Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

America's Invisible Rich

By Sam Pizzigati, Too Much: A Commentary on Excess and Inequality. Posted August 25, 2008.


Politicians can't seem to see any wealthy people when deciding whom to tax.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Atheism and Diversity: Is It Wrong For Atheists To Convert Believers?
Greta Christina

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
Are You Brave Enough to Say No to a High-Stress Holiday?
Bill McKibben

DrugReporter:
The Feds Are Addicted to Pot -- Even If You Aren't
Paul Armentano

Environment:
Our Lives Are Filled With Worthless Crap That's Destroying the Earth: Here's What You Can Do
Sharon Bloyd-Peshkin

Food:
Don't Be Scared of Food: Are We Being Needlessly Hysterical About Food Safety?
David E. Gumpert

Health and Wellness:
10 Signs Vegetarianism Is Catching On
Kathy Freston

Immigration:
Republican Playbook on Immigration Debate Long on Emotions, Short on Facts
Mary Giovagnoli

Media and Technology:
Rabid Right-Wing Media Mogul Building a News Empire
Jamison Foser

Movie Mix:
Disney Apocalypse: Why 2012 Sucks
Alexander Zaitchik

Politics:
Shocking: High School Grads Twice As Likely To Be Jobless Than College Grads – and Right-Wingers are Profiting From Their Pain
Adele M. Stan

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Why Can't We Look Away From Sarah Palin?
Vanessa Richmond

Rights and Liberties:
Why Is the Media So Obsessed With Horrifying Images of African-American Mothers?
Melissa Harris-Lacewell

Sex and Relationships:
"You Like That Baby, You Like That?": Has Porn Made Men Bad at Sex?
Cord Jefferson

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Revealed: Astroturf Groups Planning Massive California Water Grab to Benefit Big Ag and SoCal
Dan Bacher

World:
Is Obama Following in the Footsteps of Bill Clinton?
Jeff Cohen

More stories by Sam Pizzigati

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Governors don't usually deliver primetime TV addresses. That's something Presidents do. But late last month New York Gov. David Patterson did take to primetime -- to declare a state budget "crisis" and call lawmakers back to Albany for a special session.

New Yorkers, pollsters announced last week, share the governor's unease. A whopping 86 percent agree that the state has a fiscal crisis. New Yorkers also agree on a solution: tax the rich. By a 78 to 18 percent margin, New Yorkers favor hiking taxes on households that make over $1 million a year.

Those households currently abound in the Empire State. New IRS statistics, released July 31, show that New York has the nation's most top-heavy distribution of income in the entire United States.

In 2006, New York's top 1 percent of taxpayers -- that's everyone making over $517,800 a year -- grabbed 28.7 percent of the state's income, nearly three times the total income of the state's bottom 50 percent of taxpayers. No other state in the nation sports a wider income gap between top 1 and bottom 50.

Nationally, the top 1 percent of taxpayers in 2006 collected just over a fifth of all personal income in the United States, 21.1 percent. In ten states, including New York, the top 1 percent claimed an income share over that 21.1 percent level.

These ten states also share something else in common. All ten, the Washington, D.C.-based Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy charged last week, have tax systems that "generally ignore" the considerable deep-pocket presence within their borders.

Four of the ten -- Texas, Florida, Nevada, and Wyoming -- have no state income tax. Two, Massachusetts and Illinois, subject all taxpayers, no matter how rich, to the same flat income tax rate, and Connecticut, with just two tax rates, almost has a flat tax, too.

New York and California, meanwhile, "have weakened the progressivity of their income taxes since the 1990s," notes the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, "providing enormous tax cuts to the very wealthy and leaving a lasting legacy of structural budget deficits."

New York's fall from progressive tax grace has been particularly steep and severe. Just 30 years ago, millionaires in New York faced a 15.375 percent tax rate on income in the state's highest income bracket. That top-bracket rate now sits at just 6.85 percent.

Under the current New York tax code, a married couple making $50,000 a year pays taxes on all income over $40,000 a year at the same rate as a married couple making $5 million.

"Restoring some of the New York tax system's lost progressivity," Frank Mauro of the Fiscal Policy Institute, a state research group, noted last week, "should be part of the state's effort to balance its budget."

New York Governor David Patterson apparently disagrees. Patterson has no "millionaire's tax" in his package of proposals to cut the state's $6.4 billion budget deficit. The governor seems to buy the line, wildly popular on Wall Street, that upping tax rates on the rich will lead to a massive statewide exodus of New York's wealthy.

That's what a former New York governor, George Pataki, claimed back in 2003 when lawmakers voted to place a temporary 7.7 percent tax on income over $500,000 and a 7.5 percent tax on any income that couples report over $150,000. Pataki vetoed this tax hike on New York's most affluent, but lawmakers then enacted the measure over his veto. What happened? Over the next three years, with the tax hike on the wealthy that Pataki vetoed on the books, the number of taxpayers in New York making over $200,000 actually increased by 31 percent.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: taxes, progressive tax, new yorker

Sam Pizzigati is the editor of the online weekly Too Much, and an associate fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

You've chosen to turn comments off for the entire site. Would you like to turn them back on?
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement