Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

John McCain: Running for War President at Any Cost

By Robert Scheer, Truthdig. Posted August 27, 2008.


In order to win, McCain needs a new Cold War. Lucky for him that Republicans are so good at whipping up false international threats.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Robert Scheer

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Just great! Nuclear-armed Pakistan is falling apart, Iran's nuclear program is unchecked and congressional legislation on cooperation with the Russians on controlling nuclear proliferation is now dead in the water. Horrid news except for Sen. John McCain, who thrills to a repeat of the danger lines of the Cold War, and now stands a good chance of being our next president.

A very good chance, if the Russian recognition of the independence of two breakaway Georgia provinces can be elevated to the status of a major challenge to the security of the United States. It is an absurd claim: How can one justify uncritical support for the independence of Kosovo from Serbia earlier this year while denouncing a similar claim by a Georgian ethnic minority? It is also difficult to ignore that it was Georgia's president and close McCain friend, Mikheil Saakashvili, who upset the status quo by invading first.

Saakashvili's attempt to compare the Russian response with that of the "Stalinist Soviet Union" is a nutty reference to a Georgian-born tyrant who ruled Russia and who is still revered in much of his native Georgia. But when you need a new Stalin to get a Cold War going, President Dmitry Medvedev and the elected members of a unanimous Russian parliament will have to do. And McCain is very happy to have this card to play.

McCain can win only as a war president. He neither knows nor cares much about the economic meltdown, which is the consequence of the deregulation mania that he has supported at every turn during his career in the Senate. If McCain had to run on his economic policy record in the Senate, he might be a loser even in his home state of Arizona, whose residents are suffering mightily from economic disarray presided over by the Republicans. Better to dwell on the dubious success of the surge in Iraq than on the surge in home mortgage foreclosures and the price of gasoline that has crippled Arizona's and the nation's economy. Still better to change the subject to the Russians and Georgia rather than dwell overly long on the disaster of Iraq, which has cost our nation trillions of dollars and where the prime minister now is far more zealous than Barack Obama in calling for an early withdrawal of U.S. troops. But whatever McCain's problems from cheerleading for Bush's war, they pale in comparison to his vulnerability on the most pressing domestic issues.

Instead of learning the hard lessons of the need for stern government oversight of the financial sector from his own compromised involvement as a member of the Keating Five in the 1980s savings-and-loan scandal, he voted to have more of the same. McCain became a booster for all of the banking deregulation legislation advanced by the Senate Banking Committee's then-chairman, Phil Gramm, who, more than any other legislator in the past decade, should be held responsible for the current mess.

Instead of recognizing that Gramm had pursued a disastrous course as the subprime mortgage scandal was exposed, McCain appointed the former-senator-turned-banker to be his campaign chair. McCain fired Gramm over a verbal gaffe but has not retracted any of his key votes liberating the financial community to fleece those desperate to become homeowners, and, were that the subject of the presidential campaign, he would lag way behind in the polls. This is not the season for laissez-faire corporate capitalism.

That's why he needs a new Cold War, but it's a bad fit for the world we face. The danger from Russia is not that it has imperial ambitions driven by the remnants of an expansionist communist ideology. Even China, which is still a communist-run state, knows that old-fashioned imperialism doesn't pay. What drives nations to madness these days is not ideology -- communist, Muslim or any other flavor of the month -- but rather an assortment of nationalist and religion-fueled grievances. In the case of Russia, the evolution of Prime Minister Vladimir Putin from the man Bush so admired to the one McCain despises was driven by hostile U.S. policies -- from NATO expansion to placing anti-missile rockets near Russia's borders.

The first step in adjusting U.S. foreign policy to a multipolar world is to recognize that other nations, as well as the United States, have causes and concerns that may be legitimate, even when they differ from our view. The hope of the Obama campaign was that a less U.S.-centric view might be in the offing, but that might be too great an expectation in the midst of a presidential campaign.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: russia, mccain, georgia, cold war

Robert Scheer is the co-author of The Pornography of Power: How Defense Hawks Hijacked 9/11 and Weakened America.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
All true, but you're forgetting...
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Aug 27, 2008 11:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that McCain was a POW. For 5 1/2 years.

jdfu!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» sarcasm is lost on you people... Posted by: hurricane hugo
Both Obama and Mccain are running as war presidents.
Posted by: maxpayne on Aug 27, 2008 1:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't see evidence of Obama running as peace candidate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Encino, you Love Israel Posted by: weathered
» RE: ncino, you Love Israel Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: ncino, you Love Israel Posted by: weathered
» RE: ncino, you Love Israel Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: ncino, you Love Israel Posted by: countingdaisies
» RE: ncino, you Love Israel Posted by: weathered
» umm, dude... Posted by: hurricane hugo
POW?
Posted by: ahmlco on Aug 27, 2008 1:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I'm sure that being a POW is in no way a cakewalk, I'm also sure that having been a POW is not a major qualification for becoming president.

In fact, one also has to consider just how much resentment and revenge would consciously (or unconsciously) play into his decision making.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The New Cold War and Bipartisanship
Posted by: intheheights on Aug 27, 2008 2:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wouldn't hold out much hope for an easing of the new Cold War by an Obama administration. After all the narrative, up until now, seems to be that the foreign policy novice needs guidance from the experienced hands in the Democratic party. The steadily worsening domestic situation could give both parties an incentive to pursue a new Cold War.

Richard Holbrooke, in tight with Brzezinski and Biden, wrote an article entitled "If Saakashvili survives in Georgia, Russia loses" in the Gulf Times calling for vigorous support of the current Georgian President and all but calling Bush a sissy for not doing more in the face of supposed Russian aggression. He notes the resolute action by Biden and Obama on getting more aid to the Georgians:

"US Senator Joseph Biden has called for an immediate $1bn supplemental appropriation, a proposal quickly endorsed by Barack Obama. But the Bush administration has not yet been specific on economic support. Congress will be in session only briefly before the election, and a supplemental appropriation will pass only if President Bush pursues it vigorously as a bipartisan measure.'

We have been here before.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Couple Things
Posted by: QQOblivion on Aug 27, 2008 2:59 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Russians say that a US warship (which the US says is carrying "humanitarian" aid to Georgia) is likely carrying weapons for Georgia's military.

Hmmmm. Now the US should know how Iran feels, since Iran has been accused by the US of supplying weapons to insurgents in Iraq.
If those alleged Iranian weapons are a valid excuse for the US to attack Iran, as some neocons claim, then the alleged weapons that the US is accused of giving the Georgians might be a valid excuse for Russia to attack the US.
(After all, those alleged weapons we are sending to Georgia might be used to HARM RUSSIAN TROOPS, to carry the analogy further.)


Also in the news: Russia recognizes the break-away regions of S Ossetia and Abkhazia, (formerly) in the country of Georgia.
And the US is not pleased about this development at all, saying that Georgia's border integrity must be maintained.

I'm sorry -- even though this recognition of S Ossetia and Abkhazia is probably tit-for-tat for the West's recognition of Kosovo -- but I am with Russia on this one.
The residents of the break-away regions WANT for the most part to be free of Georgian control.
And in any case, the regions already have de facto independence.

If freedom really is "on the march", then the US should butt out of this one.

Just saying, I mean, this could lead to war (possibly nuclear) between the US and Russia. Do we really want to literally destroy the world over such a small piece of territory, especially when we are likely in the wrong?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A Couple Things Posted by: countingdaisies
POW -- So?
Posted by: Jeanne on Aug 27, 2008 4:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't understand how undergoing the trauma and ordeal of being a POW and being tortured is a good qualification to become president. I want to be certain that the individual who has undergone such a trauma is not an emotional or psychological cripple. Do I want a PTSD-stressed person who has anger issues handling delicate diplomatic dealings? What might trigger an act of war, when sending the Sec of State might be a better solution? McCain is the wild card, not Obama. McCain is by far the scarier prospect to be commander in chief. Angry, emotional, cognitively impaired -- I would be afraid to sleep at night with McCain with his finger on the figurative button.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

USA = Freedom
Posted by: richholland on Aug 28, 2008 6:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Georgian defence minister, David Kezrashvili is a Jew who once lived in Israel.Born in Georgia immigrated to Israel as a boy.

The Georgian army was helped by Israeli security experts and american adviser.
In the sixties americans also were advising in Vietnam after the advice we had the Vietnam War.

Why the UN is not taking an inspection and prevent a possible war???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: USA = Freedom Posted by: EncinoM