Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Why Obama's Message Resonates with Millions

By Matt Taibbi, RollingStone.com. Posted September 9, 2008.


Obama delivers the same message Democrats always rely on. So why does it sound like a clarion call this time around?
Advertisement

On the campaign trail with Barack Obama, four days before the Democratic convention. Another teeming high school gym in another halfway-to-somewhere town, decorated with still more banners proclaiming the heroic exploits of the Local Sports Team, in this case the football studs of Oscar Smith High in Chesapeake, Virginia.

In the audience are the same characters you see everywhere on the campaign trail: the bare-armed cheerleaders congregating near the bleachers, the sullen-faced union workers dutifully decked out in matching T-shirts, the heavyset Soccer Moms cheering from the back rows with that weird overhand applause style they all seem to use, their fingers curled back so as not to ruin freshly painted nails. There are the same Secret Service agents waiting to herd the press into the same windowless concrete filing room, and the same exhausted, khaki-clad campaign staffers with the rapidly thickening backsides ready to queue up behind the journalists to fill their buffet plates with the same Regionally Appropriate Cuisine (pork ribs and hush puppies in the South; steak, corn and potatoes in the Midwest) made up with pride by the local caterers.

And to top it all off, there's even the same speech.

Four years ago, I listened first to Howard Dean and then to John Kerry as they went through the motions of promising to support the middle class, to create jobs through investment in renewable energy, to punish companies that exploited tax loopholes by moving overseas and to find the real terrorists in Afghanistan. They trod the same ground as Gore and even Clinton, coughing out the same paeans to the same lost paradise of the middle-class lifestyle, to those same vanishing days of our history when hardworking, patriotic Americans could live with comfort and economic security on one decent manufacturing job. At stake, they insisted, was nothing less than the American Dream itself. For Dean, it was "time for a change in America." Kerry sometimes ended his speeches by presenting his campaign as a choice of "change versus more of the same" -- a phrase he actually borrowed from Bill Clinton's 1992 campaign.

Here in Chesapeake, Barack Obama offers up the same milky hodgepodge of middle-class tax cuts, investment in alternative fuels and consequences for job exporters and terrorists. And rhetorically, he uses the same old magic trick for his main theme, talking about how all Americans want is to leave a better world for their children.

"That's the essence of the American Dream," he tells the crowd, echoing his predecessors. He goes on to tell the already-famous story of John McCain's seven houses, then explains that someone who has seven houses can't possibly understand what the middle class is going through. "You need a president who's going to be fighting for you," Obama says, to thunderous applause. He concludes by declaring, "We are going to fundamentally bring about change in America" -- a message punctuated by the huge banner hanging behind him, emblazoned with his infuriatingly omnipresent campaign slogan: "Change We Can Believe In." Obama has even taken to borrowing some of his theme music from other candidates: I was mortified when his rallies began to feature the worst of the Hillary standbys, the excruciating "I Won't Back Down" by Tom Petty. The painful predictability of it all was summed up by a front-page headline in The New York Times after the first day of the Democratic convention: "Appeals Evoking American Dream Rally Democrats."

All of this saccharine talk of "change" is so transparently a mechanical come-on that if it were anybody but Barack Obama uttering the word, you'd want to throw up at the very sound of it. And yet, as I watch Obama deliver the same hackneyed act I've seen hundreds of times before, I feel against my will that I am actually watching something different at work. After Kerry and Dean speeches, I often heard people say things like, "At least he's not as dumb as Bush." But after Obama speeches, I see audience members stumbling around in all directions with orgiastic smiles on their faces, as though they've been splashed with gallons of magic pixie paint. In Raleigh, North Carolina, where Obama knocked dead a massive town-hall crowd at a local fairgrounds with a speech that said almost nothing at all, I ask a woman named Melanie Threatt why she thinks her life would improve under an Obama presidency. "It just will," she says. When I press her for specifics, she says, "I just think doors are going to open." You hear stuff like this a lot on Planet Obama, and it makes you wonder just what it is you're encountering. Obama's followers implicitly believe in the things he says, and the fervor of their belief is more religious than intellectual, closer to faith than to reason. Watching him at work, you realize that Obama's remarkable success has almost nothing to do with the same-old product being marketed by the same-old political machine, and almost everything to do with the specific qualities of the individual who is selling it. The same stuff that sounded like hollow, invidious horseshit coming from Kerry and Gore sounds, as dispensed by Obama, like nothing less than a clarion call to collective action. And every time you feel his pitch working, you wonder: Is this some chat-room robot I'm falling in love with? Or is this an actual human being on the line, offering me an opportunity at last to fulfill my deepest desires?


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: democrats, obama, election 2008

Matt Taibbi is a writer for Rolling Stone.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
If Obama had been commander-in-chief when I was in the service...
Posted by: VetAgainst McCain on Sep 9, 2008 12:06 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would still be in uniform!

Vet Against McCain
To find out why, click on the links below
VietnamVeteransAgainstJohnMcCain.com
VoteVets.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Polls Don't Reflect This Thesis
Posted by: AlexLawyer on Sep 9, 2008 12:25 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm not so sure Obama's message resonates all that well. The anointed successor to the most unpopular president of this century, who has vowed to continue the same failing policies, shouldn't be running even with the challenger at this point. It doesn't bode well. Had Obama maintained his more progressive positions he'd be way ahead, but with the policy differences narrowing it comes down to personality for many voters, and that's (inexplicably, from my vantage point) helping McCain and Palin.

My disappointment in Obama notwithstanding, I'm strongly supporting him because the thought of another 4 years of Bush is too scary.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Indeed McCain is up: McCain 54, Obama 44 Posted by: democracynowiniraq
» Intentionally stupid Posted by: progdem
» Intentionally stupid enough to win-again Posted by: democracynowiniraq
» Jasonix Posted by: democracynowiniraq
» RE: The Polls Don't Reflect This Thesis Posted by: Allstar Cookie
» RE: The Polls Don't Reflect This Thesis Posted by: christianslayer1955
Here's another possibility
Posted by: Uriahz on Sep 9, 2008 12:32 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Maybe the guy's a sociopath. Wouldn't be out of the ordinary. He's obviously way smarter than the average dude on the street. Seems to really mean his endless parade of bullshit? Yeah, seems likely.

Not to knock the guy. Maybe he's just the sort of man who really genuinely feels whatever he wants to feel at the time. There are several schools of approaching that challenge to be found in the acting field. Check out Antonin Artaud. Having a message that you agree with 80% certainly makes it easier. But really, is it THAT hard to give a rip-roaring barnburner of a political speech? I don't find it so amazing that this guy's a great speaker-- I find it amazing that he's the best damn speaker in a presidential campaign since Bobby Kennedy at least, maybe as far back as FDR. And he has some damn amazing speechwriters.

But seriously, the fan worship? Come on. The guy's charismatic and powerful, but his politician roots are showing to anyone with the mind to look. He's a phony. I happen to like phonies, but there's no denying the fact. He's a huckster.

I liked him in the primary because he's a better public speaker with much the same platform, and hence a better chance of winning. I like him now because he has a far superior platform than McCain, even though I admit he's just another politician. His public speaking skills are absolutely integral to his success, sure, but if you're seriously taken in by this guy you have a screw loose. He's just telling you what you want to hear, and doing it beautifully.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Here's another possibility Posted by: thinkingisfun
» RE: Here's another possibility Posted by: radical53
barack who??...
Posted by: Annapurna1 on Sep 9, 2008 12:45 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
thx for reminding the audience that theres actually another ticket on the ballot besides palin/mccain...and im sure alot of voters will get a similar shock when they see more than one ticket on the ballot in november.. not that it has any chance of winning...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

He's had the same effect on me!
Posted by: outsideagitator on Sep 9, 2008 12:49 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And I am glad to hear similar feelings from a skeptical and I must say jaded reporter that trots around on the campaign trail with politicians.

I did not pay much attention to him until I watched him working the crowds in Iowa early in the primary season. I tuned in late and so missed the speech, but C-span kept following him around as he interacted with the folks that came out to hear him and I watched intently how they seemed to react to him. The sincere smiles and obvious pleasure while talking to him seemed genuine to me and he seemed to be really enjoying it and radiated sincerity...over the T.V. screen! I had never observed that before on tv.

I am to the left of most progressives and vote with and for Dems. because in my opinion its the only party where even part of my own political desires are likely to be realized. I know that he is a liberal and probably will have to be pressured to do the right thing if he is elected by the progressive part of the Dem. base, but somehow I think that maybe this time we got some one who will really listen and really try to do the right thing.

I like him a lot...he makes me feel good.

Joseph

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It will take an exceptional man to pull it off
Posted by: ukeman on Sep 9, 2008 3:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and he may just be the man... but come on, apprehensive because the repulicans candidates are pulling even???
he's a black man, with a middle eastern name!
I mean how difficult does it need to be?
We've got the right minions all with their underwear in a bunch in what has to be the most weird combination of occurrences here, actually trying to justify getting excited about another 4 years.
When it takes a snide, divisive, lying, boastful, knee-capping woman, who happens to be an ultra fundamentalist to get the "holier than thou" crowd up again... talk about your ironies.

You know what?, if Obama doesnt win, I say that the best candidate couldnt win, and maybe it's time to let the suckers just pay the consequences ... and let them go down with the ship!
dam the torpedoes! they deserve it!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's over for Obamarama/Biden!
Posted by: Col. Jackleg on Sep 9, 2008 4:04 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
According to the latest polling, the O/B ticket had a 7 points lead after Denver. McCain/Palin made up that deficit and now lead by 4 points. That's an 11 points swing following two conventions and a death knell for O/B. Moreover, MSNBC cheerleaders Matthews and Olberman have been ousted through election day and that means but one thing....the neocons got their way and will shield Palin from any criticism or need to defend her selection on the merits of her worthiness. Justice [puke] Roberts will swear in McCain in January and the only issue is how many Dipocrits will be elected to the House and Senate. It's over folks and it entails more than a mere election outcome. We have reached the level of dumbass politics that no nation can survive!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It's over for Obamarama/Biden! Posted by: nochicagoboys
» But I'll bet if Obama wins Posted by: democracynowiniraq
» RE: But I'll bet if Obama wins Posted by: nochicagoboys
» cj, I feel your pain Posted by: Centavo
» RE: cj, I feel your pain Posted by: nochicagoboys
» RE: It's over for Obamarama/Biden! Posted by: christianslayer1955
» Statistics 101 Posted by: Col. Jackleg
We want CHANGE in WASHINGTON! That means KICK BUSH/McSAME OUT!
Posted by: williameon on Sep 9, 2008 4:17 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Read my lips!
Kick the Crooks out of Washington.
All the Lies,
All the Stolen Votes,
All the Spying, Stealing, Treason and Dying!
We are sick of it.
Change the Administration
Change the Government.
That's what we’re talking about.
The Corpirate Fascist Dictatorship ruining this Country.
Bush/McPain are clueless Aristo Trash.
Front men for The Alien Aristocracy
We are tired of
The Corpirate BU__! SH__!
It is a sham, they are old, crooked and corrupt.
They have failed the people.
GREED is Evil.
Relentless Corpirate GREED serves only one purpose
It enslaves you and makes the Billionaire Corpirates Richer.

What does Murdock and Bill Gates care about you?
Nothing!
They would rather drop a Bomb on you then buy you a sandwich.
Our Government is 77% Privatized.
Put that on CNN, Fox or any other FAUX Blues Channel
Tax breaks for the 15,000 Richest Families while our children starve.
The 15,000 Families that own 99% of everything and still want more.
When will it end?
When we throw the CROOKS out?
There is a difference between McSame and Change.
Hundreds of Military Bases around the world and NOTHING for you.
Billions for EXXon and nothing 4 U.
They will do anything to steal this Election.
Is that right?
Is the FAUX Corpirate Greedia right?
We live in a evil Propaganda Military Media Police State.
It is a crime.
Propaganda is a Crime.
Millions of Millions for Trillionaires and none for you.
That's a Crime!
Everyone in this country is aganist BUSH/Chainey & McSame
What space ship did the media just step off of.
One Voice rises up against the
Corporate Trash and a giant BLACK boot stomps him into the ground.
Take the money out of politics.
McPain will work for free.
What does that tell you?
What does a 72 year old Billionaire with eight mansions know about our problems?
$300,000 Dollar Earings?
Oh, that’s middle class to him!
He does he need a job for?
Everyone else is forced to retire except this a-sholes.
He just keeps coming.
Spewing BU__! SH__!
They have taken over the voting system.
They count the votes.
CHANGE is in order.
VOTE BUSH/McSAME OUT!
Or
Kick them out.
Give them a taste of their own medicine.

IMPEACH!
Surge
Purge
Update and
REBOOT!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Huh?? Posted by: democracynowiniraq
» RE: Huh?? Posted by: popeurbanxxiii
Both and Neither For All Time
Posted by: Last Chance on Sep 9, 2008 4:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Both candidates assume everyone wants a growing economy, and neither admits the human population must be reduced for the planet to survive. So, whoever wins or steals the election, the problems they try to solve will be overwhelmed by the relentlessly growing population: McCain may drill for more oil, but millions more people will need even more. Barack may broaden Medicare coverage, but millions more people will need even more. So, the only solution they can see is to grow the economy to produce new money to pay for it, on and on for 7, 8, 9, 10 billion people all demanding more of everything. THAT is what is killing the Earth -- too much of our good thing turning bad.

But no one wants to hear this. They just want to satisfy their short term appetites, never mind the consequences. But the consequences arrive no matter what fantasies the people are fed by their political hucksters -- and those consequences are summed up in one word: ecocide, the death of a life-supporting planet.

On the other hand, McCain as President would probably provoke World War Three which would kill the Earth in a day, not a lingering ecocidal collapse.

So there is our REAL choice. Which mode of planetary death do we prefer: McCain's short track, or Obama's longer track? The destination is the same.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Both and Neither For All Time Posted by: nochicagoboys
» RE: Both and Neither For All Time Posted by: Last Chance
» No, we are three voices. Posted by: Centavo
» baloney Posted by: socialpsych
» baloney? Posted by: Last Chance
» RE: baloney? Posted by: socialpsych
» OK Posted by: Last Chance
» RE: Both and Neither For All Time Posted by: Last Chance
» RE: Both and Neither For All Time Posted by: Last Chance
» RE: Both and Neither For All Time Posted by: nochicagoboys
The Power of Hope
Posted by: ava1984 on Sep 9, 2008 4:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's hard to imagine that anyone who has existed lo these many, (Can it be just 08?), years under the stupidity and tyranny of the GOP and too many complicit Dems, could possibly vote for 04 more years!
Unfortunately, there are millions of people in our land who are as dumb as a sack of hair; and will go out of their dim way to find excuses to vote for MCShame.

If Obama can pull this off, and remain above it all, he will make more than history, he will represent a better America! And, the possibilities will be endless; because we will have shown ourselves to be better than we have been in many years!

"Nobody ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public" HL Mencken

Here's hoping we can prove Mr. Mencken wrong; at last!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Power of Hope Posted by: Girl39
ALL THE MCSAME/PITPALIN LIES ARE SICKENING
Posted by: LOVELYT. on Sep 9, 2008 5:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It must be a prerequisite to lie on every turn for the repukes. Do they even consider truth or a stones throw passed a lie? They even have the audacity to take the "change" slogan. They only prove to me that they will lie, cheat and STEAL everything in sight.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Obama will win by a landslide Posted by: itzamirakul
seazen
Posted by: seazen on Sep 9, 2008 5:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great article in many dimensions. Trying to understand the "why?" behind Barack's popularity is an important task because it is clear that even those of us who are deeply hopeful he will win the election also find answering the question difficult. From my perspective as a 67-yr old white male there seems to be a convergence in him of some deeply important things:

1) He reflects the real future of the multi-cultural world we live in today - not because of his skim color but because of his personal life experiences. Everyone else screams of the past and an almost psychopathic need to go backwards.

2) He reawakens the sense of "we" in us - that it is, in fact, a country dedicated to the well-being of "We the People" and not the arrogant, aristocratic, "let them eat cake" group that runs the country today.

3) He has sustained an effort to refrain from the petty, cruel, and childish nonsense that has dominated politics and the right-wing airwaves for so long.

4) He is intelligent, he listens, and "talks" to us (and does great speeches, too) and that alone is a needed relief from the inane, controlled, and disdainful crud we have been subjected to for the past 8 years.

I really, really hope we vote for the smart ones this time. Three strikes and we are definitely out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» God Posted by: foreverhope
» god Posted by: Ahimsa
Americans have Bush fatigue
Posted by: nfamous on Sep 9, 2008 5:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Americans don't even care what happens in the White House anymore. Bush and the neocons have demonstrated they will not listen to anyone or abide by any laws. Impeachment is the remedy for that but because corporations benefit from their lawlessness neocons have been allowed to continue in office and subvert the entire Constitution. Now people feel powerless because we are. Violent revolution is called for but Americans are too afraid of their government to stop it from stepping all over them.

Any charismatic Democrat would be embraced after eight ears of criminality and a wrecked economy. Bush has set Americans up for the fall again because all forty-three presidents have made promises they couldn't keep and subsequently broke. It's called lying in layman's terms. Just because Obama is not white doesn't mean he will change this historical pattern of abuse. He represents the establishment. How could he really change anything and not be assassinated?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

They're back... and they're doin' it again.
Posted by: chlamor on Sep 9, 2008 5:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They're back... and they're doin' it again.

Demobama: "We love the miltary, they are all heroes, we honor their service..."
Republicain: "I was the military; I should be honored..."

Demobama: "We don't oppose all war; we are just against the way war is handled."
Republicain: "Didn't you hear me? I am the military. Who can handle war better?"

Demobama: "Gas prices are really high. We favor all kinds of indistinct measures to fix them."
Republicain: "We favor the same indistinct shit (what is the harm?) plus we wanna drill everywhere - Hummers are us.

Demobama: "The economy is terrible. We want a middle class tax break."
Republicain: "We want a tax break for everybody - we are more egalitarian."

Demobama: "We want indistinct change and meaningless experience."
Republicain: "We want meaningless experience and indistinct change - better ordering."

Demobama: "Women's issues are really important. That is why we are for abortion."
Republicain: "Hell, we gotta a girl... err, 'woman'."

Demobama: "Since we live in a post racial era, our guy is black but it don't mean nothin'."
Republicain: "Since it don't mean nothin', we stopped paying attention."

Demobama: "We are really really smart and entitled. We should win."
Republicain: "Lots of people hate 'entitled'. We are billionaire homies."

Demobama: "We want to invite the Republicans into our ruling coalition."
Republicain: "We are Republicans. We don't need to invite nobody."

Demobama: "Don't worry, we won't really change too much."
Republicain: "Ditto..."

Demobama: "We are certain voters are stupid so we will wow 'em with fireworks and not distract them with substance."
Republicain: "We will see your 'stupid' and raise you ten thousand 'floating chrysanthemums of cynicism'."

...and so it goes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Verbose
Posted by: progdem on Sep 9, 2008 5:41 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't know if I want shorter artciles from him or more contentful ones, but it seems to me if you take out the paragraphs where he is clearly trying really hard to be a good writer, as opposed to a good journalist, you would get a normal sized blog post. He is a smart guy, this Taibbi, so I suspect I would like to see more than a blog post. But the strings of adjectives are too long and the imagery way overdone. Makes him seem like a dilletante.

And do we really need a 'I'm a cynical guy, but I am positively gushing over this Obama person'? Cynics don't gush. Chronicly dissapointed optimists gush when they get fooled into think their luck will change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Run, Ralph, run
Posted by: suckerbeagle on Sep 9, 2008 6:02 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't want to vote for the 'wrong' war and I don't want to vote for the 'right' war. I'm voting for No war. I'm voting for Nader.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Suckerbeagle? Posted by: GrannyBgood
» RE: Suckerbeagle? Posted by: whit4brains
Even when scripted, Obama seems unscripted
Posted by: taxidriver on Sep 9, 2008 6:02 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama is simply a charismatic and gifted speaker--and he is genuine as well. Gore was and is wooden, and Kerry was trying too hard by half, and didn't know what he wanted to be: a war hero? a hunter? a liberal?

Obama represents the American dream. He's not a privileged child of admirals, he's a biracial child raised by a single mom and his grandparents. He's not a hell-raising fighter jock and alpha male who objectifies women, but a thoughtful and ambitious politician who married an equal, not an heiress.

All that being said, many Americans can't get past his black face and funny-sounding name--and all the innuendo promoted by cynical right-wingers.

So I suppose we'll elect the "reformed" jet pilot jockey and the wet-behind-the-ears big game hunter.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

He's An Actor
Posted by: Southern Gal on Sep 9, 2008 6:21 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama is an actor. He can play the role of president. He certainly changes his rhetoric depending on his audience and his speech writers. The last time we had an actor for president, it didn't work out so well for real, working people. Unfortunately, the corporations have given us a choice between the angry old POW and the actor.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE:NO comparison Posted by: GrannyBgood
» Girl... (a letter) Posted by: Ahimsa
» Are you for real? Posted by: Jest2007
Try running for office yourself
Posted by: phastphil on Sep 9, 2008 6:23 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Having run for local office 3 times - you think listening to the same old speech gets old - try giving it over and over again. The fact the Matt still believes after hearing the same old crap over and over speaks volumes to why Obama will win.
A wise man once said: "they will never remember what you said, but they will always remember the way you made them feel"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The only ad I'm hearing on the radio from Obama is the "abortion" ad.
Posted by: maxpayne on Sep 9, 2008 6:31 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And frankly, I am sick of it. "Abortion" has already been outlawed more or less for the past 8 years. Remember how the Laci Peterson shit was hyped to slip the phony "partial birth abortion ban" through Congress ? Remember that phoney "unborn victims" shit? What about the born and living? No clear message on undoing the damage. Roe v Wade at this point is IRRELEVANT as the DAMAGE has already been done. Obama's beating a dead horse at this point. And his support of Big Pharma and Big Insurance proves that he's no different from McSHIT.

P.S:

Obama has pandered to the rightwing on virtually everything and that has angered me beyond the point of insanity. My wife was even more angered by Obama's waffling to pandering but would calm me down and remind me that when all is lost, there's Ralph Nader. And you wonder why more of Obama's base are switching to Indies such as Nader and Mckinney or don't even want to vote. Faux Noise and other media outlets wouldn't be chalked with hundreds of users talking Orwellian and going McSHIT if Obama had stayed a progressive/liberal populist in the first place and had actually challenged the establishment as he had originally promised in 2004.

And stay tuned as I get ready to present my entire take titled:

"What if Obama were actually a populist?"

You won't be disappointed, well sort of.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This person(persona) is just that, a persona
Posted by: bluetara on Sep 9, 2008 6:36 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the non thinkin folks(lemmings), (us, me, you) of good ole want and be(lie)ve in this persona(obama) who espouses change. The speeches by this persons(obama) are simply neuro- linguisitc programming (mantras) which are repeated and repeated and repeated by this persona (obama), and the entourage of (sorcerers), oops, I mean hired pr firms(thank you freud and edward bernaise), lobbyists and hired media conglomerates such as ny times, washington post, abc, nbc, cbs, fox, cnn, google, yahoo,npr, the list is endless. this cult of personality has been wrapped in a nice little package for the dining pleasure of the receptors in our brains that have been entrained since we were in kindergarten to a authority figure to guide us to the right outcome. btw how many hours, days years has the state(true parent) indoctrinated us compared to the guidance we have received from our biological surrogate parents? add up the time and compare, you will be shocked!! We are just following a tradition that our parents and our parents parents have sadly gone through. being mind controlled all our lives by the fasci-corporate government(govern-to control, ment-mind)TO CONTROL YOUR MIND. I see this mania everywhere which shows me we are still in kindergarten.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why not......
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Sep 9, 2008 6:36 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Although Sen. Obama is a politician, maybe it's because he thinks, hopes, and is able to articulate a vision. I may not always agree with what he is saying, but he does have a way of inspiring hope in America, hope in ourselves! These last 8 years have been an abomination to the lower 95% of Americans! We have seen health-care become unaffordable for millions, wars without end, outsourced jobs, etc. The Repugnikans would have you to believe that all will be fine if "we" would continue to let the "free markets" do their thing, or if the government would just get out of the way!

I was not around to see the last gilded age, but if it was as perverse as this current one, well it was truly a low point for Americans! That Sen. Obama can and has tapped into the emotional nerve and articulates well the feelings is what has helped to bring him to this point. Now if he can channel the anger that many have and talk with a more progressive voice, that will put him a league all his own.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Simple
Posted by: GreyFoxThree on Sep 9, 2008 6:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Its quite simple actually. On one hand you have Obama, and on the other hand you have "McSame" Clearly to anyone with a single ounce of common sense Obama is the lesser of the two evils. Pretty logical huh?

Jen
Is your ISP watching you?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Obviously! Posted by: GrannyBgood
» RE: Simple Posted by: whit4brains
Understanding Obama
Posted by: radical53 on Sep 9, 2008 6:44 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It seems that most people, including those on Alternet, are buying into the media spin on Obama. It's true that 99% of his policies are retreads, but that's not the point.

To listen to the media and his political adversaries, you would think all he has going for him is his oratory. The Republicans take it a few steps further and put out Rovian lies about him.

The main thing Obama really offers is a change in the approach to politics in Washington. He is not a left-wing idealogue. He is about getting things done by negotiating the best deal he can get. His most recent demonstration of this approach is his energy proposal. Obama is not a fan of offshore oil drilling, but he is saying he will include some of it in his energy policy so he can get a more comprehensive program adopted. Obama is also proposing that the government set the political agenda and write the legislation, rather than just voting on laws written by multi-national corporations.

The old ideas of economic growth, health care reform, cleaning up the environment, more jobs, and improving international relations have been advanced with soaring oratory to try to get folks to vote for them. Based on the latest trends in the polls and the excitement over Sarah Palin, it appears that even a rock star can't get the majority of Americans to put any faith in its government.

To make matters worse, the national media's campaign of spin, confusion, and obfuscation is in full swing. Obama's proposed solutions to our problems are being cast as very complicated and confusing. I've listened time and again to Obama laying out his programs, followed by some nitwit saying he or she didn't hear any specifics. More recently, the media "examines" specific issues like the candidates' stands on taxes, energy, and the economy and comes to the conclusion that "it's all very complicated" and "you can't really tell". If you don't understand Obama's policies or you can't tell what his policies are, you might just settle for the status quo.

I'm afraid the American electorate is about to make their biggest mistake ever without considering the consequences. Four years of McCain will be hard to recover from.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]