comments_image -

Nader Blasts NOW On Women's Issues

Criticized by the head of the National Organization of Women as being "ill-informed about abortion rights," Ralph Nader Thursday accused the group of ignoring key women's issues in favor of "political expediency" and said he's been fighting for women's issues since 1957.
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.

 
 
 
 

OAKLAND, California -- Criticized by the head of the National Organization of Women as being "ill-informed about abortion rights," presidential candidate Ralph Nader Thursday accused the group of ignoring key women's issues in favor of "political expediency."

Nader was responding to NOW president Patricia Ireland's stinging accusation in Thursday's San Francisco Chronicle. In a voice rising with irritation, he argued Ireland's active campaign against his candidacy is typical "politics of fear" rhetoric common among powerful liberal organizations.

"I think it's time for the constituency groups of the Democratic Party to hold that party up to a higher standard, instead of crawling on their knees to an endorsement because they think Republicans are worse," he said at the headquarters of the California Nurses Association, one of the largest unions to endorse his Green Party candidacy.

Ireland criticized Nader for not mentioning "any explicitly feminist issues, not birth control or abortion," in his 10-page candidacy statement. "It's not just an indifference," she told the Chronicle, "it's an ignorance that's almost willful."

Nader responded with a sharp civics lecture about his own career.

"I've been fighting for women's rights since before Patricia Ireland knew the term," he said. "In 1957, there were 11 states in this country that prohibited women from serving on juries. ... Do you know who wrote (about that issue)? You're looking at him."

The Green Party's position on abortion, available on the votenader.com Web site, is actually a verbatim copy of NOW's, Nader said. Furthermore, NOW has been conspicuously silent on several issues over the past eight years, he charged.

"By the way, they haven't asked Mr. Gore to speak about (the Equal Rights Amendment). Isn't that strange? Wasn't that a big crusade?" Nader asked. "I haven't heard NOW talk about why the Clinton/Gore administration is foot-dragging on RU-486 for almost eight years," he added, referring to the so-called abortion pill.

Two of Nader's many consumer-protection books have covered discrimination against women and many of his other core issues, such as medical malpractice, greatly affect women, he said.

"Women are discriminated against in everything from excessive and unnecessary operations, unnecessary prescriptions, auto dealer and repair firms ripping them off because they think they can take advantage of them, credit discrimination, and many other forms that are documented in our book," he said. "I have failed utterly to get NOW interested in this subject for the last 18 years. And the other thing I'd like Patricia Ireland to pay some attention to, is over 40,000 women a year die from medical malpractice in hospitals. No comment there!"

Rosanne DeMoro, executive director of the California Nurses Association, said she was appalled by Ireland's statements.

"You know, we're an organization of women -- 31,000 registered nurses," DeMoro said. "And we're appalled by this thing today. I mean, if health care isn't a women's issue, what is? And this man has the best position on health care by far. On all of the issues."

Nader, who has never married and is known for being awkward around women, is having trouble connecting with several hardcore constituencies of the Democratic Party, from major unions to African-American organizations, who accuse him of dishonestly minimizing the differences between the two major parties and abetting Republican George W. Bush's candidacy. Answering their concerns has taken much of Nader's campaigning time, and his responses have ranged from sympathy to exasperation.

"I think [Ireland] is hiding the better instincts of that organization, because they're afraid of the Republicans more than they're disgusted with the Democrats," he said. "I don't like political expedience by NOW, or any other groups that are affiliated with the Democratic Party."

submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
AlterNet Radio: What's At Stake in Wisconsin; Real "Defense" Budget Is $1 Trillion; the Right's Phony Race War

By Staff | AlterNet

 
 
Fox, Breitbart, and Ricketts Try to Bring Back D'Souza's Pseudo-Birtherism

By Steve M | No More Mister Nice Blog

 
 
Activists Speak Out Against Lack of Access to Bradley Manning

By Agence France Presse

 
 
NYPD Catches Sexual Assailant, Then Lets Him Go Free Because He Didn't Feel Like Being Questioned

By Jill F | Feministe

 
 
Gov. Scott Orders Purging of Florida’s Voter Rolls - Just in Time For Prez Election

By Adele Stan | AlterNet

 
 
Abortion Clinics Across Country Put On Alert In Wake of Georgia Clinic Arson Cases

By Robin Marty | RH Reality Check

 
 
Former GOP Congresswoman Blasts New GOP Women’s Caucus: ‘They’re Not Voting In Best Interest Of All Women’

By Josh Israel | ThinkProgress

 
 
Debbie Wasserman Schulz is Wrong on Wisconsin

By LaFeminista | DailyKos

 
 
Pro-Coal Group Pays People to Wear Its Shirts at EPA Hearing

By Heather Moyer | Sierra Club

 
 
Kids Inundate NY Governor With Concerns About Fracking

By Seth Gladstone | Food and Water Watch

 
 
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 2 ]