Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Continuous Police State: Hundreds of Demonstrators Detained at RNC

By Chris Nolan, Firedoglake. Posted September 5, 2008.


Cops detained hundreds demonstrators on the final night of the Republican National Convention in St. Paul.

Police detained hundreds demonstrators on the final night of the Republican National Convention in St. Paul. Approximately 250 people were arrested shortly before John McCain took to the stage to accept the presidential nomination. That's in addition to the 422 people who had already been arrested earlier in the week.

Riot police held approximate 300 people, including journalists and observers for nearly an hour on an overpass spanning Interstate 94. Police instructed the crowd to get on the bridge, then announced that everyone on the bridge was under arrest. 

The Joint Information Center offered conflicting accounts about the status of the assembly permits for last night's gatherings. When I called at 4pm, a spokesman told me that the organizers of the March were slated to march from the capitol, through downtown, around the xCel Center and back to the capitol and that the protest was set to go until 7pm. 



Digg!

See more stories tagged with: police, demonstrators

Lindsay Beyerstein a New York writer blogging at Majikthise.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Why do people tolerate this un-American betrayal of our basic freedoms?
Posted by: PaulC on Sep 5, 2008 9:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What kind of cowards are they?

I guess it is the same people who tolerate selling out America by sending our entire industrial base and all of our hard-earned technical know-how to Communist China.

Is that what is meant by the term "traitor"? Or does it have to be on a smaller scale, involving a poor person, as with tax evasion?

peace,
Paul

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bribery
Posted by: oregoncharles on Sep 5, 2008 9:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
According to the handy link in the article, the insurance company was Lexington Insurance in Boston and the cost was $1.1 million.

New York City just paid out $2 million in claims on a much smaller event. This policy made no financial sense for the company, so it constitutes a BRIBE to the RNC.

An official in the linked article "doubts" that police even knew about the deal. So why did they act as if they'd been told they were above the law? Police often do, but this reached new levels of blatancy.

The city of St. Paul (with a supposedly liberal mayor!) and the RNC engaged in a conspiracy to violate civil rights with impunity. The insurance itself documents it. And they bragged about it in the press!

How about suing both of them for that conspiracy? They don't have insurance for that.

Many crimes were committed, too, but the chances of actual prosecution are minimal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

100 MILLON FOR INSURANCE?
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Sep 5, 2008 9:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So how much did they pay the police? Granted, police reaction all over the country is ratcheted up, but this is unprecedented. Funny that they anticipated this much damage. Almost like taking out a huge life insurance policy out on someone and shortly thereafter they meet with a terrible accident. I wonder who underwrote the policy. Didn't they consider "pre-existing conditions"? Something here stinks. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: 100 MILLON FOR INSURANCE? Posted by: alan1111