Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Obama's Grand Speech: Reason for Hope

By David Corn, Mother Jones Online. Posted August 29, 2008.


Can an acceptance speech make a difference in an election? This was one with the potential to do so.
Advertisement

It was a historic speech on a historic night -- in a remarkable setting. A crowd of tens of thousands of Americans, filling an entire stadium in the middle of the country, waved American flags and signs calling for "Change." Never in the nation's history had more Americans attended such an event. Never before had an African-American accepted the presidential nomination of a major party in the United States. And the speech of Barack Obama matched the moment.

He connected his own history -- the history of a not-quite-ordinary American family -- to the mythical promise of America. His rhetoric soared -- as usual -- but it was tethered to reality: in particular, the stark differences between how Obama would approach the challenges the nation now faces and how John McCain would do so. Obama laced his criticism of the Bush years and the possible McCain years with a dose of populism, which gave portions of the speech a sharp edge. And he brought his pitch for hope and change down to the ground with a succinct description of policy ideas he would work for as president.

Obama, as convention dictates, began with a high-minded theme: America is a land of promise, but, he declared, that promise -- especially for hardworking Americans -- is in jeopardy, placing the nation at a critical juncture. "These challenges are not all of government's making," he said. "But the failure to respond is a direct result of a broken politics in Washington and the failed policies of George W. Bush. America, we are better than these last eight years. We are a better country than this." Given that polls show that at least seven out of ten Americans -- maybe more -- believe the country is on the wrong track and a similar number of Americans disapprove of Bush, his criticism was not at all radical.

In one of the more important passages, Obama, taking a populist turn, made the case that his opponent does not understand this:

The truth is, on issue after issue that would make a difference in your lives -- on health care and education and the economy -- Senator McCain has been anything but independent. He said that our economy has made "great progress" under this President. He said that the fundamentals of the economy are strong. And when one of his chief advisors -- the man who wrote his economic plan -- was talking about the anxiety Americans are feeling, he said that we were just suffering from a "mental recession," and that we've become, and I quote, "a nation of whiners."

A nation of whiners? Tell that to the proud auto workers at a Michigan plant who, after they found out it was closing, kept showing up every day and working as hard as ever, because they knew there were people who counted on the brakes that they made. Tell that to the military families who shoulder their burdens silently as they watch their loved ones leave for their third or fourth or fifth tour of duty. These are not whiners. They work hard and give back and keep going without complaint. These are the Americans that I know.

Now, I don't believe that Senator McCain doesn't care what's going on in the lives of Americans. I just think he doesn't know. Why else would he define middle-class as someone making under five million dollars a year? How else could he propose hundreds of billions in tax breaks for big corporations and oil companies but not one penny of tax relief to more than one hundred million Americans? How else could he offer a health care plan that would actually tax people's benefits, or an education plan that would do nothing to help families pay for college, or a plan that would privatize Social Security and gamble your retirement? It's not because John McCain doesn't care. It's because John McCain doesn't get it.

Obama blasted McCain for embracing the "that old, discredited Republican philosophy -- give more and more to those with the most and hope that prosperity trickles down to everyone else." He proclaimed that it was time for GOPers, "to own their failure. It's time for us to change America. And that's why I'm running for president of the United States."

He did not say -- as Hillary Clinton did during the primaries -- that he was running to fight for you. His is still a campaign of collective action -- us, not me -- and that might continue to make it hard for voters facing tough economic times to identify with Obama. (Some people desire a champion slugging for them, not a movement to join.) But on tax cuts, health care, outsourcing, energy independence, and education, Obama vigorously outlined the stark differences between him and McCain -- and he presented those differences in language designed to appeal to working-class voters.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: obama, dnc, obama speech

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Hey AlterNet Editors
Posted by: socialpsych on Aug 29, 2008 5:49 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How about pulling the plug on Tom-Semper-Fi? He is posting his "comment" on multiple stories and those "comments" are nothing more than adverts for Hugh Scott. Thanks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hey AlterNet Editors Posted by: Joni50
RE: Obama is the greatesti
Posted by: COC on Aug 29, 2008 8:04 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm an ex-Marine pilot and former yellow dog Democrat. I was an Obama supporter before he began advocating an escalation of the war in Afghanistan. His way will substitute the disaster in Iraq for another quagmire. The Russians weren't able to subdue the Afghans with 130,000 troops, and they didn't have to support those troops from halfway around the world.

The fundamental debate Americans ought to be having is whether the current policy of world domination is to continue, not which war is more justified.

Americans should debate whether to continue spending almost as much as the rest of the world combined to maintain its defense or whether savings from cutting the defense budget could be better spent by providing healthcare to all its citizens and repairing the nations infrastructure.

Americans should debate whether it makes sense to antagonize a nation that still has the capability to annihilate us or whether it makes more sense to reject the Bush doctrine of preemption.

Obama claims that a vote for McCain would be another four years of the failed Bush policies. But, the distinctions he makes won't make a difference.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» America's expensive Defense Posted by: Cathyc
RE: Obama is the greatesti **GOOD RIDDANCE TO HUGH SCOTT**
Posted by: maribelle on Aug 29, 2008 10:16 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I must be honest, Tom, and say that I am deeply relieved to hear that Hugh Scott has been banned. He has been one of the most obtuse, disagreeable, pointlessly argumentative and agressive posters on this site. I am glad to hear that Joshua put us all out of our misery.

That said, I hope he finds a rich life blogging about what's important to him. (PS I agree with him about McCain, but still can't bear to read his pointlessly aggressive and bullying posts.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» False impression going around Posted by: Joshua Holland
this article adds something important to the one above it--an emphasis on Obama's apparently strong
Posted by: Suzon on Aug 29, 2008 4:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and well-judged delivery.

There can be skill without intelligence, but Obama obviously has both.

If I were McCain, I'd be quaking in my boots just thinking about a debate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Three Words . . .
Posted by: 6399 on Aug 29, 2008 5:06 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Afghanistan, Clean Coal . . . .

Yeah, reason for hope.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Three Words . . . Posted by: mike1997
» RE: Three Words . . . Posted by: 6399
» Two HUGE Policies! Posted by: 6399
» RE: Two HUGE Policies! Posted by: veg4peace
» RE: Two HUGE Policies! Posted by: 6399
Passion, Conviction, Charisma
Posted by: taxidriver on Aug 29, 2008 6:21 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It was a fine and historic speech, delivered with grace and (measured) strength.

Seeing Obama joined by his attractive, loving, and smart wife and two gloriously fresh-faced girls, I asked myself, "How can this wonderful example of the American dream and the nuclear family possibly lose?" After all, they're the embodiment of conservative Christian values: loyalty, fidelity, love of God and country. Then I remembered: they're Black. Good heavens!

I hope and pray that enough Americans can put aside racial prejudices and vote for the candidate who truly represents the American dream.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Passion, Conviction, Charisma Posted by: nochicagoboys
» No worries - Obama will win Posted by: dover23
» RE: No worries - Obama will win Posted by: nochicagoboys
» RE: No worries - Obama will win Posted by: tennismom
» RE: No worries - Obama will win Posted by: nochicagoboys
» RE: No worries - Obama will win Posted by: nochicagoboys
ALL Rhetroc and No Idea
Posted by: Godfather89 on Aug 29, 2008 6:45 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He like McCain are both run by the same people. If Obama was really about "Change We Can Believe In" he would talk about removing the Federal Income Tax as well as The Federal Reserve.

If he was really about "Change We Can Believe In" during hi speech he would have talked about reinstating Constitutional Government and removal of Acts and Laws and Agreements that torch Constitutional government.

If Obama was really about Change We Can Believe In" he would have talked about Sound Money (e.g. Gold Dollar) instead of Money out of thin air as well as Exalting the Bill of Rights instead of "National Security."

Yeah their will be change... Largely socialist change unfortunately. The republic is Dead and it dies with an Applaud. :(

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ALL Rhetroc and No Idea Posted by: biginJapan
He can talk all he wants but his voting record is the BIGGEST STAIN to TARNISH his candidacy !!
Posted by: maxpayne on Aug 29, 2008 6:52 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When do Democrats learn that they're opportunistic pander-to-the-opponent voting will come back to HAUNT them everytime? NEVER, I suppose.

VOTENADER.ORG !!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Safe nuclear energy?
Posted by: BobbieP on Aug 29, 2008 7:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rather than continuing the search for the Holy Grail, why not just keep putting up the windmills? The technology is clean, here, and ready to roll. Denmark is now entirely self-sufficient, on wind. The Danes have put in two plants here in the USA, and the technology is already tested as safe.

60 years would have been enough time to figure out how to get clean nuclear energy. There isn't even a way to do a cleanup, so why continue.No small adjustments will change the big picture.

Chernobyl can blow again at any time now, as the solution they found was only good for 20 years, and that sell by date was 2 years ago.

Indian Point, right on a fault line, 25 miles from Manhattan, and leaking, continues to be supported by those who make the money, or get the patronage.

In Germany, a study proved that cancer is significantly higher in children who live withing the 100 mile radius of a reactor, and they are dismantling their entire system. A woman runs that country right now.

What makes us all so stupid?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Answered prayers
Posted by: mike1997 on Aug 29, 2008 7:17 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyone else remember those fundie groups that were praying for a rain of truly historic proportions to wash out Obamas' speech? Well, as you may have noted the weather last night was perfect! Now, however, Gustav threatens to postpone the Republican Convention!

Maybe the fundies will learn an important lesson. Sometimes the answer to your prayers is "no." Other times it's "HELL NO"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

collins101
Posted by: collins101 on Aug 29, 2008 7:57 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
you kool aid drinkers still think barack hussein is the messiah. if he was a white guy with the same flimsy resume this wouldn't even be a discussion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: collins101 Posted by: mrmystery
» RE: collins101 Posted by: using
» RE: collins101 Posted by: adempatriot
» He's not the messiah. WE ARE. Posted by: crashgrab
to collins and all others who habor his beleifs:
Posted by: using on Aug 29, 2008 9:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Read you history...read our state of current affairs..listen to the speech.....whether he is or isn't the messiah is not point....the point is....he is our only hope....he has the only chance of being elected...he is the only one who if elected is at the very least stating openly that he is aware of what is needed in this country at this time...and he is willing to go on record ...theredore he will be judged by his ability to meets those needs. There is no hedging here. OFcasue, MCCain is not hedging either...he has taken his stand...a bush/chenney one at that. Obama may not be as perfect as he can be....but...he is the best we have. And he is the only one willing to take a stand for us. And sorry to say, it is clear that you need to re-check your thinking against our reality and see decide how much your assumption is based on our current reality? and how much it is based on the traditional "ARchie Bunker" type mentality, that the Republicans so heavily count on.
And that said, I can understand that you might be feeling, as the many of us are, that no one in the end comes through for us, they just use us to gain power or are backed by the same forces that are backing McCain. However, he is not the end...he is the beginning of derailing our downward spiriling. We need to find a way to support all movements in our favor and stand firm as a group for the things that are in our collective long range best interests.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Michel
Posted by: Michel on Aug 29, 2008 9:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama..A man with a heartfelt, clear vision of what this great country's future can and should be. A man motivated to help in bringing about change because he believe's with every fiber of his being that as a nation, as a people, we are ALL capable of greatness..I truly believe that history will show that this man will be one of our greatest leaders of all time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Personal Thought While Watching Obama's Speech
Posted by: The_Curmudgeon on Aug 29, 2008 11:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In watching Barack’s speech, my mind drifted back to childhood when I first experienced the role race plays in our nation’s history.

In the summer of my fifth year, my parents set out to buy their first home. Every Sunday, my infant sister was left grandparents while mother, dad and I climbed into a green, two-door Nash and drove around Milwaukee from one open house to another.

At the time, Milwaukee was a prosperous city, growing in size as the industrial might of Allis-Chalmers and Johnson Motors and Harley-Davidson shifted back to consumer production, drawing tens of thousands of people from Midwestern farms and the rural South to well-paying jobs in the endless factories sprouting up and dotting the city’s south side.

As a result, the face of Milwaukee was changing.

Once dominated by the stern, round, white faces of Germans and Poles, the city was drawing a steady stream of southern black faces – people who were called “Negro’s” back then – that came from dirt poor counties of Alabama and Mississippi and Kentucky where they had no chance for a life, moving to a city where they could find a real job, not have to fear every sound in the night because lynching was still a law enforcement tool down South, and where they could send their kids to a decent school.

A combination of the country’s post-war, Eisenhower prosperity coupled with the huge number of new families being formed and new people moving into the city meant sub-divisions were sprouting up everywhere, like tulips in the warm spring sun. So, we spent Sunday after Sunday going from one new suburb to another. Some developments mother dismissed because the houses were “cracker boxes,” whatever that meant; some were too expensive, even with dad’s GI mortgage requiring only 5% down and a 2% interest rate waiting to be signed. Some had tiny kitchens; some had only one bathroom; others just two bedrooms.

But on one such Sunday outing, we found the perfect house: Four bedrooms, a big yard to play in and a basement for when it rained, a new school with a huge playground only three blocks away, and a Halen’s – the local grocery chain – within walking distance. I was very excited.

Suddenly, mother gave the real estate agent a curt “thank you” and hustled dad and me out to the car. As we drove away, I stood up to lean on the back of the front seat with its sticky, green, nylon upholstery to ask why we weren’t going to buy that neat house. Mother’s answer gave me my first introduction to the real world.

“Because the man said they won’t let Negroes buy houses here,” she explained, swivelling around to look at me. “That’s not right. Everyone should be able to live wherever they want.”

I had no idea what a radical family I’d been born into five years earlier, or what a political activist my mother was en route to becoming. Yet a short 10 years later, I wasn’t surprised when she flew to Washington to be part of the march and hear Dr. King’s speech. And 10 years after that, when she and father ended up on one of Nixon’s “enemies lists,” not only was I not surprised but took it as a complement.

As Obama spoke, tears filled my eyes remembering that Sunday afternoon and comparing it to what was happening last night. When I was a child, there were still lynchings in the south yet also neighbourhoods in a northern city where African-Americans could not live. But I lived long enough to see an African-American accept the Democratic Party’s nomination to be President of the United States – not because of his color but despite it.

Now Obama is one step away from becoming America's president. America took one huge step towards putting its racist past behind it.

We are a better people today than we were yesterday.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Stop crying. Get angry! Posted by: Cathyc
What Obama speech?
Posted by: lindat on Aug 29, 2008 11:20 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
McCain's Palin VP pick stole the spotlight and changed the game.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What Obama speech? Posted by: Rosasharn
» Palin Posted by: Michel
Obama and the Clintons. LOL!
Posted by: Cathyc on Aug 29, 2008 2:27 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't follow the American Elections, as I'm not particularly interested in Celebrity Politics, or shallow people in general. But I have to say that if Mr. Barack is standing on the same platform with the Clintons, then he's as shallow as they are.

Good luck America, you're gonna to need it!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let's take another pause....
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Aug 29, 2008 2:57 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great speech yes. Full of hope,yes. But shit floats too. I heard nothing about the 10 million homeless that were'nt veterans,what about them? I heard nothing of ending war as a means of National Strength,just troop relocation. No messages of apology for previous administrations mistakes in getting invloved with corrupt dictators nor promises to never engage in such practices again. No promises of doing what they say they will or we could remove them from office,as is our right. No gestures to the people to help make his administration keep it's promises,as we should. No offers of an 'open door' policy.
HOPE. Hope I've held ever since I was old enough to understand politics and DC. I've never failed in being let down by the inaction,lies and failure to 'Walk their Talk'.
Yes, I hope we do move strongly away from oil. I hope the opportunities for alternative energy expansion are'nt just given to the rich but that grants for R&D are given to citizens.
I hope he will truly listen to the will of the people. A people that yearns for their presonal Freedom and Liberty to be returned. Hope,for Women's rights,to salary and reproductive
choice to become an amendment to the Constitution. I hope we begin as a people to recognize the need for Respect for eachother as beings of a Greater Creation not consumers.
I hope,should either party win,they actually do waht is good for the people and not just their fat contributers.
I hope the winners see the futility of war and killing and set about honoring all veterans
by setting up the means where war never happens again.
I hope the essentials of life, AIR,WATER and GOOD GROWING SOILS be seen as more valuable to life than gold.
I hope all the good they want to do happens and I hope that if we've been fooled again we,the poeple,will have the gumption to remove them from office,peacefully,respectfully,Constitutionally
for the good of the Nation and peace in the World

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Point by Point rebuttals to Obama speech
Posted by: democracynowiniraq on Aug 29, 2008 5:04 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
“Now, I don't believe that Senator McCain doesn't care what's going on in the lives of Americans. I just think he doesn't know. Why else would he define middle-class as someone making under five million dollars a year? How else could he propose hundreds of billions in tax breaks for big corporations and oil companies but not one penny of tax relief to more than one hundred million Americans?”

--Any quote where McCain says the middle class are those making under 5 million a year I’ll GUARNANTEE were taken out of context. Show me the quote. Tax breaks to oil companies help keep gas prices low for you and me-good thing, not a bad thing. Tax breaks for big corporations? Sure why not. We have the highest business tax rate in the so-called “industrialized” world. If you had a choice of 35% tax rate or 10% tax rate, which would YOU choose if you were a business? Ever occurred to Obama that high tax rates on businesses would be the cause for the “outsourcing” of American jobs?

“We measure progress in the 23 million new jobs that were created when Bill Clinton was President - when the average American family saw its income go up $7,500 instead of down $2,000 like it has under George Bush.”

Not true.
http://ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=304643903414901


“Unlike John McCain, I will stop giving tax breaks to corporations that ship jobs overseas, and I will start giving them to companies that create good jobs right here in America.”

There is NO specific targeting of tax breaks for ONLY those companies that send jobs overseas. As if the Bush policy was you only get a tax break if you send your jobs overseas?? Does Obama (or anyone else) really believe that?



“I will cut taxes - cut taxes - for 95% of all working families. Because in an economy like this, the last thing we should do is raise taxes on the middle-class.”

Oh how noble.. You mean as opposed to Bush, who cut taxes for 100% of all working families??


“And for the sake of our economy, our security, and the future of our planet, I will set a clear goal as President: in ten years, we will finally end our dependence on oil from the Middle East.”
--Jesus Christ Himself will not pull this country off of Middle East, European OR South American oil in 10 years. Partially because in the last 10 years, we refused to heed the advice of someone who knows a thing or two about energy-George W.Bush.


“I will also go through the federal budget, line by line, eliminating programs that no longer work and making the ones we do need work better and cost less - because we cannot meet twenty-first century challenges with a twentieth century bureaucracy.”

Ohhhhhh well lookie here! Did he steal this line from one of Bush’s speeches of 2000 or 2004?

“And today, as my call for a time frame to remove our troops from Iraq has been echoed by the Iraqi government and even the Bush Administration, even after we learned that Iraq has a $79 billion surplus while we're wallowing in deficits, John McCain stands alone in his stubborn refusal to end a misguided war.”

Are you seroius?! The whole reason we’re in a position to negotiate at timetable in the 1st place is because of the surge, which Obama so adamantly opposed.. He has since removed language from his website criticizing the surge, but STILL hasn’t quite come around to saying it worked.


"If John McCain wants to have a debate about who has the temperament, and judgment, to serve as the next Commander-in-Chief, that's a debate I'm ready to have."
--Yeah sure you are, tough guy.. Just like you were ready to have town hall debates with John McCain "anytime, anywhere" and then pussied out and settled for only the 3 conventional debates.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rebuttals to Obama speech
Posted by: democracynowiniraq on Aug 29, 2008 5:08 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
“Now, I don't believe that Senator McCain doesn't care what's going on in the lives of Americans. I just think he doesn't know. Why else would he define middle-class as someone making under five million dollars a year? How else could he propose hundreds of billions in tax breaks for big corporations and oil companies but not one penny of tax relief to more than one hundred million Americans?”

--Any quote where McCain says the middle class are those making under 5 million a year I’ll GUARNANTEE were taken out of context. Show me the quote. Tax breaks to oil companies help keep gas prices low for you and me-good thing, not a bad thing. Tax breaks for big corporations? Sure why not. We have the highest business tax rate in the so-called “industrialized” world. If you had a choice of 35% tax rate or 10% tax rate, which would YOU choose if you were a business? Ever occurred to Obama that high tax rates on businesses would be the cause for the “outsourcing” of American jobs?

“We measure progress in the 23 million new jobs that were created when Bill Clinton was President - when the average American family saw its income go up $7,500 instead of down $2,000 like it has under George Bush.”

Not true.
http://ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=304643903414901


“Unlike John McCain, I will stop giving tax breaks to corporations that ship jobs overseas, and I will start giving them to companies that create good jobs right here in America.”

There is NO specific targeting of tax breaks for ONLY those companies that send jobs overseas. As if the Bush policy was you only get a tax break if you send your jobs overseas?? Does Obama (or anyone else) really believe that?


“I will cut taxes - cut taxes - for 95% of all working families. Because in an economy like this, the last thing we should do is raise taxes on the middle-class.”

Oh how noble.. You mean as opposed to Bush, who cut taxes for 100% of all working families??

"I will also go through the federal budget, line by line, eliminating programs that no longer work and making the ones we do need work better and cost less - because we cannot meet twenty-first century challenges with a twentieth century bureaucracy.”

Ohhhhhh well lookie here! Did he steal this line from one of Bush’s speeches of 2000 or 2004?

“And today, as my call for a time frame to remove our troops from Iraq has been echoed by the Iraqi government and even the Bush Administration, even after we learned that Iraq has a $79 billion surplus while we're wallowing in deficits, John McCain stands alone in his stubborn refusal to end a misguided war.”

Are you seroius?! The whole reason we’re in a position to negotiate at timetable in the 1st place is because of the surge, which Obama so adamantly opposed.. He has since removed language from his website criticizing the surge, but STILL hasn’t quite come around to saying it worked.


"If John McCain wants to have a debate about who has the temperament, and judgment, to serve as the next Commander-in-Chief, that's a debate I'm ready to have."
--Yeah sure you are, tough guy.. Just like you were ready to have town hall debates with John McCain "anytime, anywhere" and then pussied out and settled for only the 3 conventional debates.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How Come We Got No Bomb Shelters?
Posted by: bottom-line on Aug 29, 2008 7:49 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If all these people are so eager to start a nuclear war with Russia, to make AMerica the most hated country ever, the kind of country the entire world would like to see disappear in a puff of smoke --

WHY DON'T THEY AT LEAST BUILD US SOME BOMB SHELTERS, OR GIVE US A TAX BREAK TO BUILD ONE!

It's because they don't care about us. They hope we die. They can crawl down in their underground cities and military bases and wait it out while we are nuked and savaged away.

I'm sick of hearing about families blown up by American soldiers in this phony war on terror.

The government did it. Congress is going along with it. If we get a Democratic president with a Democratic congress, it will be no stopping the senseless bloodshed and tyranny, the torture, the horror that has been dished out to Americans, while the politicians ignore us and put on a big show for the cameras, as though anybody cared or believed any of them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]