Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

For the Next 10 Weeks, Obama Should Hammer McCain on the Economy

By Bob Herbert, The New York Times. Posted August 23, 2008.


A populist message and a willingness to take the fight to his opponent is Barack Obama's ticket to the White House.
Advertisement

After being pummeled for weeks by John McCain, and losing some of his slender lead in the polls, the Obama campaign may finally be showing signs of life.

Barack Obama was always a long shot to win the White House. It's no secret that some portion of the electorate will never vote for him because of his color. But he has made the odds even longer by running a campaign that, since the primaries, has seemed directionless, uninspired and addicted to the empty calories of generalities.

And the candidate himself has seemed flat. No fire. No passion.

I'm all for thoughtful, reasonable, even cerebral candidates. John Wayne has had way too much influence on our politics. ("Bring 'em on." "Bomb, bomb Iran.") But if ever there was a presidential campaign that cried out for a populist's passion, this is it.

The last eight years have been calamitous. We're struggling with two wars, one of which we never should have started. The economy has tanked big time. The housing market has collapsed and foreclosures have skyrocketed.

Motorists are reeling from high gasoline prices. The financial-services sector is teetering like a skyscraper in an earthquake. Robust budget surpluses have morphed into deficits stretching to the horizon and beyond. And cash-strapped, debt-ridden working families are viewing the future with high anxiety, if not outright fear.

Senator Obama should be invoking F.D.R., who wanted to make the U.S. "a country in which no one is left out." And Harry Truman, who had no qualms about getting in the face of the political opposition. ("I never gave anybody hell. I just told the truth, and they thought it was hell.") And Robert Kennedy, who wanted the government to get behind a massive effort to rebuild the country and create millions of new jobs.

Senator Obama has been talking about the economy lately, but his approach has been tepid and his remedies vague. The electorate wants more. A so-so appearance in Martinsville, Va., this week warmed up considerably when Senator Obama began talking about jobs and the nation's infrastructure.

"We need a policy to create jobs here in America," he said. Suddenly, the crowd was paying closer attention.

Feeding off the heightened energy, Mr. Obama talked of the need "to invest in people and our infrastructure right here in the U.S.A."

He went on: "At a time when Iraq has a $79 billion surplus -- they have parked it in banks in New York City -- it doesn't make too much sense for us to be still spending U.S. taxpayer dollars, $10 billion monthly, rebuilding Baghdad.

"We should use some of that money to rebuild Virginia, building roads and laying broadband lines and putting people back to work."

There was a burst of applause and the crowd was completely with the candidate. It was the kind of connection that Senator Obama will have to make repeatedly, across the country, if he expects to be taking the oath of office in Washington in January.

At that moment in Martinsville, the senator was speaking plainly and his listeners had no trouble relating. "If we create a world-class infrastructure," Mr. Obama said, "we create jobs now, but we also create the competitive platform for the future."

A new sense of excitement has been building around the Obama campaign, fueled by anticipation about his running mate, the upcoming convention and John McCain's inability to master the inventory of homes that he and his wife Cindy own.

But that's summertime excitement. It's not the sort of thing that will carry a candidate across the finish line. Senator Obama needs a first-rate, crackling-with-excitement populist message, which means a laser-like focus on the economy and jobs.

And he needs to show a lot more fire.

Mr. Obama likes to say he's skinny but tough. But with all due respect, he hasn't yet demonstrated the degree of toughness needed to prevail in a presidential campaign. There is nothing genteel about these contests.

From Watergate to the Swift Boat madness, we've seen how the struggle for the ultimate power of the presidency can degenerate to the rankest kind of ruthlessness and ugliness, usually at the expense of the Democrat.

Joe Biden is a good model to follow here. A few months ago, after being asked on MSNBC about attacks on Senator Obama that were being unleashed by Senators McCain and Joe Lieberman, Mr. Biden said:

"I refuse to sit back like we did in 2000 and 2004. This administration is the worst administration in American foreign policy in modern history -- maybe ever. ... Every single thing they've touched has been a near-disaster."

A populist message and a willingness to take the fight to his opponent is Barack Obama's ticket to the White House.

He's got 10 weeks to show if he's got the right stuff.

© 2008 The New York Times

AlterNet is making this New York Times material available in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107: This article is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

AlterNet is a nonprofit organization and does not make political endorsements. The opinions expressed by its writers are their own.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: barack obama, joe biden

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
What a mess
Posted by: LionHeart on Aug 23, 2008 4:14 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For the next 10 weeks Obama will be picking up after Biden

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What a mess Posted by: Romans1
» 30 years in DC Posted by: theVRWCwhodatesLiberals
» RE: What a mess - no sh-t. Posted by: weathered
definition of populist
Posted by: Romans1 on Aug 23, 2008 4:49 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
class envy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» When the ruling class declares class war.. Posted by: theVRWCwhodatesLiberals
» Definition of a bible thumper: Posted by: GuitarBill
If You Tolerate This Then Your Children Will Be Next
Posted by: opmoc on Aug 23, 2008 4:58 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Copywrite - with one of those nice C's in a circle

Manic Street Preachers who I always thought were a second division band - like Wrexham beating Oldham

And the Killers

Copywrite - I've got soul but I love playing in England with nice Soldiers - though I'm not one

And Rage Against The Machine

All Coverage Deleted By The Machine

Fuck You - I Won't Do What You Tell Me

Available on Youtube by some of 60,000 English People singing it louder than the band

Fuck - I wish I had been there

Who the fuck is Joe Biden?

Tony

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

All John McCain needs to do now is nominate Ron Paul as his Vice President
Posted by: opmoc on Aug 23, 2008 5:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No Competition

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

J. Sidney McCain III - "Old Uncle Pennybag" from the Monopoly game!
Posted by: war_on_tara on Aug 23, 2008 5:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Republicans try to annoy us by saying "B. Hussein Obama," so let's say J. Sidney McCain III.

J. Sidney McCain III owns so many houses he forgot how many there are. They're all on Boardwalk and Park Place. He wants one more house, and it's on the third most expensive property on the Monopoly board: Pennsylvania Avenue!

Go directly to jail, Republican scum! Do not pass GO, do not collect $200!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Atlantic City Posted by: war_on_tara
» Dude you missed out Posted by: theVRWCwhodatesLiberals
» RE: Dude you missed out Posted by: opmoc
» really Posted by: theVRWCwhodatesLiberals
» Whats in your closet Posted by: LionHeart
Instead of Arguing About The US Elections Shouldn't We Be Discussing Policies To Move Us Forward
Posted by: opmoc on Aug 23, 2008 7:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Us=Us - Not The United States

But Us Human Beings Who Live On This Planet

We are all the same

Travel

And you will find exactly the same love and emotion between mother and father and child

Irrespective of wealth

So how canwe just "compartmentalise entire countries such as Iraq" - and drop bombs on them to steal their oil

and think it is ok - cos we have to steal their oil - otherwise our own depraved corrupt western society will collapse - unless we steal their oil

Just mentally transpose yourself and your family to Baghdad

You are living in your home - just trying to make ends meet

aND ALL THESE bOMBS FALL FROM THE sKY

aND BLOW THE ARMS AND LEGS OF YOUR TWO YEAR OLD LITTLE GIRL

AND SHE SURVIVES

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

McBush
Posted by: GreyFoxThree on Aug 23, 2008 10:05 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
LOL, I still find it hard to believe that ANYONE with a single ounce of common sense would be considering McBush! LOL, it just doesnt make any sense.

RD
Ultimate Anonymity

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» ObaMcgovern Posted by: Romans1
» RE: ObaMcgovern Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: ObaMcgovern Posted by: Romans1
It's The ECONOMY Stupid!
Posted by: williameon on Aug 24, 2008 4:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
McPain more of the same.
McBush

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not gonna happen.
Posted by: maxpayne on Aug 24, 2008 4:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Besides, Obama never hammered Mccain on the economy for the past several months and in fact has gone out of his way to imitate Mccain's flip flopping by moving to the "right" on everything. So what make any of you think that he's gonna do it now? Obama's TOAST ! END OF AMERICA !!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not a chance in Hell!
Posted by: Age of Reason on Aug 24, 2008 7:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...that Senators Obama or Biden will discuss our fiat currency or the disaster that is the "Federal" Reserve Bank. I put Federal in quotes for those who do not realize that it is a PRIVATE consortium who lend our government money at interest.

Here's a fact I like to point out to people to help start this discussion. The same 3 dimes that would buy me a gallon of gas in 1965 (with a few pennies left over, no less) will also buy a gallon of gas today...and have about the same percentage of change left over.

WHY? Because the silver in those 3 dimes is currently worth over $4 at any coin or metal dealer. Ask yourselves and your friends - and most of all your candidates for elected office - and when you dig into the answer you will see why the ONLY candidate for President who wanted to discuss this issue was marginalized.

Please follow along as I run for U.S. Senate from New York in 2010 as an independent.

Michael W. Lurie for U.S. Senate (Note: Facebook login required)

"It's not THE government, it's OUR government...DO SOMETHING!"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CommonDreamer
Posted by: CommonDreamer on Aug 24, 2008 8:48 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr. Herbert and many other writers have touched upon this paradox so well. The real stunner here is that swing voters even have to be convinced. This just shows you the underlying sophistry re "supply side" (as IF only ONE side supplies the entire economy with its momentum!)...took root very well over the last decades, that incredibly, Swiftboating and prejudicial ads still work....you get the government you deserve and your wallets emptied for good if you do this again as voters.

We still don't have a deeply thoughtful electorate - thanks to those who benefit from heuristic and simplistic thinking (that's right, the present regime benefits quite well from this)....those who won the election on the anti-intellectual premise. How, exactly did the Repubs get over with this one? This after all from the "education administration". Dems must find a similarly sophistic and idiotically contrarian spin to put out there....this is how bad the thought process in America really is...that voters don't recognize the hypocrisy of this.

It's up to the voters to actually "get it" and get that Dems, however imperfect, really have their interests in mind so much more than the "me" regime where thy brother can fall off of a breaking bridge for all they care....because no one wants to take responsibility and pay the needed taxes - and direct them towards the things that matter (the unglamorous but necessary infrastructure, health care and so on).

Finally, how they got over on this one, another sophistic and inane argument that it's all about the individual and not the collective (this from the "moral values" people at that) - is something that must be studied and imitated....perhaps we can come up with an equally inane and hypocritical stance that does the job.

However, if Obama keeps hammering and wallets keep getting emptied by the nanny state in order to support the wealthiest constituents as they run off with all of the money....then maybe, just maybe it might work.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Demoks enable Repuks Posted by: rtdrury
» RE: Demoks enable Repuks Posted by: CommonDreamer
Populism? How about Socialism instead.
Posted by: KurtFF8 on Aug 24, 2008 9:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Populism is an empty ideology of "the people vs the elites". Socialism however (at least the Marxian socialist analysis that most current socialist theories are at least loosely based off of) analyze the problems of the economy and society through class struggle and look at problems economically instead of abstractly.

Here's a good article about populism vs socialism (And it's basically addressed to Obama so it's quite relevant to this post):

http://theactivist.org/blog/?p=320

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Class Warfare Posted by: Romans1
» RE: Class Warfare Posted by: KurtFF8
» RE: Class Warfare Posted by: Romans1
» RE: Class Warfare Posted by: KurtFF8
» Liar Posted by: LMNOP
The 10th Commandment
Posted by: Romans1 on Aug 24, 2008 9:41 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thou shall not covet thy neighbor's hard earned stuff.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» OK here's the direct quote Posted by: Romans1
» RE: OK here's the direct quote Posted by: GuitarBill
» Definition of covet Posted by: Romans1
» See the above quote... Posted by: Romans1
» But you're forgetting one thing Posted by: GuitarBill
» STFU conservative scum Posted by: LMNOP
» RE: The 10th Commandment Posted by: CommonDreamer
It's not the "President's" economy anyway
Posted by: edgar1 on Aug 24, 2008 12:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the economy is a patch of good and bad spots. thanks to massive military, homeland security, healthcare and education spending, as well as relatively prosperous energy and agriculture sectors, the widespread misery of the few severe recessions since 1945 just isn't there. This is not 1982 or 1974. The vast majority of mortgages are fine; the unemployment rate is low compared with the Eisenhower thru Reagan years. Up to four bucks a gallon people did pay the price, showing that gas discounted for inflation since the early 70's has not gone up that much compared with earlier decades.

However,international competition is worse every year, and unions in the private sector are dead. Thus wages are not going up even if Obama raises the minimum wage and makes thousands of least among us speeches.uinehon

In fact, it's a good thing millions of jobs were added after the dot com Clinton recession prior to the housing decline last year. Things would be far worse.
Thank god foreign investors dumped their excess capital here!

Since the Fed will have to raise rates no matter who wins this election, given rising US debt and the need for oil producers to diversify investments and thus dump the dollar, we may look back at the Bush years with nostalgia, from an economic view. Awful lot of commercial and residential property was built and occupied before last year, and most of it is still occupied.

Presidents have little to do with the economy anyway except for direct spending like the military and homeland security, which Bush used to push us out of the Clinton recession. Mostly foreign investors and our own Fed will decide how fast our living standards plunge under either party.

BTW, is Obama going to require that all those solar panel installers be legal citizens of the US and that the panels be made in the US? I doubt it. Can't be a racist you know.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Divide in the Country
Posted by: Bob Horn on Aug 25, 2008 5:48 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not since the civil war has the divide in the country been this hot. The stakes are high and beating McCain is crucial. We need to view it more like it is war than ever before. We must beat McCain no matter what it takes. They will break any law necessary to prevent democracy, so we need to ask ourselves what we are willing to do to preserve democracy and make sure Obama wins and lives to be in office.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]