Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Five Dangerous, Disastrous Things About the Proposed Bailout and What You Can Do to Help Stop It

By AlterNet Staff, AlterNet. Posted September 23, 2008.


You can help stop the economic hijacking before it's too late.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Are the "New Atheists" As Bad as Christian Fundamentalists?
Frank Schaeffer

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
How a Public Jobs Program Could Put America Back on Track
Julianne Malveaux

DrugReporter:
Pot Is More Mainstream Than Ever, So Why Is Legalization Still Taboo?
Steven Wishnia

Environment:
Why We Need Bees and More People Becoming Organic Beekeepers
Makenna Goodman

Food:
The Raw Milk Revolution: Behind America's Emerging Battle Over Food Rights
Makenna Goodman

Health and Wellness:
New York May Stop Heartless Health Insurers from Dropping Coverage When It Stops Being Profitable
William Ehart

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
Focusing on Fort Hood Killer's Beliefs Is an Easy Out to Avoid the Deeper Reasons for the Massacre
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Michelle and Barack's Marriage Has in Common with 56 Million Other Ones
Annabelle Gurwitch

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Fetus-Shaped Potatoes? Going Undercover Inside the Weird World of Right-Wing Abortion Foes
Ann Neumann

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
Instant Sex: Has the Digital Age Destroyed Relationships or Made Them Better?
Vanessa Richmond

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
With Unemployment at 40 Percent, Afghan Teens Enlist in Army, Police
Lal Aqa Sherin

More stories by AlterNet Staff

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The Bush era has been a period of one outrage following the next, but the administration's bailout of Wall Street's wheeler-dealers is the most outrageous yet!

Bush's parting gift to the fat cats who twice filled his campaign coffers to the brim -- when they weren't busy playing fast and loose with the American economy -- is a huge pile of tax dollars that will get them out of the problems their recklessness created, while leaving Main Street high and dry and at risk of foreclosure.

Here are five things about the crisis -- and the Bush-Paulson Plan -- that we just can't believe our officials would even have the nerve to contemplate, as well as something you can do to help stop them …

1. They're Making Longtime Wall Street Honcho Henry Paulson Into an Emperor!

We just can't get over this little tiny section in the Bush-Paulson plan. Just 32 words long, it says that the whole thing is up to Paulson's "discretion" and "may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency." That's like burning the Constitution! What happened to the separation of powers -- to checks and balances?

2. They Want the Fox to Guard the Henhouse: Wall Street Brokers Will Decide Which Wall Street Brokers Get a Piece of the Pie!

Believe it or not, Henry Paulson, who was a key player in creating this mess in the first place as the CEO of brokerage giant Goldman Sachs, wants to "outsource" the buying and selling of all these junk securities to Wall Street money managers. Remember, there are no restrictions on what they can do -- their actions can't even be reviewed by the courts!

3. They Want to Establish American Socialism for the Richest, and Dog-Eat-Dog for the Rest of Us!

Another thing that's sticking in our craw is that this outrage is being pushed by the very same politicians who passed the horrible bankruptcy "reform" bill in 2005. That law actually made the mortgage situation worse, because it kept ordinary people from getting out from under a pile of consumer debt, and many more ended up losing their homes as a result.

When Bush signed the law, he said, "America is a nation of personal responsibility where people are expected to meet their obligations," but that only goes for the Little Guy -- the Big Boys get to make a mess and take no responsibility for it at all!

4. Nobody Knows How Much They'll Really End Up Pilfering From the Treasury!

The headlines all say that it's a $700 billion bailout. But the plan that Bush put together only says that Paulson can hold onto $700 billion in bad securities at one time! He can buy some, sell 'em at fire-sale prices and then buy some more. Even worse, nobody knows what the final bill will be, because nobody knows what all those bad mortgages are worth.

5. They Want to Borrow All This Cash to Give to Wall Street, and Foreign Banks Too!

And, remember, the government doesn't have that kind of money lying around -- it'll all be borrowed cash, sending the deficit through the roof.

When Bush came into office, he had a budget surplus. Then he got us into a trillion-dollar war in Iraq and at the same time gave all these huge tax cuts to the same people who are most responsible for this mortgage mess. He was set to pass a half-trillion-dollar deficit to the next president -- now, it'll be even higher! If the bailout passes, our children will still be paying for it for decades to come.

And Paulson says he even wants to let foreign banks get their snouts into the trough as well. It's crazy!

This is certainly the greatest outrage yet, and we've got to stop it.

The following appeal from the Campaign for America's Future is a great way to add your say to the snowballing resistance to this attempt to steal hundreds of billions from the public purse.

Within the next 24 hours, we expect that Congress will make a historic choice to address America's financial crisis: Cut the Bush administration a $700 billion blank check for Wall Street, OR demand sensible public checks and balances in the $700 billion bailout. Write an emergency letter to Congress now, and tell them: No $700 billion blank check to the Bush administration for Wall Street.

In the next 24 hours, Congress could shape America's financial well-being for decades to come. Exploiting the financial crisis, the Bush administration is strong-arming Congress to give Wall Street $700,000,000,000 more of our taxpayer dollars -- with no strings attached and no say from us.

Write an emergency letter to Congress now, and tell them: No $700 billion blank check to the Bush administration for Wall Street!

Legislation could be on the floor of Congress within 24 hours. With the Bush administration stoking panic and pressuring Congress, citizens must speak up now to push back and demand common sense.

We need to fix this financial crisis, but giving $700 billion to Bush's Treasury secretary to spend as he wishes is over the top. The Bush administration is basically holding a gun to Congress' head and saying, "Give us the money immediately, or the banks will blow up the world economy."

If steps must be taken to keep the economy from failing, common sense must not be thrown out the window. Write Congress now and demand 3 basic principles to protect the public:

1. No Taxation Without Representation. If our tax dollars are going to buy bad assets from irresponsible bankers, the American people must get something for it. Equity in bailed-out firms. Strong regulation so this doesn't happen again. Stern public oversight. And, no golden parachutes for CEOs with our money.

2. No Help for Wall Street Without Help for Main Street. To truly get our economy back on track, we must aid the victims, not just the predators. Freeze foreclosures. Renegotiate bad mortgages. Create jobs generating clean energy and modernizing infrastructure. Prevent cuts in local police, health, road and school budgets. Extend unemployment insurance and food stamps.

3. No Insider Dealing. Wall Street can no longer be allowed to write its own laws. Legislators should refuse campaign money from Wall Street PACs or executives. We need a "time out" on contact between paid Wall Street lobbyists and elected officials while the crisis is addressed. Any congressional meetings with Wall Street officials must be immediately posted on a single Web site for complete transparency.

The next 24 hours will likely determine whether these commonsense solutions prevail, or whether the Bush administration gets $700 billion more of our money to do with as it pleases.

Write now and demand that Congress ensure sensible checks and balances when dealing with hundreds of billions of our taxpayer dollars. Write now and tell Congress: No $700 billion blank check to the Bush administration for Wall Street!

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: congress, paulson, bailout, blank check, billions

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
CASH FOR EQUITY
Posted by: Peter Mackrael on Sep 23, 2008 10:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
CASH FOR EQUITY NOT PAPER

The US Congress is currently under pressure to quickly pass Paulson’s $700 billion bail-out proposal. Paulson's initial proposal will give the Bush administration incredible power to privatize profits while socializing the losses!

If any company is given federal assistance, the US government should receive equity in the company otherwise any massive cash infusion will merely reward those banks that got deepest in debt. Buying their worthless paper makes no sense. There is no clear method to evaluate the paper to be 'bought' and worst of all, no regulations to address the real cause or to investigate possible criminal activity. Buying this worthless paper without enforcing new regulations will merely encourage continued derivatives trading and increase the total debt. If this occurs, does anyone believe that $700 billion will be enough? I expect total bail-out costs could run into the tens of trillions if foreign banks are included.

On the other hand, government ownership will ensure that future profits (if any) are returned to the people and that new regulations to manage derivatives trading - assuming Congress writes them - are followed. If and when these banks become profitable and socially responsible, they can be sold back to private investors.

I do not trust Treasury Secretary Paulson and the Bush administration to administer this huge 'bail-out/buy-out'. As with the war in Iraq, I fear that most of this money will go to political allies and cronies.

A separate bi-partisan committee/agency should be created to assess other alternatives. If it is agreed to buy these failing banks at their current market value, the guidelines and restrictions must be transparent to all. All purchase offers should be subject to review and approval by Congress.

I believe it is highly likely that conspiracy to defraud and outright fraud has occurred before and may occur during this 'rescue' plan. An independent agency should be assigned to investigate fraud/conspiracy and these investigations should begin immediately.

The current approach uses "fear of imminent financial collapse and appeals to the need for public sacrifice" combined with a rush to push a "clean" bill through a Congress distracted by “how to protect the interests of homeowners facing foreclosure”, without allowing adequate time for assessment. This reminds me of the method that President Bush used to pass the bill to authorize the invasion of Iraq.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Sacrifical Lambs Posted by: Cathyc
Economics 101
Posted by: Spot on Sep 23, 2008 11:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Economics 101: There is no Free Lunch.

I don't want your sob story, because the next ten years will make today look like Christmas whether or not we give away the farm.

The loss of billions on Wall Street is the cost of doing business in the post-regulation world. They wanted to work without the government over their shoulder, and they got it. If they didn't care enough about solvency to check their own facts, that's not my problem. I don't have millions of dollars, I don't have property to sell when inflation makes the dollars I have worthless, and I won't be getting a golden parachute.

When a man jumps off a bridge, we don't tie all our shoelaces together and throw them down after him.

There's no way that the 700B which won't even exist until the Federal Reserve Bank prints it will do anything but ruin the financial stability of our domestic market. If we permit the criminal classes of Wall Street and Washington to bail themselves out, massive inflation will accompany the inevitable massive unemployment, and force millions into poverty and starvation.

Say NO to the bailout, no matter what dress it wears!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: conomics 101 Posted by: weathered
» RE: conomics 101 Posted by: Use your Brains
Musical Antidote to Gulf of Wall Street Bailout Resolution
Posted by: mainesongwriter on Sep 23, 2008 11:14 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here's a musical antidote to having your head explode in anticipation of the impending Gulf of Wall Street bailout resolution:

"WE"RE GONNA HAVE A SCARY HALLOWEEN!"
http://soundclick.com/share?songid=5896354

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Last Chance Gulch...
Posted by: Gisele on Sep 23, 2008 11:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and the Bush Cabal is going to make the most of it before the lucrative door of EASY money closes.

Welcome to the "October Surprise!" Just a tad early.

Let them fall on their own swords, they sharpened them up for an unsuspecting citizenry - let them swallow their own poison.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Unsuspecting citizenry? Posted by: Cathyc
» RE: Unsuspecting citizenry? Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: Unsuspecting citizenry? Posted by: Gisele
» RE: Unsuspecting citizenry? Posted by: Knot_Rich
Do What FDR Did ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Sep 23, 2008 11:56 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Time to call your Senators and Representative and tell them no to Paulson's Raw Deal ...

Zip Code link to Your Senators and Representative

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

What FDR Did ...

Nationalize, Evaluate , Liquidate , Recapitalize ... Fire the Banksters ...

~ Nationalize all the banks and declare a bank holiday just like FDR did.

~ Evaluate the banks assets ...

~ Liquidate failed banks ...

~ Re-capitalize healthy banks and take a stake for any investment ...

~ Fire the Banksters and the boards ...

This is the only way to cleanse the system. Without getting rid of the toxic waste the few will always pollute the many causing credit seizure.

Would this cost 700 billlion dollars ? No where near that. Then why are we doing this ... to bail out insolvent banks that should go belly up and one in particular ... Goldman Sachs ... Paulson's old firm where Paulson has many friends and much money !

Bank of America Says "Paulson Plan Benefits Mostly Goldman, Morgan" A study done by a BoA securities analyst shows that Goldman Sacjs has the most to gain by this bailout.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Do What FDR Did ... Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Do What FDR Did ... Posted by: EncinoM
complicated
Posted by: astralman on Sep 23, 2008 12:15 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
we are getting what we didn't pay for. every time you try to get something for less than what it is really worth you end up paying for it somewhere else. people in the u.s. live beyond their means and think it's okay to do so. people in the u.s. live pay check to pay check always counting on future riches to pay for what they have consumed in the present. the future is here and it wants to be paid now. this is taxation with representation. all of these "crooks on wall st" did everything they could to keep the "american dream" going, while lining their own pockets of course, but that's the american dream. work hard, succeed. live like a king either way. now we all have to pay up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: complicated Posted by: cellorelio
» RE: complicated Posted by: Knot_Rich
So the most conservative administration in US history demands a $700b government bailout for Wall St
Posted by: yellow on Sep 23, 2008 2:42 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Talk about "socialism for the rich!!" As is often the case in late capitalism, the gains are privatized and the losses socialized. The only way this should go through is if there are guarantees of congressional oversight, most of the money goes to help the 3 million homeowners in danger of foreclosure stay in their homes, there is emergency legislation passed to reregulate the financial system including restoring glass-steagal and regulating the MBS market and finally, the implementation of the plan must be fully transparent.

The US financial system is becoming dangerously chaotic and unstable. Congress needs to act.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bernanke says recession
Posted by: Sharkie on Sep 23, 2008 2:44 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Havent seen people so upset since Bush pushed through the selling of US ports to Dubai. This is looking like it is headed for the same backlash; Funny how touchy we get about our ports and money and such.

Yes, this regime was "front page" with their corruption while others before them covered up somewhat better. We have learned now there really isnt any reason to cover this stuff up because there is absolutely nothing anybody will do to you for stealing, lying, war crimes, etc. Mr. Dodd, senate banking chair keeps his job after Wall Street money couldnt buy him the presidency he sought. Barney Frank, chairman of the financial service committee, never saw a problem he couldnt solve by a bailout. Both men democrats, both men went kicking and shouting doubting the existence of a housing bubble to begin with. Actually, Congress people would be by far much better off reading the blogs of those who saw this coming two years ago, rather than listening to Hank Paulson or Ben Bernanke. Even today Bernanke threatened us with recession if we don't go along with Hank's bailout. A recession, imagine that.

A logical conclusion is that our corrupt financial system is dead and there is little good reason to save it. It is begging to be re-built if only these politicians would let it go. A cure for this sort of thing is called reorganization under bankruptcy proceedings. The strong and well run survives. Plenty of blame to go around, but a Congress reacting to the now walking dead is late to this party. And for their tardiness, should never be returned to office, and never given the chance to vote on bankrupting the United States to save their buddies on Wall Street.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» True Lauren Posted by: marid
This poor website is getting a hammering
Posted by: tRANIS on Sep 23, 2008 3:49 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Had my letter ready to go now for over a hour and not a single movement on the status bar. Oh I'll keep trying but I think we all are.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

$6000 per household!
Posted by: racje on Sep 23, 2008 3:59 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
$700 Billion works out to $6000 for each US Household.

That's right, there are 116 million households in the US. And we're being asked to ante up an average of $6000 for each household to bail out those who have profited from lax regulations and indolent oversight.

Half of us have incomes under $50,000 per year. $6000 seems like real money to us, unlike the rich with their seven houses and golden parachutes.

At the very least, we need to demand clear ground rules, diligent oversight, and a share in any future profits of whatever shaky institutions we're being asked to invest in.

This crisis has been building for years. We have time to carefully consider how to respond. Let's not be stampeded by rush scare tactics. Let our representatives be very deliberate as they work out what to do.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: $6000 per household! Posted by: Lauren
» RE: $6000 per household! Posted by: aussidawg
Idiocracy!
Posted by: left-leaning-libertarian on Sep 23, 2008 4:16 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is there ANYBODY beyond Wall Street or the Bush administration who thinks this cluster-f*** of a bail-out plan is actually a good idea?

These greedy f***ers have been screaming bloody murder about government regulation for decades; "get the guv'ment off our backs! Gub'ment is the problem! Big guv'ment stifles capitalism etc etc etc" and now, after years of reckless, unchecked, unregulated villany, they've all suddenly morphed into socialists!
(But, their "God" forbid we have universal health care. . .that's still "evil socialized medicine like they have in--y'know, nudge nudge, wink wink--France!") Give me a BREAK (and, yes, give me French-style socialized medicine while your at it!!!!!)

Good effing gawds, people! I was telling anybody who'd listen ten years ago that these hyper-complex derivatives and sub-prime-mortgage leveraged investments were going to result in disaster; maybe even a Great Depression. And I was RIGHT, just like Casandra amidst the ruins of Troy!

What really appals me about this legislation is the Bushies' demand that it be passed so quickly wihout any kind of deliberation or oversight (can we say; Patriot Act? Iraq war? etc etc etc). Every time these rapacious robber barons ignore a problem until it blows up in their face, they start running around like Chicken Little with his head cut off, screaming that "Congress must act NOW!" And every effing time, THEY HAVE BEEN WRONG!!!!!!

Well, not this time! I've e-mailed all three of my reps in Congress to register my OUTRAGE!

And if it hasn't been crystal clear up to now,
this whole mess should drive home the point like a railroad spike lobotomy:

THE ONLY SANE CHOICE FOR PRESIDENT IN 2008 IS BARACK OBAMA!!!!!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Idiocracy! Posted by: Alohajnc
» RE: Idiocracy! Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Idiocracy! Posted by: tdterry1999
this is what larouche has been warning about for ages
Posted by: avatar_singh on Sep 23, 2008 4:43 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But he has been ridiculed by the so called main street media because he recognized that itis the british orchestrated plan to reestablish british emopire on the back of american power. and he was reviled just as the prominent jewish buinessman rudoph Hearst of publishing empire was reviled for opposing wilson's tilt to fight on behalf of britian against other european powers( germany that time in 1914).

look what he has written now--

http://www.larouchepac.com/news/2008/09/23/larouche
"LaRouche: "This Is Straight-Out Fascism"
Increase Decrease

September 23, 2008 (LPAC)--Lyndon LaRouche today warned Secretary of the Treasury Henry Paulson that his bailout scheme, particularly its demand, in Section 8, for absolute dictatorial decision-making powers over all aspects of the trillion-dollar bailout, "is straight-out fascism. And the American people will never tolerate this.'' LaRouche candidly added, "The American people are being screwed, and they shall not take it kindly, I would hope.''

In the past 24 hours, a handful of people have begun to join LaRouche in calling this looting swindle for what it is. In a column in today's New York Times by David Brooks, three critics of the bailout scheme were quoted. William Greider warned, "If Wall Street gets away with this, it will represent an historic swindle of the American public--all sugar for the villains, lasting pain and damage for the victims.'' Christopher Whalen of Institutional Risk Analytics wrote, "The joyous reception from Congressional Democrats to Paulson's latest massive bailout proposal smells an awful lot like yet another corporatist love fest between Washington's one-party government and the Sell Side investment banks.'' But Brooks himself added, "If you wanted to devise a name for this approach, you might pick the phrase economist Arnold Kling has used: Progressive Corporatism. We're not entering a phase in which government stands back and lets the chips fall. We're not entering an era when the government pounds the powerful on behalf of the people. We're entering an era of the educated establishment, in which government acts to create a stable--and often oligarchic--framework for capitalist endeavor.'' Economist Kling commented, on his own website, hours after the Brook article appeared, musing, "Progressive corporatism--I guess it goes down easier than liberal fascism.''

Indeed, more than 30 years ago, Lyndon LaRouche warned about the dangers of "fascism with a democratic face,'' and singled out the David Rockefeller interests as the chief American architects of this fascism. Today, the same Rockefeller interests are driving the outright corporatist/Fascist schemes of the likes of Felix Rohatyn, including his so-called Public Private Partnership Initiatives, which have been aggressively peddled by Rohatyn clones, Rockefeller Foundation director Judith Rudin, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger.

"They are all fascists, of the classic fascist/corporatist tradition,'' LaRouche noted, "especially Felix 'The Fascist' Rohatyn. I don't know why more people don't have the guts to just call it for what it is: straight-out fascism. Maybe they are just afraid the American people will, sooner or later, greet them with pitch-forks.''

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs: Foxes Run The Chicken Coop
Posted by: avatar_singh on Sep 23, 2008 4:49 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.larouchepac.com/news/2008/09/23/

quote--
"
Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs: Foxes Run The Chicken Coop
Increase Decrease

September 22, 2008 (LPAC)-At 9 PM on Sunday night, the Federal Reserve Board approved the applications of Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley to become bank holding companies. With that action, the last of the major Wall Street investment banks will disappear, some 14 months after Lyndon LaRouche declared the financial system dead. As we saw with Bank of America's purchase of Merrill Lynch, the remaining investment banking operations are being reorganized into the commercial banking apparatus, where their demise will allegedly be more manageable. While many explanations have been advanced as reasons for the two Wall Street giants to make this move, the simple fact is that, with the demise of the securities markets, they were no longer viable, and this is the only hope they have of survival. As bank holding companies regulated by the Fed, they will of course have access to the growing list of bailout facilities.

What is now planned is a rapid consolidation of the banking sector into a handful of giant banks with both depository and speculative functions, combining commercial and investment banking in ways which hark back to the era before the Great Depression, when banks knowingly dumped bad paper on their customers as a way of protecting themselves in the crash. FDR used the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933 to drive a wedge between commercial banking and investment banking as a way of stopping such abuse. Congress, at the behest of the banks, began undercutting Glass-Steagall in the 1980s, and it was officially repealed in 1999, making it easier for the banks to return to their rapacious, pre-FDR ways.

LaRouche said on September 15 after Lehman Brothers declared bankruptcy, "The banks and financial institutions are all sick, but you have to start minimizing what you try to bail out at this point...This is a question of triage. Now the triage begins."

Treasury Secretary Paulson, Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke and the rest of the Plunge Protection Team are attempting their own form of triage, trying to save as much of the speculative paper as possible. Everyone should know that Paulson is a former chairman and CEO of Goldman Sachs. The fox is indeed in charge of the chicken coop.

As the waves of bank failures begin, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley will now be in a position to begin gobbling banks up after the FDIC has eaten the losses, and thus become major banks themselves. They, and the other giants like J.P. Morgan Chase, Citigroup and Bank of America, can then use your bank deposits as their own speculative piggy banks.

This crisis has just begun, and will grow far worse over the coming hours and days. As it does, the relevant and responsible people ought to be reminded--even if it requires a two-by-four to jog their memories--that this crisis would not have been possible without the systematic reversal of President Franklin Roosevelt's banking regulations, which, among other virtues, kept the risky activities of the investment banks separate from the necessary activities of commercial banks. FDR's regulations represented the high-water mark of modern national financial regulation, which is precisely why the bankers demanded that his regulations be repealed, in favor of the old imperial model.

As LaRouche repeated on the LaRouche Show on September 20, "What has to be done is a number of measures which I've prescribed; but, otherwise, we have to take action based on the principle of law we used to have: Glass-Steagall. What we have to do now, is immediately go in and take all the banks that are real banks, chartered banks, state banks, and Federal banks, on which the communities are dependent, ---"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Resistor
Posted by: Curbrunner on Sep 23, 2008 5:42 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"In the next 24 hours, Congress could shape America's financial well-being for decades."
Get real!....What a laughable statement! When has Congress ever been able accomplished anything in 24 hours, let alone one of the most complex problems they've ever been handed. I'd say they're lucky if they accomplish this in 24 weeks, especially when they operate on their Tuesday through Thursday work-week.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: esistor Posted by: PirateJesus
» RE: esistor Posted by: Lauren
» The so called Patriot Act Posted by: marid
» RE: The so called Patriot Act Posted by: aussidawg
Arrest the Bush Administration
Posted by: macktan on Sep 23, 2008 6:15 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
According to McCain, the worker is the only sound fundamental in this economy, so shouldn't we be the recipients of a bailout instead of the crooks who drove it?

Of course, bankruptcy reform in 2005 eliminated the bailout option for workers because credit card companies wanted guarantees that if they hooked us they wouldn't have to release us. But the principles of trickle down economy promote bankruptcy for corporations so that they are in a position to save the victims they created.

I still haven't heard anyone explain how a stage 5 life threatening financial tumor sprung forth overnight to kill unless we treat it immediately. If this had happened last year, would it have gotten in the way of our saving Iraq from terrorists?

Funny how Bush never wants to be asked for an itemized receipt. "give me 100 billion for Iraq, no questions asked. your children will die if you don't." Now "give us 700 billion or you'll all lose your jobs and houses (and the ability to pay off your 30% monthly interest of credit card debt."

Remember Hurricane Katrina. Congress urged Bush to appoint a financial czar to oversee the aid package for the gulf region. He refused. Most of those people were fleeced out of their money or saw it diverted to "contractors."

It may be too late to impeach Bush but the statute of limitations gives us time to arrest him and his lousy enabling administration.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Paulsen's Parachute
Posted by: jumpr on Sep 23, 2008 6:27 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I just wonder what Paulsen's self-interest in this bailout is?
How long ago was he Goldman's CEO? And is he still a stockholder?
Surely not, but I don't get shocked easily anymore.
Can someone help with some info,
Doesn't Paulsen have a conflict of interest here?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Paulsen's Parachute Posted by: radical53
» RE: Paulsen's Parachute Posted by: leafsong1
WHAT IF THE MONEY IS FOR CHENEY'S NEXT WAR
Posted by: omygodnotagain on Sep 23, 2008 8:30 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
NO WAY TO EARMARK, NO VALUATIONS, NO ACCOUNTABILITY... SOUNDS TO ME LIKE DICK CHENEY FOUND A NEW WAY TO FUND THE NEXT WAR WITH IRAN OR RUSSIA AND KEEP THE WAR MACHINE PARTY ROLLING

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Go Fuck Yourself, Mr. Cheney
Posted by: Direct Democracy on Sep 23, 2008 9:06 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There’s no excuse for allowing the collapse of the U.S. economy to happen.

No amnesty, no pardons.

Pursue the Bush administration beyond January 20 until they are brought to justice.

FREE AMERICA

REVOLUTIONARY (DIRECT) DEMOCRACY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Off with their heads, NOW, in the next 24 hours
Posted by: Floresta on Sep 23, 2008 9:27 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am so f***ing pissed off at the Greedy Class and I mean it; Off with Their Heads! Jail! How Paulson and Bernake can sit there and bullshit everyone in the room...and off with the heads of both houses of Congress if they cave in to a lamer-than-lame-f***ing duck 'Resident' and his Henchman. Twentyfour hours! Who ever said more like 24 weeks was talking true about this gutless bunch in Mordor. Gawd!
BTW, I did call both my California Senators and my Representative and sent them emails!
Gawd!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thank you, Pelosi & Reed
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Sep 23, 2008 9:57 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
for knuckling under to these fuckers every chance you got these past 2 years.

jdfu!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: FUCK you, Pelosi & Reed Posted by: Lauren
» I love it when you talk dirty Posted by: hurricane hugo
» RE: I love it when you talk dirty Posted by: hurricane hugo
Another Awful Truth
Posted by: Last Chance on Sep 24, 2008 5:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ever since the Soviet Union collapsed, Russia has been suffering a die-off, the population declining by about a million per year. So, as our economic Recession slips into Depression and Bush creates a state managed economy similar to Russia, we will suffer a die-off too. That is the upper class solution to overpopulation and global warming!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Another Awful Truth Posted by: Lauren
» Money talks and the people walk. Posted by: Last Chance
» RE: Another Awful Truth Posted by: HoboHomo
The Language of the Bailout Plan?
Posted by: henkle110936 on Sep 24, 2008 5:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Does anyone know or have a copy of the exact language of the Bailout Plan? I have been unable to find a copy of it anywhere on the Internet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And how about electing new non-monied independents to the House and Senate?
Posted by: maxpayne on Sep 24, 2008 6:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even if the House and/or Senate stops this one, they're only doing this for "election" stunt purposes. Once the election's over, they'll just go back to doing it but in smaller "installments".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WallStreters have A choice...Pay Up or be Prosecuted
Posted by: Purple Girl on Sep 24, 2008 6:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let these Gamblers figure out how to pay off their foreign creditors they Swindled out the Front money.We have no intentions of paying off their Gambling Debts.
These Wallstreeters had better decide which is more vlaueable, their Yachts, additional homes, bobbles...Or their Freedom or Life!
With Clear Forethought and Malice, motivated by purely personal gain these CEO's, CFO's COO's and thier Boards of Trustees have Embezzeld Trillions(?) From The American People, Resulting in a near collapse of our Treasury and our Economy..The only other Industry that makes the Banking industries crimes pale in comparison, a Better example & Definition of TREASON, is the Oil industry!Of course their cahrges also include War Crimes and Crimes against Humantiy- Which Investment banking no doubt also had a hand in.

EASY SOLUTION- Borrow the Trillion, but cut US the Checks..We can resolve many banking issues and Fire up th eeconomy- if we have the money to PAY OUR Mortgages, car payments, utilities bills, credit cards, and get a chance to by a lil' somethin'somethin' for ourselves.
All these investment types do is Hoard the money- no such thing as 'Trickle Down' when those at the top are Corrupt Immoral and basically vile Human beings. We knew it was 'Shit Rolls Dwon Hill'Economics During Ronnys era- and so Did THEY (Foresight and Malice)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

FMAinMass
Posted by: FMABBI on Sep 24, 2008 7:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lets just say "Thanks but No Thanks" to this bailout plan. If they want to bail out wall street let the wall streeters do it themselves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just like before the Iraq invasion
Posted by: NoMcCainPalin on Sep 24, 2008 7:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Once again, like in 2003, the White House is shouting "WOLFowiz!"
and Congress will surrender the way it did about WMDs.

This time, it's Words of Mass Deception.

John McCain--OLD ideas, OLD solutions, OLD lobby connections
For more reasons why JM should not be president
of the United States, click on: Vote Against McCain

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hey wow, choruses of Dannyboy is running thru me moind!
Posted by: Nightstallion on Sep 24, 2008 7:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr. Hazen and staff,

Once upon a time a long time ago in 1929 these bastards were faced with the same result to their double dealing shenanigans. Many took that well deserved plunge into their Wonderful Wall Street from office windows rather than face the Consequences of their greed.


Myself, I’d like to be front and center with a good Rosewood Shillelagh to be whacking them on their way down! I agree with the others who say the entire cabinet should be put on trial for murder and treason. I begin to see a glimmer of hope when you yourselves write articles like this, Godspeed to you all.


I am old and Jaded, but not dead yet. It is my fervent wish to see these scalawags get their comeuppance at least once in this lifetime. NONE of us have requested the hand we’ve been dealt, but the same none of us till now has seemed to want to work out a solution to this problem that does not require ripping off the American people. Thanks for this article and your suggestions, at least you attempt to do something.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Driving Miss Daisy back to the bank.
Posted by: symcokid on Sep 24, 2008 8:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who cares if this economy goes belly up, what else could we expect when nothing but money people crooks have been running the show since this country was invaded and all of the resources stolen?

All this government should really be concerned about is telling the rest of the world how they should live. Actually I believe the rest of the world is well aware of this country's double standards and propagandist BS!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Crash and Burn
Posted by: Shankari46 on Sep 24, 2008 8:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Look you know you and I will get fired anyway. We won't be able to get a loan for a Hummer. Who cares? We don't need a Hummer right now. We need to let these fools crash and burn. If we burn out these fools then they will lose power. They need to lose power. They need to be on the street begging and having dirt thrown in their faces. They don't need my tax dollars.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Crash and Burn Posted by: HoboHomo
The Beatings will continue until "morals" improve.
Posted by: common intelligence on Sep 24, 2008 8:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
On the media surface it appears the Financial Intervention wants no bail out, both Repuk and Demo. Will Pelosi cave in again as she always does? This is time for Demos to show their metal.

The emotional driven sense of dire eminent doom is being pushed by the BUSH TEAM all before the election. The Bush head is dead but won't die. Henry Paulson could be the new Carl Rove? There is a power play going on here. Unless we cut off the "head" this monster won't die.

Fear of a so called recession is slow to be recognized by those in denial that it is and has been here for a couple of years. But for those with lots of cash, theirs is yet to be felt. This is what the urgent push is about .
Saving the money mongers from their recession is what these politicos are talking about in session. They are talking to themselves about their concerns, not ours.
For the rest of us, whether you have a house or a morgage or rent, our recession has been beating down the door.

Sorry for those that bought into the economic system that is a pyramid scam gone bad. Such as 401k's where a scam from the get go.
Many tried to tell those that bought it. But for those with values falling thru the floor----that's business!
This is why we don't want a abil out. Because if it was our business that went tits-up it would have to be sold at auction of ended.
SO should go the way of all business's.

But Wall Street just reconfigures the Corporate structure and characturistics to hide the guilty and then are allowed to carry on.
NO that should not be allowed! Itshould be over done and scattered like ashes. Let the pieces fall where they may.

It's funny how from Reaganomic / Bush perspective, Governement is too big and should be privatized, yet no one will address the fact that the governement has to control the economic system because the kids on Wall Street have learned and play the scam game they have recognized is the system!

Aren't you glad Social security wasn't "privatized". Let's hear Bush say that!

It's now all about hidding and dodging responsibility. You watch. Everyone will be pardoned that should be jailed, by Bush before he leaves office. Accountability must be written into the laws of our nation. It's the only way to safegard the country from terrony. Which this latest escapade revealed is just an other act in the play.

No free lunch, no medical care, no retirement, no health maintanance.

Just watch as when the bills start coming into to the insurance companies for Hurricane Ike. Opps! Sorry AIG, etc. they don't have the funds. That's beacuse no one buys their stock and the Insurance companies bought mutual funds that have gone into a dive bomb.
SO if the governement bails'm out that means that taxpayers bail them selvesout.

Therefore, ya'all should have just stuft your investments in a mattress. At least then you could get to them. But when the FDIC which is funded by your monies too, drains their source (it's already been so, Bush spent it in Iraq), everyone will realize the theiving that's been going on for eight years has become to smack them in the face.

This is partially why the urgency of a quick bail out. To postpone the impact and spread it out over a longer period of time so it doesn't look so daunting until Bush is Out.

Man I pity who ever get in office next. They've been had! It's goning to be a nightmare they will have wished they never signed up for.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No Doubt about it.
Posted by: GreyFoxThree on Sep 24, 2008 8:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Make no doubt about it, America has truly and for once finally gone to Hell in a hand basket! Way to go there Dictator Bush, way to go!

Jeff Price
Online Privacy when it Counts

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

SAVE OUR ECONOMY INSTEAD
Posted by: patginsd on Sep 24, 2008 9:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Send the following message to your representatives:

DON'T BAIL OUT WALL STREET!
BAIL OUT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE INSTEAD-
BY FORCING ALL MORTGAGE INTEREST RATES INTO FIXED 30-YEAR 6%. DAMN WALL STREET. DAMN SPECULATORS. DAMN PREDATORY FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS.

THIS ONE RELIEF WILL SAVE OUR HOUSING MARKET AND THE NATION'S ECONOMY BY ITSELF AS IT WILL STABILIZE THE HOUSING MARKET AND WITH IT, THE REST OF OUR ECONOMY.

YOU DO NOT HAVE MY PERMISSION TO USE MY TAXPAYER DOLLARS TO BAIL OUT WALL STREET AND THE FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS.

You can replace the contents of the following letter with the above demand. Then ask all of our friends, neighbors, colleagues to do the same. Here's a handy link to send your message:
< a href="http://www.ga3.org/campaign/congress_no_blank_check">linked text= http://www.ga3.org/campaign/congress_no_blank_check

PASS IT ON!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Quick! Look over there!
Posted by: Chattyjane on Sep 24, 2008 9:38 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I noticed a small article in the paper today. The moratorium on off shore drilling expires at the end of this month. Since Congress has been so busy debating this Bail Out, they did not get a chance to address drilling. Coincidence?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Quick! Look over there! Posted by: Karina
the answer is
Posted by: pacto on Sep 24, 2008 9:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
don`t bail out wall street. when the economy fails maybe the American people will wake up and realize that they are out of touch. Such a sick society will never learn unless they experience some real life values. the people who caused this should pay the piper,or there is always the alternative ....out the window like 1929.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

VoteNoBailout.org - you can write your reps from this website
Posted by: fanny666 on Sep 24, 2008 10:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
VoteNoBailout.org - they've already sent 100,000 letters from this website.

You can also call your reps at 202.224.3121

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I've Sent Mine Posted by: pdxjoe
One outrage after another
Posted by: DaveEriqat on Sep 24, 2008 10:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's funny, several years ago I noted a pattern of this administration: it covers up each outrage with a new, larger one! Call it "outrage inflation." With all this bailout talk we've arrived at the biggest outrage yet, at least so far.

If this bailout plan is approved, the true cost will likely be ten times what is admitted to now.

Dave
http://daveeriqat.wordpress.com/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

GET OFF YOUR ASS!!!!
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Sep 24, 2008 10:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We need strong action by the people to stop this idiocy before it really hurts us. We already owe a trillion dollars to China and japan,borrowed for the war, and we are expected to swallow another trillion? Sorry we're not gonna take it!!!
Step one call 202-456-1111 ext 0 that's the Whitehouse switchboard and the direct line to the pres' secretary. She has to take the message and give it to him. Tell the secretary I don't want my taxes used to bail out Wall Street.
Then telegram or email you dude or woman in the Congress and let them know that passing this action is a deal breaker with the people,their bosses,and we will seek to have them removed from office at once. You'd be surprized how fast they do what we want when they're jobs are threatened.
The fact is we have to ride the Congress and the president just like a rented mule and sometimes a mule need a smack along side the head to get them to pull right. Now is the time for the 2x4 along side this mule's head.
Third roadblock all road access into Wall Street and DC. You can't work if you can't get there. If they bailout Wall Street it would be our duty as Americans to blockade them from work. Block every exit into and out of NYC and DC. Use truck,semi's, and junkers,park them and leave them shutting down all road access. Maybe we should start that today while there's still some time to save our asses from this fire.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

My Modest Proposal
Posted by: kk33deg on Sep 24, 2008 10:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Treat the corporate officers of the companies who are asking for the bailout the same way that suspected drug offenders are treated: arrest them, charge them with grand theft, seize all their assets under the assumption that said assets were acquired illegally and liquidate said assets before the defendants' trials come up. State that the actions may not be constitutional, but the courts can sort that out, of course long after the assets have been liquidated. Pump the money back into the economy through infrastucture projects, green energy research and implementation and a single payer health care system.

The wealthy vermin who have caused this mess have already ruined way more lives than, say, Pablo Escobar. Why should they not be treated the same way that the DEA treats mid-level drug dealers?

Of course, this will never happen here in the Land of the Free.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: My Modest Proposal Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: My Modest Proposal Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: My Modest Proposal Posted by: hemp&hemp
Be heard
Posted by: Karina on Sep 24, 2008 10:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here you can find you representatives and senators-

https://forms.house.gov/wyr/welcome.shtml
http://www.senate.gov/

You can't get anywhere near Capitol Hill today. I tried.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sweden fixed their financial crisis 16 years ago,
Posted by: photon's feather on Sep 24, 2008 11:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and not by sticking it to the citizens or giving the bankers a free pass.

Stopping a Financial Crisis, the Swedish Way

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Eff 'em all!
Posted by: MD1 on Sep 24, 2008 12:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As far as I'm concerned, the wealthiest 1% who caused this disaster, the same bastards who designed and ran this Ponzi scheme, Bush's "base" in other words, can all go **** themselves with rusty nail-encrusted baseball bats! If they've wiped themselves and their companies out, they can all deal with it the old fashioned way like their grandfathers did in 1929... open a window in their penthouses and take a dive! Again... eff 'em!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Listen to Ron Paul, or keep getting scammed
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on Sep 24, 2008 12:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Read these quotes from 5 years ago:

Ironically, by transferring the risk of a widespread mortgage default, the government increases the likelihood of a painful crash in the housing market. This is because the special privileges granted to Fannie and Freddie have distorted the housing market by allowing them to attract capital they could not attract under pure market conditions. As a result, capital is diverted from its most productive use into housing. This reduces the efficacy of the entire market and thus reduces the standard of living of all Americans.

I think it is time to arrest Dr Paul because he must have caused all of this by being so prescient!

When housing prices fall, homeowners will experience difficulty as their equity is wiped out. Furthermore, the holders of the mortgage debt will also have a loss. These losses will be greater than they would have otherwise been had government policy not actively encouraged over-investment in housing.

Notice the use of words like will, rather than might. He is saying what will happen, not what might happen. Keep that in mind.

Perhaps the Federal Reserve can stave off the day of reckoning by purchasing GSE debt and pumping liquidity into the housing market, but this cannot hold off the inevitable drop in the housing market forever. In fact, postponing the necessary, but painful market corrections will only deepen the inevitable fall. The more people invested in the market, the greater the effects across the economy when the bubble bursts.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Yeah, deregulation led to this Posted by: fanny666
No money, just regulation
Posted by: areader on Sep 24, 2008 2:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Money shouldn't even be part of the equation here. We need to reregulate, and that's it. And why doesn't the government seize any personal property from the companies and sell it? Isn't that what normally happens when people declare bankruptcy? Why should these companies be immune to that? Shareholders made bad investments, and that's not the American people's problem. They are privatizing profits and socializing losses, and it stinks. And if CEOs run their companies into the ground, then the companies have no right to exist. Will someone in Washington please talk turkey to these jerk-offs on Wall Street and in the White House?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

NO CASH FOR WORTHLESS PAPER!
Posted by: Peter Mackrael on Sep 24, 2008 3:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is no need to reward investment banks for their reckless behavior. Here are two recommendations for your consideration.

1. There is no need for the federal government to buy any derivatives paper - this paper is absolutely worthless and should not be purchased by the government! If Congress is convinced that a cash injection is needed, there are at least three better alternatives: provide credit through an existing bank that was not involved in this derivatives fraud/casino OR buy an existing bank outright and issue new credit through this bank OR create a new federal bank for this purpose. A new bi-partisan committee should be created to assess the need and to administer this activity. Let the investment banks and insurance companies that did gamble with derivatives fail as they should. There is no reason to bail out these socially harmful operators. This credit injection need not be the full $700 billion, but should be injected in small pieces only if absolutely needed.

2. Regarding homeowners facing mortgage default, these owners got in over their head by choice. If they believe that a lender defrauded them, they should initiate a law suit against the bank that they believe defrauded them. The public should not assume any responsibility for these mortgages.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Back up the homeowner
Posted by: Jim Hill on Sep 24, 2008 9:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The bailout may be simple. Follow me for a minute:

The crisis is caused by complex financial instruments held by banks, brokerage firms, insurance companies that contain "contaminated" assets - subprime loans, bundled and resold as securities, Collateralized Debt Obligations, Mortgage Backed Securities, Credit Default Swaps - and those financial instruments cannot be properly valued because nobody knows how many of the subprime mortgages will go into default.

In addition, the increasing numbers of defaulted mortgates resulting in foreclosures is driving housing prices down.

Instead of buying the bad paper, the government should guarantee all the subprime loans. This allows the banks, etc., to value their assets properly, with confidence.

To my thinking, bailing out the banks, etc., is going at the problem from the wrong end of the system, and is probably just a massive scheme to pull off the biggest heist of a national treasury in history.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Presidential Directive 51.
Posted by: weslen1 on Sep 24, 2008 10:05 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is this "crisis" manufactured? I wouldn't be a bit surprised.

2) In this directive:

(a) "Category" refers to the categories of executive departments and agencies listed in Annex A to this directive;

(b) "Catastrophic Emergency" means any incident, regardless of location, that results in extraordinary levels of mass casualties, damage, or disruption severely affecting the U.S. population, infrastructure, environment, economy, or government functions;

(c) "Continuity of Government," or "COG," means a coordinated effort within the Federal Government's executive branch to ensure that National Essential Functions continue to be performed during a Catastrophic Emergency;

(d) "Continuity of Operations," or "COOP," means an effort within individual executive departments and agencies to ensure that Primary Mission-Essential Functions continue to be performed during a wide range of emergencies, including localized acts of nature, accidents, and technological or attack-related emergencies;

Pay particular attention to (b) above. Further into the "directive" you learn that BUSH ALONE will decide if something is a "National Emergency", can then declare Martial Law, Suspend the election and be completely in charge of ALL branches of government from Capital Hill to Nowhere Any State. FOR AS LONG AS HE SEES FIT. Isn't this "so-called" crisis kind of convenient for Bush, just 40 days before he's supposed to start preparing to LEAVE?

IF WE ARE LUCKY ENOUGH TO SEE THE END OF BUSH GOVERNANCE? WHY ON EARTH WOULD YOU WANT ANOTHER?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

bailout alternative
Posted by: JLCNB on Sep 29, 2008 11:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm against the $85,000,000,000.00 bailout of AIG.
>
> Instead, I'm in favor of giving $85,000,000,000 to America in a We Deserve
> It Dividend.
>
> To make the math simple, let's assume there are 200,000,000 bonafide U.S.
> Citizens 18+.
>
> Our population is about 301,000,000 +/- counting every man, woman and
> child. So 200,000,000 might be a fair stab at adults 18 and up..
>
> So divide 200 million adults 18+ into $85 billion that equals $425,000.00.
>
> My plan is to give $425,000 to every person 18+ as a We Deserve It
> Dividend.
>
> Of course, it would NOT be tax free.
>
> So let's assume a tax rate of 30%.
>
> Every individual 18+ has to pay $127,500.00 in taxes.
>
> That sends $25,500,000,000 right back to Uncle Sam.
>
> But it means that every adult 18+ has $297,500.00 in their pocket.
>
> A husband and wife has $595,000.00.
>
> What would you do with $297,500.00 to $595,000.00 in your family?
>
> Pay off your mortgage - housing crisis solved.
>
> Repay college loans - what a great boost to new grads
>
> Put away money for college - it'll be there
>
> Save in a bank - create money to loan to entrepreneurs.
>
> Buy a new car - create jobs
>
> Invest in the market - capital drives growth
>
> Pay for your parent's medical insurance - health care improves
>
> Enable Deadbeat Dads to come clean - or else
>
>
> Remember this is for every adult U S Citizen 18+ including the folks who
> lost their jobs at Lehman Brothers and every other company that is cutting
> back. And of course, for those serving in our Armed Forces.
>
> If we're going to re-distribute wealth let's really do it...instead of
> trickling out a puny $1000.00 ( 'vote buy' ) economic incentive that is
> being proposed
> by one of our candidates for President.
>
>
> If we're going to do an $85 billion bailout, let's bail out every adult U
> S Citizen 18+!
>
> As for AIG - liquidate it.
>
> Sell off its parts.
>
> Let American General go back to being American General.
>
> Sell off the real estate.
>
> Let the private sector bargain hunters cut it up and clean it up.
>
> Here's my rationale. We deserve it and AIG doesn't.
>
> Sure it's a crazy idea that can 'never work.'
>
> But can you imagine the Coast-To-Coast Block Party!
>
> How do you spell Economic Boom?
>
> I trust my fellow adult Americans to know how to use the $85 Billion
>
> We Deserve It Dividend more than I do the geniuses at AIG or in Washington
> DC
>
> And remember, The Birk plan only really costs $59.5 Billion because $25.5
> Billion is returned instantly in taxes to Uncle Sam.
>
> Ahhh...I feel so much better getting that off my chest.
>
> Kindest personal regards,
>
> Birk
>
> T. J. Birkenmeier, A Creative Guy & Citizen of the Republic
>
> PS: Feel free to pass this along to your pals as it's either good for a
> laugh or a tear or a very sobering thought on how to best use $85
> Billion!!
>

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement