Libertarians’ Ethical Gap: Why Their Alliance with Christians Is Based on Contempt
Stay up to date with the latest headlines via email.
CPAC 2014 banished its would-be atheist booth, but religion was still a fraught issue among its attendees. While the conservatives of CPAC may have cringed at the evangelizing of American Atheists, it hardly proposed a much sturdier vision of the relationship between Christianity and the evolving American right wing.
Christian leaders at the conference, including CitizenLink’s Tom Minnery and Colorado Christian University Centennial Institute director John Andrews, seemed quick to urge Christian voters to accept and support politicians with patently un-Christian positions on various social issues. But this was no typical call for acceptance of imperfection or mercy on the flawed; it was a calculated political move to try to endear libertarian candidates to erstwhile Republican values voters.
Andrews lamented that the media “are doing their utmost to create divisiveness, fractures, factions, back-biting, family squabbles, between all who believe in liberty, limited government, free enterprise, and traditional Judeo-Christian values,” and urged conservative Christian voters to view their differences with libertarian candidates as a mere “family feud.” According to Minnery, “libertarians can learn from social conservatives about the importance of basic moral principles that create the sense of ordered liberty which is so important to our country.” In other words, the two Christian leaders had in mind a kind of alliance – not unlike the initial marriage of convenience that brought together the Christian right and free market capitalists under Reagan.
But at least when the Reaganite revolution brought Christian values voters and free marketeers together, the profit-driven sect of the Republican Party was willing to campaign for the maintenance of some Christian political principles, such as the sanctity of life and the primacy of the family. CPAC’s message takes the alliance a step further from its Christian commitments by suggesting, more or less, that Christian values are negotiable so long as policies intended to bolster free market capitalism are upheld.
A brief glance at libertarian polls and policy goals is all that’s needed to underscore what a drastic move this is for the Christian right. Consider, for example, one of the greatest political victories of Christian coalitions within the last century: the Civil Rights movement. Do libertarians take a particularly rosy view of that push for equality and justice, as headed up by venerable Christians like Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.? Not at all: Rand Paul famously suggested the matter of ending institutionalized racism should have been left up to, well, the racists who institutionalized it in the first place.
And on values issues, Christian values voters may find libertarians even chillier company. The Libertarian Party states on its website that it is for the legalization of prostitution, a principle that should doubtlessly unsettle members of the Christian right who are otherwise comfortable with its “pro-business” platform. After all, the state need not force individuals to participate in prostitution to nonetheless legitimize and increase engagement in the practice, and if family-oriented conservatives are concerned about the message sent by the legality of abortion, then they should be equally troubled by the prospect of legalized prostitution.
On the topic of abortion, libertarians are much friendlier to the practice than the Christian right. The Public Religion Research Institute’s 2013 American Values Survey found that while a mere 29% of white evangelicals would oppose legislation making it more difficult to get an abortion, a robust 57% of libertarians would oppose such legislation. Further, while only 29% of white evangelicals feel it should be legal for doctors to administer life-ending drugs to terminally ill patients, 70% of libertarians believe physician-assisted suicide should be legal.
And, while libertarians are still split on gay marriage – with 40% in favor of and 59% opposed – their divide is nothing on white evangelicals, among whom only 19% favor, while a solid 80% oppose. For a political faction so incensed at the idea of being taken to court for refusing gay couples wedding cakes and event photography, the alliance with a demographic so significantly less committed on the topic of gay marriage seems outright bizarre.