Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Does McCain Really Need Another Mansion? Giving Him White House Is One Too Many

By Jared Bernstein, Huffington Post. Posted August 27, 2008.


McCain's got eight houses and a level of wealth that insulates him from the real lives of 99% of Americans. That's dangerous for a president.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Jared Bernstein

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

So McCain is rich. Or, his wife is rich, and that makes him rich too. Wasn't there some movie where Dudley Moore was engaged to a women with megabucks, and he kept getting drunk and introducing her to people as my 'financier' (instead of fiance)?

For all the ink spilled over this last week, two related issues were under-explored, the latter of which is especially important: what's 'rich,' and why does it matter? What does McCain's wealth, and the way he talks about it, reveal about his ability to be a successful president?

On the first point -- what means 'rich'? -- there's no simple answer, no line in the economic sand that divides the rich from the rest. I'll get to the income data in a second, but they're only of marginal help here.

For one, there's tremendous geographical variation. If your family income is $100,000 in a rural area of a low-income state, you're well off. That income in Manhattan arguably puts you in the middle-class.

This example also suggests that there's a relative component to "rich." To be rich means you breath the rarified air in the upper reaches of the income scale. In a series of recent revealing remarks, McCain said he thought an income of $5 million made you rich. There's no doubt that's true, but if that's your income cutoff, almost nobody's rich.

The often-cited work of income analysts Piketty and Saez (see Table 0) reveals that admission to the top 1% of the income scale will run you a cool $375,000. Too many common folk there for your taste? Then you'll need about $600K to move up to the top half of the top 1% (i.e., the top 0.5%).

What's that? You want to roll with some serious money? It'll cost you $2 million to break into the top 0.1% (the top tenth of the top percent), and $10.5 million for the top 0.01% -- the top one-hundredth of the top one percent, average income: $30 million.

So yes, Cindy's $100 million in wealth, inherited from her family business, puts the McCain family solidly up there in the narrowest sliver of the richest of the rich. But numbers like these only give you an upper bound. Certainly, there are more rich people in America than those who reside in the 15,000 households of the top 0.01%.

My research on income class has led me to take a less quantitative approach to the question of who's middle class, rich, poor, etc. I think it has much to do with your choices and your access to opportunities.

Rich people's choices are generally not constrained by lack of income (boy, that sounds really obvious, but read on). Years ago when I worked with poor clients in New York City, I remember someone telling me they thought about cost before making a long-distance phone call.

Move up the "choices chain" and you get the picture. Middle class people tend not to think twice about a phone call, but a baby sitter, dinner, and a movie, is not a slam dunk right now, what with prices up and incomes down. And speaking of the price of transportation, vacations don't become "stay-cations" for rich people. Their choice set isn't constrained that way.

These choices may sound kind of trivial, but of course, there are real life-changing opportunities at stake here. One of my favorite -- well, least favorite, really -- factoids to make this point has to do with access to higher education. Once you control for cognitive ability, high-testing, low-income kids have the same (low) college completion rates as low-testing high-income kids. We do not, my fellow HuffPosters, reside in a meritocracy.

(If I may shamelessly tout my own work with colleagues at EPI, please read our forthcoming chapter on income mobility from the new State of Working America, out Labor Day -- though I'll see if I can get the mobility chapter posted here ASAP. It's a tour through this critical question of how challenging it is for people to get ahead given the mobility barriers they face these days. To us, this strikes at the heart of a basic American economic value. We may not believe in equal outcomes in this country, but we sure believe in equal opportunities. And the data on inequality and mobility suggest this basic value is under siege.)


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: john mccain, rich

Jared Bernstein is a senior economist and director of the Living Standards Program at the Economic Policy Institute in Washington D.C.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Reality check
Posted by: Col. Jackleg on Aug 27, 2008 2:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is wealth disparity among us? The ever-swelling bottom tier of our society is disadvantaged and cannot compete with our better-heeled elites? Free market capitalism is unfair? Rich people have advantages poor people do not? Gee...I never knew. Save all of this tripe. McCain is a nitwit that is incapable of knowing his many area and zip codes. That he is reputedly running ahead or neck and neck with Obamarama in current polling establishes.....he ain't that dumb and he's rich enough to "swift boat" Obamarama's ass into Senate oblivion in November. He'll be in the White House in January because the Dipocrits have no clue about how to stop him. His negative ads are already gutting the Dipocrits Convention and you ain't seen nuthin yet....wait until next week in St. Paul when Hillary-rex' primary campaign slurs are replayed. God save us from this lunacy, because He damned sure ain't blessing us!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: eality check Posted by: 1gma
The Kennedy's
Posted by: theVRWCwhodatesLiberals on Aug 27, 2008 4:14 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
gets a free pass along other very very rich Dems. Even the McCain's have a pre-nup

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Kennedy's Posted by: CatDad
» RE: The Kennedy's Posted by: JSquercia
» RE: The Kennedy's Posted by: CatDad
» RE: The Kennedy's Posted by: Knot_Rich
Gallup Poll
Posted by: theVRWCwhodatesLiberals on Aug 27, 2008 4:15 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
McCain leads as of today! I guess its not working eh... these are the dumb issues that the Dems miss and wonder why they lose national elections.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Gallup Poll Posted by: Karl.Ben
» RE: Gallup Poll Posted by: CatDad
What matters
Posted by: Karl.Ben on Aug 27, 2008 4:52 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With respect to the comment regarding taxes - when comparing tax rate and tax plans of each candidates it is a simplistic view to say Obama helps the lower/middle class while McCains plan does the opposite.

Basically Obama's plan reduces tax rates for those who pay very little taxes.. it increases taxes on those that most likely support, contribute to and hire the poor and middle class.

McCains plan is designed to spur the economic investment and development, Obama's plan isn't. That is at least it on the surface. I'ts much more complex than this for sure.

How much taxes you pay isn't always the issue, it's how much money you make. Poor would rather work then get $200 a year tax break. The rich will put their money where it will earn the most...either thats America, with the second highest corp tax rates in the world, or overseas.

As for McCains wealth, I think I'd rather have a person who knows how to be successful, walk in powerful circles, play hardball when they have to and has the contacts to get things done then a poor guy from the hood.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What matters Posted by: Sissy
» RE: What matters Posted by: fred_53_99
» RE: What matters Posted by: Karl.Ben
» Marry for $$$ Posted by: Prairie Waif
» RE: What matters Posted by: Karl.Ben
» RE: What matters Posted by: Sissy
» RE: What matters Posted by: Karl.Ben
» RE: What matters Posted by: JSquercia
» RE: What matters Posted by: Knot_Rich
» RE: What matters Posted by: JSquercia
» RE: What matters Posted by: freshlemon
» RE: What matters Posted by: Karl.Ben
» RE: What matters Posted by: freshlemon
» RE: What matters Posted by: Karl.Ben
» Troll or Kool-Aid drinker Posted by: chaoslegs
» RE: What matters Posted by: 1gma
» RE: What matters Posted by: JSquercia
Only Seven ?
Posted by: US Citizen on Aug 27, 2008 5:30 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Considering how long and how hard John McCain has been whoring for the defense and arms industries, it's surprising he only has seven mansions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Warmonger Teddy and Barack Posted by: edgar1
Stating the obvious
Posted by: charlief on Aug 27, 2008 6:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"McCain's got eight houses and a level of wealth that insulates him from the real lives of 99% of Americans. That's dangerous for a president."

A politician... rich? Really? That surely applies to every single presidential candidate. They may not have eight houses, but they sure as hell are 'insulated from the real lives of 99%' of us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Stating the obvious Posted by: Knot_Rich
RE: McCain is unfit for the White House
Posted by: CatDad on Aug 27, 2008 10:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Being unfit for the White House seems to be the overriding qualification for becoming President of the United States these days.

Making an issue of McCain's exploitation of his war record is a Pandora's Box that should not be opened this late in the game.

The GOP is [allegedly] the party of traditional values....yet its candidate has become an army of one in redefining what the institution of marriage is: a union between a man and a woman that lasts until - your current spouse becomes too fat/old/frumpy to take to A-list DC cocktail parties and/or you find a billionaire family to marry into...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: McCain is unfit for the White House
Posted by: 1gma on Aug 27, 2008 11:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Tom, I went to your friend's website. I hope he is successful in showing McCain's shallowness and dishonesty. I was particularly impressed with his #6. It smacks of the George Bush exploitation of the 9/11 tragedy. They are so alike.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Where's the Bathroom? Posted by: edgar1
X-POLYGAMIST WIFE
Posted by: X-POLYGAMIST WIFE on Aug 27, 2008 7:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
John McCain hasn't lifted a finger to help the thousand of FLDS women and children trapped inside Colorado City, Arizona, the largest polygamous enclave in the United States.

http://www.bankingonheaven.com

Abraham Lincoln, a white man, freed the black slaves. Maybe Barack Obama, a black man, will free the white slaves, because that's what polygamy is, white slavery.

Vote for Change! Vote for Barack Obama!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» If he does... Posted by: truthlover
» RE: X-POLYGAMIST WIFE Posted by: edgar1
'Who's the Elitist?' - a 'What Now' cartoon
Posted by: what0now0toons on Aug 27, 2008 11:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
McCain has so many homes he can't recall how many he actually has. He represents the Haves and the have mores, you know, Bush's base. The wealthy elite, not we the people.
I devoted my weekly, left of center cartoon series to this topic, it's up on my website now. www.whatnowtoons.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You could substitute "Kerry" for "McCain"
Posted by: Blink on Aug 27, 2008 6:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and "Teresa" for "Cindy" and have the same article. But of course, such an article was never published published by Alternet in 2004 and never would be, because it would show too much intellectual consistency.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]