Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Bush's AIG Takeover Won't Solve Our Financial Crisis, Now Unfolding by the Hour

By Nicholas von Hoffman, TheNation.com. Posted September 17, 2008.


Many banks are now candidates for extinction. Fear has set in and the Bush administration is unable to explain what it is doing to its people.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Nicholas von Hoffman

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

When Julius Caesar crossed the Rubicon, he knew he was starting a new political system. As the Bush administration takes over trillion-dollar AIG, it has no idea what it is starting. It does not even know what to do next.

All that Secretary of the Treasury Henry Paulson knew was that if AIG was allowed to slip under the waters, all hell would break loose. There might be something close to panic in the streets.

The Secretary and his co-workers knew that one money market fund had already lost so much money when Lehman Brothers declared bankruptcy that it had to suspend its depositors' withdrawals. But Lehman is small potatoes compared to AIG, a gigantic insurance-cum-investment corporation.

If it collapsed, many more money market funds would be in danger of being frozen. Americans have deposited over $3.5 trillion in money market funds and, if that money could not be withdrawn, we would be looking at a depositor panic such as that of 1933, when thousands were pounding on bank doors to retrieve their lost life savings. As it is, many are so frightened of losing their money that they are putting it into the safety of government notes paying interest of around two tenths of a percent.

It was either act or stand aside and let things rip. Paulson, and especially Federal Reserve Board Chairman Ben Bernanke, who is a close student of the subject, know what happened in 1933 when everyone was frozen in place as first Wall Street and then every other street crashed and burned. Faced with only two choices, these Republican businessmen elected to nationalize AIG just as the same men had done a few days before with the government takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the huge home mortgage finance corporations.

From the point of view of AIG's stockholders, this is not a sweetheart deal. The interest AIG must pay on the $85 million loan it needs to stay afloat is 11.5 percent. Those are almost credit card rates. In addition, the government gets to own 79.9 percent of the stock and gets to fire the old CEO, name the new one and do anything else it wants.

The government now owns AIG for all intents and purposes, although reluctantly. The hope was that private-sector companies would come up with the money, but either they were too scared or they did not have that kind of capital. Everybody has taken such a beating that assembling such large chunks may be impossible at the moment.

The AIG rescue takes care of this week's crisis, but does not put an end to them. The AIG arrangement was no sooner announced than the talk began that Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, the last two big brokerage houses, are next up on the chopping block. Either they will have to sell themselves to somebody or watch their stock sledge-hammered to the point of bankruptcy or so some think.

Goldman and Morgan are not the only candidates for extinction. The names of Wachovia, a big bank and financial wheeler-dealer, and Washington Mutual, the nation's largest savings and loan association, are on the death list. Fear and suspicion permeate the world of finance and money. Banks are even afraid to lend to each other.

Beyond Wall Street a tide of anger is growing as people see layoffs, swelling unemployment, home foreclosures, students struggling for college loans, retirement savings evaporating on one side and on the other sums too large to calculate seemingly being spent to bailout billionaires. Reports of larcenous CEOs walking away from shipwrecks of their own making with untold millions is setting poorly on many an upset stomach.

The administration, after having plunged the country into a new era of state capitalism, is unable to explain what it is doing to its people. The talking has been left to Paulson, an ex-Goldman Sachs CEO, whose estimated worth is close to three quarters of a billion; he is unable to communicate with anybody outside of finance and government.

Even if he could talk in language ordinary people could understand, he would have little to say. He is living a day-to-day life of exhaustion, coping with the crises as they zoom in on him. He has no plan of action, only the received market doctrine, which has failed him. Do not ask Henry Paulson how or when this terrible storm is going to abate.

Do not look to the presidential candidates, either. John McCain, the newly born re-regulator, has no idea what he is talking about. Barack Obama knows what he is talking about but it does not apply. Discussions about how the rules and regulations must be changed are of little moment. We do not know what there will be left to regulate by this time next year.

For now it is day to day, hour to hour, minute to minute. Hold on tight.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: economy, banking, wall street, financial crisis, aig

Nicholas Von Hoffman is a columnist for the New York Observer and is the author, most recently, of "Hoax" (Nation Books, 2004).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Mistake with the Article
Posted by: EncinoM on Sep 17, 2008 1:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"elected to nationalize AIG just as the same men had done a few days before with the government takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the huge home mortgage finance corporations"

Fannie and Freddie were national organizations until Regan privatized them, even then they were never whole private. The government forced them to secure sub-prime loans.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Mistake with the Article Posted by: progdem
» 'Hank' Greenberg & Sons Posted by: weathered
Flash, breaking news, another $80B to $160B job next week
Posted by: PaulK on Sep 17, 2008 1:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Republicans, under the "drill baby drill" disguise, want to guarantee roughly $160B to $320B in 20% down low-interest loans for every nuclear power plant proposal in America. The Congressional Budget Office already estimates a 50% default rate. Estimated loss to the taxpayers, $80B to $160B if it passes. At least 20 Republican senators have signed on.

Isn't it nice to see how quickly the high rollers in the Capitol dome come around to fiscal reality?

http://www.nirs.org/alerts/09-12-2008/1

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Privatize the profits and sprinkle with tax breaks …..
Posted by: Falang on Sep 17, 2008 2:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Privatize the profits and sprinkle with tax breaks but when things go wrong nationalize (socialize) the lost with tax payer money.

So let see, your revenue don’t go up, you loose your job so also your medical benefit, your pension plan let say what is left of your pension plan is going down the drain, you lost your home to foreclosure and the price of everything is going up, on top of that you have to bailed out those millionaires with the taxes you are paying and they get the tax cut. Don’t forget that you still have to pay your part of the deficit who should be rename the black hole.

Wow!
What a great system!

On top of that half the people who answer the polls say they will vote for McSame, sometime I think Americans deserve 4 more years of this bad administration maybe they will finally wake up.

In the text you can read that the feds had to put 85 millions to save AIG but on what I saw in the news it’s 85 billions not 85 millions.

Don’t forget to vote for McSame to make sure that when AIG will make some profit they will privatize it again, remember privatize the profit sans socialize the lost.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

AIG is a recidivist law-breaker; this is deregulation at work
Posted by: fanny666 on Sep 17, 2008 2:15 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Corporate watchdog groups have been pointing out that AIG has been cooking their books for years.

The next president will be inheriting a HUGE mess; some economists (such as Kuchinich's economic advisor Michael Hudson) don't think there CAN be a recovery.

A weird nihilistic part of me knows that if Obama wins the election, he will somehow be blamed for the crap economy, and he'll not make the radical changes necessary to reel in the speculative economy anyways. If McCain wins, he will continue the idiot policies that brought us here, and it will just hasten the demise of a violent, overstretched, and arrogant empire.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We do not know what there will be left to regulate next year.
Posted by: badkitty on Sep 17, 2008 2:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"We do not know what there will be left to regulate next year." That's just what worries me. I have the same feeling I got watching a TV program last week when a climate scientist said about the plans his daughters were making for the future, "why bother?". I think we're in the middle of collapse, but we can't see it, just like you can't see the forest for the trees...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I Have to Admit, This Is All A Little Too Massive for Me to Get My Head Around.
Posted by: grumble-bum on Sep 17, 2008 2:57 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not that, with only my layman's common sense to guide me, I haven't been predicting this for years.

Really, how anyone thought things would play out any differently is somewhat beyond me.

But then, I don't think of Capitalism as some sort of deity, to be worshiped at any cost.

Every addiction has a price, & it looks like we're damn near hitting bottom.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hey, Bush --takeover this!
Posted by: NoMcCainPalin on Sep 17, 2008 4:18 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My utility bills, food and transportation costs that are going through the roof, you incompetent boob.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hey, Bush --takeover this! Posted by: ranchero42
Is Obama For or Against the Bailout ???
Posted by: left_libertarian on Sep 17, 2008 5:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Can anyone answer this simple question?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I wonder what the free-marketeers are thinking right now
Posted by: PaulC on Sep 17, 2008 8:02 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who are they blaming this on? Do they even think anything is wrong?

My conservative paper, The Plain Dealer, repeatedly described what is going on as a "makeover", as if this were the market correcting itself in its own fail-safe way. They printed a wire piece that blamed this on Clinton signing "a bill" in 1999, and on Democrats who are "in power" in Congress. No mention that "the bill" was called Gramm-Beach-Bliley, that Phil Gramm was and is McCain's close advisor on the economy, that Bush is actually the President at the moment, that Dems only have parity in the Senate and Bush is wielding his veto pen freely.

Ohio is a pivotal state and The "Plain Dealer" is NE Ohio's only regional paper. Every 4 years it goes into unofficial Republican campaign HQ mode like clockwork when things get tight.

This is why we have red states after all that has gone wrong.

Also, has anyone noticed that troll activity on Alternet has dropped by, what, a gazillion percent? Have the corporate shills been given their severance checks, job well done - democracy denied?

peace,
Paul

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Greedy Idiots
Posted by: bessie on Sep 17, 2008 8:08 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When the Republican party lost its true nature to a bunch of religious idiots who couldn't pay attention to its reckless spending and our mounting deficits & the greedy war mongering 'game players' who were calling all the shots - it's where we find ourselves today. The Democratic party was always a strange mix of FDR liberals & Dixiecrats. Bill Clinton, with his quasi-populist & corporate benefactors, only added to the confusion with a banking and Wall Street system left deregulated and unsupervised -it's where we find ourselves today. What puzzles me is the idea that any billionaire could want or need more to the point that they are willingly selling out their own society. Their society that they'd like to travel around in. But when I think about that, I can't help but think of the man who loved Germany so much, the man who built is political legacy on this claim, and yet, in a bunker, with his country destroyed, took his own greedy idiotic life.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the root of the problem
Posted by: oregonstu on Sep 18, 2008 1:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The root of the problem is that debt itself is the foundation of our monetary system. The central Banks create new money through the issuance of new debt. There is never enough money in existence at any given point to repay the aggregate principal and interest of the debt that exists at that point. Therefore, the money supply must continue to expand, exponentially, in order to repay the exponentially expanding debt burden.
This is the insane feedback loop we are trapped in, the inherently unsustainable generations long ponzi scheme that the central bankers have been running on us all, the house of cards that is now blowing up in their (and everyone else's) faces.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is Compassionate Conservatism?
Posted by: boing007 on Sep 18, 2008 4:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Heckuva job, Dubya.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Taking over the country by stealth
Posted by: boing007 on Sep 18, 2008 5:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a silent takeover, folks. Be afraid. The thugs in Washington have succeeded in taking you to the cleaners! Some people are celebrating with champagne and caviar. Most are crying in their beer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Economic Free-Fall Hits Workers Harder than Wall Street
Posted by: CA NOW on Sep 18, 2008 7:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We're writing about how the economic crisis is affecting women and families at the CA NOW blog: Economic Free-Fall Hits Workers Harder than Wall Street

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Payday Loan Advocate for Alternet.org
Posted by: davidnofaxpaydayloan on Sep 28, 2008 10:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some politicians, such as Barack Obama, are looking to outlaw the payday loan industry. A large part of this intention was stirred by the flawed idea that payday lenders fall under the same moral values as illegal loan sharks. Being misinformed can accumulate some severe consequences. Although this statement is true, they take no notice of the genuine fact that the main source of these consequences is based on a course of action on inaccurate information. Sadly, a number of politicians have successfully passed legislation in their states, city and towns which controls, or even takes away your ability to get a payday loan. Now is the time to take action and educate your friend and family to protect your rights to financial independence.

Post Courtesy of Personal Money Store
Professional Blogging Team
Feed Back: 1-866-641-3406
Home: http://personalmoneystore.com/NoFaxPaydayLoans.html
Blog: http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]