Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

How 6,700 Tons of Radioactive Sand from Kuwait Ended Up in Idaho

By Penny Coleman, AlterNet. Posted September 17, 2008.


Questions remain about how depleted uranium waste from the first Gulf War was transferred, and whether health risks were posed.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Penny Coleman

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

On April 26, 2008, the BBC Alabama arrived in Longview, Wash., carrying 6,700 tons of Kuwaiti sand. The sand had become contaminated with depleted uranium when U.S. military vehicles and munitions caught fire at Doha Army base in Kuwait during the 1991 Gulf War. The depleted uranium was being repatriated. The sand was a gift of the Kuwaiti government.

So was the cost of repatriation. Neither government will discuss just how much the tab was.

The Longview Daily News reported that Mike Wilcox, vice president of the International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union Local 21, initially had been "concerned about the safety of longshoremen and the entire community when he heard a shipment of depleted uranium was coming into Longview."

But the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission determined that the sand contained "unimportant quantities" of radioactive material, and officials from the Department of Health would be available to test radiation levels -- just in case any of the sand spilled.

At the last minute, the Army notified port authorities that tests had revealed that the sand was also contaminated with lead -- in fact, four times more lead than the EPA's limit for hazardous materials. Transshipment was delayed for a few days awaiting a green light from the EPA.

Wilcox told the Daily News that he hoped the delivery would be a one-time thing.

Over the next month, longshoremen loaded 160 containers onto railcars bound for an Idaho-based waste disposal site owned by a company called American Ecology. When the sand arrived at the Idaho site, the company did its own tests and, as Chad Hyslop, project director for American Ecology, told the Daily News, "found no hazardous levels of lead."

Doug Rokke, who quit his job directing the cleanup of radioactive battlefields for the Army, contacted American Ecology and discovered "that they had absolutely no knowledge of U.S. Army Regulation 700-48, U.S. Army PAM 700-48, U.S. Army Technical Bulletin 9-1300-278, and all of the medical orders dealing with depleted uranium contamination, environmental remediation procedures, safety and medical care."

Hazardous materials storage has become a lucrative and growing business, especially since Donald Rumsfeld began implementing his plans for a sleek new "global cavalry" capable of swift and lethal response from strategically placed "frontier stockades" to punish bad guys whenever and wherever they have been bad. According to the Pentagon's annual "Base Structure Report," which itemizes its foreign and domestic military real estate, the Department of Defense currently operates more than 800 such bases around the world; 5,311 if you count the ones in American territories and on the U.S. mainland; probably well over 6,000 if you count the ones, like Doha in Kuwait, that for some reason didn't make the list. (Similarly omitted are all U.S. bases in Iraq, Afghanistan, Israel, Kyrgyzstan, Qatar and Uzbekistan.)

Rumsfeld, coyly switching metaphors, referred to them as "lily pads," which is about as convincing a euphemism as "American Ecology." Lily pads may sound greener and friendlier than, say, "footprint," which makes one at least think of boot heels, but it is safe to assume -- because there has never been an exception -- that every one of those bases is an environmental disaster area. The U.S. military is the most profligate polluter on the planet.

The Thule base in Greenland, for example, was sort of a pioneer lily pad. In the '40s, it was a convenient hop, skip and a bomber run to Berlin, and later it was part of the Cold War surveillance network. In 1953, the U.S. Navy sailed into Thule Harbor and informed the local Inughuit community that they had 48 hours to leave. Sorry for the inconvenience, folks, but there are houses 100 miles north of here with your names on them. We promise.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: kuwait, military bases

Penny Coleman is the widow of a Vietnam veteran who took his own life after coming home. Her latest book, Flashback: Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, Suicide and the Lessons of War, was released on Memorial Day, 2006. Her Web site is Flashback.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
RE: The best news is...
Posted by: ranchero42 on Sep 17, 2008 1:50 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Night skiing just got REALLY interesting.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And gosh, those big potatoes will cook themselves!
Posted by: greentime on Sep 17, 2008 5:14 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
LOL
;-)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ironic
Posted by: Dyolfknip on Sep 17, 2008 2:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That dirty American weaponry from dirty American wars ends up dirtying American soil because of dirty American policy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Ironic Posted by: Godfather89
Idaho votes 70% Republican. The voters in that state don't pay attention.
Posted by: dmwsd92 on Sep 17, 2008 3:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Funny, isn't that the same state that screams the most about government getting on their backs? Well? The same Republicans who you trust to get rid of Big Government are dumping radioactive wastes on your backs. Why aren't you standing up to this atrocity? You wouldn't allow this to happen if this were Democrats dumping radioactive wastes on your backs. Anyone in Idaho care to explain this double standard backlash?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
Douglas Lind Rokke, Imposter and Fraud
Posted by: Rhotel1 on Sep 17, 2008 5:02 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The following statement regarding Douglas Lind Rokke and his claims about this sand is untrue.

"Doug Rokke, who quit his job directing the clean-up of radioactive battlefields for the Army,"

First Lieutenant Douglas Lind Rokke, US Army Reserve, had no job to quit. Lieutenant Rokke was left behind and made a "theatre health physicist" by the Army after the real experts, both two Army Captain Health Physicists and senior Army civilians from Rock Island Arsenal, had gone home. Rokke then was charged with overseeing the work of contractor Chem Nuclear Systems, Inc. in crating up DU-contaminated Bradley Fighting Vehicles and perhaps a couple of Abrams Tanks that were returned to South Carolina. Rokke had no connection with Camp Doha. Rokke was released from active duty in Wisconsin on July 1st and the fire and explosions were ten days later. Rokke never returned to Saudi Arabia, Kuwait or Southwest Asia. Except for 15 months at the Army Chemical Corps School E R Bradley Radiation Laboratory, Rokke's reserve career included no more active duty and was entirely spent in the midwest, mainly in Illinois. Rokke totally ignores the current Army regulations; the Bradley Lab has relocated with the Chemical School to Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri and it offers a distance learning program on depleted uranium. Rokke is an opportunist and a con artist. I have made substantial effort to find out who Rokke really is as opposed to who Rokke claims that he is or what writers like Ms Coleman embellish even more than Rokke's own version of the story. As a result, I have posted portions of Rokke's military records, his doctoral thesis, his work experience at the University of Illinois and other items in the Files Section of the Yahoo Group DUStory which can be accessed by following the instructions at http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DUStory/message/77

Rokke rolls out this regulation as his mantra. When I challenged him to report any failure to follow this regulation to the Army or Defense Inspector General, Rokke claimed I was picking on him and smeared me all over the world. He just keeps trotting it out, knowing that the reader has no idea what it says or if anyone actually is following it or not. I intend to obtain a copy of the on-line DU training and post it to DUStory. I have already posted the Army's "common soldier tasks" regarding depleted uranium. Rokke lies when he says that soldiers in Iraq have never been trained about DU.

"contacted American Ecology and discovered "that they had absolutely no knowledge of U.S. Army Regulation 700-48, U.S. Army PAM 700-48, U.S. Army Technical Bulletin 9-1300-278, and all of the medical orders dealing with depleted uranium contamination, environmental remediation procedures, safety, and medical care."

Want to learn more about Rokke, even about his Neo Nazi connection, contact me at DUStory-owner@yahoogroups.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Boomerang!
Posted by: johnjmccarthy on Sep 17, 2008 7:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How many nano sized particles of Depleted Uranium can you put on a grain of "contaminated" sand?
(a nano equals one billionth of a meter) The trucks that hauled the sand to the ships who sailed across the oceans to the USA and transfered the material to trucks and trains for transport to Idaho can not say that DU was NOT released upon the unsuspecting humans, animals and fish along the route.
And if all this contaminated sand is being "stored" in facilities in Idaho, the storage faciities must be air tight to prevent the DU from escaping. They cannot simply dump it on the ground without contaminating the entire State and eventually the entire country....

This reminds me of the 2004 story and photo of an Abrams A1 Main Battle Tank sitting on a flatbed train car next to wheat fields in Kansas; another casualty of DU, the tank and Kansas. The tank had the universal sign of radiation contamination on one of the fenders. Every time the wind would blow, DU particles would undoubtedly end up in the Kansas wheat fields, and ultimately, on your cereal and bread, (whole wheat only)!

So, are the sands of Kuwait any more contaminated than the sands of Iraq and Afghanistan? In real time, the areas 1000 miles around Kabul and Baghdad are currently contaminated with DU for the next 4.5 billion years, including the food chain and 100,000,000 people from Tel Aviv to Delhi...and all the land in between.

There is NO ANTIDOTE or cure for Uranium Poisoning! This begs the question; how are humans supposed to manage the oil extraction and transportation faciities in Iraq without being contaminated with DU? Nano sized particles can not be kept off human skin or from being inhaled with gas masks. Where do we go from here?

http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/98950/?page=entire

Google "leuren moret" for numerbous articles on DU

John McCarthy
vpocv@hotmail.com
http://johnmccarthy90066.tripod.com/id155.html

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Boomerang! Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Boomerang! Posted by: Rhotel1
» RE: Boomerang! Posted by: Rhotel1
Major Doug Rokke, who was in charge of the depleted uranium cleanup after Gulf War 1
Posted by: fanny666 on Sep 17, 2008 8:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is an MP3 format talk from Maj. Doug Rokke, former director of the U.S. Army Depleted Uranium Project.

Health Effects of Depleted Uranium

Worth listening to and sharing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Coming home to roost......
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Sep 17, 2008 8:55 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
An excellent example of things that come back to haunt US! Even as "the government" denied the existence of the returning vets from the first Gulf War and their claims of illnesses contracted over there! And unless, there is proper airtight storage, this mess will be borne on the wind! Another reason why with all of the nuclear material that we cannot allow more of this stuff to proliferate!

So, how many are still continuing to vote for their Repugnikan buddies! Yes, they do know how to take care of US, don't they!?!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There is no 'safe' radioactive waste!!!!!
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Sep 17, 2008 9:14 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It don't matter where it came from,radioactive waste is dangerous for thousands of years. Kuwait is nothing compaired to Iraq or for that matter the DU waste that finds it's way into the drinking waters of Hawaii. An island group that's not really a State yet. Yes Hawaii's not a State yet. We just took it over by force.
DU in any State should be a crime. It will be a threat to all future generations. They want to put the crap in Wisconsin on Menoninee Lands. We'll defend this land with force if needed,if we're going to save our people we may need to bear arms against the Nuclear Waste
clowns. This kind of poisoning we can stop.
That is unless you like kids with two heads and believe the gov't types that tell us DU is safe to be around. Let's stop swapping nuclear sand for good barrel prices on oil. The other black death.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Not accurate! Posted by: fanny666
» I meant "alpha" Posted by: fanny666
Sad how not One Congressman will address DU. Era of Unaccountability
Posted by: common intelligence on Sep 17, 2008 10:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A lot of us have been sceaming about DU since Desert storm.
But is apparent The repuks don't care one "Iota".

One comment above claimed 70% of Idaho is a repuk.
All scared of government themselves so they hide out in a remote corner of the country, I guess. But didn't the Ruby Ridge Incident take place there? And wasn't Idaho also the hide out of the infamous Unibomber? Now there were a couple that knew people should hideout. But the government couldn't have anyone that was..as GWB said, "Your either with US or the terrorists".
So it appears the government is the terrorist, eco-terrorist wheeling weapons of mass distruction, at least the right wing repuks.

Kandinsky was right. The bastards should be bombed.
But you'll never hear the MSM bring that up. Never forget Ruby Ridge. Because it was the lame ass morons in the militias and law enforcement that do the repuks evil while they fly around killing moose and wolves for sport, from airpalnes and helicopters.

So just watch because nothing it seems we do can stop these bastards of human feces from desimating earth. All for sustained igrorance.

Now where is the unibomber in prison? I want to write him a letter.
Now he was a leader of the real free world.

It's kind of like why does the media and government keep giving time
to what Alan Greenspan and Bernaky have to say about the economy?
They are the ones that got the country in the mess it's in.

So it has become obvious that the ones who have taken on thier leadership rolls in this country have foundout that the complexities of our world have become so overwhelming that the respondsibilities are beyond their control. They can not be affective in their rolls because entropy of complexity has been reached.

Growing a system and guarding a system as large in magnitude as the United States has become can now only go backwards. Dealing with the left overs such as unintended consiquences, here being DU,
can only point to degradation of the country and the ecosystem as a whole.

Those that plan and engage in the building an applying such dangerous massively distructive ideas as DU are all to blame.
Intellegent they are not. And anyone that supports them in their programs, directly or indirectly, are mentally deranged. For as a Homo Sapien , the alleged "thinking man" they are not. Thus the way of the neandrathal demise has become our inevitable legacy too.

But that doesn't mean we shouldn't make them all accountable!
So let's start the beheading!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Great for Idaho night harvests.
Posted by: NoMcCainPalin on Sep 17, 2008 11:25 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Potatoes that glow in the dark.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

From the land of the potato
Posted by: Wild West on Sep 17, 2008 12:54 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This wonderful event was barely covered by any Idaho media at all. The information you read here at Alternet is more than was reported throughout Idaho.

This stock pile was just dumped into a so-called treated open pit it is only 70 miles south of Boise and the Treasure Valley the largest population in the state of approx. 500,000 Idahoans

The republican leadership here doesn't care unless it effects a rural issue, farming or ranching.

Beware of Idaho potatoes farms are near these contaminated storage areas as well as the Idaho wineries that are popular in the Northwest.

Idaho is under siege by corporate and government interests, Idaho is currently the dumping ground for the world and the people of Idaho are never allowed to vote of these issues.
The governor Butch Otter and both parties US Senate candidates won't talk about it at all both receive funding from the pro-nuke corporations. We are targeted for multiple new nuclear planets from a french company and an American company from the east coast.

Idaho is a beautiful wilderness state that has been scarified by the American government and Idaho republicans for power and money.

Keep us in your thoughts.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Where is AsteroidMiner by the way? Maybe this article is scaring him, no?
Posted by: dmwsd92 on Sep 17, 2008 6:32 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That rascal who drowns out discussions usually posts obnoxiously acting as a propaganda agent for Big Nuclear. I hope he is surrounded by nuclear waste so that rascal learns his lesson !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
Tank duels
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Sep 17, 2008 10:49 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Tank vs tank battles are very common. Tankers [the soldiers
inside the tank] have no other reason to use a depleted uranium
[DU] round. They have other ammunition for other tasks, such a
beehive rounds to kill groups of dismounted [walking] soldiers,
illumination rounds, high explosive squash head [HESH] rounds,
high explosive penetrating rounds, etc. The DU now being
encountered is in the remains of dead Iraqi tanks. The dead Iraqi
tanks were killed because they fired on American tanks.
In World War 2, tank battles often raged for weeks at a time,
with the same 2 tanks sometimes duelling every day and being
repaired every night. A simple hole in a tank doesn't "K" kill it.
It can be driven away and repaired. DU and computer cannon
aiming put an end to that. Every round our tankers fire is a K
kill. A K killed tank is beyond repair. DU rounds were designed
to win against the Soviet Union in central Europe.

Anyone who does anything with the thousands? of dead Iraqi tanks should follow the Technical Manual [TM] on that subject. I'm assuming that there is a TM on that subject. I never worked in Ammo. If the TM is followed exactly, the dead Iraqi tanks can be dealt with safely. Bad things happen when a TM is not followed. Proper safety equipment [respirators or whatever] would be listed in the TM.
DU rounds are managed by nice people at Rock Island Arsenal in Rock Island, Illinois. I worked there for many years.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Tank duels Posted by: Rhotel1
Threshhold
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Sep 17, 2008 10:59 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There IS a threshold for radiation to cause cancer.
Reference: "Power to Save the World; The Truth About Nuclear
Energy" by Gwyneth Cravens, 2007
Finally a truthful book about nuclear power.

Page 35: Your golf clubs may contain depleted uranium [DU].
Don't worry, and don't confuse DU with spent fuel. DU is what
is removed from the uranium to make it enriched in U235. DU is
pure U238. U238 has such a long half life that it is almost not
radioactive. DU is safe to handle, but don't eat it because it is a
chemical poison. Heavy metals in general are poisons, radioactive
or not. DU has other uses that depend on its high density.


Page 70: Natural background radiation where the author happens
to be at the time is higher than what people living at Chernobyl
are getting. The US national average background radiation is 360
millirems/year.

Page 71: The natural background radiation in northeastern
Washington state is 1700 millirems/year.
The natural background radiation on the Zuni uplift is 500 to 700
millirem/year.
The natural background radiation in New Mexico is greater than
the calculated dose from the Three Mile Island meltdown, if you
were next to the reactor.
A chest x-ray gives you 10 millirem.

Page 72: The natural background radiation inside Grand Central
Station is 600 millirem/year because Grand Central Station is
made of granite. [ALL rocks are radioactive.]
The allowed exposure to the public from a nuclear power plant is
15 millirem/year.
A set of dental X-rays gives you 39 millirem.

Page 74: Smoking a pack and a half of cigarettes a day gives
your bronchial airways 1300 millirems/year according to the
NCRP OR 8000 millirems/year according to the National
Academy of Sciences.

Page 75: A coal fired power plant gives you 100 to 400 times as
much radiation as a nuclear power plant. Worldwide, an average
person gets 0.01 millirem/year from nuclear power plants, the
same as eating one banana. Bananas contain potassium and some
of the potassium is radioactive potassium 40. This has always
been the case.

Page 76: The cancer rate in New Mexico is much lower than the
national average but the natural background radiation is much
higher than average. The highest rates of cancer are around
heavy industry, chemical factories and petrochemical factories.
[Benzene, a petroleum distillate, is a very powerful carcinogen.]

Page 77: Natural gas contains radon, a radioactive gas.

Page 86: Among 80000 nuclear bomb survivors from Hiroshima
and Nagasaki, the cancer rate was only 6% higher than expected.
Radiation is very weak at causing cancer. Try benzene if you
really want to catch cancer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

DU is safe, coal is not
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Sep 17, 2008 11:14 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Coal contains: URANIUM, ARSENIC, LEAD, MERCURY,
Antimony, Cobalt, Nickel, Copper, Selenium, Barium, Fluorine,
Silver, Beryllium, Iron, Sulfur, Boron, Titanium, Cadmium,
Magnesium, Thorium, Calcium, Manganese, Vanadium, Chlorine,
Aluminum, Chromium, Molybdenum and Zinc. There is so much
of these elements in coal that cinders and coal smoke are actually
valuable ores. We should be able to get all the uranium and
thorium we need to fuel nuclear power plants for centuries by
using cinders and smoke as ore. Remember that, to get a given
amount of energy, you need on the order of 100 MILLION
TIMES as much coal as uranium. That means the coal mine has
to be 100 million times larger than the uranium mine, not counting
the recycling of nuclear fuel. We can keep our mountains and
forests and our health by switching from coal to nuclear power.

Chinese industrial grade coal is sometimes stolen by
peasants for cooking. The result is that the whole family
dies of arsenic poisoning because Chinese industrial grade
coal contains large amounts of arsenic.

I have zero financial interest in nuclear power, and I never have
had a financial interest in nuclear power. My sole motivation in
writing this is to avoid extinction by H2S gas due to global
warming.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

BENZENE is causing cancer
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Sep 17, 2008 11:30 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some of the real causes of cancer in soldiers in the Iraq war:
1. Thick black smoke pouring nonstop out of the smokestacks
that line the Iraq/Kuwait border
2. The polluted air they lived in, the brown water they had to
use, the dust they breathed
3. Oil refineries, a cement factory, a chlorine factory and a
sulfuric acid factory, all spewing unfiltered and uncontrolled
substances into the air
4. "One day, we were walking toward the port and they had
sulfuric acid exploding out of the stacks. We were covered with it,
everything was burning on us, and we had to turn around and get
to the medics,"
Missed factors:
1. BENZENE from the crude oil. Benzene is the single most
likely cause of cancer until proven otherwise.
2. I don't know what is in the smoke from crude oil fires, but I
suspect that there could be additional toxic substances caused by
partial burning.

Clearly if the soldiers were sprayed with sulfuric acid, the
environment there is so polluted and so hostile that it isn't a fit
place for people. The problem is the lack of environmental
regulation of local industry and burning oil wells. Depleted
Uranium [DU] was available by mail order in 1981. DU is safe
to handle but not to ingest.
The soldiers and civilians who work for the army do not
conspire to injure soldiers. The soldiers and civilians who work
for the army do everything they can to make war as survivable as
possible for our soldiers. Our soldiers are often the children of
Department of the Army civilians. We use depleted uranium
ammunition because depleted uranium ammunition greatly
enhances our soldiers' chances of winning the war and surviving.
There is nothing else that works as well as DU ammunition in
tank vs tank battles. Depleted uranium has never been near a
reactor. Depleted uranium is the U238 that was separated out in
the enrichment process. Our army thinks DU weapons are green
because they prevent the repair of enemy tanks. Tank duels used
to be repeated daily for weeks as the same 2 tanks could duel
every day and get repaired every night.

DU is a chemical poison if you ingest it, but natural background
radiation is far greater than soldiers get from handling DU rounds.
Natural background radiation has always been there. More
information on background radiation is available at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Background_radiation
and:
http://www.unscear.org/unscear/en/publications/2000_1.html

Soldiers should be advised to wear their gas masks and possibly
MOPP4 chemical protection suits when encountering dangerous
chemical environments of all types. The super-dusty
environment of the middle east was new to the army as of
Operation Desert Shield. We are still learning how to deal with
powder fine dusts. Since their gas mask filters were not designed
for industrial hazards, the filters may have to be replaced often
and may not be optimal for industrial hazards. People should not
allow crude oil to remain on their skin. Benzene from the crude
oil will soak through the skin and cause cancer. Soldiers should
go around rather than through puddles of crude oil. The army has
water purification equipment that should be used to prevent
having to drink polluted water.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Seriously, folks: how did MSM miss this story?
Posted by: ranchero42 on Sep 17, 2008 11:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Could this be the same wire service that placed the Oregon state border next to British Columbia last week? No wonder all those poor Kootenai sturgeon missed out on thirty years of blind dates.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

OK... here we go....
Posted by: Quannah on Sep 18, 2008 11:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
we get the hijacking of this thread by Pro-Nuke idealogues. This happens every time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Discovery Channel investigation pegs DU as GWS culprit
Posted by: Beagle17 on Sep 20, 2008 1:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All the DU naysayers should be able to rebut the results of this recent investigation by Discovery Channel. It was produced for the regular segment, Conspiracy Test.

The “conspiracy” they are testing is not DU however, it is whether GWS really exists. It does, they find. Using the latest in DNA scanning technology, they find blood samples from GWS-suffering vets show massive, generalized DNA damage that would be expected to cause a wide range of symptoms, such as transposed chromosome segments and chromosomes missing large chunks. Much of the damage is of the sort cause by internal alpha radiation. This sort of damage is typical only of internal (ie. up-close) alpha radiation damage. Alpha particles are much larger than beta or gamma - the kinds of radiation we normally think of as harmful - but all the dose-response curves were developed for beta/gamma. An alpha particle is 2 protons and 2 neutrons (a helium nucleus basically). Our skin normally shields us from this kind of radiation, but if we get it inside our cells, it can smash DNA like Mac trucks hitting trains.

This is a smoking gun, folks. Anyone can follow the logic of this video. Watch it and see what you think. The discussion of DU is mostly found in the 5th clip.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Birth Defects and Cancers
Posted by: Rhotel1 on Sep 22, 2008 11:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There have been false claims of birth defects illustrated by photos of Harlequin Fetal Syndrome, a grotesque, generally fatal skin condition that was first noted in 1750 and is known to be caused by the combination of two parents with an extremely rare recessive gene. These false claims began when Saddam Hussein's government showed peace activists, including German Doctor Siegwart Horst-Gunther, supposed cases of depleted uranium babies. Saddam's government knew that the doctor had no expertise in rare fetal conditions and the activists did not even have the benefit of an elementary medical education. The activists claim that the government is out to get them, but the government has made no effort to examine these photos and show that they are actually of rare genetic conditions that have nothing to do with DU. When I learned of the Harlequin Fetal Syndrome, I began to do just that and the National Institutes of Health turned my request for help down. I will share my findings complete with photos and references with the readers of Alter Net.

Mohammed Daud Miraki uses the Harlequin Fetal Syndrome to get suckers on the net to give to his Afghan DU and Recovery Fund that was closed in 2005 because he refused to file the required annual reports.

article and autopsy photo

article by French doctor

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]