in the battle to make Wal-Mart honest. This week, progressive media gets into the act in a big way with a unique journalistic collaboration. Writers from AlterNet, The Nation, In These Times, and the American Prospect have each tackled a key element of Greenwald's film, flexing independent media's muscle with quality journalism and opinion writing.

As Greenwald explains, "This media collaboration is an exciting model. Our film tells a number of important stories about how Wal-Mart goes about its business, often shockingly so. The addition of the in-depth investigative work creates an opportunity to go much deeper, and peel away more layers of the Wal-Mart story, getting closer to the truth."

Today AlterNet brings you Wal-Mart's China Price, by staff writer Joshua Holland, an expose of who really pays for Wal-Mart's cheap products (hint: the Chinese workers who make them). Tomorrow AlterNet offers Wal-Mart's Tax on Us, by Greg LeRoy, which documents how Wal-Mart's giant growth is the result of sweetheart deals and taxpayer subsidies.

Simultaneously, In These Times is publishing Slashing Costs, Busting Unions, by Christopher Hayes, which reports on Wal-Mart's anti-union efforts and how the company routinely breaks labor laws with impunity.

The American Prospect features Harold Meyerson's Open Doors, Closed Minds, a story of how a Wal-Mart true believer was persecuted by the company merely for doing what he thought was expected of him: crying foul.

The Nation is publishing On the Wal-Mart Money Trail, by Liza Featherstone, an investigation of Walton family philanthropy. Evidently, the giving habits of the wealthiest family in the world have changed a lot since Sam Walton's death.

Any business that employees 1.6 million people, costs the taxpayers upwards of $2.5 billion for supplementary government services to keep its employees out of poverty and has annual revenues of $258 billion -- bigger than many countries -- deserves close scrutiny. We're pleased that our partners have joined AlterNet in digging deeper and exposing the nasty ingredients that serve as the foundation of Wal-Mart's success.

Keep in mind, Round III in the big battle begins the week of November 14. Already there are more than 7,000 house parties scheduled and 1,000 churches showing the film in what will be one of the biggest debuts of a documentary in history. Sign up today to attend a screening or host one in your community!

Digg!

Don Hazen is the executive editor of AlterNet.


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
So What's the Alternative?
Posted by: LuisaO on Nov 7, 2005 5:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The alt. media collaboration on this is good to see, but where are the stories about the positive alternatives like community-owned dept. stores, the rise of Independent Business Alliances and communities passing laws to limit chain businesses?

If you don't know who to call for such stories, here are a few top notch writers in those realms: Gar Alperovitz, Jeff Milchen (spelling?), Stacy Mitchell.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

celebrity endorsement
Posted by: neena on Nov 7, 2005 5:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's great the progressive media has finally waged this campaign against Walmart. However the people who need to know the truth behind Walmarts tactics are exactly the people who won't be reading or viewing the mentioned resources. These are Walmarts bread and butter, lower to middle income Americans who are interested in making ends meet and providing for their families. They will continue to shop and support Walmart even if it is against their own best interests in the end. Making this even more difficult is Walmarts planned holiday adds featuring celebrities such as Garth Brooks, Destinys Child and Jesse McCarthey. Unfortunately that is what will get the attention of Walmarts targert shoppers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: celebrity endorsement Posted by: realmuzik
Walmart Must Die
Posted by: birdman on Nov 7, 2005 5:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Forget about reforming Walmart. You can "reform" Walmart all you want, and at the end of the day it is still an undemocratic, profit-mining, community-destroying abomination. IT'S A CORPORATION! As such, it will NEVER serve the needs of a free people in a democratic society. As another poster has suggested, the real answer is to see local, sustainable businesses thrive. Shilling for the continued, albeit "reformed," existence of Walmart is the kind of kind of pro-coroporate mind-fucking we expect from ... well, from WALMART! Are you guys really progressives? The beast must die.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Walmart Schmalmart
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Nov 7, 2005 6:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
OK Walmart is bad. But, it's only a small part of the problem. The problem is the takeover of "our" government by too powerful corporations. The way to cure this requires only three steps. 1. Take control of both political parties. 2. Finance political campaigns with public money. 3.Grant corporations renewable licences to operate. If the corporation does not serve the public interest, the license will not be renewed. Click on a new idea

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Walmart Schmalmart Posted by: Ely Whitney
» RE: Walmart Schmalmart Posted by: birdman
Dont' count on the Democratic Party's help
Posted by: sausage on Nov 7, 2005 8:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In case you weren't noticing, an axis of politcal power now runs directly from Washington, D.C. to Bentonville, AR. The rise of Wal-Mart as we know it was largely facilitated under of auspices of erstwhile Arkansas governor Bill Clinton and his wife, Hillary, who was both legal counsel to and a member of the Wal-Mart board member during his administration.

Let me leave you with a few choice quotes from Jonathan Tasini's blog for November 2:" Let's start by looking at what I call the Wal-Mart 22: The 22 Democrats who, on June 24th, voted against an amendment to the 2006 fiscal year Labor appropriations billthat would have barred any spending of money by the Department of Labor to implement the part of the deal the department had made with Wal-Mart calling for advance notice of inspections any time the DOL planned to investigate Wal-Mart. -snip-
" Anyway, so who were the Wal-Mart 22? Marion Berry (AR) Sanford Bishop (GA) Dan Boren (OK) G. K. Butterfield (NC) James Clyburn (SC) Bud Cramer (AL) Henry Cuellar (TX) Artur Davis (AL) Diana DeGette (CO) Harold Ford (TN) Charles Gonzalez (TX) Ron Kind (WI) Jim Matheson (UT) Dennis Moore (KS) Mike Ross (AR) John Salazar (CO) Vic Snyder (AR) John Tanner (TN) Mike Thompson (CA) Bennie Thompson (MS) Ed Towns (NY) and Al Wynn (MD).-snip-
"Then, to top it off, I heard from a source that Matt Miller, a staffer at the Center for American Progress, is doing consulting work for Wal-Mart. Miller considers himself a Democrat and CAP, I believe, seems to position itself as a rapid-response operation in opposition to the Republican idea- and-spin machine."
-snip-
Working Life
Our options for dealing with corporate America, let alone Wal-Mart, are dwindling.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Doing what you can makes changes
Posted by: UnWalled on Nov 7, 2005 8:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ok, guess I basically disagree with many of the posters. Yes there's lots of change needed, but... just like the neo-cons who 40 years ago started with school boards, we can't start at the top although in the Wal-Mart case it does make sense because whatever light shines on Wal-Mart keeps others from following and attacking those below Wal-Mart would only benefit Wal-Mart.

Besides, Wal-Mart (and the Waltons too) is certainly behind a lot of the political crap that's been going on in this country lately including the lowered taxes on the rich and the abolishment of the Estate Tax. They are also behind many other things including attempts to get labor laws changed like the overtime laws, and the hours truckers can legally work but only to Wal-Mart's benefit not the public or group individual good.

That's just the tip of the Wal-Mart Titanic Iceburg.

Not to share my income but I'm not exactly rolling in it. So far in the last 6 months since I heard about the movie coming out (right here at Alternet) and started doing some research of my own on the company I've convinced at least 22 others (if not more) within my circle to stay clear of the store just with a few reveals of what the company is really up to. These people are finding they like not going there and are telling others too.

It's thanks to the progressive media that's put pressure on some of the more mainstream media as well that I've been able to do the research. I'm proud and happy with Alternet, The Nation, American Progress, In These Times, as well as Business Week and others for standing up to the monster even when the monster in typical controlling and abusive ways reaches out to punish any and all who stand against it.

Go Alternet, et al and Mr. Greenwald! You guys ROCK!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Why Change Wal-Mart? Posted by: zackpez
Stephen Hand, editor TCRNews.com
Posted by: TCRNews.com on Nov 7, 2005 11:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Monastery boycotts walmart

http://www.tcrnews2.com/HomickAbbot.html

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Walmart Schmalmart; you make some good points
Posted by: qrswave on Nov 7, 2005 4:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't know about taking over the political parties; but giving corporations renewable licenses is an excellent idea and reforming campaign finance is key, too.

But, if you want to strike at the real root of our economic problems eliminate the monopoly of the monetary system by the Federal Reserve System; and the mechanism by which they encumber the entire world with debt--INTEREST.

Mathematically, this debt that can never be repaid--seeing that the fed system only issues principal--NOT interest.

Thus, the only way that one man's interest can be paid is by tapping into another man's principal. It creates a zero sum economy in which some people must 'lose' in order for others to 'win.'

In the modern economy, the dollar represents wealth. But, what is never discussed is that money represents wealth only because everyone agrees that it does. If no one accepted the dollar in exchange for REAL wealth--which is the product of human LABOR--the dollar would be worthless.

There are other issues associated with inequality in salaries for labor, but those are only tangentially related. The focus of the argument I make now is that the interest-based financial system is at the core of our economic problems. It's what enabled the corporations of today to weild the financial power that they do.

For some more links on what I'm talking about visit The Truth Will Set You Free

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

EncinoM
Posted by: qrswave on Nov 7, 2005 8:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I really don't mean this in a derogatory sense, but, you make a good parrot...easy to train and unquestioning.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ncinoM Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: ncinoM Posted by: cacky
» RE: ncinoM Posted by: cacky
» RE: ncinoM Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: ncinoM Posted by: cacky
I'm Libertarian, too
Posted by: qrswave on Nov 7, 2005 9:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And I have nothing against capitalism, if by capitalism you mean free market, private enterprise and protection for hard earned private property.

But, money earned through interest is not hard earned -- it sucks its value out of principal which represents real value.

And, what I'm trying to explain to you, perhaps not very effectively, is that when bankers charge our government interest on bonds it DOES come out of your hard earned money! It has no where else to come from!

They control the money supply; they never issue it without interest; so there is no debt free money! wherever the government gets the money from, the working class will alwyas have to pay for it!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I'm Libertarian, too Posted by: cacky
» Another one who understands! Posted by: qrswave
EncinoM
Posted by: cacky on Nov 7, 2005 11:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bullshit

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» EncinoM... Posted by: qrswave
» RE: ncinoM... Posted by: cacky
» Cacky Posted by: qrswave
» RE: Cacky Posted by: cacky
ChristianLeft
Posted by: ChristianLeft on Nov 10, 2005 4:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If corporations are organisms, and I believe that they legally are, then their DNA is the Corporate Mission Statement, and Vision Statement. It is these documents that guide the cogs (Directors, Managers, and Rank and File Employees) every movement. I'm fairly certain that "sustainability," "nuturing a diverse and thriving local economy" and "providing a fair living wage and adequate health care for all our employees" are not presently included in Wal-Mart's "DNA." If you really want to change Wal-Mart don't bother treating its anti-social, genetically pre-determined symptoms. Really, the only way to affect long term change is to do a bit of corporate genetic engineering. You'd be doing them a favor, because only if Wal-Mart's Mission and Vision Statements keep them from destroying their own tissues (workers), and hosts (the communities they operate in) will the organism thrive beyond the short-term.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Brilliant analogy! Posted by: qrswave
The Real Walmart Story is Still Untold...
Posted by: juliepierce on Nov 10, 2005 3:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The real Walmart Story is still untold and changes just about each day. The stores run from the home office are supposed to be held accountable. The lies, the fluff, the policies are just broken pieces of the old culture that has died in the hands of Lee Scott.
The Walmart Movie...(I wouldn't sign a release for them to use any of my information) is good but basically old news that is now in movie form.
The real story will be published...I may have to do it myself but it will be published as the mainstream media will not cover it and publishers seem to be afraid of the truth as is everyone else.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

3 reasons for the piling on of Wal-Mart
Posted by: reason on Dec 13, 2005 7:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are 3 reasons for the piling on of Wal-Mart.

1. Wal-Mart will be used against Hilary Clinton if she runs for President.

2. Other businesses want to buy at the same prices that Wal-Mart does, but sell at higher prices. Eliminating Wal-Mart would make that possible.

3. The Insurance Companies want a big cut of the Wal-Mart money pie for insurance.

It is unAmerican to pile on one company.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]